No. I’m sorry, but no. And I’m going to try and explain this as best as I can but this sort of thing makes me really frustrated. I know it’s well meaning. It still hurts.
First. I’m going to go on the language. “Has autism” is nasty person first connotations that is language popularized by Autism Speaks, a veritable hate group for autistic folk. Don’t use it unless the person themselves prefers it, but I’m going to be blunt and say majority prefers identity first: autistic person. Autism is not a tote bag.
Second. Behavioural therapy for autistic individuals is a slippery slope that ranges from “useful that helps kids manage emotions” to “Applied Behavioural Analysis” which point blank is conversion therapy for autistic folk. It tries to make them pass as neurotypical via abuse, and often leaves PTSD behind.
FOR REFERENCE she is using ABA techniques in the form of “he gets two M&Ms as a reward for a perfect train ride as an incentive to keep going.” I know this looks/sounds like regular reward based parenting. It’s not, especially when it does not matter how many incentives there are: if a meltdown is going to happen, there will be a meltdown. Eventually. It might not be right then, but it will happen.
The article goes into detail about how he’s undergoing “intervention.” This is an ABA codeword that means “we’re making him look more normal so he integrates into society better.”
This is not a good thing. And should not be treated as such.
Third. The article itself says “with rising autism rates.” No. Autism has exited forever. The myth of the Changeling Child is basically a textbook autism description. Diagnostic rates are going up, because we finally have semi-accurate diagnosis. There is no such thing as increasing autism rates.
Fourth. There are dozens of notes of “tragic autism making my parenting job EVEN HARDER” in this. She treats his meltdowns like crisis mode. She treats his abnormal behaviour as crisis mode. She is making it about herself, how much she wants to cry, how hard it is for her, how her anxiety rises when he has a “bad day.” There is next to nothing about how hard it must be for him. It’s all about “I’m doing this for my child, look at how much work I go through” instead of “my child needs X, so I do it.”
Fifth. His behaviours aren’t “repetitive behaviours.” They are regulatory behaviours. They help him manage his emotions. He doesn’t need a “string of distractions.” He needs a sensory diet to help him self sooth so he can not feel so overwhelmed. They can look very similar, but the fact food is on this list is a red flag for me. Treats are often used as leverage in ABA therapy, because children respond well to them. He should, instead, be allowed to explore whatever stimuli he prefers and be absorbed in something that helps everything feel right.
So. No. This is not sweet. This is not good parenting. Well meaning, sure. But it’s full of dangerous attitudes around autistic people and full of codewords that indicate he is currently undergoing therapy to fix his autistic traits, when they don’t need fixing. They need support, sure, but support shouldn’t come in the form of “act normal or else.”