Brambleclaw vs Squirrelstar is the new Ashfur vs Hollyleaf
I've been in this fandom since 2010. I was there in the trenches on the old Warrior Cats official forums message boards when you had multiple threads about who was better: Ashfur or Hollyleaf. And this is because of a simple reason:
Ashfur did wrong to Hollyleaf. Hollyleaf did wrong to Ashfur. (It's more complex than this, but place yourself in the mind of a mentally developing teenager from the 2010s.)
People developed different communities based on who they hated more. Did you like Ashfur? Then Hollyleaf was the worst character ever, deserved to die, and in some peoples cases, Ashfur should have burned her alive with her siblings.
Did you like Hollyleaf? Then Ashfur was the worst character ever, deserved to die, and Hollyleaf should have killed him more painfully.
"BC", you might say, "This sounds like a strawman." And it is. But it serves to explain how these groups began to form around not just liking one character, but hating the other character in the equation. The people forming these groups were mostly teenagers who were deeply passionate about a character and would direct that passion outwards, both positively and negatively. I like to say if you cringe at your younger self in your online days, then you have grown as a person. :P
(There was definitely Ashfur vs Squirrelstar groups, but back then Squirrelstar was far less liked than she is now.)
This is a tried and true method of online discourse and debates. You join a "group" and stick to it, as it provides a sense of belonging.
The "Hollyleaf vs Ashfur of the late 2000s is the Dovepaw vs Ivypaw of the Omen of the Stars era. And Squirrelstar vs Brambleclaw is one of the newer iterations of these social groupings.
The entire debate around Squirrelstar and Brambleclaw is complex and nuanced where you have to take into account authorial intent vs interpreted reading of the characters, but group mentality is not about nuance. It's about social acceptance and community. It's an emotional reaction.
You will have your groups that love Squirrelstar, and may not have even read the books at all. It is because the community they are in love Squirrelstar, and because of what they have been told by senior members of the community they look to for guidance. And as a result, the other half of this equation, Brambleclaw, becomes the devil incarnate.
Consequently, you will have your groups that love Brambleclaw, and may not have even read the books at all. It is because the community they are in love Brambleclaw, and because of what they have been told by senior members of the community they look to for guidance. And as a result, the other half of this equation, Squirrelstar, becomes the devil incarnate.
What needs to be understood is that nuance is lost in favor of group thinking. "I am on this team, so the other team is bad." And it is often younger fans, usually teenagers, making these black-and-white inferences.
The truth is: they are fictional characters that make us think and feel things differently. We interpret each character differently. The solution to group-based mentality is to talk to other people outside that group. You might be like me, friends in the same server with someone who I would have been sworn enemies with in the Ashfur vs Hollyleaf flame wars. Or find an interpretation of a character you hate so much (Millie) that you definitively love that interpretation over your own reading of the character.
I'll probably never be able to like Brambleclaw/Bramblestar. But I have a dear friend who does, and whose interpretation of that character I respect. Online groups are helpful in establishing community and socialization. But you should still always be aware that the other person on the side of the screen you are disagreeing with is a person like you.