if / when tumblr finally goes down, here are the places you can find me...
AO3: antigonewinchester
dreamwidth: antigonewinchester
discord: antigonewinchester
email: antigonewinchester [@] proton [.] me

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

Product Placement
No title available
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Today's Document
No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Sweet Seals For You, Always

roma★

titsay

Kiana Khansmith
hello vonnie
No title available
macklin celebrini has autism
No title available

#extradirty
The Stonewall Inn
h

ellievsbear

pixel skylines
seen from Moldova

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Paraguay
seen from United States
seen from Finland

seen from Brazil
seen from India

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Morocco
seen from Senegal

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Canada
@antigonewinchester
if / when tumblr finally goes down, here are the places you can find me...
AO3: antigonewinchester
dreamwidth: antigonewinchester
discord: antigonewinchester
email: antigonewinchester [@] proton [.] me
media literacy includes understanding why a media product was made, to whom it's being sold, and the assumed preferences of its marketing demographic. narrative is not produced or sold in a vacuum.
you might be totally correct that your ship would be narratively satisfying. I don't know, I'm not watching your show. Whether your ship is likely to happen on the show is a whole different question to whether it's satisfying, because the show is being sold to Netflix or Amazon or the BBC, and they are purchasing a show they think they can market to a particular demographic and that demographic isn't you, the nightmarishly online tumblr user. The show is being made for marketability to a constructed average viewer. It is being funded with that audience in mind. This art is being made to commission, and commissioned art is art, but at some point you have to stop expecting the Church to commission a statue of Lucifer fucking St Michael. It might be narratively satisfying, but that's just not what they're paying for.
it's literally so awesome when you discover a new way to do something ...
Emily Wilson has inadvertently created a fascinating new way to categorize basically any visual media ever made
it's always some shit like "whumpee is trembling and avoidant and has nightmares after getting whumped and doesn't like restrictive clothing because it reminds them of being tied up" NO! THAT'S BORING.
just once i wanna see them being traumatized in weird ugly incomprehensible ways. they start fantasizing about being kidnapped and then feeling intense guilt about it. they feel more comfortable when other people make decisions. they tie their own hands with a scarf and wonder why on earth this calms them down. make your characters seek out and retraumatize themself. give them just enough self awareness to know this is weird, but not enough to understand why they do it.
"Nolan may not understand women but he does love his wife!"
He loves his wife in the way all men who hate women love their wives. Someone to give them a ton of free labour and emotional support. He can't truly love his wife if he can't write a female character that doesn't sound like a man trying to write what he thinks is a woman
Well, on the broader point of setting high standards I can’t possibly disagree, but I’ll push back a little on a couple of sub-points.
First, I think it’s useful to draw a distinction between a person’s creative work and personal behavior. Primarily, I think about this from the reverse angle of the great, empathetic art made by men who abused women. For example, Franny and Zooey was so important to me as a young woman because it was a rare literary work that treated a fictional young woman with real seriousness and made the serious, intellectual/emotional/spiritual experiences I was having were real and not unique to me. But now I think often that this appealing image of a young girl was written by a guy who preyed on young girls with exactly this faux seriousness. And of course, I was also a teen girl in the 1990s when Sandman was (rightly) experienced as the comic book that took young women seriously, and that has been another grim betrayal.
The other is I think Christopher Nolan’s somewhat conservative view of gender is very much “Guys should be married. A guy without a wife is fucked. The worse thing that could happen to a guy is losing his wife” and pretty clearly a projection of a guy whose wife is his close creative partner and the most important person in his life and I think that’s kind of interesting!
And tying both together with the guy who I think of as the anti-Nolan and who is the shadow over my view of Nolan: Does not The Last Picture Show present its female characters with a great deal of depth despite being made by a man who was literally while making it treating his own wife and creative partner with the kind of cruelty that Christopher Nolan wouldn’t commit with a gun to his head? Or as I said in my tags, isn’t Inception a movie about Peter Bogdonavich’s career made by a man who finds Peter Bogdonavich’s actions so unfathomably self-destructive that he genuinely can’t empathize with them?
