Diva

@beevaviba

Opinions and such

38 posts

Bro I can’t repost this one Incels repost off of my page 💀

Guys… what if…what if??

All these incels need to leave me alone 😭

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

red-faced-wolf-deactivated20251

Op getting called out then going “no it’s not actually serious :(“

You thought you ate. Bitch you fucking starved. If you want sources they are on my page somewhere. <33 good luck finding them and reading them all.

red-faced-wolf-deactivated20251

You’re not even making a coherent argument. You’re just rage baiting. You just attack everyone who replies. 1/10 comedy

Girl you commented on MY post with no evidence to back up your reasoning or nothing. I have links posted and evidence for my posts. Also just an FWI I’m not arguing anything hunny, I’m informing people about the topic. Sorry you can’t comprehend this.

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Just in case you're as lacking in critical thinking as you're making it seem, op... Avoiding critical thinking is not something to be proud of and you're only making yourself look stupid. Not cool. Not fun. Not casual.

Just stupid.

When did I ever say I avoid critical thinking?? Don’t breach my character now. I was saying that this post isn’t something to start debates about it was to inform people on laws and regulations and potential harm/solutions. It was for a SCHOOL project so it shouldn’t be that deep. And btw’s, I’m more intelligent and know more knowledge about a plethora of topics and facts than the average person, which you are so maybe keep your keyboard to yourself and stop harassing a student who is just trying to get a grade for an assignment. <33

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

bro you're still in school shut up lmao

Grad school because I wanted to get a higher education then people like you <33 and I’ll continue to go to classes to learn and practice law and other things because you can never learn too much. Take that advice!! Don’t be mad because you dropped out!

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Been to college already kiddo, once again, hush. You've only displayed more and more lack of critical thought with every reply.

Oh boo hoo. The fuck does your opinion matter? You’re a incel who thinks they know everthing but in reality your knowledge is so outdated because the last time you actually tried to learn something that wasn’t someone else’s opinion was 39 years ago.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Actually I'm a married woman and my views have shifted radically over the last ten years from left to right to anarchist so you're wrong again, buddo. Want to take another try? This is priceless please keep going.

Good for you?? 💀

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

There's that lack of critical thought again. Tsk.

Ready? Here I'll spell it out like you're in kindergarten:

Your assumptions were incorrect and you can't even read people correctly. Also, going off at the mouth without the ability to back it up is gonna land you in some deep shit someday.

That's ok. No one expects you to get it right. We all know you're stupid.

Aweee someone’s mad 🥺

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

This isn't mad. Still reading incorrectly, I see.

Typical of someone who says "you're harassing a student" in the same breath as "I'm actually a grad student and just disarmed my previous statement".

Don't worry. There are plenty of jobs who hire the disabled.

That’s a good thing for you then.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

I'm 30 and retired kid. Try again.

You do know bashing your head repeatedly against the wall is unhealthy, right?

What really?? I never knew!!!

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

... Alright, I mean, as long as you know you're making your brain damage worse.

🤯

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Just in case you're as lacking in critical thinking as you're making it seem, op... Avoiding critical thinking is not something to be proud of and you're only making yourself look stupid. Not cool. Not fun. Not casual.

Just stupid.

When did I ever say I avoid critical thinking?? Don’t breach my character now. I was saying that this post isn’t something to start debates about it was to inform people on laws and regulations and potential harm/solutions. It was for a SCHOOL project so it shouldn’t be that deep. And btw’s, I’m more intelligent and know more knowledge about a plethora of topics and facts than the average person, which you are so maybe keep your keyboard to yourself and stop harassing a student who is just trying to get a grade for an assignment. <33

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

bro you're still in school shut up lmao

Grad school because I wanted to get a higher education then people like you <33 and I’ll continue to go to classes to learn and practice law and other things because you can never learn too much. Take that advice!! Don’t be mad because you dropped out!

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Been to college already kiddo, once again, hush. You've only displayed more and more lack of critical thought with every reply.

Oh boo hoo. The fuck does your opinion matter? You’re a incel who thinks they know everthing but in reality your knowledge is so outdated because the last time you actually tried to learn something that wasn’t someone else’s opinion was 39 years ago.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Actually I'm a married woman and my views have shifted radically over the last ten years from left to right to anarchist so you're wrong again, buddo. Want to take another try? This is priceless please keep going.

Good for you?? 💀

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

There's that lack of critical thought again. Tsk.

Ready? Here I'll spell it out like you're in kindergarten:

Your assumptions were incorrect and you can't even read people correctly. Also, going off at the mouth without the ability to back it up is gonna land you in some deep shit someday.

That's ok. No one expects you to get it right. We all know you're stupid.

Aweee someone’s mad 🥺

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

This isn't mad. Still reading incorrectly, I see.

