SEMBENE!
Xuebing Du

#extradirty

No title available
Today's Document
EXPECTATIONS
Misplaced Lens Cap
Not today Justin
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Show & Tell
we're not kids anymore.
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Jules of Nature
The Stonewall Inn

titsay

roma★

Love Begins
Game of Thrones Daily

Origami Around
d e v o n
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from Norway
seen from Germany
seen from Italy
@blackpessimism-blog
SEMBENE!
Shared with Dropbox
The ultimate consolidation of whiteness as a cultural identity, however, occurred through violence: the slave patrols. The patrols were composed of conscripted poor whites to form an intermediary control stratum between the colony and its black labor force. (Allen,251) Their task was to stop runaways, and disrupt any signs of association or social autonomy among the Africans. In short order, patrol suppression of anything that might signify black bond-laborer autonomy received the approbation of the colonial elite as a discovery of a threat. The poorer whites thus gained inclusion in the colonial society from which they had previously been marginalized. (Stampp, 214; Genovese, 135) Patrol violence made the colony’s original paranoia seem real, gave it assurance that its enslavement of the Africans was justified, and gave concrete expression to the white sense of threat. In order to further enhance their social inclusion, the patrols soon engaged in gratuitous violence against the black bond-laborers, representing it as actual suppression of rebellion. The sense of social inclusion thus fostered, in the context of the indispensibility of a control stratum to control the African bond-laborers, marks the inception of a bargain between classes in the English settlements. It is here, at the beginning, that the historical tendency among US workers to prioritize white solidarity over class solidarity finds its inception. It emerged from the cycle of paranoia, enslavement, social categorization, and violence toward the Africans that unified the English around a sense of white identity; it would later emerge as a class collaboration in subsequent forms of racialization. (Martinot 2003a, 68) Overall, violence, paranoia, and social solidarity constituted a self-generating cycle. Social paranoia necessitates defensive solidarity; defensive consensus requires violence to neutralize the perceived threat; the violence not only makes the original paranoia seem real, but creates more palpable resistance on the part of those it subjugates, and thus greater fear among the dominant, calling for greater solidarity and violence. Whiteness as a social identity emerged from this cycle. The culture of whiteness, the criminality of its oppressive violence, its psychology of fear and endless defensive solidarity then served to mitigate white society’s internal class contradictions and conflicts. The operation of this cycle of threat (paranoia), a demand for social allegiance, and gratuitous violence is evident throughout US history. Jim Crow demonized black men as assault-prone, against which segregation was proclaimed a defense, and for which mob murder was ritualized to legitimize that paranoid assessment and provide a sense of white belonging. (Hale) In the present era, even as mild a corrective of past discrimination as “affirmative action” was greeted with “they want to take over everything” by a populist movement whose slogan about “reverse discrimination” did endless conceptual violence to the idea of equality, and whose harassment of black people on formerly “white” jobs made even partial programs ineffective. In the present invasion and occupation of Iraq, the first step was to invent a threat (WMDs) and, following the invasion, call for solidarity to “support the troops;” subsequently, the US military destroyed entire towns and decimated neighborhoods in Iraq because it could say that Iraqis who were attacking Americans. What this culture of whiteness must seek to disguise from itself, however, is its dependence on black people, because it is through their continual racialization that whites racialize themselves as white. That is, early plantation capitalist dependence on black labor got transformed into a cultural and identity dependence (through the invention of “race”) that threads itself through all US history. White identity finds its center in black people, and not in itself. It obsessively suppresses black political autonomy and community economic self-determination in order to maintain control over that external source of its own identity. The continual impoverishment of black people to render them economically and politically dependent on white society is the first exigency of white racialized identity; hence, the white necessity to dismantle affirmative action.
Steve Martinot, “The Question of Fascism in the U.S.” (via hersaffroneyeballs)
How do we ensure public safety w/o police? Check out this list on alternatives to policing
Alternatives to Police (PDF) by Rose City Copwatch (2008)
Alternatives to the Police by Evan Dent, Molly Korab, and Farid Rener
The Avant-garde of White Supremacy by Steve Martinot and Jared Sexton
Broken Windows is On Hiatus: Community Interventions We Can Enact Now for Real Justice by Hannah Hodson
Can We Build an Anti-Policing Movement that Isn’t Anti-Police? by Radical Faggot
Citizens, Cops, and Power: Recognizing the Limits of Community by Steve Herbert
Feeling for the Edge of your Imagination: finding ways not to call the police
A New Year’s Resolution: Don’t Call the Police by Mike Ludwig
Not Calling the Police by Prison Culture
Origins of the Police by David Whitehouse
