🔞18+ content🔞 | ☔️hard hours always💦 commissions: open | requests: closed | currently working on: Kinktober 2021 🥭🍊you make my worst days feel like Sundays and cut fruit🍈🍓
if you are a minor, or if you have a problem with rpf, smut, smutty rpf, or kink, this is your chance to leave. i’ve provided warnings for my content and i’m not responsible for your online experience moving forward.
more details on messaging, what i do/don’t write, my blocking policy, etc. under the cut~
inbox policy:
requests aren't always open, but my inbox is~ y'all are welcome to pop in at anytime—tell me who / what is revving your engine these days, give me people / songs to check out, or just wail in anguish over male-presenting nipples on mnet.
if you're worried about a message getting eaten by tumblr, feel free to drop me a line! just make sure you let me know what it was about, so i can answer you properly. i'm also pretty slow to respond a lot of the time, so please keep that in mind before you get antsy.
i won’t reblog posts or publish messages that contain censored words (ex. n5fw, k!nk, bd5m, 4gepl4y, etc), because that reduces ease of readability and it makes most people's filters ineffective.
i will not be responding to requests/messages that use afab/amab/fem-bodied/masc-bodied anymore, because i’m not interested in conflating gender with junk; if you wanna talk about a specific configuration of genitalia, you can just say it, we're all grown-ups here.
if you send me a request when my requests are closed, it will be ignored and deleted. i have the status of requests in two different places on my blog (the top of this pinned post as well as this blog's description), and even if you can't find either of those, assuming that a writer is open for requests when nothing indicates that's the case is wildly presumptuous. don't do that.
content:
i write kpop rpf, and it's almost always nsfw. since this blog as a whole is nsfw and i keep things out of the general/non-smut tags, i will not be attempting to tag every possible kink in every post. i have a list of specific kinks/subjects i will consistently tag for; if there’s something not on that list that you would like me to tag, feel free to drop me a line.
you can expect: readers with vulvas, but also occasionally readers with strap-ons / penises; sub and dom idols; unprotected sex; bdsm; degradation; dumbification; poly; daddy kink/mommy kink/ageplay; petplay; watersports; somnophilia; incest; a/b/o dynamics; hybrids; cumplay; dacryphilia; spit kink
groups i write for: BTS, Seventeen, Mamamoo, Stray Kids, TXT, BTOB, Ateez, The Boyz, SF9
individual idols i write for: eaJ (Jae from Day6), Wonho, Jessi, Jay Park, BM (from KARD), Jackson Wang, Eric Nam
(groups i'm getting to know: GOT7, SHINee)
kinks i do not take requests for: emeto, scat, gore, snuff, necrophilia, needle play
general content i do not take requests for: specific types of reader (i.e. height, weight, other characteristics specified), ships (sorry, self-indulgent reader fic only 💀), suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, infidelity
these lists are subject to change because, well, people change. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ if something isn’t on either of these lists, feel free to request it! if it turns out to not be my thing, i'll just let you know and update this post.
tagging / content warnings:
i consistently warn for content in the tags of my post; in my experience, blacklisting tags has usually been how people avoid things they don’t want to see in fandom. the way i do that is with 'cw [thing being warned for]’. if there’s anything you’d like me to add to the list, let me know!
content i will ALWAYS tag:
menstruation / menophilia
somnophilia / consensual somnophilia
urolagnia (watersports) / omorashi
sex work
pregnancy / breeding kink
mommy kink / daddy kink
hybrids
incest / stepcest
weapon play (knife play, gun play, etc.)
blood / blood play
sounding / urethral play
death / death mention
noncon / dubcon / cnc (consensual nonconsent)
religion / religion kink
blocking policy:
i like looking through likes and reblogs, but i do not exhaustively check every account that interacts with this blog. as an adult with a full-time job, i simply do not have the time; even if i did, i am not responsible for making sure that children or assholes aren’t consuming / sharing my work.
i will block your account if you:
engage with me from a blog that indicates you're under eighteen (i do not auto-block ageless blogs—people who understand basic intenet safety deserve porn)
kinkshame
engage in hostile/threatening behavior
display so much as a whiff of racist/terfy/swerfy/exclusionary behavior
Had an anon (of course it was an anon) come into my asks last night with big sealioning vibes.
If you don't know, "sealioning" is when someone comes up to you "just asking questions" when, in fact, you have not agreed to talk to them, don't want to talk to them, and don't owe them any sort of conversation. The goal of the sealion is to trick you into answering so they can keep jumping up your ass as they continue to disagree.
They don't want a conversation. They just want the opportunity to show you that they're smarter than you. If you disprove any of their points, they'll claim they weren't talking about THAT.
The term comes from this fantastic comic from Wondermark:
Beware the sealion. They're really fucking annoying.
I am literally begging. BEGGING. Yall to just actually Google what the word "fetishize" means, even just one time. I know that nuance and context is a concept a lot of people on the internet don't understand, but here's the gist. Finding something attractive is not fetishization. Being turned on by something is not fetishization. Having kinks is not necessarily fetishization. Having a preference is not necessarily fetishization. Appreciating certain features, aesthetics, or behaviors is not necessarily fetishization. Reducing a human being from a complex person with their own thoughts, feelings, wants, and needs, down to one singular aspect of their character that you find sexually or otherwise gratifying is fetishization. Saying, "I really enjoy that my boyfriend, whom I love and enjoy sharing a life with, is well-endowed" isn't fetishization, saying "I don't care about who he is or what his life is like, he has a big dick and I use him for that" is fetishization. Men who only date Asian women because they believe the stereotype that Asian women are all submissive, childlike, and docile are fetishizing them. Embracing your partner's cultural background because you love them and want to appreciate all parts of their life is not fetishizing. Fetishization is the act of reducing someone to a single characteristic, whether true or perceived, and disregarding their other attributes as a human being. Not every fucking aspect of attraction or kink or sex is fetishization, you fucking walnuts.
