quality

hi im abby normal | pan/pan | she/he/they | early adult-ish

[mmm-asbestos]

wroOOOOOooom

[bl00doodle]

D.... do robots have gender

based off this;

[idwsonicnews]

Sonic the Hedgehog (IDW) #61 1:10 Retailer Incentive Variant

Art: Nathalie Fourdraine

[beehunterkisser]

GET SILLY

[sticksandsharks]

last of my prehistoric little guys. these ones are a bit different…

[idwsonicnews]

Sonic the Hedgehog (IDW) #59 Cover B

Art: Natalie Haines

[tsaikonautz]

a little geebo

[ratrrriot]

🎶 ♪ My wish for you,sweet happy life

May all your sorrows be gone, and your heart begin to sing

And if a wish can make it be,

I wish you spend every day of your happy life with me ♪🎶

[wenteltrap]

good things are better when they're a rarity! ^_^

[homeless-candy]

:0

[eassbees]

Thought this fit

[ampervadasz]

[thatbowserguy]

Literally something out of Scooby Doo

[teaboot]

Do you think animals have a threshold for Uncanny Valley experiences? Like. If you built a statue of an elephant. Would it give a real elephant the heebies

[teaboot]

the first time I wore my kitty ears in front of my roommate's cat he fluffed up twice his size and ran into a wall trying to get away from me. What did he see

[tiktoksthataregood-ish]

[flagellant]

Isn't the Pedro Pascal situation just puritanism?

*takes a deep breath* Okay, let me engage with you in good faith here. Let's give this a shot.

The context of your question is this: Is it okay if news sites like Buzzfeed and stuff have Pedro Pascal read horny tweets or ask him his opinion on how people are calling him Daddy.

The question you are asking is this: Saying that this is shitty is just Puritanism.

Here is my answer:

Anon. Pedro Pascal is a service worker. For the purposes of this context, he is quite literally not the slightest bit different from a Starbucks barista or a Target cashier or a mall food court employee. He is someone who is performing their job, and their job entails existing in public and being polite and smiley and not making the public uncomfortable, even if the public is, say, sexually harassing him.

By placing celebrities into scenarios in which they are forced to answer or acknowledge the fact that there are fans who are objectifying and fetishizing them, and asking those celebrities to respond to said fans, those celebrities are now being forced to experience a form of sexual harassment. I do not care if you are calling Pedro Pascal daddy on the Internet. He's hot. I've called him Daddy, for Christ's sake. The problem is not that people enjoy seeing what movie stars look like on a screen. That is their literal job description.

The problem, the sole and only problem here, and it is a big one, is when those movie stars are being shown tweets or fanfic or whatever, I don't care, of how their fans have graphic and explicit sexual desires for them, and this is being done to create content, and that content is being made to make someone a lot of money because people will click a link to watch or read how Pedro Pascal reacted to learning about his fans calling him Daddy and what they want him to do to them, when he is in a public interview where whatever his reaction is will be unavoidably recorded and picked apart by dozens of thousands of parasocially horny vultures with no sense of tact or boundaries.

Does this make sense, Anon? Do you understand now why this isn't "just Puritanism"?

[pyronoid-d-deactivated20181217]

im fucking crying this is so funny

[spaghettioverdose-deactivated20]

There's only one real way to categorise disorders and it's when you google it and the first results fit into one or more of the following categories:

1. "Is your child-" "Does your child-" "How to cope with the burden of being a parent for-"

2. "How to get better: Step One: have a lot of money!" "How to get better: Step One: simply stop having it!"

3. "10 Ways To Spot Sickopaths With This Disorder So You Can Protect Yourself" "The Bad People Disease -by Dr. Eugene X."