I love the Night Watch books so much I could cry
Today's Document

Discoholic 🪩
art blog(derogatory)

if i look back, i am lost
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
hello vonnie

Love Begins

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
YOU ARE THE REASON
The Bowery Presents
Not today Justin

titsay
taylor price
The Stonewall Inn
noise dept.
No title available
Doug Jones
macklin celebrini has autism
EXPECTATIONS

roma★

seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Ecuador
seen from Mexico

seen from United States

seen from Italy

seen from Australia

seen from Australia

seen from Türkiye

seen from Brazil

seen from Australia

seen from Vietnam
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
@a-mad-scientist-approaches
I love the Night Watch books so much I could cry
Found these pictures of the paintings I donated to the Discworld Convention charity auction... I thought I had forgotten to take pictures of them and I was kicking myself but fortunately I did! I wasn't at the auction but I've been told they went for a decent price :)
i love writing porn and i wont feel bad about it. understanding the eroticism of a character is character analysis if u are enlightened.
i love you porn i love you smut i love you intricacies of human sexuality i love erotica i love you freak nasty walls of texts i love you analyzing the subconscious through the lens of sexuality i love you bdsm i love you weird fetishes . u move me
@incalyscent
I think the best thing to ever come out of the TMNT franchise is when they gave all four of them mid life crises before they were 20 in 2007 and then never brought it up again like what
one thing i do really like about TMNT 2007 is this more mature version of Raph and Casey's friendship. it's one aspect of the movie where i can actually say "ok yeah we've jumped ahead 4-5 years because clearly they're not just young punks who met last month."
admittedly, this movie is just a snapshot of their relationship. and it requires the context of other series to appreciate, where Casey is introduced as (and usually remains) angry, short-tempered, and reckless to mirror Raph and giving him a teaching moment about his own emotions.
but here? they're talking on the rooftop. they're talking about their lives, their feelings, what's bothering them. Casey is genuinely trying to give good advice. that's not their usual thing. and what's also unusual is that Casey is the one remaining level-headed, trying to calm Raph's storm, trying to hold him back from doing something reckless or stupid.
they're obviously both still vigilante-ing and taking-names-kicking-ass together. but this is a nice way to show that both Casey and Raph have grown up and matured, seperately and together.
My first 2007 set, I can't believe it's taken me this long to do one.
I sincerely apologise for the lack of Mikey in this set, I couldn't find any that specifically fit him for this movie. 😭 I'll be sure to include him next time, though!
I wanted to make a Pokemon card for my fave characters, so here's Bill's piece inspired by Masako Tomii! 🌿🌼
i saw Mutant Mayhem at a fan preview the other day (it’s to good, they’re cringey little boys i love them) and immediately downloaded the soundtrack
here’s some of my favorite titles (minor spoilers)
Let's goooo
Hellooooo and welcome to the Odyverse, we have:
(Yeah this came to me in a dream… don’t think too hard about it I just felt like shitposting)
They’re such silly beans (war criminals)
There are no sex scenes, and all the food looks horrible.
I like The Odyssey well enough, but I love movies. And it's zero percent surprising that Tumblr would love Emily Wilson's LBR piece, because it's just premiere posting. Her prose fucking crushes, so many lines are absolutely killer. But I do just need to mention that it's really not film criticism. It's hardly speaking to or about the movie at all, and when it is, it's predominantly her positing that because she is not interested in what it's saying, then it's not saying anything.
I mean if you just want to take, "There are no sex scenes, and all the food looks horrible." This line makes me laugh every time I see it, it rules. And it has nothing to do with Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey (2026).
Presumably it's coming from the same complaint well as the majority of Wilson's piece: that while the Homeric poem is a celebration of fucking around and feasting, this movie is not. But in just saying, "it's not this" and nothing more, she's not discussing or even acknowledging how sex and food are actually used in this retelling. Both are tied together in what has been widely praised among audiences as one of the most indelible sequences: Samantha Morton's scene as the witch Circe. In it, the threat of sexual violence and act of eating are linked in a commentary on warmongering rapaciousness writ large, as a part of Nolan's intently laid out thesis of the Trojan horse as a kind of atomic bomb xenia violation whose nuclear winter the whole Mediterranean is now living under. And yes the food does look horrible, because it's horror food! It's difficult to describe in words, but it's like the stew Odysseus's men are eating is turning into gristly tentacles in their mouths, the sounds of their eating ghastly and so disgusting, while Morton transforms them through....something I will not even try to describe, I've just never seen anything quite like it onscreen. Largely practical effects too, astonishing.
Not a bit of that is in that line, of course. Great line, but isn't about the movie, it's about the author.
And honestly, the author is a bit out on a limb with much of how she has actually interpreted The Odyssey (film) itself, must also be said! And not just by me, or by film critics naturally, but also other classics scholars:
Emily Wilson used baffling arguments to flay Christopher Nolan’s adaptation of Homer’s poem.
I mean when early on she summarily defined the work of cinema as "light and noise" and moved on, it was pretty clear that Wilson just doesn't have a ton of respect or feeling for epic scale movies in general. Which is fine! Everyone has types of art that they don't jibe with. But you don't go to the person who's not keen on dance for a good assessment of the new ballet, negative or positive.
And if one of the things someone claims about a movie is that casting actors of color flattened all of those roles into the stereotypical "Black best friend," but not by anything that can be seen in the script or their performances, so seemingly suggesting 'we', to use her skeptical punctuation motif, should read them that way merely because they aren't white, worth a pause to consider that while haterism can be a rush to read (or write), it can also mask any number of deeply iffy assertions that could definitely stand to be questioned!
