Index:
@black-owl-nebula : My personal blog
@black-owl-arts : My art blog
Twitch: blackowlnebula
YouTube (Main): BlackOwlNebula
YouTube (VODs): BlackOwlNebulaVODs
BlueSky: Owl
untitled

Origami Around
Show & Tell
Mike Driver
h
NASA

Kiana Khansmith
YOU ARE THE REASON
KIROKAZE
Cosimo Galluzzi
Misplaced Lens Cap
hello vonnie
𓃗
One Nice Bug Per Day
No title available

ellievsbear

★
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
todays bird

titsay
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada
seen from Indonesia

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Indonesia

seen from India

seen from United States
seen from Peru
seen from Jamaica
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States
@black-owl-nebula
Index:
@black-owl-nebula : My personal blog
@black-owl-arts : My art blog
Twitch: blackowlnebula
YouTube (Main): BlackOwlNebula
YouTube (VODs): BlackOwlNebulaVODs
BlueSky: Owl
pure innocent spite
yeah so even if you reblog with tags it keeps the op from seeing it. like I can't see tags on gifsets I could see this morning. nice one tumblr.
basically means if you want op to see your tags you have to reblog from them directly. nice one tumblr.
I wish I had stopped to savor it, the last time I saw a kung pow penis. I never knew it was to be my last
theory: whatever paltry single-digit number of devs tumblr has left doesn't know how to keep up with the site maintenance so they're just wholesale stealing code from other social media platforms that are still being actively maintained
second theory: devs' metrics are being measured by number of new features implemented instead of maintenance of a smooth-running status quo because we live in terminal Number Go Up society so if you aren't doing More you are actually doing Nothing
reminder that staff has said they don’t pay attention to feedback on posts and the best way to tell them how you feel about this upcoming notes update is by sending feedback at tumblr.com/support!
pet peeve is when you look up fashion references from a specific era and you keep getting modern day '[era]-inspired' fashion like NO i want authenticity damn it. i can see your 2020 photo quality and your 2020 hair and your 2020 makeup. youre not fooling me.
hello i'm a historical fashion researcher and i have a lot of experience looking up things! this is a very widely experienced irritation and you're definitely not alone in this, but i am here to share everything i know!
so, ways to get around this:
turn off AI results. they're literally nonsense to us
don't use pinterest because the sources/provenance is often hard to trace
a standard internet search can be okay, but museum collections are the top tier (list of collections below this list)
instead of broad terms like victorian, regency, tudor, renaissance etc. try using the decade you're looking for. if you're not sure of what decade it is but have a vague image in your head, look on the fashion history timeline and just jump around until you find it. but even changing to e.g. 19th century will give better results than victorian
including terms like womenswear/menswear, daywear, formal wear, evening wear, court dress should increase the value of your search too
including "fashion plates" in your search can give you a nice impression of the intended silhouettes of the era. some of these might be a little stylised but will show you what was considered in vogue
for pre-fashion plate eras or things like makeup and styling, you'll have to look at portraiture or manuscripts. these are harder to actually find what you're looking for, but searching museum collections and limiting results to specific date ranges will be your friend
when looking at art, do bear in mind sometimes artists would paint fabric extra flow-y to show off their skills. it might not have been exactly like that in terms of fabric weight or drape. so, a pinch of salt required!
if you find something on image search where the provenance is dubious, reverse image search and you might find a source! i've been able to trace random pinterest images to real sources, but this does take a lot of time and effort and is often not worth the headache
some online resources and museum collections:
fashion history timeline is an invaluable resource if you're trying to get a feel for everything and should be your first port of call. it'll also link to good examples
the met has a vast number of extant examples of clothing, as well as fashion plates
costume institute fashion plates is a subcollection of the met for fashion plates (1800s-1922)
v&a also has many extant garments, fashion plates, and incredible articles on clothing and aesthetics. read the details of the objects because they'll often reveal a lot about the piece
lacma is good for C19th-20th pieces
nypl digital collection for photographs
national portrait gallery or similar for portraiture, or literally any museum in your country that has historical art