Typical of someone who says "you're harassing a student" in the same breath as "I'm actually a grad student and just disarmed my previous statement".

Don't worry. There are plenty of jobs who hire the disabled.

That’s a good thing for you then.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

I'm 30 and retired kid. Try again.

You do know bashing your head repeatedly against the wall is unhealthy, right?

What really?? I never knew!!!

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Just in case you're as lacking in critical thinking as you're making it seem, op... Avoiding critical thinking is not something to be proud of and you're only making yourself look stupid. Not cool. Not fun. Not casual.

Just stupid.

When did I ever say I avoid critical thinking?? Don’t breach my character now. I was saying that this post isn’t something to start debates about it was to inform people on laws and regulations and potential harm/solutions. It was for a SCHOOL project so it shouldn’t be that deep. And btw’s, I’m more intelligent and know more knowledge about a plethora of topics and facts than the average person, which you are so maybe keep your keyboard to yourself and stop harassing a student who is just trying to get a grade for an assignment. <33

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

bro you're still in school shut up lmao

Grad school because I wanted to get a higher education then people like you <33 and I’ll continue to go to classes to learn and practice law and other things because you can never learn too much. Take that advice!! Don’t be mad because you dropped out!

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Been to college already kiddo, once again, hush. You've only displayed more and more lack of critical thought with every reply.

Oh boo hoo. The fuck does your opinion matter? You’re a incel who thinks they know everthing but in reality your knowledge is so outdated because the last time you actually tried to learn something that wasn’t someone else’s opinion was 39 years ago.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Actually I'm a married woman and my views have shifted radically over the last ten years from left to right to anarchist so you're wrong again, buddo. Want to take another try? This is priceless please keep going.

Good for you?? 💀

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

There's that lack of critical thought again. Tsk.

Ready? Here I'll spell it out like you're in kindergarten:

Your assumptions were incorrect and you can't even read people correctly. Also, going off at the mouth without the ability to back it up is gonna land you in some deep shit someday.

That's ok. No one expects you to get it right. We all know you're stupid.

Aweee someone’s mad 🥺

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

This isn't mad. Still reading incorrectly, I see.

Typical of someone who says "you're harassing a student" in the same breath as "I'm actually a grad student and just disarmed my previous statement".

Don't worry. There are plenty of jobs who hire the disabled.

That’s a good thing for you then.

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Just in case you're as lacking in critical thinking as you're making it seem, op... Avoiding critical thinking is not something to be proud of and you're only making yourself look stupid. Not cool. Not fun. Not casual.

Just stupid.

When did I ever say I avoid critical thinking?? Don’t breach my character now. I was saying that this post isn’t something to start debates about it was to inform people on laws and regulations and potential harm/solutions. It was for a SCHOOL project so it shouldn’t be that deep. And btw’s, I’m more intelligent and know more knowledge about a plethora of topics and facts than the average person, which you are so maybe keep your keyboard to yourself and stop harassing a student who is just trying to get a grade for an assignment. <33

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

bro you're still in school shut up lmao

Grad school because I wanted to get a higher education then people like you <33 and I’ll continue to go to classes to learn and practice law and other things because you can never learn too much. Take that advice!! Don’t be mad because you dropped out!

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Been to college already kiddo, once again, hush. You've only displayed more and more lack of critical thought with every reply.

Oh boo hoo. The fuck does your opinion matter? You’re a incel who thinks they know everthing but in reality your knowledge is so outdated because the last time you actually tried to learn something that wasn’t someone else’s opinion was 39 years ago.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Actually I'm a married woman and my views have shifted radically over the last ten years from left to right to anarchist so you're wrong again, buddo. Want to take another try? This is priceless please keep going.

Good for you?? 💀

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

There's that lack of critical thought again. Tsk.

Ready? Here I'll spell it out like you're in kindergarten:

Your assumptions were incorrect and you can't even read people correctly. Also, going off at the mouth without the ability to back it up is gonna land you in some deep shit someday.

That's ok. No one expects you to get it right. We all know you're stupid.

Aweee someone’s mad 🥺

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Just in case you're as lacking in critical thinking as you're making it seem, op... Avoiding critical thinking is not something to be proud of and you're only making yourself look stupid. Not cool. Not fun. Not casual.

Just stupid.

When did I ever say I avoid critical thinking?? Don’t breach my character now. I was saying that this post isn’t something to start debates about it was to inform people on laws and regulations and potential harm/solutions. It was for a SCHOOL project so it shouldn’t be that deep. And btw’s, I’m more intelligent and know more knowledge about a plethora of topics and facts than the average person, which you are so maybe keep your keyboard to yourself and stop harassing a student who is just trying to get a grade for an assignment. <33

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

bro you're still in school shut up lmao

Grad school because I wanted to get a higher education then people like you <33 and I’ll continue to go to classes to learn and practice law and other things because you can never learn too much. Take that advice!! Don’t be mad because you dropped out!

