@c-llapsing - Tumblr Blog

please don't take advantage of me because you know I'd never leave

do some of u realize that in 5, 10, 20 years you’ll be long gone from this website but your posts about wanting Harry Styles to nut in your ear will still be here

summerofloveinthecity

sarahmaxwellart

lifeinpoetry

I want everything to spring up from the ground: grace, forgiveness. I want the sun to stop following me, to file a restraining order against the spiny beast.

— Jane Wong, from “Pastoral Power,” Overpour

11anothergirl11

So look at my eyes and tell me that I wasn’t good enough. Because I’m sick of the lies and I don’t want to give up

(via 11anothergirl11)

coral

Hope is the thing with feathers That perches in the soul, And sings the tune without the words, And never stops at all, And sweetest in the gale is heard; And sore must be the storm That could abash the little bird That kept so many warm. I’ve heard it in the chilliest land And on the strangest sea; Yet, never, in extremity, It asked a crumb of me.

Emily Dickinson (via feellng)

via weheartit

Punctuation Matters by The Visual Communication Guy

thewrittenmagic

I’ll never understand writers who don’t care about punctuation. It adds control, clarity, meaning, and variety.

saramcclarinet

My English major ass appreciates this so hard 👌🏻🙌🏻

ghostlywriterr

twitterlols

chemicalheart-deactivated202009

i love this so much i dont know where to start - the comedy itself - the commentary on ‘what is art’ - further on what is art: the viewers are interpreting this as art, but the intention of the “artist” was not actually art, so is it art or not? who gets to decide, the viewers or the creator? - the act of placing the glasses and watching the response (and the response itself being that the viewers treated the glasses as art) as performance art like is this a critique of postmodernism? does the critique betray itself since (one could argue) the viewers interpreting the glasses as art makes them art? or is that so ridiculous that it doesn’t matter? i could go on

pervocracy

The intention of the “artist” was not actually art, but… their intention was to create a specific image for public display in order to evoke a reaction from an audience, and then to create an image of that in order to evoke a different reaction from a second audience.

I think they accidentally arted. Twice.

surfcommiesmustdie-deactivated2

I hate everything about this post

libertarirynn-deactivated202006

This stuff is why my art appreciation class was so deliciously easy. I just bullshitted my way through all the assignments with random drivel about “what is really art” and got an A.