there are a NUMBER of folktale Woman-Creatures like selkies who exist to make the inherently coercive nature of heterosexual marriage explicit and to externalize male anxiety about how if your wife had actual autonomy she very well might disappear and you might never fucking hear from her again
which is a FASCINATING category of Woman-Creature imo
someone said it's also a cautionary tale about mistreating your wife and I think that's spot on especially for other related types of stories e.g. the crane wife. like I think these stories are very much Husband Anxiety Stories. the Woman-Creatures are black boxes whose interior experience it is impossible to know and who have strange and often seemingly arbitrary rules that you must follow or else they will disappear. idk. like. that's why I think that any empowering-to-women-ness qualities of these stories is incidental. I think they're externalized anxiety about coercive societal heterosexuality and the inability to truly Know one's wife in such circumstances.
you also see a variant of this formula a lot (generally at the more literary end of the fairy tale space) where it's not a creature you capture, but a magical lady who picks you for seemingly arbitrary reasons, bettering your fortune enormously with her magic and wealth and second-hand status.
and then, for reasons usually at least slightly less arbitrary, fucks off again.
the husbandly anxiety here is more about not having access to coercion as an option.
oooo yes absolutely!
was just talking to Story about this and he told me about one folktale where a guy meets a beautiful woman at a lake and she brings a bountiful dowry of like one million fat cows and such and she is of course a fairy so she's like "my one requirement in our bargain is that if you strike me three times I will leave" and in many versions of the story the husband doesn't ""actually"" strike her -- each time it's something like, one 'strike' involves her forgetting her gloves inside and he walks out and taps her on the shoulder with her gloves, but she tells him that counts as striking her. this sort of thing. which is TRANSPARENTLY like "whoa wouldn't it be fucked up if your wife could enforce consequences for behavior she said was harmful, even if according to your cultural norms it was fine, and you didn't see it as a big deal?" like... lol. what if women could actually be the ones who decided whether or not any given action their husbands took against them was harmful? IMAGINE... PREDEY SCARY....
Universal Monsters: Dracula (2023, #2)
— Will Rees, “Kafka the hypochondriac”
BI~
prints | instagram | facebook | bluesky | cara
"An orange orchard in beautiful California." 1910.
California Revealed via Internet Archive
not to be a gatekeeper or anything but i wholeheartedly believe that if you cannot appreciate the constant planning, effort, and labor of ancient workers (slaves, farmers, weavers, potters, etc) - you genuinely cannot examine or appreciate antiquity in any meaningful way (besides becoming an example for what NOT to do).
Because so much of what survives - the impressive works that people think of when they hear “Greece,” “Rome,” “Egypt,” “Sumer,” etc. is not the result of ‘scholars’ but was built off the labor and skills of laborers who were not ‘scholars’ in the modern sense, were not ‘educated’ in the same manner as someone from fucking middle-class USA or whatever, but who were trained and informed about their particular discipline in a way that most of us cannot even begin to fathom. And their labor was built off the unseen efforts of other workers - slaves, farmers, weavers, potters, quarrymen, smiths, etc - with similarly specialized, period-specific knowledge that I think is impossible to fully appreciate if you do not respect blue-collar work and manual labor.
Like, you can say you “know more” than the average person in antiquity - but you don’t. Maybe in a conceptual manner - yeah, we know about distant planets and galaxies, we’ve got germ theory, we have made a collection of the entire human genome, we have walked on the fucking moon - but from the perspective of someone from 500 BCE (if I may be allowed a dash of speculation here), does that matter?
In our industrialized, globalized world, I think we forget the sheer effort that went into everything. The sheer degree of skill needed to create homes, tools, clothing, ceramics, fine jewelry, statues, and everything in-between. The skill, knowledge, and effort that went into everyday subsistence activities, like farming, herding, and weaving; and into other trades such as shipping and manufacturing. These are not mindless tasks, devoid of calculation and forethought; to pretend they are in even the slightest is disingenuous.
