Sensoron is a strong yikes
Sensoron really surprised me with itâs strong conservative messages. Despite our previous discussions of Japanese conservative ideology in anime and manga, our class has never really explored Japanese conservatism to this extent.Â
As someone who loves to learn about history, using the manga medium to distort history in favor of the authorâs perspective is wrong on so many levels. Kobayashi uses language such as group lynching when referring to the Tokyo War Crimes Trial. This manga tries to justify Japanâs actions by saying that other nations committed war crimes and Japan is only persecuted because they lost frustrates me. Thatâs the  equivalent of two children fighting over cookies with the child who at a dozen saying that other child who ate a single cookie is just as guilty. As someone who is Jewish, deescalating Nazi war crimes because they lost the war is wrong on so many levels.Â
In the chapter a short history of mankind, Gellner explores the history of nationalism throughout mankind. The article divides civilization into three stages: foraging, agriculture, and scientific/industrial society. It then elaborates that high culture is necessary for nationalism to occur. The reading ultimately concludes that culture is invisible unless religion is involved. It claims in regards to nationalism that, âIn the agrarian world, cultural similarity is not a political bond, and political bonds do not require cultural similarityâ. Â As the reading goes progressed into nationalism theory I become more confused with its discussion on nationalism.
I would definitely agree that this manga lacks true discussion of what Japan actually did, instead focusing on satirized misplay by other countries to downplay Japanâs actions and in some cases use these post war ethical violations to kind of justify it.
















