There's just not enough fear of God in modern country music.
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Origami Around
One Nice Bug Per Day

if i look back, i am lost
sheepfilms
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

oozey mess
Interview Vampire Daily
EXPECTATIONS

izzy's playlists!
d e v o n

pixel skylines
tumblr dot com
KIROKAZE
NASA

blake kathryn
Game of Thrones Daily
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
todays bird

No title available
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia
seen from Spain
seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Colombia

seen from Azerbaijan
seen from Brazil

seen from Canada

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Malaysia
@ainsi-soit-il
There's just not enough fear of God in modern country music.
How do you make sense of horrific ruthless suffering?
The Cross. Throughout the Old Testament you see these cries to God asking why suffering is permitted, both in general and in specific instances. For instance, in Habakkuk we read: O Lord, how long shall I cry for help, and you will not hear? The same sentiment can be seen in many instances by the Psalmist and then we have the entire book of Job wrestling with the question through various means.
The answer comes by way of the Crucifixion. God Himself enters creation and does something considered scandalous to the Jews and folly to the Gentiles. The innocent, spotless Lamb suffers unjustly. Now this is the great mystery come to fruition. People tend to argue from providence wherein God brings a greater good out of any evil. And that is true, certainly, but this argument is incomplete without the view of Golgotha. The death of the Son of Man shows us that the pain and suffering of this world is not alien to the Divine Mind but becomes, as it were, inscribed on the heart of salvation history itself. That the suffering of this world, in a mystical way, can be united to the suffering of the God-Man on the Cross and it can be truly meritorious for us in the hope of the Heavenly Jerusalem for all eternity.
just saw this, relevant to the thesis
“A friend once told me the story of how she first met God. She doesn't remember her age; she must have been about five or six. Her family lived in the countryside on the rim of one of our big eastern cities. And one July evening, cloudless, moonless, with just the hint of a humid breeze, her father took her out into the backyard in the dark and told her to look up at the sky.
From one horizon to the other, all across the black carpet of the night, were the stars—thousands of them, tens of thousands, in clusters and rivers of light. And in the quiet, her father said, "God made the world beautiful because He loves us."
That was more than sixty years ago.My friend grew up and learned all about entropy and supernovas and colliding galaxies and quantum mechanics and the general theory of relativity. But still, when she closes her eyes, she can see that carpet of stars and hear her father's voice: God made the world beautiful because He loves us. Creation is more than an accident of dead matter. It's a romance. It has purpose. It sings of the Living God. It bears His signature. And it's our home.”
-Archbishop Charles J. Chaput, Strangers in a Strange Land: Living the Catholic Faith in a Post-Christian World
think the thing we’re missing most these days is solemnity. humanity really yearns for the serious and the solemn. you can see it in our culture, people cracking jokes during wedding masses and funerals, movies having no purpose except to bring in money through marvel quotes. life is serious! we only live it once, people die, people vow their lives to one another, none of this is serious enough to refrain from joking? killing the sacred nature of solemnity I think is seriously injuring us as human people.
we want direction and aim, and belittling it in everything we come about, whether media or real life, teaches us that those things are not to be taken seriously. and if we cannot take these things seriously, we will be left feeling directionless and aimless.
St. Benedict's Painted Church in Hōnaunau, Hawaii. The vaulted ceilings are painted with palm frond tops. The walls depict biblical stories and symbolism.
Photos: Megan Spelman
OooooOOooo, N.T. Wright‘s thought that, while Greek’s many words that describe the concept of “love” allow for one to easily distinguish the type of love they mean (highlighting the diversity of these feelings), English’s singular verb “to love” is useful in that it highlights that different types of authentic love are nonetheless united in the essential characteristic that defines them
There's reasons for me saying this but a reminder that Jesus was Jewish. He was a Jew from Judea his Mom was Jewish the last supper was a passover meal. They were Jews practicing Judaism in Judea.
"Some people who claimed to have extraterrestrial experiences under the influence of drugs were actually contacted by demons" okay. Fine.
"The government found this interesting and attempted to recreate it with a program" plausible I guess.
"The government has physical demons in a glass jar and they're waiting to reveal them as part of the unveiling of the antichrist when They unleash their master plan for humanity which involves building bodies and interbreeding with humans—" you are being groomed into psychosis and being taken advantage of by Youtubers for money