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Been to college already kiddo, once again, hush. You've only displayed more and more lack of critical thought with every reply.

Oh boo hoo. The fuck does your opinion matter? You’re a incel who thinks they know everthing but in reality your knowledge is so outdated because the last time you actually tried to learn something that wasn’t someone else’s opinion was 39 years ago.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Actually I'm a married woman and my views have shifted radically over the last ten years from left to right to anarchist so you're wrong again, buddo. Want to take another try? This is priceless please keep going.

Good for you?? 💀

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

red-faced-wolf-deactivated20251

Op getting called out then going “no it’s not actually serious :(“

You thought you ate. Bitch you fucking starved. If you want sources they are on my page somewhere. <33 good luck finding them and reading them all.

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Just in case you're as lacking in critical thinking as you're making it seem, op... Avoiding critical thinking is not something to be proud of and you're only making yourself look stupid. Not cool. Not fun. Not casual.

Just stupid.

When did I ever say I avoid critical thinking?? Don’t breach my character now. I was saying that this post isn’t something to start debates about it was to inform people on laws and regulations and potential harm/solutions. It was for a SCHOOL project so it shouldn’t be that deep. And btw’s, I’m more intelligent and know more knowledge about a plethora of topics and facts than the average person, which you are so maybe keep your keyboard to yourself and stop harassing a student who is just trying to get a grade for an assignment. <33

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

bro you're still in school shut up lmao

Grad school because I wanted to get a higher education then people like you <33 and I’ll continue to go to classes to learn and practice law and other things because you can never learn too much. Take that advice!! Don’t be mad because you dropped out!

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Been to college already kiddo, once again, hush. You've only displayed more and more lack of critical thought with every reply.

Oh boo hoo. The fuck does your opinion matter? You’re a incel who thinks they know everthing but in reality your knowledge is so outdated because the last time you actually tried to learn something that wasn’t someone else’s opinion was 39 years ago.

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Just in case you're as lacking in critical thinking as you're making it seem, op... Avoiding critical thinking is not something to be proud of and you're only making yourself look stupid. Not cool. Not fun. Not casual.

Just stupid.

When did I ever say I avoid critical thinking?? Don’t breach my character now. I was saying that this post isn’t something to start debates about it was to inform people on laws and regulations and potential harm/solutions. It was for a SCHOOL project so it shouldn’t be that deep. And btw’s, I’m more intelligent and know more knowledge about a plethora of topics and facts than the average person, which you are so maybe keep your keyboard to yourself and stop harassing a student who is just trying to get a grade for an assignment. <33

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

bro you're still in school shut up lmao

Grad school because I wanted to get a higher education then people like you <33 and I’ll continue to go to classes to learn and practice law and other things because you can never learn too much. Take that advice!! Don’t be mad because you dropped out!

WHY AM I ATTRACTING INCELS. 💀

#incelcore #trump supporters #crazy people #leave me alone #what the fuck

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

echoictwistofdarkness-deactivat

Just in case you're as lacking in critical thinking as you're making it seem, op... Avoiding critical thinking is not something to be proud of and you're only making yourself look stupid. Not cool. Not fun. Not casual.

Just stupid.

When did I ever say I avoid critical thinking?? Don’t breach my character now. I was saying that this post isn’t something to start debates about it was to inform people on laws and regulations and potential harm/solutions. It was for a SCHOOL project so it shouldn’t be that deep. And btw’s, I’m more intelligent and know more knowledge about a plethora of topics and facts than the average person, which you are so maybe keep your keyboard to yourself and stop harassing a student who is just trying to get a grade for an assignment. <33

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

unaffiliatedpangolin

Good to know you don’t think very deeply about school assignments. Keep it very shallow, keep all critical thinking to a minimum.

I keep my thinking as minimum as your brain cells which is one!! <33

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

unaffiliatedpangolin

None of what you said involves coming together it’s all about implementing more controls. Everything you listed is something you want gun owners to concede to.

It’s always interesting to see people call for “more extensive background checks” but, I’ve never heard anyone ever say what else needs to be checked. They almost never know what is currently being checked. It’s always just a vague blanket statement.

Regular permit renewals, like I said before about not knowing what’s going on right now, states that require permits also have expiration dates on those permits.

Intensive training required, again a lot of states have training requirements. But, what exactly constitutes “intensive”? Again, it’s a vague blanket statement that’s wide open to interpretation.

In any case all these things are barriers you put in front of law abiding people, while criminals will ignore the whole thing.

This is for a school assignment. It’s not that deep. 💀

Concealed Carry Law Regulation Shifts: A Balancing Act

Today I want to talk about concealed carry laws in the US. It's a hot topic between both major political parties, but it really is not about politics. It’s all about finding that sweet spot between personal freedom and public safety. Both sides should be able to come together and find a solution for the undermining daggers with concealed carry laws.

