No. No it would not.
Stranger Things

JVL

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

Love Begins
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
i don't do bad sauce passes

@theartofmadeline
h
ojovivo
No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON

Origami Around
Claire Keane

ellievsbear

roma★
sheepfilms
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Peter Solarz

blake kathryn
trying on a metaphor

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Denmark
seen from Sweden

seen from Canada
seen from South Africa

seen from Iraq
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from United States
seen from United States
@brixiepants
No. No it would not.
DED Gray goes on Pacific Run.
Bonus:
My daughter also needs to see if your son can manage a house, cook food. Only then we’ll agree to this marriage.
It’s a nice ad from BIBA India with a good ending as well. Link - (x)
Okay, he’s got potential. :)
Look at the glow in her eyes. She may or may not have loved him before, but now she knows he’s willing to grow and change to improve their life together. That’s real love.
Reblogging for this version. Even if she’s happy to be the primary homemaker, her husband needs to know the basics. Otherwise, if she falls sick or otherwise has a bad day, they’re both out of luck, and that’s just not fair to a sick woman. Or to a pregnant one.
And this young man steps up to the task! He accepts that he’s lacking in the basic skills necessary to care for a wife, and resolves to grow as a person.
Locking your wheelchair lift and requiring disabled people to find an employee to unlock AND OPERATE it is a direct violation of the ADA.
“The [ADA] Standards require ‘unassisted’ entry and exit from lifts (§410.1). Situations in which platform lifts are locked and require users to request or retrieve a key for operation will not satisfy this requirement for independent operation.”
“Attendant operation, although recognized by the ASME A18.1 Standard, is expressly prohibited by the ADA Standards. Platform lifts must provide ‘unassisted entry and exit from the lift’ (§410.1).”
(Source)
Smells like a lawsuit waiting to happen…
This is not great, but it’s likely because people are fucking stupid and will screw around with it if it’s not locked up.
[ID: @gavrielabrahams “It’s probably because people were peeing in it.”]
You think people were peeing. In an open wheelchair lift. In the middle of a museum. With public toilets around the corner.
I think not.
But even if people had been peeing in it or otherwise misusing the lift… It. Doesn’t. Matter. It’s not just “not great.” It’s ILLEGAL. It is just as illegal to lock off a wheelchair lift as it is to not provide one to begin with.
The correct response to people peeing in an elevator is never to lock the elevator. It is to provide a toilet. If you think the correct response to any problem is to violate the civil rights of an entire group of people by denying them access, YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM.
Disability rights are civil rights.
You want to know exactly how this went down? Let me tell you a tale.
I was visiting the museum with friends. They went on around the corner while I finished looking at the previous exhibit. I then followed them around the corner only to find I couldn’t get up to the exhibit because the museum AS PART OF THEIR POLICY had illegally locked the lift. My friends didn’t know the lift was locked (why would the lift be locked?) and had no idea that I couldn’t get to them.
Now I, the disabled person, am forced to travel halfway around the building to the front desk to find someone to unlock the lift for me, wait for them to finish what they’re doing, and then travel all the way back to the lift. This was bad enough in a wheelchair. Who else uses lifts? Oh yes. People who struggle to walk. Can you imagine, as a person who struggles to walk, being forced to walk halfway around a building, and then back again, just to access an exhibit? You wouldn’t do it. You’d skip the exhibit. You’ve just been completely denied access.
So finally the museum employee unlocks the lift and then operates it (because yes, they’ve made it so I can’t operate it myself, which is also illegal). I finally get to the top probably ten minutes later, only to find that my friends have finished looking at the exhibit and are heading down again, wondering what has happened to me.
After I’ve gone to all the trouble to get up there, fuck it if I’m not going to look at the damn exhibit. So I look at it, then head back to the lift to go back down, only to find they’ve locked the lift with me at the top and gone back to the front desk.
If one of my friends hadn’t stayed up there with me, I’d probably still be up there. As it was, my friend had to go down the stairs, back around to the front, find an employee, and get them to come back and let me down. Leaving me sitting up there. Alone. For another five minutes.