national museums scotland can be useful situationally but might be oddly specific
stout style history is a great collection for finding image references for fat people wearing historical clothes. survival bias of a lot of museum pieces tends towards smaller clothing that couldn't be repurposed, but this aims to counter that. it's not sortable, but is still a really nice resource
wikimedia commons is surprisingly handy! and the images, if you should need to link/repost them, are public domain
auction websites sound like a funny one to recommend. some won't have mannequins and some will. just look up historical garment auctions and you'll find some!
anyway, i hope this has been a good place to start for anyone interested! there are probably some i've missed because there are so many museums across the world and i don't know about all of them or can't remember them. but these are the ones i've used the most! (my specialisation/jobs i've had to research for have only really been in western fashion, so my resources reflect that)
Wikipedia has a list of fashion museums. Unfortunately, the page itself is only available in German, but the introductory paragraph is very short and after that, it's organised by country, and then it's a simple list. If you click on a museum's article, the website is usually linked in the overview table.
for everyone asking, tumblr is making it impossible for you to add onto ANY post without making it its own separate post. If you put any addition on someone's post its now your post. The OP won't even be privy to any notes it gets unless they check that specific post. This makes it impossible to track anything which is really detrimental to artists who need to know their reach or just see what people are saying about their work. It also just means you can't reblog with any additions without taking notes away from your original post. This is part of what made twitter hostile and its the last gasping breath of a site run by people who don't understand it.
we fucked up
Since some of you don't seem to understand how this 'new notes' thing works, I'll break it down:
I'm the OP. I'm making this post. If you like, comment, reblog (without comment) on this post, then I'm the one who will see all those notes in my activity page.
However...
If you reblog (with comment), I will get a notification that you did that, but any likes/comments/reblogs (without comment) you get on that reblog will only be shown to you. As OP I won't see them.
If someone adds a reblog (with comment) to your reblog...as OP I won't see that. I won't see any of those notes in my activity page.
Basically, if someone with a large following makes a comment, then they will get all the notes and OP will see nothing. If OP has said something silly because they're, y'know, 21 and it happens, and then someone reblogs it onto the dash of someone with a large following who then dunks on them for fun? OP doesn't see it, doesn't get notes for it, but they're gonna get the harrassment for it in their inbox.
If I, someone with a 5 digit follower count, reblog something to correct misinformation on Ancient Egypt, then OP will never see it unless it was on the original post, but I will continue to get notes on that post even though it's not my post. If I reblog fanart, or just art in general, with a comment like 'Oh this is so lovely!' then OP will not see any of the notes from people reblogging it from me. They'll only see my reblog. So it's possible for an art post by someone else to have 200 notes for them, but 9000 for someone who reblogs it with a comment, and the OP artist will have no idea it's been seen by that many people.
It's killing blow to the community we've built here, by someone higher up who doesn't understand that being able to see all the comments and reblogs is what makes this site the place I keep coming back to.
That's what sucks.
I encourage people to go to tumblr's support page, select contact support, and then in the dropdown menu select 'Feedback' and leave polite and constructive feedback (for those of you who enjoy 'emails worded politely but are a strong 'are you an idiot?', try that way of wording it). They're more likely to listen to you if you're not an asshole about it. I've already gone and done this, and I hope others will too.
so as long as tumblr keeps this, here's the tumblr version of etiquette that was maintained when twitter's quote-retweets affected artist visibility/notes:
for art that someone has added reblog commentary to (or removed the caption from), reblog from the source
otherwise, avoid adding reblog comments to art (as this will affect the artist's notes/visibility)—utilize tags and replies to provide commentary (which artists will absolutely appreciate)
reblog comments are comments added to the body of a post, not the tags and not replies.
Reblogs in a chain now get their own notes