having finally seen the odyssey, i do think chris nolan's is self-serious to his own detriment, having completely wasted matt damon's long-recorded talent for playing an insufferable but intensely lovable smartass. of my critiques of the film, odysseus' sheer lack of humor ranks high. but the way that nolan reframes the trojan horse as a unbearable trespass against the public good . . . that shit slapped. the film, for all its many flaws, is an indictment against self-interest and condemns our modern impulse to laugh at the trojans for accepting a sacred gift in good faith and honoring a long-held tradition of treating the stranger as one might treat the divine. (since i read the odyssey in high school, i've always seen memes and jokes about how buffoonishly stupid the trojans were! i fell into the logic myself! i've never really inspected my own mockery of them until this film!!). and while i think nolan took the coward's way out quite a bit with respect to Odysseus (he never willfully cheats in the film, for instance, and the film never really discomforts us enough, i think, for our identification/sympathy for him), i really do love that the core message of the film is that the archetypical return to home narrative is an impossibility. for odysseus, there is no golden, edenic home to return to. the gilded home of his memories is ruined by the sheer act of his return to it. or better yet, it is, in fact, corrupted by the evil he enacts abroad which cannot be separated from the evil that can be found at home. and the use of "the people of the sea" is such a fascinating addition to the epic greek tale because, insofar as the western world so often thinks of ancient greece as our social and political heritage ("they invented democracy!"), how damning that what the greeks were most afraid of in the invading foreigner was, in truth, themselves. because isn't that the core fear of anti-immigrant sentiment in the United States and United Kingdom alike? what we fear most is that the abject evil we have wrought against others will one day be enacted upon ourselves. that the invading foreigner will do to us what we have done to countless people in the past and the present alike. all that in a blockbuster movie?? hell yeah man.
The wild thing about all the commentary regarding The Odyssey movie and its faithfulness or lack thereof to 1) the text and 2) history is that neither of those things are what people seem to think.
When I read Emily Wilson’s translation of The Odyssey – where she made a point of keeping it the same length as the original text – I was shocked to realize that very little of it was about Odysseus’ famous journeys and adventures – the Cyclops, Scylla and Charybdis, the Lotus-Eaters, the Sirens, his men releasing the winds, Circe, and so forth. All of that is told in flashback, and all of that is 4 chapters out of 24. That’s right. They’re less than one-fifth of the text (in page count as well as chapter count). They take up a little less space that Telemachus’ journey to see Menelaus, which starts off the book and is not part of popular common knowledge of the Odyssey (when people talk about accuracy to the the text, the fact that this was included at all is probably one of the things they’re thinking of!)
The rest of the book – i.e. the majority of it – is the events that happen after Odysseys leaves Calypso. His meeting with the princess Nausicaa, getting help from her father, returning to Ithaca, everything with the suitors. Odysseus on Ithaca isn’t the conclusion (as it has been in most popular depictions and descriptions of The Odyssey that I’ve seen), it’s over half of the story!
You’re talking accuracy? You are never going to get an adaptation that distributes its time that way, and virtually everyone watching it would be disappointed if it did!
And the clincher, also the thing that made this translation really make an impression on me, is that Emily Wilson starts off Odysseus’ tale of his fantastical adventures, with:
Wily Odysseus, the lord of lies, answered:
This translation is implying that all the monsters and magic in his adventures could be Odysseus just making shit up. No adaptational divergences from the specifics of those adventures even comes close to the kind of earthquake that reading of the text is.
In terms of the history – other people with more knowledge have said this too, but it’s impossible to have a “historically accurate” adaptation of The Odyssey because the original wasn’t historically accurate! The most common estimates for when it was composed are around the 700s BC (though there’s certainly debate ). The original events that inspired it, if they occured at all (which is also debated) would most likely have been in the 1200s BC, and would have been far smaller scale in terms of number of ships, number of men, and length of time. Neither the logistics nor the technology nor the pooulation size of Mycenaean Greece would have been able to sustain a war of anything like the size of the one described in The Iliad. It’s transposing 700s BC-scale-wars (probably the scale of wars in the Middle East, like Assyria’s conquests; 700s BC Greece was only starting to have governments and writing again after the multi-century impact of the Late Bronze Age Collapse) into the 1200s BC.
So there’s no way to get historical accuracy. Put it in the Late Bronze Age, where it was set, and it’s out of step with the kind of war that could have existed at the time. Put it any time in the Iron Age, when that scale of warfare could exist, and it’s wildly discordant with actual historical events. It is fantasy. It’s kind of like the Arthurian mythos, whose faint historical roots are, if anywhere, in the early middle ages and whose knights-and-castles aesthetic is in the late middle ages.
The historical grounding we do have is fascinating to me, though. There are written documents from the Hittites (state in central Turkey in 1200s BC) that mentions the Ahhiyyawa (taking into account the differences in languages, it’s not too far from Achaeans) in contexts that makes it pretty clear that they’re the Mycenaeans, and that mention a dispute around Wilusa (i.e. Ilium, i.e. Troy). We’ve got burned ruins in Troy, once from around the early 1200s BC and once from around the late 1200s BC, either of which could be the result of war.