You guys make me sick. Literally you treat fiction as if someone committed a crime.
It’s not dangerous or a crime to used to like something problematic or whatever. It’s not a fucking crime to simply LIKE someone’s art, just because it’s a problematic ship.
You guys are so PATHETIC you make a fucking BLOG dedicated to what, a call out that doesn’t even mean anything?
Like wow, talk about fucking LOSERS. At this point I think you’re all doing this out of jealousy and spite, because that artist has an AMAZING and gorgeous art style, and gained a lot of popularity.
Does it make you feel good? To go after people over fictional characters and ships? To cause witch hunts and harassment and bullying? To accuse someone of booking what you call, LITERAL CHILD PORN??
DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT LITERAL MEANS? DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT CHILD PORN CONSISTS OF? CAUSE IT AIN’T FUCKING CARTOON DRAWINGS OF CHARACTERS THAT DON’T EXIST!
CHILD PORN IS MADE WITH REAL CHILDREN YOU STUPID FUCKHEAD– YOU’RE EQUATING THE HARM AND ABUSE OF REAL CHILDREN TO, WHAT? DRAWINGS OF CARTOON AND FICTIONAL CHARACTERS???? THAT AREN’T EVEN THAT BAD????????????
“Child pornography is considered to be any depiction of a minor or an individual who appears to be a minor who is engaged in sexual or sexually related conduct. This includes pictures, videos, and computer-generated content. Even altering an image or video so that it appears to be a minor can be considered child pornography. One important exception to the category of illegal child pornography is artistic renderings or depictions that have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.” [x]
Simulated child pornography is child pornography depicting what appear to be minors but which is produced without the direct involvement of children in the production process itself.
Types of simulated child pornography include: modified photographs of real children, non-minor teenagers made to look younger (age regression), and fully computer-generated imagery[1] or adults made to look like children.[2](Drawings or animations that depict sexual acts involving children but are not intended to look like photographs may also be considered by some to be simulated child pornography.)
Now, Antis like to use this basic definition to claim that any depiction of a minor, especially in fiction, can be considered pedophilia/child porn. This is entirely false.
What Legally Makes It Child Pornography?
So, you know what, even though fiction falls under grey legality, the law is even more caring of real children since they don’t equate ships to CHILD PORN AND CHILD MOLESTATION.
Allow me to give you the real definition–from 18 U.S. Code § 2256–when we’re talking about artwork:
“The term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults.” [x]
Child porn is only considered that if the individual looks so realistic that they could be assumed as a real human being. Anime and cartoon characters don’t typically look like real depictions of real children.
And don’t bother citing the PROTECT Act, because that was deemed unconstitutional on a federal level as of United States vs Handley, which is the ONLY CASE THAT WE KNOW OF that was based completely on drawn material of fictional characters, without any discovery of other types of material in the possession of the accused:
“Last year, the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a federal law that criminalized the possession of “virtual” child pornography, i.e., materials whose production may not have involved the use of real children.”
People have been sexualizing cartoons in general for nearly a century, and few people have had any issue with this, due to cartoons typically having proportions that don’t resemble those of actual human beings. Especially when we’re talking about anime or anime-influenced artwork, even art books on drawing manga talk about the interchangeability of faces between age, and even gender.
What you are referring to as “drawn child porn” is people making fan art of fictional characters that are usually at least in their teens. The overwhelming majority of the people creating this fan art are young women and teenage girls that are using fan works as a means to explore their sexuality in a way that they don’t feel physically pressured, threatened, or intimidated.
There is no fucking legality when it even comes to ships– because it doesn’t fall under anything illegal, UNLESS the artwork is so fucking realistic that you couldn’t make out if it’s a photo or not, or it’s realistic artwork of a child that does exist, then does it become illegal.
Do you even know what you’ve done? What you people have put in motion?
You aren’t protecting anyone! You aren’t saving people from someone bad! You’re acting as if your SMEARING of someone over ART is activism and helping ANYONE!
No! You’re just causing others to be paranoid and scared they’re next because they like a ship or characters individuals like YOU dislike or are personally repulsed by.
You guys only do this for yourselves! Because you’re entitled stalkers who SCOUR peoples media to find even an OUNCE of problematic fictional content, when you’re probably no better than them!
You’re more harmful than any ship around, because you’re normalizing harmful call out culture! You’re normalizing this manipulative, abusive behavior in fandom’s and only driving out creators to the point the fandom DIES on here.
It’s DISGUSTING, and the fact you’re using their icon is so fucking ASININE and PETTY.
This whole thing is petty! You’re petty!
You think you’re justified! You aren’t! Because all you assholes needed to do was BLOCK the artist and go on your merry fucking way! You could blacklist them! Or you could just stop using the website!
But no, you people chose to ATTACK and SMEAR and act as if this individual did anything wrong because you don’t agree with past ships or current ships they LIKE.
This is the GROSSEST form of entitlement and abusive behavior I’ve seen so far, and I’ve seen some pretty bad shit, so you people are really up there with the vilest people.
God, you people take your personal disgust so fucking far to the point you’re fine with the person you dislike is getting harassed, bullied, lied about, stalked, and even doxxed.
ALL YOU PEOPLE NEEDED TO DO WAS BLOCK THE USER AND MOVE ON, BUT NO, YOU RESORTED TO EXTREME TACTICS LIKE ACCUSING THEM OF DRAWING/BOOKMARKING LITERAL CHILD PORN.
WHEN ALL THE EVIDENCE YOU’VE USED IS FUCKING DRAWINGS, FUCKING DRAWINGS OF CARTOON AND FICTIONAL CHARACTERS!
THAT ISN’T CHILD PORN YOU YOU BAG OF POORLY PACKAGED DOG SHIT!
PLEASE REPORT THEM FOR HARM TO MINORS, HATE SPEECH, PRIVACY VIOLATION [STALKING AND SCOURING FOR THE ARTISTS OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA] AND YOU CAN USE THIS POST.
THIS BEHAVIOR WILL NOT BE TOLERATED ANYMORE, WE CAN’T LET PEOPLE LIKE THIS GET AWAY WITH THIS.
HELP GET THIS ACCOUNT DEACTIVATED/REMOVED.
@largic @takashi0 @tired-user @rainbowloliofjustice @antis-delete-your-blogs-pls-thx @such-justice-wow @iwillshipwhatiwant @immaterialmurdoc @space-coyote-judal @discoursecatharsis @kayrowhitesyrup @satans-tiddies @mageknight14 @dasha-henshins @lethal-cuddles @ethan-loves-you @deku-the-nerd @bakugo-away-antis @huntypastellance @kanade-against-antis @shipswith-no-morals-reincarnated @regain-hyperactivity @bigsnakediscourse @freedom-of-fiction @darius-likes-badshit @garboshark @dangerbooze @eilikes @xxx-theartofsuicide-xxx @king-kong-raisin-bran
kaledo-art
andulkaphoto
areudirty
pixelskylines
tangentwithtanner
vaporwave
yousharknotpass