The reblog chain is one of the things that makes Tumblr unlike anywhere else. All the notes on reblogs are attributed to the original post, no matter which branch people actually liked or reblogged. We want to keep encouraging conversations, and give contributors the recognition they deserve.
Soon, you'll be able to like, reblog, or reply to any part of a reblog chain, and that note will go to that reblog's author. Each reblog will have its own counts, instead of one aggregated number from every version of the post. And yes, you’ll be able to like multiple posts in one chain.
If a reblog doesn't add anything, the love flows up to the last person in the chain who did. Your post doesn't lose notes just because people spread it quietly.
Past notes will stay on the original post — we're only changing what happens from here on out. Retroactively re-attributing all of them would be... a lot.
This is just the beginning. More changes are coming as we keep building this out – stay tuned!
In case we don’t understand why this sucks: this update is hostile to creators.
You add a reblog that says “oh cool!” to a gif. Someone reblogs your comment. That gif maker will now not be notified that someone liked and reblogged their work. You will.
This sucks. This is functionally a QRT for tumblr, and it has no place here. I’ve seen some of the most talented, creative writers, gif makers and artists here. I don’t know what it is about modern tech companies making a concentrated effort to deprioritize the very individuals who make their platforms desirable to be on in the first place. This is one of the worst updates I can think of, after well. The one we’re probably all thinking of, haha.
So I just want to give you all an idea:
Before this update hit, here were the notes on this post. They were not segmented. They showed up about the same on my reblog.
With this update, you can see the original post is now down any reblogs with additions. My post counts only interactions I’ve had.
This WILL impact artists, and badly. Make no mistake. I have seen people talking about turning off reblogs. We will be lucky if artists leave them on. I’ll be going to the original post probably, but I will also need to make a more conscious effort to interact with mutuals.
Reblogs in a chain now get their own notes
The reblog chain is one of the things that makes Tumblr unlike anywhere else. All the notes on reblogs are attributed to the original post, no matter which branch people actually liked or reblogged. We want to keep encouraging conversations, and give contributors the recognition they deserve.
Soon, you'll be able to like, reblog, or reply to any part of a reblog chain, and that note will go to that reblog's author. Each reblog will have its own counts, instead of one aggregated number from every version of the post. And yes, you’ll be able to like multiple posts in one chain.
If a reblog doesn't add anything, the love flows up to the last person in the chain who did. Your post doesn't lose notes just because people spread it quietly.
Past notes will stay on the original post — we're only changing what happens from here on out. Retroactively re-attributing all of them would be... a lot.
This is just the beginning. More changes are coming as we keep building this out – stay tuned!
Hey guys go send in your feedback on how terrible this is as soon as possible. We are witnessing the twitter-fication of this hellsite. No contributor wants “recognition” from a reblog. This is down right disgusting and I’m shocked this got through every single person that’s employed by tumblr
Go send feedback im so serious
Tumblr is a place to express yourself, discover yourself, and bond over the stuff you love. It's where your interests connect you with your
Y'all HAVE to fill in the feedback form. Please. If you enjoy seeing fanart, GIFs, writing, fanfics, anything that's creative on this site, you need to fill the form in and leave your outrage on there.
This is killing the notes sent to the ogs. The original creators aren't getting a TON of notifications and feedback and interactions because of these new "chains"
They want us to spam @changes instead but I'd still recommend lodging a ticket anyway. Multiple if you feel like it
spam both!
anyone remember what these things are called like little cartoony expressive doohickies i think they have a real name but i can’t remember
im not fucking crazy.
if i have one more person say sparkles on this post im gonna blow i swear to god
They're squeans I'm pretty sure! If they pop like that anyway. But the term for this kind of "symbol to refer to the general vibe of something in art" is called "Emanata" because it emanates from a person or object.
if you are reading this i want you to stop for a moment and imagine a crab
JEAN PAUL GAULTIER Fall/Winter RTW 2026 if you want to support this blog consider donating to: ko-fi.com/fashionrunways