Today's Document
almost home

tannertan36

No title available
hello vonnie
Keni
Cosmic Funnies
taylor price

Discoholic 🪩
NASA

No title available
dirt enthusiast
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Monterey Bay Aquarium

shark vs the universe
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
No title available
RMH

Kiana Khansmith
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from France
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Greece
seen from United States

seen from Argentina

seen from Ecuador
seen from Türkiye
seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia
seen from Japan
seen from United Kingdom
@alwaysalreadyangry
Beverley Nichols and the Bensons
E. F. (Fred) Benson, Beverley Nichols and A. C. (Arthur) Benson
Beverley Nichols dined with Fred and went into raptures about [Fred's] house, saying in his usual whimsical way that the furniture seemed to have been put in its place by the gentle hands of Time; the pictures had almost grown into the walls; and the carpets had sprung naturally from the floors like some gracious form of grass. According to Nichols, Fred's face glowed with happiness as he showed his guest round the house. He was described as ‘a smallish (Fred was five feet ten), pinkish, twinkling, urbane, grey-flannel-trousered man’ who had finally come to rest in a quiet London square, having retained the sparkle of his eyes, his taste for Italian wine and, above all, his love of a sheet of white paper in the stillness of the night. Fred, who had not ‘come to rest’ at all, noted with amusement the slight cattiness behind Nichols's gush. [Geoffrey Palmer and Noel Lloyd, E. F. Benson: As He Was]
Beverley Nichols was a lunch guest and on one occasion he came with his nephew. This must have been the time he was contemplating his piece “E. F. Benson, or Very Much at Home” (from Are they the same at home? 1927), because Mr Benson asked him if he was going to show it to him before he published and he said yes. But apparently he didn't, as Mr Benson was pretty peeved at a reference in the article to his novels "growing more and more dusty on the shelves of the subscription libraries. He doesn't care, I'm sure." In fact he did. "Mr Benson didn't like that at all," said Charlie [Tomlin]. Mr Benson had a mild dig at him in retaliation in some review of a publication where Beverley Nichols is in Italy or somewhere abroad and suddenly at the end realises it is April and the daffodils are blooming in England. So he has to rush home, of which Mr Benson wrote "I hope to God he got back in time." (Beverley Nichols was to retain a certain animosity towards Mr Benson until his own death in 1983.) [Cynthia and Tony Reavell, E. F. Benson: Remembered, and the World of Tilling]
Despite this shared animosity between him and Fred, Nichols previously maintained a long friendship with the older Benson brother, Arthur:
In the space of two minutes my war — my very special war — seemed much less unpleasant, because my new friend was none other than the Master of Magdalene, A. C. Benson, whose father had been one of Queen Victoria's favourite Archbishops. There were three Benson brothers, all distinguished in their separate ways, though the only one who is nowadays remembered is E. F. Benson, who is currently enjoying a belated revival as a writer of Edwardian comedy. A. C. Benson, whom I came to know very well indeed, was a true scholar and an admirable administrator, with a knack of coaxing large sums out of American philanthropists for the benefit of Magdalene, which was his chief love. A beautiful little college it was, with a library of exceptional distinction, founded on the original bequest from Samuel Pepys. Benson was a mixed-up man, who had a habit of developing sentimental attachments at a moment's notice, and no doubt this was what had occurred when he met me in the porch, though I did not at first realise the full implications of the encounter.
[…] Ever since my departure [A. C. Benson] had kept in touch through a constant stream of correspondence. No young man ever had a kindlier mentor; he wrote as an equal, drawing me out, seeking my opinions. He was not only kindly but practical. Realising that I had no means apart from my meagre Second Lieutenant's pay, he took some of my letters and sent them to an American magazine called The Outlook with the suggestion that they should be published anonymously. They were accepted, and the editors asked for more. Altogether I made five hundred dollars from The Outlook, which was a small fortune in those days. For the first time I knew the excitement of writing words on paper and selling them, of twisting my pen into symbols that could be exchanged for gold. Which is all that authorship has ever been about, or ever will be. I do not know whether The Outlook still survives and Benson's letters to me have long since disappeared, with the exception of one, which I kept and cherished because I had a feeling that it was a landmark in my life.
"My Dear Beverley, We do not know each other as we might have done, but if you have come to know me at all you will have realised that one of my ‘complexes’ — I believe that is the fashionable expression — is a hatred of waste. Perhaps that is why I can claim some success as the Master of Magdalene. I keep a very strict watch on the outgoings of the Bursary! But it is not only a matter of accountancy. It goes deeper than that. I am bewildered and alarmed by the profligacy of Nature, and even more bewildered and alarmed by the wastage of this hideous war. I think that you are being wasted. You have many talents and none of them is being used. With your precarious state of health your sphere of activities must be limited, but that does not mean that you can be of no use at all. As soon as I see an opportunity I propose to do something about this. Once you suggested to me — with that never-failing impertinence which I find so engaging — that I was an ‘intri- guant.’ (I had been telling you the story of the ingenious manner in which I had persuaded a Chicago millionaire to give us ten thousand dollars for our beloved Library.) You could not have paid me a higher compliment. Intrigue, to me, is the spice of life. I am an ancient spider, sitting in the centre of an ancient web, weaving ancient spells. And some of them will shortly be speeding in your direction. My affectionate greetings, A.C.B."
