cherry valley forever
Keni
Show & Tell
Monterey Bay Aquarium
occasionally subtle
Acquired Stardust
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Andulka
Peter Solarz

No title available
Stranger Things
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Claire Keane
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
AnasAbdin
taylor price
trying on a metaphor

Janaina Medeiros

shark vs the universe
hello vonnie

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Finland

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Hungary
@agentrusco
Moody Path by Laura Gómez
Happy Birthday, Ursula Le Guin - Important words and an important video
Le Guin is my favourite living author. She turned 88 this weekend. She was first published more than fifty years ago and even now her work still feels incredibly visionary, progressive and grounded in purest human experience. I saw her speak in Seattle once and got to ask her a question. It was like talking to God.
I feel now is as good a time as ever to reflect on some things she said at a convention address once, to what seemed to be a largely male audience in a largely male field. They’re words about gatekeeping, about inclusion and about fan attitudes. She spoke about fans feeling alienated by having a niche interest:
“I can’t blame those of my generation who don’t want to see the walls crumbling down and who cling to their ghetto status as if it were a precious thing, making a religion out of science fiction which the touch of the uninitiated will profane. They were forced into that attitude by the attitude of respectable society, intellectual and literary, toward their particular interest and it was perfectly natural for them, like any persecuted group, to make a virtue of their necessity. I don’t blame them, but neither can I agree with them.”
She also spoke about how that interest isn’t so niche any more:
“To cling to a posture of evasion and defense, once persecution and contempt has ceased, is not to be a rebel but to be a cripple.”
She spoke about not only how things were changing, but that things should change, about how change is good, healthy, radical and exciting:
“What I’d like to see is science fiction continue to rebel. I’d like to see science fiction evade not those who despise it, but those who want it to be just what it was thirty years ago. I want to see science fiction step over the old walls and hit right into the next wall and start to break it down, too.”
She also explicitly addressed this largely male audience and asked to conduct some extremely important self-examination.
“I’d like to ask the men here to consider idly, in some spare moment, whether by any chance they’ve been building any walls to keep the women out, or to keep them in their place, and what they may have lost by doing so.”
Here’s the video of the full address, which contains all this and much more. Note that date.
Nineteen seventy-five.
Now consider replacing every instance of “science fiction” with “gaming.” Or, really, with anything.
Visionary. Progressive. Grounded.
Happy Birthday, Ursula Le Guin. You are one of the most beautiful humans the world has ever known.
RIP to an absolute fucking rock star.
The Return of the King in 4k
Ursula K. Le Guin, The Left Hand of Darkness
being so staunchly anti generative ai while everyone around you is "i used chatgpt" and "i asked grok" and google search is useless and every company is implementing ai and every single celeb is taking ai money and partnering with ai is like... it's so jarring. why can't you see the harm like i can? why are you so lazy? why are we making society this stupid? can we please stop? it's killing people does that not matter to you?
Can you (or anyone else who reads) please provide some sources? I agree with you, but I'm stuck on trying to articulate this to other people.
cognitive offloading:
LLM users displayed the "weakest" brain connectivity in a new MIT study that hints AI use harms critical thinking. It's not the first such s
It’s a question that some HR bosses are pondering, albeit in less dramatic terms. And an academic paper might hold some answers.
environmental harm:
Billionaire Elon Musk's development of a supercomputer in Memphis is another environmental blow to a marginalized Black community.
MIT News explores the environmental and sustainability implications of generative AI technologies and applications.
There's evidence it's causing psychosis
AI may be fueling psychotic delusions in a phenomenon known as "AI psychosis" or "ChatGPT psychosis." New research explains the risks.
Yes.
And, it exists. I don't see it going anywhere. We may need to learn to live with it and try to mitigate the negative impacts.
Every David and Patrick kiss
+ for the sake of completion
Monument Valley, Utah by Radek Skrzypczak
Apple TV Murderbot + Text posts
As a society we have benefited so much from successful public health measures that we now have the privilege of declaring that we must not need them anymore
Bitch before enriched flour, neural tube defects like spina bifida were far more common. Even now, spina bifida clinicians and researchers are begging to have salt and maize fortified to reach groups that don’t use as much flour. Before iodized salt, the United States had a fucking GOITER BELT. Eleven years after the introduction of fluoridated water, a city in Michigan found the rate of dental caries among school children dropped a staggering 60%— in an era where tooth decay regularly fucking killed people
