Investments, Baby (2024)
inkblood.art || inkblood.store
You can purchase the files, including nsfw version, and digital sticker, here!
If you'd enjoy a cheeky sticker to apply in real life, here~
Happy Pride! 🌈🎊
Mike Driver
Show & Tell
Game of Thrones Daily
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

Product Placement
YOU ARE THE REASON
Cosmic Funnies
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Not today Justin

EXPECTATIONS
almost home
Keni
NASA

if i look back, i am lost
𓃗
Doug Jones
untitled

Kiana Khansmith
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

blake kathryn
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Chile
seen from Pakistan

seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from United States
@amiserablerabbit
Investments, Baby (2024)
inkblood.art || inkblood.store
You can purchase the files, including nsfw version, and digital sticker, here!
If you'd enjoy a cheeky sticker to apply in real life, here~
Happy Pride! 🌈🎊
"Cat Headed Blengiglomenean Gasook, or the Thunderer", Henry Darger.
I dreamt there was a shoujo manga called "Tombstone of the Primadonna"
2005-07-07
crane climbing artfight for @/serpent___x on twt !!
THING!!
this is what i wanted to make! feel free 2 use this for whatever i love you
In 1950 Ray Bradbury wrote a short story (it’s 5 pages long) called “There Will Come Soft Rains” which is set on the 4th of august 2026.
Check it out:
Martin Ramirez, Untitled (Galleon on Water). c. 1960–63
gouache, colored pencil, and graphite on pieced paper, 33 x 24 in (all images courtesy Ricco Maresca Gallery unless otherwise noted)
Martín Ramírez was a self-taught artist who spent most of his adult life institutionalized in California mental hospitals, diagnosed as a catatonic schizophrenic.
🌊 The whimsical illustrations of Serendipity, written by Stephen Cosgrove and illustrated by Robin James, 1974 🌊
Mass attack: The Tower (ft. Every* single Johnny Truant Limbus OC I could find on artfight)
(Clockwise, starting from the left): @alexandermolokovs // @grainthief // CapriKal (AF) // ph0sph0phyllite (AF) // danceroboto (AF) // @ssevenneedles // @clouwncoree // @botcomplex // @drawrygon
*I apparently missed a couple. Ah well. There's always next year.
The Kitchen Entity came crawling out of the oven vent, and now it just hovers here in the middle of the room, like some kind of domesticated jellyfish. When you turn on the microwave, it crackles like a geiger counter. On warm days, it smells like mom's special m&m pancakes.
"Wing Span" 12"x18" Acrylic, conte crayon, colored pencil, paint pen on reclaimed wood
Are they spreading their wings to dry, or flicking water off their hands? And also: what's the difference? A slightly different arrangement of particles is all that separates us from our animal kin.
Original available, just reach out, or snag a print.
Wild, green-crawling world — Gainesville, Florida
legalize copyright infringement
to be clear this is a fully sincere political belief that I have. I am pro copyright infringement and in fact anti "asking for permission to make derivative art"
a few people in the notes seem to be under the impression that this is a stance that requires caveats. so just so we're all on the same page: no exceptions. "stealing art" (copying existing works for personal gain) is a good thing.
some of you seem to have bought into the capitalist lie that copyright infringement causes artists to "lose money", which fundamentally assumes that everyone (or even like a notable portion) who obtains a would-be-illegal copy would have otherwise paid full price to obtain the original. and like we all know that's not true right
So without copyright, what would prevent capitalists from taking a book and selling copies of it at a much lower price than the author? (thereby preventing the author from making money on their creative work)
this is already how copyright law works. working creatives (the majority of people in the industries) already sign away their work to "capitalists" (problematic wording - petit bourgeois artists are typically already capitalists, but i do understand the intent) and then are not permitted to make money off of or sell their work, have no claim to it, and will be legally decimated if they try to outside of whatever very narrow avenues may be granted to them
passing glances