Patriarchy and Womenâs Subordination in the Philippines, Luz Lopez Rodriguez
âPatriarchy is therefore loosely defined as male culture or ideology, male choice, male bonding and male political interests in dominating women as producers and reproducers.
Patriarchy is historically developed. Â It started with the appropriation by men of womenâs sexual and reproductive capacity even prior to the formation of property and class society but its commodification evolved with private propertyâ (15).
Ann Ferguson, historical evolution of concept of patriarchy in US (15-16):
Father patriarchy: during the colonial period, it was reproduced by the fathersâ legal and economic control of childrenâs marriages and inheritance through family property which rested in sons, not daughters.
Husband patriarchy: during the Victorian period, it was reproduced by the institution of âfamily wageâ which was rested in husbands who were the family breadwinners.
Public patriarchy: it was reproduced by modes of sex/affective production characteristic of modern industrial states, whether capitalist or socialist states â through an unequal division of family wage and unwaged labour, through the relative power in family decision making that their higher paid wage labour brings, through domestic violence, and through public mechanisms of the patriarchal welfare state: gender segregation of wage labour, state controls over womenâs physical and mental health and biological reproduction, and the exploitation of all mothersâ unpaid child rearing labour, mass mediaâs stereotyping and sexual objectification of women in the context of sexual consumerism.
Lacanian feminists: two semi-autonomous domination systems in advanced industrial societies which perpetuate male dominance: capitalism and patriarchy, the mode of ideological reproduction (16).
âUnpaid domestic labor provides the most reliable and the cheapest way to reproduce the labor force it needs to reproduce itself. Â Patriarchy, on the other hand, is perpetual, not primarily through ideological beliefs about the natural role of women in the family, but through the structure of unconscious desires that are tied to gender identity through early childhood experiencesâ (16).
âResearch on the status of indigenous Filipino women before Spanish colonization reveals that they enjoyed a high status in society.  There was equal value given to male and female offspring.  Women participated in the decision-making processes not only in the home but in the important social processes of the bigger community.  They had equal access to production resources and had equal âinheritance rightsâ to usufruct [n. the right to enjoy the use and advantages of anotherâs property short of the destruction or waste of its substance] rights over communal property.  They received an equal opportunity for education; they enjoyed the same liberty of movement as men.  They had equal rights with regards to divorce before the law.  They occupied leadership roles as the men in the political and religious fieldsâ (18).
Pre-Hispanic communities geared for social use, to fulfill kinship duties (18). Family as self-sufficient subsistence unit of production and consumption. Â âThus there was no need to create relations of dependence nor of exploitation. Â Since the concept of private property still was to come with Spanish conquest, the concept of woman as property of a man had no social basis for existing. Â However, the early forms of feudalism had started to take root in some communities, and class structures had germinated and were well on their way to full development. Â This was happening in some economically progressive and more politically consolidated riverine and coastal kingdoms which had more production surplus, had more barter trade contacts with foreign traders, and in some areas had become Muslim sultanates. Â In these communities, the women had become part of social and productive relations which had need for dependence and exploitationâ (18).
Spanish conquest turned communal lands into private reserves (18).
Sr. Mary John Mananzan, âThe Filipino Woman: Before and After the Spanish Conquest of the Philippines.â Essays on Filipino Women 1987
Aida Maranan, âDo Women Really Hold Up Half the Sky?â Essays on Filipino Women, 1987.
The ânewâ Filipina (or female Indio) was now her fatherâs meek daughter, her husbandâs faithful subject, the Churchâs obedient servant, and before her marriage, a chaste virgin who would yield only to her husband (and occasionally to the friar).  But of course, like her peasant husband, she was also a slavelike toiler who worked the rich manâs and his descendantsâ land for pittanceâŠ
Export crops: coconut, sugar, tobacco, abaca, pineapple, banana, mango (19).
Landgrabbing, usury, ânew legalities of ownership of which the peasants were unawareâ (19).
âThe traditional self-sufficiency of the Filipino rural households (usually an extended kinship system) gave way to nuclear families dependent on male wage earners who worked mostly as landless peasants, as factory and office workers, or at other low-paying jobs. Â Many families migrated from the farms to urban centers and constituted the urban poor population congesting the slum communitiesâ (19). Â â> Stagnation of countrysides; subordination of women; sexual division of labor; elitist socio-political structures; inequities in power and wealth distribution.
âReligion, specifically Roman Catholicism, was introduced by the Spanish colonizers to facilitate their rule over the local people, especially to neutralize the influence of independent women at that time.  Mananzan writes âHer freedom of choice in important aspects of her life was curtailed by the imposition of new laws and mores.  Confined in her area of action, the woman poured all her innate sensibility and energy into the energies allowed her, developing a religious fervor which would verge on fanaticism.  She was constantly reminded of her innate danger to men as the seductive Eve and was relentlessly exhorted to follow an impossible model â the Virgin Mother.  She would venerate her but her efforts to emulate her brought her into scrupulous, frustrated efforts which ended up in giving her an abiding guilt complex which added to her timidity and lack of self-confidence and in many cases reducing her to frigidityâ (19).