Now imagine if I had gone to the the museum by myself. Or what if there had been an emergency? You think if there was a fire some museum employee who couldn’t be assed to leave the damn lift unlocked until I had come back down would really have run back into the building to unlock the lift so I could get down? I think not.
Locking an accessibility feature is never the right solution. It is denying access to an entire class of people. Which is ILLEGAL and a CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION.
Disability law is civil rights law.
Also making lifts that disabled people wouldn’t be able to use by themselves means implying that if we are disabled we can’t be independent and this is wrong.
Disabled people should have the possibility to go whatever they have to go by themselves if they feel like doing so.
Only we can decide what our limits are!
It’s not just wrong - it’s illegal. The ADA specifically says that the disabled person must be able to use the lift alone and unassisted. Requiring an attendant operate the lift is a violation of federal disability law.
is this also applicable in a school setting? there are lifts that require keys that students cannot have (even disabled students).
Yes this is illegal even in a school setting. If the lift is the accessible route between two floors then disabled students must have free access.
ADA requirements for elevators
If places are going to require that an employee operate a lift then they should require that an employee be near the lift at all time ffs
Hey so fun fact that’s still illegal. The ADA specifies that the disabled person must be able to run the lift themselves, unaided. If it requires a helper it’s an ADA violation.
You know, I’ve always loved how the Deadly Device abbreviation is DED. Well…. Since it revolves around murder and now… We have this…
It fits.
if you needed proof that i’m really not cut out for the casual environment of teaching from my living room, just know that today i almost ruined a 20 minute long video i was recording about romano-british culture because i almost said “this dude fucks” while talking about the bitchin outfits worn by british chieftains
in my defense look at this dude! the level of ‘this dude fucks’ here is off the charts
remember that first live action scooby doo movie. where the antagonist was literally scrappy doo and he was stealing peoples souls, like actually really stealing and absorbing souls, and was planning on taking scoobys soul to rule the world with an army of demons and get revenge on the gang after they abandoned him because he kept peeing in the car, and near the end he turned into this huge dog monster
a real movie
shit. shit
I researched this because I saw this movie in cinemas when I was like 6 goddamn years old and remembering its existence just now blew my mind. James Gunn screenwrote this. The writer and director of Guardians of the Galaxy, 12 full years before his most successful film. He stated in interviews that he hated Scrappy’s guts and “their whole goal was to destroy Scrappy forever”, since the character was famously brought in to Scooby Doo in the 80s to help ratings and was almost immediately overexposed and overmarketed to the point that many fans hate him. And they totally did. He hasn’t appeared in anything Scooby Doo related since, except for these throwaway allusions as a nightmare-like traumatic event for the rest of the gang. Depending how you wanna interpret those references the canon fate of Scrappy Doo was that he went nuts and tried to kill anyone. Also, according to this movie he was never even a puppy, just “had a glandular issue”, which makes all those times he went “puppy power” really creepy in hindsight tbh I haven’t watched a SD related thing in years but I spent like a half hour looking into and reading about this. Worth.
The best part is that Gunn is still proud of this and admits to writing him as the villain because scrappy is a “completely fucking awful person”
I wish to be as proud of my fanfiction as James Gunn is of his SD movie
Well, Steve Bannon got arrested this morning, so it’s not ALL bad news.
Update: ARRESTED AT SEA BY THE US POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE.
Y’all, he’d been on that boat for weeks.
sleep paralysis is honestly the most bullshit part of being a living thing. sometimes my brain just occasionally screws up and goes ????? uhhhh . cant move. here’s a demon
#once i had sleep paralysis but instead of there being something scary in my room there was just someone tossing salad at the foot of my bed
My captain friend sent me this photo. Saudi prince bought ticket for his 80 hawks.
Apparently falcon passports are a mandatory thing throughout Arabia.
You have to appreciate the irony of birds on an airplane.
i learned of Dmitry Argarkov who scanned a credit card agreement, edited it, and returned it with a 0% interest rate and no limit in the new terms. The bank signed and approved without reading and a judge held them to it (x)
2020 Disney Songs 🎶
that was the best thing I have read in about 10 years.
I want everything that this 🐕 doggo has
(Source)