4 gravitons

The tumblrs and tribulations of four gravitons and a professor

[4gravitons]

Most people who argue about reductionism aren't really arguing about reductionism. They're arguing about attitudes. And I still disagree:

[4gravitons]

Part II of my Amplitudes 2026 coverage:

[4gravitons]

Your yearly conference coverage:

View On WordPress

[4gravitons]

At a conference this week, for the first time in a long time:

[4gravitons]

What does radiation mean? To whom?

[4gravitons]

You ever read something, and suddenly a whole classification scheme lights up in your head?

[4gravitons]

Do good scholars read every paper they cite? Depends on what the citation is for:

[4gravitons]

If you want to hold scientists to account, you want them to collaborate internationally.

[4gravitons]

Why are hallucinated citations possible in the first place? Especially on a platform like arXiv?

[4gravitons]

"Make no mistakes" isn't a totally useless thing to tell an LLM. But it doesn't do what you think it does.

[4gravitons]

Some bonus info fo my New Scientist piece last week:

View On WordPress

[4gravitons]

The Breakthrough Prize: I recognize a few of these names!

[4gravitons]

As promised, my "bonus info" post on my jamming article with Quanta Magazine:

[4gravitons]

Everything that can happen will happen. Thus, we can learn something about everything.

[4gravitons]

Some more thoughts on "AI Physicists":

[4gravitons]

Old news, with my thoughts on it:

[4gravitons]

Scientists trust what they can verify. Journalists have to trust differently.