hi, i’m bean

welcome to the blog of a 27 year old piece of shit lmao

[venator-signum]

is this anything

[mikesbasementbeets]

We really need some magic up here.

[titfairy]

"Now it's up to you. For the both of us."

Wicked | Wicked: For Good

[livelovecaliforniadreams]

#Their Child Was Born A Yearner

[leporiska]

this is them to me

[dnpstardust]

“Phil was my safe space, you know, you were my first boyfriend”

[anna-scribbles]

merry late ladynoir christmas 🎄

bonus:

[somnidasha]

[wearewatcher]

it’s him. it’s shyan.

[areyoudoingthis]

babe wake up ao3 came up with the only funny april fools joke in the history of the world

[yenvengerberg]

#lucy 'gosh, fudging okey dokey!' mclean

[ficauthor]

[strange-aeons]

APPARENTLY MARCH 3RD MY IMMORTAL DAY IS ALSO A LUNAR ECLIPSE??

OH MY GOD ITS TRUE BLOOD MOON ON THE MY IMMORTAL 20TH ANNIVERSARY

[geosaurusrex-deactivated2015070]

I bought this last night. This is a total game changer. Internet fame, here I come.

[world-heritage-posts]

world heritage post

[xxspronkus420xx]

Holy shit what. This is like if someone in ancient sumeria had a camera

[skinnamon39]

[emper0rbuggy]

[desolationlesbian]

remember when Elementary adapted the holmes stories and made Watson a woman which removed the gay subtext but then made Moriarty also a woman and gave them weird lesbian subtext. masterful technique. the never-before-seen uno yuri reverse

[mistbjorn]

totally normal 10ft tall portrait of your nemesis’ coworker

[journoeil]

what bothers me most about Fennell’s adaptation of Wuthering Heights is the discourse that continues to be propagated (often by women themselves!) that because it was written by a woman, the novel must reflect the kind of relationship the author secretly dreamed of, that she was quirky, dark, perhaps secretly romantic in a morbid way. if it had been written by a man, everyone would say: “oh, the author is analyzing toxic relationships through these characters. he’s criticizing them.” it always bothered me that Brontë was immediately branded as a weird lovelorn woman, when in reality there is not much in her biography to attest to that. she was just a very intelligent writer who thought about a very intelligent subject like any of her male counterparts.

the canon always sees men as universal observers and geniuses who undertake social studies, but when it comes to women, they are reduced to being mere subjective chroniclers of interiority, supposedly recording their personal romantic fantasies.

many novels contain a romantic thread. among other things, Wuthering Heights opens with one. but most of the book is about revenge, cruelty, trauma, inheritance, generational damage etc. and yet, because it was written by a woman, only the love story is treated as significant.

if Wuthering Heights had been written by, say, F. Scott Fitzgerald, critics would likely praise the ruthless anatomy of obsession. I am just so sick of this. I sure would love to see the day when The Great Gatsby is marketed as the greatest love story ever told, overflowing with loose erotic scenes, rather than the highbrow social critique it’s usually presented as. the idea that women write “from emotion” while men write “from intellect” is still too deeply sedimented in how we talk about art.

[iliothermia]

i wish everyone following me made enough money to not feel like they were being boiled alive and had the time and energy to clean their room at their own leisure