insane for parents to read the story of isaac and abraham to their kids like ok so would you also kill me if god asked you to, dad?
I've always believed that Christians are taking the wrong message from that story. I've always thought that was a test Abraham failed.
TL;DR: 1) the test was for Hagar (https://www.tumblr.com/forsakenbythenarrative/745856861318823937/it-was-for-hagar) 2) the test is about Abraham's faith in God's love for him, not his personal love of God.
I actually have many thoughts on this story which is that the way many people approach it is wrong. Here's why:
A lot of people approach it saying that the test is “Do you love Yahweh God more than your son?” The problem with this is that this is a stupid question. The Scriptures are literature. No, I don’t believe it’s fiction, but it is undeniably literature with characters and plots and arcs. Abraham’s arc has nothing to do with love; it has to do with faith.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it till I die: never read a bible verse. You read something out of context and you can make it mean anything (see for reference: Transatlantic Slave Trade). If you want to understand a narrative or a story within a narrative you must first understand the narratives and stories around that one.
Abraham’s story starts with great faith and trust in God: Yahweh says to Abram (in great poetry btw) “Leave your family and I will bless you and save the world thru you” and Abraham goes. He’s told to go to the land of Canaan and he will be made into a great nation through a child of him and his wife even though they are old. And Abraham trusts Yahweh to fulfill this promise. He takes his wife (and some other unimportant people) and goes to Canaan.
But there’s a famine. This is supposed to be a land of promise where they can be fruitful and multiply but there’s nothing. So, what will Abraham do: will he trust God to bring food out of famine (life out of death)? No. He leaves for Egypt. Where he then hands off his wife to the pharaoh in order to save his life; again, not trusting God’s power over life. Meanwhile, while Sarah is being held by the pharaoh (who, despite Sarah’s beauty, doesn’t touch her at all), Abraham is enjoying riches. Thankfully, God saves Sarah by sending plagues and warning the pharaoh of Abraham’s deceit. Then Abe and his wife leave Egypt with lots of wealth and notably a slave.
Later, he and Sarah still are without child. And without a child how will they become the great family that will save the world? Well the could trust Yahweh, have faith in he who has power over life. But they don’t. Instead Sarah says “Sleep with Hagar (whose name means something like “dragged off” or “immigrant”) the slave girl and by her produce a child.” Hagar being an immigrant slave has no say in this so… yeah. Instead of having faith in God, they abuse the immigrant slave. (And somehow Abraham is one of the most likable of Genesis’ characters!!!). It backfired tho because now that Hagar is pregnant she is (by a warped and sick logic) better than Sarah and thus begins to humiliate her. Sarah’s response: abuse her some more until she runs away.
Pregnant immigrant slave woman out in the desert. But Yahweh will not abandon the oppressed and so he visits her, comforts her, and has her return to her mistress. But, he promises to bless her and her child and make him into a great people, even if it isn’t the people of The Prophecy. Her response? Show her faith in Yahweh by giving him a new name: El Roi. The God Who Sees.
Forgetting all that though, Yahweh still must deal with Abraham. Yahweh has sworn himself to Abraham (who, btw is actually a pretty great guy; a defender of the weak and powerless and a fighter of justice. He just also happens to be a faithless coward sometimes.) so he can’t just abandon him. Instead Yahweh says “I am El Shaddhai — God Almighty” and calls Abraham to have a trusting relationship with him and to have integrity with others. God once again affirms his covenant with Abraham (to make his family into a great nation that will save the world). But then adds a new rule: you and all of your sons will have to cut their dicks.
By which I mean circumcision not castration lol. To new comers to the faith this is confusing? Why was circumcision such a big deal? But the answer is Hagar. Abraham’s lack of faith led to him using his penis to abuse his slave. Who then ran away and almost died. All of that could’ve been avoided if he would’ve had faith in Yahweh’s authority over life. He wouldn’t have slept with Hagar and he wouldn’t have went to Egypt. Now Yahweh says: I. Am. Faithful. I have blessed you even when you lied. I have reaffirmed my covenant even when you committed horrors. Why? Because I a faithful. So have faith in me.” So, circumcision. As a reminder that this family only exists because of God. Is only blessed because of God.
Moving on, next we actually have a rare scene of Abraham being having faith! It’s the infamous Sodom story lol. Sodom is evil: they oppress the poor and the widow, the take food from the hungry, they rape guests. To put it lightly, they were an abomination. So Yahweh says, “Abraham, I am a just God; I must destroy Sodom.” But Abraham has a nephew in Sodom. So Abraham tests to see how far Yahweh’s mercy would go: he asks if God would spare the city for 50 righteous people. Yahweh says he would. Then he keeps getting smaller — 45, 40, 30, 20, 10 — and Yahweh says he will spare the city for 10 righteous people.