I would even go so far as to say it is extremely classist & sexist, because - shocker - people still work in these fields. The food you eat, the clothes you wear, the streets you walk, the buildings you eat and sleep and live in - these did not spawn out of a vacuum. Constant effort - unending, backbreaking labor, time, and skill has gone into the world we walk through today, so people can go on pretending like they’re somehow ‘smarter’ than those who came before them, when the only difference is that we* are able to concentrate on something besides our own survival. something otherwise ‘useless’ for everyday survival, and i say that as an archaeologist. Excavating a Bronze Age brewery does not provide food, it does not provide you with clothes (it actually damages them), it does not give you shelter, it mostly provides you with broken potsherds and a whole lot of dirt destined for floatation. Yes, it requires practical skills too - but many of these are essentially also used, even more frequently, in manual labor and agriculture.
And - in this broken, frightful world - we are so damn lucky** that people can even spare time for this, to learn more about the ancient world. And we are even more lucky that - when we are born with health complications, are disabled, or are faced with diseases like pneumonia, measles, and COVID - that these are not death sentences. Artificial scarcity, corporate greed, and fearmongering can make them so, but there is still that ability to live. To focus on the past, instead of making it to the next day, the next week, the next month.
But - I want to emphasize here - this is all entirely reliant on the work of people who continue to carry out the same manual labor done by countless individuals - enslaved and free - up through antiquity. People whose calculations were their survival, whose understanding of the natural world and local resources made the difference between life and death.
To pretend like we are somehow more knowledgable, more capable, more “advanced” intellectually than those who laid the foundations for the entire fucking world we live in today, is a lie. A smug, disgusting little lie that spits on all we have done as a species (and all the progress we are trying to make) with the idea that “we’ve done it”, we’re “superior,” this idea that only encourages rotting in self-assured apathy while the world burns.
And you cannot appreciate the past when you approach it with false assumptions which are based on nothing except preconcieved notions of modern superiority and the belief that knowledge is both ‘quantifiable’ and absolute. We are just as capable of joy, wisdom, compassion, and love as the ancients; and we are just as susceptible to fear, anger, and hatred as they were. I’m not saying everyone has to know the ins and outs of every ancient industry ever to appreciate the fucking Parthenon, but if someone cannot approach the ancient world with an open mind, a sense of humility, and self-reflection - then I suspect they cannot appreciate the fucking Parthenon.
*When I use the term 'we,' I am referring to individuals who do not specialize in manual labor/blue-collar industries and/or engage in subsistence agriculture.
**I know that these are all very situational and that the management and medicine available to people is inextricable from their class, identity, and nationality. I am merely trying to stress that it is possible. I would be dead without modern medicine; and I know countless others who are the same way.
Indian Courser (Cursorius coromandelicus), parents and chick, family Glareolidae, order Charadriiformes, Bhigwan Grasslands, Maharashtra, India
photograph by Shiva Kumar
There's really this strong temptation that everyone has which basically says "to have interiority is to be like me; ordinary people are surface everywhere." And this manifests in different ways in different spaces, and becomes really pronounced when you cluster together with similar people. So tumblr users often act like straight people don't have any interiority because it helps you feel the deepening of social bonds with other gay people. This happens professionally too. I think it was Summer or Sharks who was saying that programming people think that intelligence is just being really good at writing code. Not surprising but very strange to me! I am (equally ridiculously) used to thinking that intelligence is being really good at philosophy, having command of a lot of sources that you can use creatively, etc. This reflects a kind of dynamic on tumblr and reddit. On reddit to have interiority is to be a science guy and on tumblr to have interiority is to be a humanities girl (and the dynamic is gendered in exactly this way). And I think there is something dangerous about habitually regarding other people as automatons. It's good to have people outside of your niche to remind you that other people from different walks of life are quite deep and complicated. They are full of love and fine grained attention to things you never thought to care about. And I think a lot of people go through life thinking of themselves as perpetually victimized by basically empty people rather than having genuine confrontations with full, genuine people who are committed to subtle, complex and real values, who have detailed and intricate histories, and who have a bond to you that you might never quite fully understand. But we rarely even try at understanding these things. We just decide that they're stupid and ridiculous and unreasonable.