âUnder Philippine laws, a woman below 23 years of age cannot leave the parental home without the consent of her parents except when she marries, exercises her profession or when either parents enters into subsequent marriageâ (19).
Until 1987, the man chose the residence of the family; was legal administrator of childrenâs property.  âThe wife could not accept expensive gifts, except from relatives, and could not make expensive purchases without the husbandâs consent.  The husband could object to the exercise of the wifeâs profession if he could support the family sufficiently⊠The husband however can more easily accuse his wife of adultery but the wife has to catch the husband in the sexual act and prove that he is supporting and maintaining another woman to be able to accuse him of concubinage⊠Barrenness on the part of the wife may be a ground for separation or an excuse for the husbandâs infidelityâ (20).
âPremarital sex is even taboo especially for a single woman whose âgreatest giftâ to her husband is her virginity.  On the other hand, it is deemed natural that bachelor men are sexually adventurous to prove themselves and gain experienceâ (21) [this is bullshit!].
âSex is generally considered dirty and taboo as a subject for discussion, hence it has not been squarely tackled until recently. Â Adolescents are often left out of sex education, thus the incidence of teen-age pregnancies. Â In the case of teen-age pregnancies, marriage is usually the solution even if the parties concerned are not prepared for the responsibilitiesâ (21).
âThe Catholic church does not allow the use of artificial contraceptives and strongly advocates against abortionâ (21).
Avg size of Fil families down from eight to six: âThis was after some years of intensive population control campaign undertaken by the government with World Bank support. This confuses the Filipino women who, on one hand are caught up in their Catholic values and, on the other hand, are pressured by the state to surrender or of their reproductive capacities in favor of the ânational interestââ (21).
âThe care of the children and the husband is the womanâs primary responsibility and at some point, is considered her greatest contribution to humanityâ (22).
âThe health of women in a poor country like the Philippines is affected most seriously by their crucial roles as child-bearers and child-rearers. Â Women get trapped in the vicious cycle of pregnancy, childbirth, lactation, malnutrition, infections, fatigue and stress in the course of their performance of their multiple roles as mothers, workers and health providers. Â Thus, they generally suffer from poor health, with a maternal mortality of 100 per 100,000 live births and a high incidence of anemia and goiter among those who are pregnant. Â Their condition is aggravated by the inadequacy of the health care delivery system and the lack of trained health personnel* to attend to them and their children. Â Women are the target consumers of food, drug and cosmetic manufacturers who have recently been criticized for their production of non-essential drugs which pose serious threats to womenâs and their familiesâ healthâ (22).
*This is interesting considering the rate at which the Philippines trains and exports health professionals.Â
âWomen are advertised alongside commodities. Â Women are commodities themselves especially in their role as prostitutes to lure tourists, as subservient mail-order brides or as lively entertainers abroadâ (22).
âOnly 36% of the population 15 years and over who are in the labor force are women; 74% of these women are housekeepers or those who enable other members of the family to engage in productive work outside the home but whose contributions remain unrecognizedâ (22).
âThe major issue in fact is how and why domestic labor came to be and continues to be regarded as less productive work and are unrenumerated reproduction/subsistence/private production, as it is variably called, secondary only to work outside the home which is paid âeconomicâ/public production activities.  It should now be clearly recognized that mothering and domestic labor performed by women in the household are exploited to subsidize capitalist productionâ (22-23).
âWork outside the home does not also result in liberation because jobs are also sex-stereotyped.  Most of the jobs that are open to women are usually extensions of the mothering, caring and educating roles that they do at home: teachers, nurses, midwives, social workers, salesladies, vending and other odd jobs in the service sectorâ â> also exported workers into electronics, garments, âfor their docility in toeing the company rules and accepting low wagesâ (23).
Filipinas: 36% of employed; 41% of unemployed
âThe lack of opportunities and unfavorable work conditions at home lure women to overseas employment mostly as domestic helpers and entertainers. Â This exposes women to greater dangers such as sexual exploitation and physical abuse. Â While it also presents a serious threat to their well being, dignity and status before the world, to the family as an institution and to national self-respect, the government somehow encourages overseas employment because of the foreign exchange they bring to the debt-ridden countryâ (23).
âDespite the increase of womenâs participation in the labor force, they do not enjoy comparable employment opportunities, privileges and benefits as men. Â Working women are also left open to displacement and marginalization by large firms and subjected to many regulatory policies by government. Â Their contribution to housework and the informal economy usually go unrecorded in standard labor force accounts and simply form part of unpaid family laborâ (23).
âIn formal education, there is the widespread sex bias in textbooks, curricula and instructional materials and even among teachers themselvesâ (24).
ââŠBut there were candles to burn, the world was my concern
While our home was her domain
And the people were mine
While the children were hers to maintainâŠâ -I Have Fallen in Loveâ by Ninoy Aquino about Corazon Aquino
âA patriarchal culture prevents men and women from genuinely working together as equals in liberating society from capitalist exploitation.
Consciousness-raising and organizing efforts in social movements such as non-governmental organizations and especially the womenâs movement should systematically take up the issue of patriarchy in its work with the grassroots as well as in advocacy for alternative policies and programsâ (25).