This is so important. Donāt let people prevent you from voting, especially a poll worker. If youāre turned away for any reason and others arenāt, stay there and call this number.
On the surface, The Condoms in Pornographic Films Initiative seems like a yes-or-no decision about requiring California porn performers to wear condoms while at work, as it were. To the ordinary voter, this seems like a no-brainer: Of course we want these people to have safer sex.Ā
Proposition 60, known as Californiaās ācondoms in pornā measure, allows any state resident to sue adult performers and companies when the viewer believes condoms havenāt been used in a porn scene. In the interest of attracting condom cops, the measure gives anyone successfully filing such a lawsuit a cut of the fees imposed on performers ā 25% of any fine assessed.
In a statement from the Free Speech Coalition, chief executive Diane Duke said āIf the proposed initiative were to pass, adult performers would immediately be targeted by stalkers and profiteers, who would use the initiativesā sue-a-performer provision to harass and extort adult performers.ā She added, āThis is an unconscionable initiative that would take a legal and safe industry and push its performers into the shadows.ā
The initiative intentionally incentivizes a cyber lynch mob of anti-porners, stalkers, upset family members, and profiteers combing through clip sites/blogs and filing lawsuits.Ā
origamiaround
kianamaiart
ellievsbear
baratheonpilled
titsay
