Here's a website where Palestine GoFundMes are vetted and shared that you can send out to people. The url is gazafunds.com
Easy to use and simple. Just share the site whenever someone asks for GFMs for Palestine.

Janaina Medeiros
$LAYYYTER
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

No title available

No title available

⁂
DEAR READER
AnasAbdin
No title available
KIROKAZE
occasionally subtle
almost home
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

Origami Around

izzy's playlists!

pixel skylines
Three Goblin Art

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Keni
seen from Netherlands
seen from Philippines
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Liechtenstein
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye

seen from China
seen from Philippines

seen from Estonia
@airplane-pt3
Here's a website where Palestine GoFundMes are vetted and shared that you can send out to people. The url is gazafunds.com
Easy to use and simple. Just share the site whenever someone asks for GFMs for Palestine.
every time a trans man who does not want to be called a twink gets called a twink I will personally go out into the world and rend 1 parked car to shreds with my teeth. cut it out
walk with me for a moment. let's think for a sec. I'm not upset but I do want people to understand. do you think assigning a label associated with feminine features, hairlessness, skinniness/lack of muscle tone, and high pitched voices is something that most trans men would feel comfortable being associated with? why or why not?
of COURSE there are trans men who don't mind it, or trans men who actively enjoy being called a twink. but I am not hairless by choice. I WANT fat and muscles and body hair and a deep voice. and a lot of trans men that get called twinks DO HAVE THESE THINGS, yet they get called "twink" anyway. why do you think that might be?
it's okay if you've done this in the past. maybe just check in before you call your friend or acquaintance something with so many specific, potentially disheartening associations!
I wonder if the inverse occurs with trans women getting called "butch" too. because there are many wonderful butch trans women!!! but if you call trans women "butches" for traits like short hair or body hair despite otherwise feminine presentation, maybe think about why that is? is she really a butch? or is that just her body? just ask first!
nonbinary people too. are they really "masc presenting" or is that just their body? are they really "fem presenting" or is that just their body? let's all try to be a bit more cognisant of the language we use to describe the trans people in our lives, yeah? [: it's worth thinking about. don't worry yourself into a hole about it, of course! but it's something to check every now and then.
Saul Bass inspired little art pieces for Apollo Justice Ace Attorney
I definitely got better at them as I went. Really happy with Succession's.
art archive @brodartrokihousuke
sketching!
WAITER! WAITER! More yuri please.
DING DING DING! a serving of ss burya asoryuri for anon!
bonus yappings under cut
Heavenly Delusion, ch. 60
no one else twists the knife as good as u come over
Happy four year anniversary to the finnpoe bible also known as Resistance Reborn (yes it’s a canon Star Wars novel)
Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi dir. Richard Marquand | 1983
holy grail
LOCK IN NOW!!💥
matching w this guy (z_z)
the night view outside of my window
call me terminally academia-brained but i do think a lot of the fun of character analysis is figuring out how to build a compelling argument for a particular reading using lines of evidence from canon as well as meta/intertextual support
and you could say that what i’m saying here is basically “a lot of the fun of doing character analysis is doing character analysis” but let’s be real a lot of fandom character analysis is pretty heavily vibes-based. and i think that’s where i really chafe up against the traditional thought-terminating fandom attitude of like, everyone’s opinions hold equal weight and any interrogation of that is inherently hostile. because i think it’s fascinating to dig into where others are coming from in terms of their views on characters or dynamics or whatever, especially when they differ significantly from more commonly expressed views, and part of that digging is asking people okay what parts of canon are you drawing from to support your opinion? what parts of canon are you disregarding or downplaying? how does this argument hold up in the light of how race, gender, class, ability, etc. operate both in the piece’s in-fiction and real world contexts?
dgs stuffs
tous les mêmes, tous les mêmes, tous les mêmes, et y'en a marre
MON "CRASH OUT" MOTHMA in ANDOR | S02E03