The Other Side of the COIN (PDF) by Kristian Williams.
Policing is a Dirty Job, But Nobody’s Gotta Do It: 6 Ideas for a Cop-Free World by Jose Martin
Policing Slaves Since the 1600s by Auandaru Nirhan
The Shanti Sena ‘peace center’ and the non-policing of an anarchist temporary autonomous zone: Rainbow Family peacekeeping strategies (PDF) by Michael Niman
Stop Kidding Yourself: The Police Were Created to Control Working Class and Poor People by Sam Mitrani
We Don’t Just Need Nicer Cops. We Need Fewer Cops by Alex S. Vitale
What Does It Mean to Be Anti-Police? by Alex S. Vitale
Where abolition meets action: women organizing against gender violence (PDF) by Vikki Law
Rotimi Fani- Kayode, Untitled, 1985
I see a lot of the influences Fani- Kayode took from Mapplethorpe’s work, and they even met and worked together for a while, but it also makes me question the limits in the ways in which black and white artists interact in terms of their outward expression of symbolism and identity in their art, because 1. Mapplethorpe’s work, while he claims to have tried to subvert norms, was actually extremely frequent in fetishising black men and depicting the black body though the lens of white supremacy in general, and 2. Fani- Kayode’s work similarly takes on the same themes but doesn’t fall prey to the pitfalls of racist imagery, fetishising maybe. And we know which one out of the two made it into the art history books.
Brandan Odums (BMike) preparing for the opening of his solo show, Ephemeral Eternal, at Studio Be in New Orleans, LA.
The show opened yesterday, February 13th, and it will be up for a couple of weeks. You can get out the times and purchase tickets here.
Studio BE - 2941 Royal Street New Orleans, LA 70117
I know families who had to bury their libraries in their backyard. I know people who have gotten through impossible moments because of a book. I know the power of words. I am an accident of literacy, and in a way, we all are. When Nikky Finney accepted the National Book Award, she immediately cited that. For a lot of us, it goes back generations. If you come from a place where literacy is a luxury and not everyone gets to go to school, and not everyone gets to read, it makes it an even more powerful notion. I’ve seen the power of words in action. I saw Nikky Finney’s ancestors in that glorious moment delivering that speech. I saw them smuggling words against death and censorship. For aspiring writers, seek your truth and tell it. We live in a moment where it’s so easy to see what everyone else is doing and to compare yourself to that. Seek your truth and tell it. Just seek your truth. It is a harder thing to sit in the stillness. You’re the best person to tell your own story. Trust that.
Edwidge Danticat, interviewed by Kima Jones in the Rumpus (via myownfuckinganchor)
I like to think of the work I do in Slaves of the State as a kind of “history of the present.” And by that I mean, I wanted to follow the work of people like Angela Davis, who early in her anti-prison scholarship spoke of the fact that pre-1865 slavery was itself a form of incarceration. From that starting point, I wanted to offer a critical genealogy of today’s system of legalized human warehousing, unfree labor and legal kidnapping—what is usually called “the prison system”—by way of tracing its origin points in former systems like the chain gang, the convict-lease system and peonage. What I found is that when we speak of “the” prison industrial complex that now encages well over 2.3 million people, we must also take into account earlier complexes of racial, capitalist, misogynist imprisonment that represent the conditions of possibility for today’s PIC. In other words, the complex of private and public re-enslavement found on convict-lease camps, peon camps and prison plantations in the early 1900s was also a prison industrial complex, one that in its white supremacist structure was born of America’s original “prisons”: the slave ships, slave pens and plantations within which Africans were imprisoned before 1865. In short, the book shows how the story of what commonly is called modern “mass incarceration” has actually been centuries in the making.
Dennis Childs in an interview with Mark Karlin, Capitalism, Slavery, Racism and Imprisonment of People of Color Cannot Be Separated (x)
I mean its lit to be Black am jus sayin
The theme of damnation illuminates perhaps Fanon’s most controversial reflection: on violence. The limited space available for this article affords no elaboration. In summary, damnation means that the black (or better, the blackened) lives the irrelevance of innocence. Without the possibility of innocence, the blackened lives the disaster of appearance where there is no room to appear as nonviolently. Acceptable being is nonexistence, nonappearance, or submergence. Today we speak, for instance, of nonviolent resistance in the Civil Rights Movement, but we should remember that the black activists from that period were chronicled as violent. At a more philosophical level, the absence of a Self-Other dialectic in racist situations means the eradication of ethical relations. Where ethics is derailed, all is permitted. The result is a twofold structure. The absence of ethical relations means living with what Abdul Jan-Mohamed has called “death-bound subjectivity.” It means living with the possibility of one’s arbitrary death as a legitimate feature of a system. It also means witnessing concrete instances of arbitrary death and social practices that demonstrate that one group of people’s lives are less valuable than others’ to the point of their not being considered to be really people at all. The second feature is the conservative response of being nonviolent by not changing anything. To change things is to appear, but to appear is to be violent since that group’s appearance is illegitimate. Violence, in this sense, need not be a physical imposition. It need not be a consequence of guns and other weapons of destruction. It need simply be appearance.