The Second Amendment gives us the right to bear arms, but when it comes to concealed carry, it's a whole different senario, depending on which state you're in. As of January 2024, we've got 27 states with "constitutional carry" laws, which basically means you can carry a concealed weapon without the need of a permit. The rest of the states have "shall-issue," which means you have to request a permit, and will receive one if you meet certain qualifications set by that state.

But here's the thing: this patchwork of laws can be confusing and might even put people at risk. We need a more refined approach based on the shall-issue system, but with some serious upgrades:

- More extensive background checks

- Regular permit renewals

- Intensive training requirements

The idea is to make sure only responsible, well-trained individuals can carry concealed weapons. It's like getting a driver's license, but for guns.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But isn't that infringing on our rights?" Here's the thing: just like we need a license and training to drive, it's not unreasonable to expect proof of ability and responsibility for carrying a concealed weapon. It's not about denying rights; it's about exercising them responsibly.

Implementing this kind of policy would take a lot of work and cooperation between different levels of government. But if it means we can have both individual freedom AND public safety, isn't it worth the work?

benjaminfranklincat

No. If you want people to be educated/trained on guns, make it a part of K through 12 education, age appropriate. Outside of that, what someone owns and carries is none of your business.

Girl what are you yapping about? Do you understand how school curriculum is enforced/created? Where is the funding coming from when Donald Trump is cutting education funds? Do you know what K-12 kids should be learning? They should be learning to research properly to prove their points!! just like you kiddo. good luck comprehending these!! <3

“Background Checks on All Gun Sales | Everytown.” Everytown, 2020, www.everytown.org/solutions/background-checks/ . Accessed 27 Jan. 2025.

“Effects of Concealed-Carry Laws on Violent Crime.” Rand.org, 2024, www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/concealed-carry/violent-crime.html Accessed 27 Jan. 2025.

“Guns in Public Spaces.” Brady United, 2022, www.bradyunited.org/resources/issues/concealed-carry . Accessed 27 Jan. 2025.

“More than 2,500 Non-Self Defense Deaths Involving Concealed Carry Killers since 2007, Latest Violence Policy Center Research Shows, Violence Policy Center.” Violence Policy Center, Feb. 2024, vpc.org/press/more-than-2500-non-self-defense-deaths-involving-concealed-carry-killers-since-2007-latest-violence-policy-center-research-shows/ Accessed 27 Jan. 2025.

“Study Finds That Dropping Training Requirement to Obtain Concealed Carry Permit Leads to Significant Increase in Gun Assaults | Center for Gun Violence Solutions.” Center for Gun Violence Solutions, 15 Nov. 2023, publichealth.jhu.edu/center-for-gun-violence-solutions/2023/study-finds-that-dropping-training-requirement-to-obtain-concealed-carry-permit-leads-to-significant-increase-in-gun-assaults?. Accessed 27 Jan. 2025.

“The Effects of Firearm Safety Training Requirements.” Rand.org, 2024, www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/firearm-safety-training-requirements.html?

“The Truth about Permitless Carry.” GIFFORDS, 8 Feb. 2023, giffords.org/lawcenter/report/the-truth-about-permitless-carry/?. Accessed 27 Jan. 2025.

Constitutional carry / unrestricted / permitless carry | USCCA. (n.d.-a). https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/terminology/types-of-concealed-carry-licensurepermitting-policies/unrestricted/

Constitutional carry states 2024. World Population Review. (n.d.). https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/constitutional-carry-states

Everytown for Gun Safety Releases 2025 state gun law rankings, providing legislative roadmap for saving 299,000 lives from gun violence over the next decade . Everytown Support Fund. (2025b, January 15). https://everytownsupportfund.org/press/everytown-for-gun-safety-releases-2025-state-gun-law-rankings-providing-legislative-roadmap-for-saving-299000-lives-from-gun-violence-over-the-next-decade/

USCCA Concealed Carry Reciprocity Map & U.S. gun laws | USCCA. (n.d.-b). https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resources/ccw_reciprocity_map

What is constitutional carry? | state gun laws | USCCA blog. USCCA. (n.d.). https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/constitutional-carry-in-states/

Wilson, N. (2024, September 27). Project 2025 would increase gun violence, reversing historic declines. Center for American Progress.

Where is the funding coming from when Donald Trump is cutting education funds?

From the ~93% of the budget that doesn't get redistributed back from the feds.

Schools are overwhelmingly paid for by state income taxes and local property taxes. Always have been. The idea that the federal government provides ANYTHING for education to justify the paltry amount it piddles back to the schools is propaganda.

If we have the money it should go to arts.

We don't. We're running massive deficits and have for decades.

I know we don’t have the money that’s what I’m saying 💀

Diva @beevaviba - Tumblr Blog | Tumgag