Nice.
AnasAbdin
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Monterey Bay Aquarium
NASA
dirt enthusiast

Andulka
almost home
Peter Solarz

izzy's playlists!

Kiana Khansmith
Keni
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Xuebing Du
trying on a metaphor
will byers stan first human second
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Product Placement
sheepfilms
Mike Driver
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from T1
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Lithuania

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
@2251bluewhales
Nice.
Fascists and their propagandized supporters deserve to be fucking tail-slapped with the force of a truck and ripped to shreds between powerful jaws!!!!!!!
Marine mammal research groups really out here asking you to coordinate their interns, collect data, analyze data, move to a remote coastline, feed yourself, house yourself, and dedicate 3 months minimum of your life for absolutely no fucking money and then say “that’s just the way it is :)”
Not certain if this has already been posted about here, but iNaturalist recently uploaded a blog post stating that they had received a grant from Google to incorporate new forms of generative AI into their 'computer vision' model.
I'm sure I don't need to tell most of you why this is a horrible idea, that does away with much of the trust gained by the thus far great service that is iNaturalist. But, to elaborate on my point, to collaborate with Google on tools such as these is a slap in the face to much of the userbase, including a multitude of biological experts and conservationists across the globe.
They claim that they will work hard to make sure that the identification information provided by the AI tools is of the highest quality, which I do not entirely doubt from this team. I would hope that there is a thorough vetting process in place for this information (Though, if you need people to vet the information, what's the point of the generative AI over a simple wiki of identification criteria). Nonetheless, if you've seen Google's (or any other tech company's) work in this field in the past, which you likely have, you will know that these tools are not ready to explain the nuances of species identification, as they continue to provide heavy amounts of complete misinformation on a daily basis. Users may be able to provide feedback, but should a casual user look to the AI for an explanation, many would not realize if what they are being told is wrong.
Furthermore, while the data is not entirely my concern, as the service has been using our data for years to train its 'computer vision' model into what it is today, and they claim to have ways to credit people in place, it does make it quite concerning that Google is involved in this deal. I can't say for certain that they will do anything more with the data given, but Google has proven time and again to be highly untrustworthy as a company.
Though, that is something I'm less concerned by than I am by the fact that a non-profit so dedicated to the biodiversity of the earth and the naturalists on it would even dare lock in a deal of this nature. Not only making a deal to create yet another shoehorned misinformation machine, that which has been proven to use more unclean energy and water (among other things) than it's worth for each unsatisfactory and untrustworthy search answer, but doing so with one of the greediest companies on the face of the earth, a beacon of smog shining in colors antithetical to the iNaturalist mission statement. It's a disgrace.
In conclusion, I want to believe in the good of iNaturalist. The point stands, though, that to do this is a step in the worst possible direction. Especially when they, for all intents and purposes, already had a system that works! With their 'computer vision' model providing basic suggestions (if not always accurate in and of itself), and user suggested IDs providing further details and corrections where needed.
If you're an iNaturalist user who stands in opposition to this decision, leave a comment on this blog post, and maybe we can get this overturned.
[Note: Yes, I am aware there is good AI used in science, this is generative AI, which is a different thing entirely. Also, if you come onto this post with strawmen or irrelevant edge-cases I will wring your neck.]
I deleted iNaturalist and told them to piss the fuck off. I will not permit the ecology sphere to openly transition to using methods that exacerbate the climate crisis, eliminate already scarce career pathways, and fund a fucking genocide, and neither should you.
Keep the ecological connection so deeply, wildly, and dangerously Animal. Isn’t that all we have left?
@inaturalist is also on tumblr if you guys want to swarm like wasps and let them know how you feel 🐝
Conservation groups that list “supporting a strong economy” as a primary objective make me wanna off myself ✨
Aquatic tunes to keep you moister than an oyster
Hey me and the boys are going to meld together to form a colonial organism later if you wanna join
Dude, the dramatic shift in wildlife ecology to make everything fully remote and automated and run by artificial intelligence is so fucked. Did you lose your passion and the will to connect with nature along the way? Loser behavior. Soulless. Disgraceful. Pathetic.
Not the headline I expected to read this morning
(Read here)
If you chinook my sockeye I’ll chum your coho til it’s pink ;)
I’m seeking any and all forms of accessible professional development assistance as I struggle building my career in marine mammal science. Primary barriers are notably lack of pay and financial support for low-income folks, and a stark lack of adequately paid entry-level opportunities overall, all of which have been conspicuously reinforced and normalized in the field.
I went to school specifically to pursue a career in marine mammal science and was lucky enough to get a taste of the field during my final years of college when I was able to intern with Cascadia Research Collective in Olympia, WA. This experience set the foundation for my skills as a marine mammal researcher and fueled an exciting fire of passion; I got a taste for what I had always dreamed of doing, and I wanted more. I participated in large whale surveys through CRC and in collaboration with whale watch operators, developed online databases for humpback sightings using Microsoft Access and roughly 25 years of third-party contributor data, and participated in stranding response efforts and necropsies. Post graduation, I’ve found that the opportunities to advance beyond my previous title as intern to be far and few between, bordering nonexistent.
