Oooof. Pushback time.
In relation to ABO Desire specifically I'm seeing a lot of defense of it as 'well, that's just what omegaverse is so you can't criticize it'.
That's wrong.
Is Omegaverse a framework often used to explore non-con and dub-con themes? Absolutely. But saying the purpose of omegaverse is consent issues is like saying the purpose of vampires is intense and graphic gore and violence. It's not, necessarily. It's an option, certainly. A popular option, even. But vampires offer so much more than violence, and the best vampire media uses violence as part of a larger tapestry, in aide of theme and story-telling.
Omegaverse serves a lot of meta functions. While consent is a factor, my omegaverse observations are that it's more often used to express shame-free sex, unabashed desire, and connection, bonding and reconciliation with a desired partner.
Think about it. I bet a lot of omegaverse you've read features an omega who wants to have filthy, semi-forceful sex, where THEY are the focal point, THEIR desires and needs are being serviced by an Alpha who is THEIR choice. An alpha who will love them no matter how wanton they are, no matter how many bodily fluids they leak. An alpha who bonds, i.e. chooses them. Who cares for them, defends them, adores them. Who wants to be domestic with them.
So much of omegaverse is actually about partnering with conviction, honesty and intimacy. Knotting is hot, yeah, but it also goes with vulnerability, with intent to procreate, and it almost always forces a post-coital cuddle and conversation. Pheromones are a way of signaling emotional states without having to articulate them, and they cannot be ignored or brushed aside; you have to deal with what your partner is feeling. Biting acts as a public sign of connection; bite marks are like fingerprints. Often claimed partners share a low level of psychic connection or empathy, another way to share partner intimacy and keep attention.
Whether you identify as the alpha or the omega- (so often those are sorted into a Dominant and Submissive- but again, not always. I've seen plenty of Dominant Omegas)- The breakdown remains the same: I want me a partner who finds me sexually irresistible, who cares about my sexual experience, who chooses to be with me in a faithful, permanent, sexually debauched union that might include kids.
But even that isn't all that omegaverse is. I've seen it used to explore sexuality, sexual assault, sexual trafficking, identity, societal gender roles, domestic gender roles, sexism, misogyny, heteronormativity, truemates/one true loves, mourning and grief, BDSM and power play, transgenderism, body image, changing body image, group and family dynamics, parental disappointment in a child's gender, parental expectations of a child's identity, child abuse and neglect, and, yes, as pure smut highlighting an assortment of kinks. There is literally so much intersectionality in omegaverse. Omegaverse is not one thing. Alphas are not always men with knotted dicks. Omegas are not always completely power-less damsels.
And I love omegaverse for it's capacity to reveal our own thoughts and biases on gender. HOWEVER. If you're going to write omegaverse that lasts beyond a sex scene or two, you have to root around in the guts of it. You can't just throw noncon on the screen and go 'Welp, that's just the way it is, lol' in something long form. Why is it like that? Should it be like that? Are we supposed to enjoy that it's like that? Are we not supposed to enjoy it? Why are you filming Rapier as titillation if you also want to condemn it? Are you not going to condemn it? Why? Is this somehow less Rapier than other Rapier? If that's the case, you sort of need to be explicit about the distinction.
Frankly, there isn't a lot of smutty fun here, and in my estimation omegaverse primarily exists as a vehicle for sex and partnering. When people onscreen go into heat or rut, it looks like they're ill, not horny. This is one of the most sex-less productions I've ever seen.
ABO Desire is primarily a story with a lot of non-con and wildly fucked up power dynamics. And that's not bad, necessarily. But that is not Omegaverse's fault. It's not there because omegaverse. Omegaverse isn't a monolith. The author chose to include lots of different kinds of non-con in this story. Personally, I think if you choose to include it, particularly on this scale, you should do something with it. I've seen that sentiment echoed a lot in people who are watching ABO Desire and finding the experience distasteful. They're then accused of not knowing what omegaverse is, or hating omegaverse. That is not the case. Omegaverse is not Sexual Assault the Musical; omegaverse means a lot of different things to different people. If what you like in omegaverse is the non-con, maybe that's something for you to acknowledge. You're ALLOWED to like it, though. You also don't get to Gatekeep omegaverse.
The show may yet deal with it's nonconsent, we don't know. But just going 'It's omegaverse' does not lend legitimacy to shallow story-telling. It's also okay to like shallow trash stories. But that isn't an excuse for lack of coherency, consequence and perpetration of Rapier culture. You just have to accept that you may like a show that does those things.