@blodofring - Tumblr Blog

nature . spirituality . feminism .

bears--bears--bears

honeyblankets

i love my uterus i love my womb i love my ovaries i love my vagina i love my clitoris i love my labia!! 🩷✨🩷✨🩷✨🩷✨

thebeautifulbook

Cumdach of the Stowe Missal (Ireland, 1025-1052) Wood, brass, silver gilt, glass cabochons;

The Department of Medieval Art and The Cloisters has in its collection a curious early 20th-century reproduction of the 11th-century Cumdach of the Stowe Missal. A cumdach, or book shrine, is an Irish form of reliquary case made for books associated with important religious figures. Only five early examples of cumdachs exist.

Held by The Metropolitan Museum of Art

milksockets

'silver + enamelled insects in the art nouveau style were amongst butler + wilson's first revivals in the early 1970s' in rough diamonds: the butler + wilson collection - vivienne becker (1990)

woman-eternal

one thing that occurred to me about the “women don’t really exist” philosophy is that no one seems terribly interested in proving that men don’t exist, that male-ness is a figment of our imagination. It’s just females that are so illusory that we could never define a female-only space.

stroopwaifey

Reminds me of Aristotle saying women were just men but deformed

woman-eternal

Or the fancy new definition of lesbian being “non man attracted to non man”

womenarehuman

And it's all literally a cope. Females are the blueprint. In the primordial ooze, there were no males, only female parthenogenesis. Females literally just created males to liven up the gene pool. Males are a mutation of the female. Males were literally just sentient carriers for sperm distribution. The Y chromosome is a malformed X, tiny and insignificant in comparison. Males were meant to live long enough to inseminate a female and then die. Females were the propagators of life, the originals, the creators. Men are the anomaly with literally no other evolutionary purpose besides being a mobile sperm sack, they are literally not needed for any other purpose evolutionarily speaking.

ray-moo

I think at this point we've switched definitions of female again. What is a human woman again? A carrier of an x chromosome?

There was no x chromosome in the primordial ooze so now we've got to define what a female is in the context of all species.

Also, no one is needed for anything other than reproduction evolutionarily speaking.

womenarehuman

Not everything is 100% literal, use common sense. In the beginning, there was the reproducing sex, everything reproduced by parthenogenesis (something only females can do btw). Females were the first to evolve in every species. The females not only carry the (more important) large gamete, they also gestate the young, birth the young, feed the young, and (in the 99.9% of cases) care for and teach the young until they are self-sufficient. The male is literally just a way to get the small gamete to the female who does all the work of actually furthering the species. After his small contribution, the male has next-to-no real use to the female and is usually an active danger to the young (he may harm, kill, or eat them.)

Males literally just evolved to be mobile sperm carriers to impregnate the female and does the rest (the vastly more important bit).

pussystigmata

one of my biggest gripes currently is the amount of people who will get super mad if u point out something that sexualises women and especially things that sexualise girls. like "ew why would u even think a 10 yr old in a crop top or a 4 year old in a bikini is sexual youre such a creep for even thinking that" like ok put ur fucking son in a crop top then. send him out in public wearing tiny little panties that have his ass sticking out. why are girls clothes so much smaller and tighter and more revealing than boys clothes?

eve-was-framed

thinking about the post that says something like “if boys were raised and socialized the ways girls were people would have no problem pointing out that it’s sexual abuse”

squash-it-like-sigourney-deacti

this post, i believe?

I’m using this specific example because it only seems abusive when applied to boys. For girls, you could say “Well, it’s annoying, it’s unfe

feminist-furby-freak

So there’s this tik toker who works at a legal brothel in Nevada and she just made a video about how in her district the law has regulations about vaginal exams for prostitutes which de facto means that only women can be purchased for sex. And then she ends the video by saying how they should change the law to have more “inclusive language” but historically nobody really tries to purchase men for sex in regulated brothers anyway. She talks about a trans identifying woman who worked in a brothel and was able to because of the law (because pigs who purchase women obviously don’t care about their pronouns) but the language of the prostitution laws is not inclusive for men who identify themselves as women. Genuinely the most dystopian video I’ve seen in a while. It again proves the point everyone knows what a woman is when they want to purchase her body or abuse her.

dozydawn

19th Century Gilt Bronze Opalescent Glass Basket

cafeinevitable-deactivated20220

Beautifully-observed & realistic figure of a sleeping Antelope incised on rock up to 10,000 years ago at Tin Taghirt, Tassili n'Ajjer in Algeria, one of the largest & most important groupings of prehistoric cave art in the world.

ph: Linus Wolf

thxrunaways

Nothing can be more repulsive than men who are like "I want a goth gf 🥺 I want a crazy girl with daddy issues 🥴😩". well I want you to kill yourself.

thxrunaways

Nothing can be more repulsive than men who are like "I want a goth gf 🥺 I want a crazy girl with daddy issues 🥴😩". well I want you to kill yourself.

davidpincher

actually if we’re mutuals we are valentines. no takebacksies.

vexingwoman

The funniest thing ever is when TRAs complain about terfs liking and reblogging their posts. Like, why are you making posts that terfs agree with…? Seems kinda terfy.