Spatial Observation: Response 1
The three images that I chose to reblog for this response were "Rose Garden," "Growing Up," and "The Wall." I chose these three in particular because both the contrast and vague similarities between my own post and these three interested me, and I wanted to further elaborate on them.
With "Rose Garden," the audience feels what can be perceived as an almost immediate sense of calm. The colors are bright, without being obnoxious. The leaves are soft and intricate, intertwining with one another, mesmerizing the viewer in a sense. A building can be seen in the background; its hard, straight lines offer a sense of structure and stability to the image overall. It isn't what's seen first, nor is the viewer initially drawn to it through the lines or patterns presented to them through the picture. It's something found later by the viewer's will, enforcing that it's not necessarily there to distract the audience from the relaxation of the garden, but rather to offer a sort of balance to the scene.
"Growing Up" offers an interesting perspective to the viewer. The edges of the trunk are hard, but not harsh; the subtle curves in its silhouette make the tree seem strong and sturdy without making it intimidating or unappealing. The repetition of the lines almost offer a sort of familiarity to the audience; the vertical pattern lures the eyes of the viewer upward into the intricacy of the foliage, providing softer and more rounded edges in correspondence with the leaves. The range of colors are bold and do well in their ability to catch the attention of the audience, but are recognizable enough not to catch the viewer off guard. All in all, I chose this picture because the contrasts within itself interested me--the boldness with familiarity, and the strong but mild shapes. I found it aesthetically pleasing, and it seemed to act as a median between what we might perceive as relaxation (seen in "Rose Garden" and "A Place to Myself") and work ("The Wall").
In "The Wall," the angles, edges, and texture of the wall itself present a harder, more serious demeanor to the audience. The sun makes what the viewer might perceive as being the goal (the top of the wall) seem almost unattainable--out of view and hidden from those trying to see it. As the audience's eyes are drawn upward, the steps and bolts which they'd be expected to grip become smaller; the image gives the viewer, ultimately, a sense of "almost." It doesn't lay out everything--it just implies it. It presents it as being there, but as something that the audience has to work for. It presents effort.
In relation to my own image, I decided to choose these three in particular because the contrast interested me. I was pleased in the fact that all of these pictures were taken outdoors, as it opposes my own picture. I kept my window closed, the blinds shut, and the door locked. From what the viewer can observe, there's nothing but darkness outside of the window, and subject to the image, nothing else exists but the small area presented in the picture. There isn't any visual hint or indication of trees or any organic material anywhere near the scene; it's limited, closed off, and solitary. The images I chose present a world that has potential and depth. Even that which presents the same overall ambience (i.e. "Rose Garden") of relaxation and tranquility still shows a "world" beyond the primary image (e.g. in the building in the background). In "Growing Up," what can't be seen in my own image is shown fully, emphasizing itself through the natural lines and shapes of the tree. "The Wall" is, perhaps, the farthest off from mine, presenting what seems only to be endeavors, adventure, and achievement to reach an unseen place. They were all visually appealing, well thought-out, and interesting pieces that I took pleasure in viewing.