As the years have passed since I achieved my bachelor’s degree in marine science, I’ve managed to dabble in a variety of seasonal work, mostly at the technician level. At Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, I previously performed dockside creel surveys, and currently perform freshwater stream surveys for the Inland Fish program as an upper level scientific technician. Previously I had detoured through the field of forestry working for Washington Dept. of Natural Resources when jobs were lacking, and I fill in the off-season gaps with grueling stints in the food service industry to keep the lights on.
Graduating right before the covid-19 pandemic resulted in years of lost opportunities when the whole world shut down. My qualifications are even beginning to expire in a way, as the skills I developed in college begin to atrophy from lack of use. Some jobs and internships now require applicants to be fresh out of college, or currently enrolled, to be eligible for employment. The digitization of the field to rely heavily on coding programs and drone operations, phasing out humans for machines, has also reduced my window of opportunity for advancement.
Currently, pursuing my master’s degree remains a risky decision in the United States as our current administration destabilizes federal institutions, and money continues to be the limiting factor at the end of the day. I question if I want to remain in the United States entirely as it becomes an incredibly dangerous nation for marginalized people, especially of low income.
Even still, I’ve found myself taking steps away from other important aspects in life in an attempt to recalibrate my professional trajectory, though I’m beginning to question my belonging in the field of marine mammal research as it has become apparent that this is an environment tailored for the independently wealthy. Since discovering the field of marine mammal research as a child through the Vancouver Aquarium, and encouraged by the regional cultural value placed on, notably, killer whale conservation and research here in the Pacific Northwest where I grew up, this is the only profession I’ve wanted to chase, and yet it consistently remains out of reach.
My areas of interest within the field lie in population monitoring and modeling (especially in relation to anthropogenic threats such as collapsing prey stocks and major environmental shifts due to pollution, over-harvesting or destruction of ecological resources, and climate change), investigation of understudied populations, citizen science as a tool for active monitoring and community engagement, educational outreach to underserved communities, professional and financial support for new [marine mammal] biologists from marginalized demographics, and indigenous-led conservation measures.
I abhor the use of generative AI that is becoming propped up by tech corporations complicit in genocide and state sanctioned violence, as it has begun to erode at job security for human beings [such as that used in photo-identification] and more recently, more importantly, the accuracy of publicly available information.
I prioritize a more traditional approach to wildlife conservation that maintains an active connection with the environments we study, and keeps human scientists at the forefront while using technological advancements as a complementary secondary tool.
I value conservation measures that extend beyond species and ecosystems of high commercial importance, prioritizing total, or at least more complete, ecological balance and planetary health over the insatiable pace of capitalism and the commercial industries this economic system feeds.
Most importantly, I’m interested in collaborating with like-minded folks who are interested in dissolving the rigid hierarchies within the realm of STEM to permit community-based learning, research, and management practices, and revolutionizing scientific fields of study by advocating for complete cultural and systemic change in how research institutions operate with regards to highly restrictive funding that fails to support its members (especially compared to the military budgets and other federal departments used to enact violence against human beings and destruction unto natural environments we study and rely on for continued survival).
I’ve been told by colleagues that I have a place in the field of marine mammal science, that my drive and passion and willingness to learn and develop my skills support that. I want to believe that I belong, that my hard work will be noticed and eventually pay off, but I can’t believe that until something changes. Until there are ample resources (and an overall willingness in the marine mammal science community) to aid new scientists from low-income and marginalized backgrounds, there is no sense of belonging. I’m hoping somebody out there can convince me otherwise.
May this letter mark my final request for help, addressed to anybody who will listen.
Marine mammal science is a playground for rich white people who can afford to work for free or otherwise shit pay. This was all a mistake.
Ocean Photography by Japan’s Ryo Minemizu
Countdown to Calving at Antarctica's Brunt Ice Shelf
Cracks growing across Antarctica’s Brunt Ice Shelf are poised to release an iceberg with an area about twice the size of New York City, (about 604 square miles). It is not yet clear how the remaining ice shelf will respond following the break, posing an uncertain future for scientific infrastructure and a human presence on the shelf that was first established in 1955.
NASA Earth Observatory image by Joshua Stevens, using Landsat data from the U.S. Geological Survey. Story by Kathryn Hansen, with image interpretation by Chris Shuman (NASA/UMBC).
The above image, from the Operational Land Imager (OLI) on Landsat 8, shows the area on January 23, 2019. The crack along the top of the image—the so-called Halloween crack—first appeared in late October 2016 and continues to grow eastward from an area known as the McDonald Ice Rumples. The rumples are due to the way ice flows over an underwater formation, where the bedrock rises high enough to reach into the underside of the ice shelf. This rocky formation impedes the flow of ice and causes pressure waves, crevasses, and rifts to form at the surface.
The more immediate concern is the rift visible in the center of the image. Previously stable for about 35 years, this crack recently started accelerating northward as fast as 4 kilometers per year.
Calving is a normal part of the life cycle of ice shelves, but the recent changes are unfamiliar in this area. The edge of the Brunt Ice Shelf has evolved slowly since Ernest Shackleton surveyed the coast in 1915, but it has been speeding up in the past several years.
Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space: http://nasa.tumblr.com