Spoiler: there were not 10 righteous people a Yahweh smote the city so hard it made the Dead Sea dead. Really. Look it up.
My interest though is in this line: “Let not Yahweh be angry, and I will speak but once more: Suppose ten be found there?”
What we witness here is both faith in God’s grace, but also a lack of faith in God’s grace. Because here’s the thing: we learn from Jesus that God would have spared the city for the 1, if someone would’ve asked. David, the man after God’s own heart? He would’ve asked for the one. Moses, the first man to have a truly intimate relationship with Yahweh? He would’ve asked for the one. But Abraham is the first person in generations to follow Yahweh and call on his name. And as such (and as with all his descendants until Joseph) he does not really know Yahweh’s character. He has yet to learn Yahweh is a God of his word. But he will.
And he’ll also learn something else: don’t test Yahweh.
You see, because following this story are 3 more stories: Abe and Abimelek, the birth of Isaac, and the flight of Hagar and her son Ishmael.
With the first narrative we see Abraham repeat the mistakes in Egypt. He lies to a king and hands off his wife to him. This time, Yahweh’s like “I’m not sending plagues again for this crap.” And just visits the king in a dream, warns him about the deception, and promises not to hurt him. Now, Abraham claims to have lied because “I thought the people here had no fear of God, so you would kill before my wife.” But that’s just it: why the heck wouldn’t he have prayed to God about it!?
Like “Hey, yo, Yahweh, I’m scared these people will kill me for my hot sister-wife. Yahweh: “No problem dude; I’m the God of covenants and faithful promises: no harm will come to you or your wife. In fact you’ll leave here richer.” (Abe does leave richer btw. Again.)
The point is: Abraham once again shows he doesn’t have faith in God and specifically God’s power over life and death.
Next: Isaac is born. To a 100 year old man and a 90 year old woman. The 90 year old woman with the barren — aka dead — womb gave birth to a baby — aka life. How? Yahweh is the God of faithfulness and loyal love who brings life out of death. Maybe you catching on to a theme…
But Sarah isn’t. Ishmael is laughing either with or at Isaac (it’s unclear and quite frankly I don't trust Sarah) and Sarah is m a d. she once again wants the slave and her child out of their home. This time Abraham is uneasy with this, but he distinctly doesn’t turn to God; God must come to him. God says, “😔. It’s fine. It’ll be fine. Isaac is the chosen one, but I will not forsake Ishmael. In fact, I will make a great nation from the son of the slave woman. All because of my loyal love and faithfulness to you.”
So Hagar leaves (with nothing but a water bottle. Seriously.), almost dies, Yahweh protects her, nourishes her and her son with his life, and Ishmael gets married. All is well, right?
No.
Why? Abraham. First: Abraham’s past sin has once again endangers this woman’s life (and we know God has a special love for 1) suffering women and 2) suffering foreigners. Hagar is both). Second: Abraham has not yet proven he trusts God or that he knows him. So what does Yahweh do? He tests him.
This is The Binding of Isaac.
Yahweh says, “Abraham! Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, and offer him there as a burnt offering on the mountain.”
So what does Abraham do? Does he fight? Does he wrestle? Does he lie?
No. He does the one thing he hasn’t done all along: he trusts in Yahweh and Yahweh’s character.
Abraham takes his son and some servants to the mountain. He leaves the servants below the mountain and says “Stay here. Isaac and I will go up and worship, and we will come back to you.”
We.
We will come back to you.
In fact (so I've heard) the Hebrew can be translated “We are determined to go, we are determined to worship, we are determined to return.”
Is he lying to the servants?
Is he delusional?
No. It is my conviction that he truly believed he and the boy would return.
Why? He heard several times that God planned to make Isaac a great nation (Genesis 12:1-7, 13:14-17, 15:1-21, 17:1-21, 18:1-15). So Abraham finally believes him. I mean, how could he not: Yahweh is the God of covenants and faithful promises. He is overflowing in loyal love. He protects Abraham even in his sin just because of some one off promise he made. And finally: Yahweh is the God with authority over life and death. Yahweh is “the Resurrection and the Life.” Abraham is the first in the Bible to believe in the resurrection of the dead.
note: we know the idea of the resurrection was not widespread early on in Israel’s religion. First people believed you died and then you were just gone. But then people like David began to meditate on Yahweh’s character and decided that if Yahweh was as overflowing in loyal love as Moses said he is, then Yahweh would not leave their bodies in the grave but would one day resurrect them back to life because he loves them. This is similar to how some Christians idea of hell has developed past “God mad. Punish sinner.” And into a more temporary condition and even autonomous choice on the individual. And these ideas are as old as the faith itself. This doesn’t mean these things are wrong or that they had a different religion, but that as our understanding of God develops, so will our understanding of our theology. Moses says "God is loving." John says "God is love." Moses says "God is like a mother." Julian of Norwich says "God is our mother." Not a contradiction, a progression.