I’m literally not even going to start on vaccines, which are among the most successful and robustly studied public health measures in world history
You might say “oh well today we all have access to vitamins and toothpastes and dentists so we don’t need those things in our food supplies” and boy do white people on social media loooove to fucking say that. But here’s the thing: no, people don’t all have easy access to those things. That’s privilege talking yet again
solidarity with california.
according to the results of the 2021 census:
"As of April 2020, just more than 86 percent of Americans live in metropolitan areas, counties that include or are adjacent to major cities with populations of 50,000 or more, an all-time high." (census results overview from The Hill)
City liberals can't talk the same shit about rural American that rural conservatives talk about cities.
"so dangerous!"
"so dirty!"
Among others.
Every time I see this quote I realize how poor even very smart people are at looking at the long game and at assessing these things in context.
One of my favourite illustrations of this was in a First Aid class. The instructor was a working paramedic. He asked, “Who here knows the stats on CPR? What percentage of people are saved by CPR outside a hospital?”
I happen to know but I’m trying not to be a TOTAL know it all in this class so I wait. And people guess 50% and he says, “Lower,” and 20% and so forth and eventually I sort of half put up my hand and I guess I had The Face because he eventually looked at me and said, “You know, don’t you.”
“My mom’s a doc,” I said. He gave me a “so say it” gesture and I said, “Four to ten percent depending on your sources.”
Everyone else looked surprised and horrified.
And the paramedic said, “We’re gonna talk a bit about some details of those figures* but first I want to talk about just this: when do you do CPR?”
The class dutifully replies: when someone is unconscious, not breathing, and has no pulse.
“What do we call someone who is unconscious, not breathing, and has no pulse?”
The class tries to figure out what the trick question is so I jump over the long pause and say, “A corpse.”
“Right,” says the paramedic. “Someone who isn’t breathing and has no heartbeat is dead. So what I’m telling you is that with this technique you have a 4-10% chance of raising the dead.”
So no, artists did not stop the Vietnam War from happening with the sheer Power of Art. The forces driving that military intervention were huge, had generations of momentum and are actually pretty damn complicated.
But if you think the mass rejection of the war was as meaningless as a soufflé - well.
Try sitting here for ten seconds and imagining where we’d be if the entire intellectual and artistic drive of the culture had been FOR the war. If everyone thought it was a GREAT IDEA.
What the whole world would look like.
Four-to-ten percent means that ninety to ninety-six percent of the time - more than nine times out of ten - CPR will do nothing, but that one time you’ll be in the company of someone worshipped as an incarnate god.
If you think the artists and performers attacking and showing up people like Donald Trump is meaningless try imagining a version of the world wherein they weren’t there.
(*if you’re curious: those stats count EVERY reported case of CPR, while the effectiveness of it is extremely time-related. With those who have had continuous CPR from the SECOND they went down, the number is actually above 80%. It drops hugely every 30 seconds from then on. When you count ALL cases you count cases where the person has already been down several minutes but a bystander still starts CPR, which affects the stats)
That Vonnegut quote brings this particular moment to mind:
Yes, it’s just a pie. Yes, the pie itself doesn’t do much direct damage in the grand scheme of things. But the pie is resistance, and resistance inspires resistance. Resistance inspires survival. Throwing pies sometimes starts a movement. Throwing pies sometimes saves lives.
And of course, we haven’t spoken about the inherent morality of throwing pies at oppressors in a world where oppressors have outlawed pie throwing. At the very least, pie throwing is a reminder to the oppressors that no matter how much money they have, no matter how much power they have, there are still some people, some moments they can’t control.
I’d rather go out throwing pies than just rolling over and accepting that pie throwing isn’t going to solve anything. Yeah, the pie throwing doesn’t immediately solve the problem, but it doesn’t have to because it’s just a starting point. So throw the damn pie.
So throw the damn pie
Turns out, Kurt Vonnegut didn’t even mean it like that in the first place. I’m skeptical of screenshots of short quotes by famous people who have lived complex lives. They rarely capture nuance. So I looked up the interview. (It took me about 45 seconds.) He agrees up front that culture (satire) can defend against the world’s insanity. That that’s a worthy goal. Then he goes on to say it also makes people feel less isolated:
Then, in answer to the specific and limited question of whether culture can “change things,” he talks about who has the political power to change history.
And finally, he wouldn’t still have been protesting wars, including through his publications, if he thought that it was worthless.
Never trust anything without a
Source: https://www.nuvo.net/news/news/vonnegut-at/article_04fdbc54-9435-54aa-992c-3130443dc334.html
anticipating an exponential increase in murderbot misgendering so I drew something about it
you've heard of "quiet quitting," now I'd like to introduce you to the next level, The French Work Ethic:
Do exactly what you're paid for and nothing more
Absolutely refuse to be available to contact when you're off the clock
Never prioritize work over your own health, wellbeing, or family because that would be insane, it's just a job.
Have a little glass of wine
Take as long as you feel like for lunch
Deeply understand that work doesn't matter
Make sure your boss your boss knows they're always your second priority ❤️
When in doubt, go on strike
You don't have to like weed but I find people who are vehemently anti-weed but claim to be left leaning infuriating. If you go into a rage because you smelled someone smoking pot, how the fuck do you expect to form community with people addicted to meth? It's easier to say you hate smokers than to say you hate all drug users in leftist spaces because one makes you sound a bit like a square while the other is the writing on the wall. You aren't anti-weed, you're anti-drug user and anyone who uses substances is not safe around you.
I know dozens of people who use meth, coke, and fentanyl. While heroin is harder to get I do know some folks who use it when they can. Some of these drug users are my neighbors, some are my clients, and some are my friends & family. One does not cease to be human just because they use a substance you find scary.
Community doesn't mean you need to invite them to your home and look away if they smoke there. It means you don't call your property manager because you suspect your neighbor uses. It means you don't require drug tests for homeless shelters and housing services. It means the very idea of someone who smokes meth in your community doesn't make you go, "what the hell."
Genuinely kind of a wild thing to see in the replies as someone who has been professionally practicing harm reduction for years.
Considering recent events over here in the States, this seemed like a good time to bring this back. Over the next four years, expect an increase in discourse around "undesirables." This will include but not be limited to drug addicts.
Also, from someone who works at a smoke/head shop: WAY MORE PEOPLE ARE DRUG USERS THAN YOU THINK. Way more people are addicted to opiates, meth, whippets, cocaine, you name it, than you have been lead to believe, and on top of that, they are often the "normal" or "functional" people you see every day, not just the person tweaking out at the gas stations. Judges, bank tellers, grandmas, teachers, the nice lady who runs your bakery— all of them. You are ALREADY IN COMMUNITY WITH THESE PEOPLE. Start fucking acting like it.
I'm gonna keep repeating this: 'community' is not a fucking friend group.
It's not a clique. It's not you and the people YOU think are cool and funny.
Drug users are your neighbors whether you're too much of an obnoxious self-righteous asshat to be aware of that or not. You don't *get* to say drug users don't deserve to be meaningfully connected to and included in the populations they call home (which is what community actually means, btw) and the mere assertion that you can is a big part of why ppl seek connection in drugs in the first place.
It doesn't matter if ppl use or not but tbh if we really wanted to cut down on addiction all we'd need to do is have fewer stuck up motherfuckers who look down on 'undesirables' in the first place.
'community' is not a fucking friend group.'community' is not a fucking friend group.'community' is not a fucking friend group.'community' is not a fucking friend group.'community' is not a fucking friend group.'community' is not a fucking friend group.
In case you didn't hear this one, the U.S. government paid a cybersecurity company called Reuters to study "large scale social deception," such as misinformation spread by hackers, and how to combat it. This contract is public information. The two guys who currently control all our lives here in America heard about this, and immediately believed it was a contract with the news website Reuters to create "large scale social deception." They literally believed the federal government paid a news website to spread liberal lies and that this payment was labeled "NEFARIOUS SCHEME MONEY." Naturally they both tweeted about this to the whole country before double checking what it actually was, have not issued a correction and obviously never ever will. And here's the kicker, in case this didn't already demonstrate how fucking stupid and dangerously unhinged these losers are: The contract was made in 2018. Under Trump.
President Donald Trump and ally Elon Musk are misleadingly depicting a Pentagon defense contract that was awarded during Trump’s first presi
Genuinely how can even their most die-hard fans not at least begin to question their choices when they do shit this embarrassing and ridiculous every fucking day.