“Through the Hellish Zone of Nonbeing: Thinking through Fanon, Disaster, and the Damned of the Earth” by Lewis R. Gordon. via so-treu, thank you for posting the article! (via nica-nopal)
The way that racism operates aesthetically is to neglect or, in extreme cases, erase whoever is not white. In the 1950s, for example, Kodak measured and calibrated skin tones in still photography using a reference card featuring “Shirley,” a white model dressed in high-contrast clothing. Ultimately, Shirley ended up being the standard for image processing in North American photography labs. It didn’t matter if the photo in question contained entirely black people; Shirley’s complexion was still treated as the ideal. Kodak’s film was so bad at capturing the different hues and saturations of black skin that when director Jean Luc Godard was sent on an assignment to Mozambique in 1977, he flat-out refused to use Kodak on the grounds that its stock was “racist.” Only when the candy and furniture industries began complaining that they couldn’t accurately shoot dark chocolate and brown wood furniture did Kodak start to improve its technology.
Morgan Jerkins, The Quiet Racism of Instagram Filters (via processedlives)
I think you make a subtle but important point here: prison and penal abolition imply an analysis of society that illuminates the repressive logic, as well as the fascistic historical trajectory, of the prison's growth as a social and industrial institution. Theoretically and politically, this 'radical position' as you call it, introduces a new set of questions that does not necessarily advocate a pragmatic alternative or a concrete and immediate solution to what currently exists. In fact, I think this is an entirely appropriate position to assume when dealing with a policing and jurisprudence system that inherently disallows the asking of such fundamental questions as: Why are some lives considered more disposable than others under the weight of police policy and criminal law? How have we arrived at a place where killing is valorized and defended when it is organized by the state? I'm thinking about the street lynchings of Diallo and Dorismond in New York City, the bombing of the MOVE organization in Philadelphia in 1985, the ongoing bombing of Iraqi civilians by the United States, yet viciously avenged (by the state) when committed by isolated individuals? Why have we come to associate community safety and personal security with the degree to which the state exercises violence through policing and criminal justice?
-Dylan Rodriguez in 'The Challenge of Prison Abolition: A Conversation between Angela Y. Davis and Dylan Rodriguez'
Although you were quite clear in the conference's opening plenary session that the purpose of Critical Resistance (gathering of prison activists in 1998) was to encourage people to imagine radical strategies for a sustained prison abolition campaign, it was clear to me that only a few people took this dimension of the conference seriously. That is, it seemed convenient for people to rejoice at the unprecedented level of participation in this presumably "radical" prison activist gathering, but the level of analysis and political discussion generally failed to embrace the creative challenge of formulating new ways to link existing activism to a larger abolitionist agenda. People were generally more interested in developing an analysis of the prison-industrial complex that incorporated the local work that they were involved in, which I think is an important practical connection to make. At the same time, I think there is an inherent danger in conflating militant reform and human rights strategies with the underlying logic of anti-prison radicalism, which conceives of the ultimate eradication of the prison as a site of state violence and social repression. What is required, at least in part, is a new vernacular that enables this kind of political dream. How does prison abolition necessitate new political language, teachings, and organizing strategies? How could these strategies help to educate and organize people inside and outside the prison for abolition?
-Dylan Rodriguez in 'The Challenge of Prison Abolition: A Conversation between Angela Y. Davis and Dylan Rodriguez'
Critique of Hannah Arendt's 'The Origins of Totalitarianism' by Barnor Hesse in 'Self-fulfilling Prophecy: The Post-racial Horizon' Fam
But it is also about the ways in which what I call a pure decolonial project remains an impossible project as long as attention to the deathly production of anti-blackness will not become to future political desires. Only by positioning anti-blackness as central to the ways in which European modernity has cemented its global rein, and thus taking on the predicament of Black social death as the instantiation of modernity's project of unfreedom, as will movements to interrupt and indeed to bring to a conclusion Europe's and now the West's, horrific global rein to be successful. It is precisely by engaging the conditions of the invention of blackness, the ways in which its invention produces the conditions of unfreedom and the question of how those conditions produce various genres of the Human, genres that are continually defined against blackness, that any attempt to engage a decolonial project may avoid its own demise
The Problem of the Human: Back Ontologies and “the Coloniality of Our Being”- Rinaldo Walcott