Hagar, a polytheist immigrant slave, a stranger in a strange land far before Moses was, trusts in God so much she returns to slavery and gives him a new name because he spoke to her 1 time. Yahweh has spoken Abraham countless times and he has refused to have faith. Now, he must.
If Yahweh says “Kill the son by which I will make you a great nation.”
Abraham says “Bet. I will. And you will resurrect him. Why? Because you are the Yahweh Yirah — Yahweh the Provider.” Provider of what? A ram? No. Yahweh is the provider of life.
“By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac, and he who had received promises offered up his only begotten son […] concluding that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead.” — Hebrews 11:17, 19
So… yeah.
Msgr used the word "traumatized" to describe Christ in today's gospel after the execution of John the Baptist and I know that word has been over-used lately but actually a) it really fits that situation and b) that's the first time I've ever heard it used applied to Christ
"God isn't a magical genie" I say, except I know that genies are trickster creatures that go out of their way to take your wishes and twist them into the most harmful thing they can because they hate you, and thus I mean that if you don't word a prayer absolutely perfectly or get nasty intrusive thoughts while youre praying, God isn't going to take that and be like "Nope, sorry, you prayed it into being!". He knows what youre trying to say and he knows those nasty thoughts are intrusive and he isn't going to take your imperfect prayer and use it to hurt you or do something outside of your favour.
Romans 8:26 NKJV
[26] Likewise the Spirit also helps in our weaknesses. For we do not know what we should pray for as we ought, but the Spirit Himself makes intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.
The truth is, sometimes we want God to be the evil genie. Actual God knows what we want and what we need, and is only waiting for us to ask because he loves us and respects our freedom. Actual God will give us what is best for us, but not necessarily what we want.
But, the evil genie? Maybe I can outsmart the evil genie, maybe I can say exactly the right thing in exactly the right way to get around all the pitfalls and get exactly what I want. Of course what I want will make me happy and not backfire at all.
Good advice for scrupulous folks to remember
People forget sins aren't "things you will be punished for" and are "things that are bad for you and you should avoid"
Ruth shot her shot when she slept at Boaz's feet, but I think that was more about 1) being present and available, and doing so with a chaste, honorable posture and 2) acknowledging her social status as compared to his with both humility and dignity.
I don't believe she continued to sleep at his feet after he married her. That's a wild thing to infer.
In short, stop being weird, and honor your husband in a way that honors God. Thank you.
After 150 years, Tehran has declared St. Peter a property of the regime.
In recent weeks, government officials have sealed the doors of the church office and the office of the Synod’s secretary, which is also located on the church property, and banned all church gatherings, according to Benyamin. “At the moment we have no property left,” Benyamin said, referring to his denomination. “[St. Peter] was the last.” In 2023, Iran had six functioning Presbyterian churches.
Me: If I don't get married I'd *thinks of a bunch of selfish things to do*
St Paul: *stares intensely at me*
Me:
Me: I'd dedicate myself to study, service, and silence.
St Paul: *nods approvingly*
I'd like to protest that there's no way St. Paul thought silence was a virtue. St. Paul was always one question asked away from delivering a five-hour rant.
Someone's got to pull out the tweet about how holiness comes in many forms; how Joseph doesn't speak a single word in Scripture, and how it's doubtful that Saint Paul had a thought that he didn't publish
The life of the Scofield Reference Bible’s creator is more—and less—interesting than the interview led listeners to believe.
Hall and other Carlson guests interpret the Scofield Reference Bible as conceptualized or deployed by actors with alternate motives, almost always Jewish Zionists (e.g., “the Rothschilds”) seeking to influence Christians. In such cases, the general argument is so distorted it would be better not to make it at all. [...] Criticisms, including historical, of both [dispensationalism and Christian Zionism] should be fair game. But they should be done fairly. The conspiracy theories surrounding Scofield are so poorly told and so transparently distorted that they need to be rebutted. Dispensationalists shouldn’t be forced to set the record straight themselves.
I'm not a dispensationalist by any stretch, but I've heard some of these same sort of whackadoodle antisemitic attitudes spouted off and it makes me sick.
my depiction of genesis 1:3