I write fic and now you comment in exchange is a barter economy.
bells started clanging in my head when you said this. Finally I have words for why it bugs me so much that people keep making tumblr posts about how rude it is that people don't leave enough comments or reblog enough fic: I'm grandma baking cookies because I want to give my grandkids a nice present, but now half of them are scolding the other half on how rude it is to accept cookies without bartering something in return even though the cookies are explicitly labeled "Free! Please take one and enjoy!"
It's like they're guilting people on my behalf for not following standards I believe to be bullshit standards nobody should follow. It almost feels rude to devalue gifts by demanding the recipients pay for them in bartering, and that's not even touching the plague of gigification!
There are some people who will block people who like & don't reblog. And some that block followers with empty or mostly-empty blogs.
And there are some who will look through the responses to the posts they like, and notice likes from blank accounts with the default picture, and block them even though they've never interacted directly.
You don't have to reblog, comment, reply to hang out on tumblr. But we have been through nazi propaganda, pornbots, "sponsored accounts" that were glorified ads, beg-for-money scams, and of course, the standard amount of people trying to hide who they are to fetch info about their ex.
These days, we have fandom shipping wars. Not the old style wars which was Harry/Ginny vs Harry/Hermione. No, these are "do you think ships are okay" vs "do you have a long list of ships you think are immoral and possibly illegal for other people to write or read?"
And there are exchanges on Tumblr that wind up screencapped on Discord and Twitter, followed by the Tumblr account being swarmed by haters.
So the tumblr culture response is: If the blog looks iffy to you, block and move on.
Don't feel comfortable jumping in to the full social side of things? That's fine. Search for gifs of baby ducks. We all like those. Reblog some cute baby animals, some interesting memes, a clip of a movie you enjoyed (and aren't embarrassed to admit) (although, you gotta work on that... if I can say "I was on a Rocky Horror Picture Show cast for three years" in public, you can cope with admitting that you liked a few scenes from whatever it was you liked).
You don't have to follow someone to reblog their things. You can reblog at random for a while until you figure out what you're doing. You don't have to track down the original post to reblog from that. The OP will be notified, along with whoever's most recent in the chain.
You don't have to take part in the Tumblr games to be here. But you're likely to be pretty lonely if you don't. Most people never look at their block lists to consider unblocking people.
You’re not shadowbanned. There’s no shadowbanning on Tumblr. If you can tell something is obviously wrong, then it’s a bug.
It’s not always a bug.
When I asked why asks from certain users don’t show on the /posts/submission endpoint of the public API, I was ultimately told this:
Later the same day, one of the affected users reported that they were now showing up in searches and notification feeds, which had not been true before my support ticket.
So:
There is a state that users can get into.
It has various symptoms like not showing up in searches and notifications.
The state exists on purpose, even if it’s sometimes applied to a given user inappropriately.
There are spam prevention filters that can put a user in this state.
The state is commonly (if perhaps misleadingly) referred to as “shadowbanning” by the user base.
Is this state a “bug”? I wouldn’t call it that. It’s meant to exist.
I suppose one could argue that the state itself isn’t a bug, but that false positives in the relevant filter are bugs. Even that doesn’t seem right, though. Every spam filter will have some false positives.
This has existed since at least Feb 19 2022 (before the OP was made), since that’s the date of the earliest example post I provided with the ticket.
Indeed, the public API issue has been happening for much longer than that. My examples start on Feb 19 2022 only because that was the day I finally got around to implementing a workaround for it, which produced logs I could later search.
I’m trying to phrase this as non-combatively as possible, although I don’t feel like I’m doing very well. I’m not trying to start an argument, about this kind of website trivia of all things. Just want to make the situation clear to people.
What this response is describing is probably the user’s trust score, a rank assigned based on whether they seem human and non-spammy enough for certain period of time. Confirming your email will raise the score for example. I’m not sure if these trust scores can be lowered automatically but there might be bugs preventing the scores from increasing automatically.
Could also be a bug with the strike system if they received strikes for trust and safety infractions. I can’t confirm any of this, but it’s my best guesses.
So yes, it is a bug that users get stuck in this state. There are anti-spam and moderation scores that are values on the user and the mechanisms that set them can break or the values could be read wrong.
If it’s a bug, it’s one with pretty widespread effects. (I guess that’s what you mean about the website being broken…)
I found 6 affected users this morning, just in my bot’s logs from the past ~2 months. According to my logs, during that same time interval, my bot received asks from 721 distinct usernames in total.
6 of 712 is a little less than 1%. Tumblr’s active user count is in the low tens of millions.
So if my bot’s askers are at all representative of the incidence rate among users as a whole, then as a rough order of magnitude, over 100,000 users would have experienced the problem in the same time period. (Real users – my bot basically never gets asks from actual spammers.)