The ink of the letter has dimmed to a sickly sepia, and the address on the envelope, with its faded penny stamp, is almost illegible. But I still feel a glow of warmth as I read it, with half a century of disillusionment behind me. [Beverley Nichols, The Unforgiving Minute: Some Confessions from Childhood to the Outbreak of the Second World War]
Incredible and gorgeous 17th century Ottoman tent from the Dresden State Art Collections.
peer-reviewed tags by @theradioghost !!! that is so cool
it is impossible to watch a movie. every night i think i want to watch a movie. no movie gets watched. because it's not possible
and yet they keep making movies with the hopes that one day humanity will discover a way to watch them. it's so inspiring
Agnes spent a lot of time this evening fixated on a moth
my problem with fandom these days remains that all i really want to read fanfic for is prophet (the macdonald/blaché book) but there is basically nobody writing fic for it. has anyone posted anything since my fic at yuletide??
it’s a queer science fiction book with lots of weird stuff and a couple that is awful in the ways that i like best. some real angst/lonely hours in there. sooo much to explore but i haven’t really been able to write anything recently. rude that other people aren’t doing it tbh (i joke but also i pine for more stories exactly like this)
Penda’s Fen (1974) | dir. Alan Clarke
[ID: Stephen, a pale teenage boy with red hair, sits on a the top of a hill with a rural landscape. He speaks forcefully: “My race is mixed. My sex is mixed. I am woman and man, light with darkness. Mixed! Mixed. I am nothing special. Nothing, nothing pure. I am mud and flame!” END ID]
there is a happy cat asleep on me but i have to get up to go to work 😭
ah the library vocational awe posts. interesting when they’re written by people who actually work at a library. but the reality is always much messier and honestly more than a bit sadder. all the people we can help, and all the people we can’t.
how is she so sweet. look at those little paws!!!
tin gao for supermarket kakamu
there’s this thing that happens on this website that’s like the opposite of pissing on the poor and is far better but also still somewhat annoying when you post something where the point is implied and then someone else adds the point you were making in a reblog as though they are like, adding something new and insightful to the post. eg you can post something about a female scientist from the 1800s having her intellect undervalued in her time and someone else is going to add like “that’s so crazy… i think they were treating her this way due to misogyny” and like well yes. i mean… yeah. you got it
I remember a post that was popular way back about the difference in treatment of atomic bombs in American media and Japanese media. I can't remember what it said exactly but something about how atomic bombs tend to be treated more seriously or as things humans are responsible for in Japanese media, but they're often just used for shock value in American media. It was a short post, and the implication was that, as a country that had an atomic bomb dropped on it, Japan has a very different relationship to them.
But there was a reply that said something along the lines of, "Wow, I wonder why that could be!! Maybe if we think real hard about it 🤪 we'll figure out why that is! Like Japan might have some sort of History with atomic bombs that makes it more likely to treat them as dangerous things? 🤔🤔🤔"
And I NEVER saw that post reblogged without that comment, like it was this massive own on the OP. And every time I saw it, I was like, Have we never heard of subtlety? Implication? The OP clearly trusted the audience enough to draw the logical conclusion from their statement, but now they're being paraded in front of everyone as an idiot...
It's been like 10 years, and I still get steamed every time I think about it
I hate this shit so much and it happens all the time and I also know that someone in the notes somewhere is defending this as “autistic people do this because we are very literal!” and as a diagnosed autistic person who does not do this and does not think that way — I believe you too can train yourself out of that impulse. Save it as a draft if you must. But it’s really aggravating and insulting to the OP and also, completely unnecessary. And if you’re doing it because you think deliberate obsessive literalism is funny, I can guarantee you it almost never is.
Starting my speech at the Omelas city council with a child acknowledgement statement
would you still be alive without modern medicine? looking back at your life, would you survive without any to the moment where you are now?
yes
no
barely
yes but it would affect me for the rest of my life
results
I'd have my knee fucked up forever alive but yeahhhhh
i could not survive in ancient greece i would be spending all my money on red figure kraters or whatever. my husband would come home like where did all of the funds for influencing votes go and i'd be like honey look this amphora's got achilles and ajax playing dice on it
my wealthy husband: i thought i had some drachmas stashed away over here
the pottery i just bought with my husband's drachmas featuring an owl dressed up like a soldier:
slowly reading Come Back In September by Darryl Pinckney who can WRITE like my god but also it’s full of the most delicious and also like surprisingly moving pieces of old literary gossip and just life.