I'd like to remind everyone that Dream canonically moves his castle further up a mountain when he's in a mood
What a relatable character I love him
will byers stan first human second
Cosmic Funnies
Mike Driver

★
taylor price
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

JVL

izzy's playlists!
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
AnasAbdin
we're not kids anymore.

tannertan36

Love Begins
Xuebing Du

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

#extradirty
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

ellievsbear
$LAYYYTER

Discoholic 🪩
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from France
seen from Spain

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from T1

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
@circa1220bce
I'd like to remind everyone that Dream canonically moves his castle further up a mountain when he's in a mood
What a relatable character I love him
My king.
When Dream decides he’s serious about his friendship with Hob, he creates a clock to help him keep better track of their time together. Hob has proven his patience, but Dream means not to make him wait again if he can help it.
(Also @dsudis has written some fics lately about Dream having time blindness, and I love this idea desperately.)
The clock sits unassumingly in his bedroom where no one else can see it, gilt details on ebony wood, with four dials instead of a single face.
(If only there was a pop culture reference that might make this kind of clock more clear. Ah well. Too bad there isn’t. Fuck TERFs. Protect and cherish trans* people.)
The first dial shows the time in the Waking where Hob is. This is to prevent him from appearing in the early hours of the morning or at other inconvenient or atypical times, or at least do so knowingly.
The second dial allows him to set the time and date of their next meeting and counts down to it. It makes a musical chime that none but him can hear, but the gentle sound reaches Dream anywhere within the Dreaming.
The third dial tells him a general idea of what Hob is doing: the slender gold hand points to Teaching a great deal, and At the New Inn. It shows With Company when Hob is hosting others so that Dream will not interrupt, despite Hob’s assertion that Dream is welcome any time. Occupied covers a great number of messy human experiences that Dream understands are not to be discussed in polite conversation. He has no desire to embarrass his friend.
Sleep also sits on this third dial in a place of pride at the noon slot. Dream doesn’t need it, knows when Hob dreams without any assistance, but every time he sees the hand point to sleep pulls a faint smile from him, and that is reason enough to have it.
The fourth dial tells Dream how Hob is faring. It has categories like In Peril, Lonely, Unwell, Typical, and Celebrating. The spidery writing on the dial changes as needed, updating with information Dream is meant to use to be a good friend.
It is completely unhelpful. Since Dream created the clock, it has pointed unwaveringly at In Love. Hob has not mentioned any type of romantic entanglement since Dream’s return. Dream is too afraid to ask.
Dream: I’m sad
Death: wanna watch me come work?
Dream: ok
Death: *kills baby*
Dream: oh ok
Google, Amazon, Meta, and other big tech companies are making their core products worse and ruining everything from apps to the internet.
In recent years, Google users have developed one very specific complaint about the ubiquitous search engine: They can’t find any answers. A simple search for “best pc for gaming” leads to a page dominated by sponsored links rather than helpful advice on which computer to buy. Meanwhile, the actual results are chock-full of low-quality, search-engine-optimized affiliate content designed to generate money for the publisher rather than provide high-quality answers. As a result, users have resorted to work-arounds and hacks to try and find useful information among the ads and low-quality chum. In short, Google’s flagship service now sucks.
And Google isn’t the only tech giant with a slowly deteriorating core product. Facebook, a website ostensibly for finding and connecting with your friends, constantly floods users’ feeds with sponsored (or “recommended”) content, and seems to bury the things people want to see under what Facebook decides is relevant. And as journalist John Herrman wrote earlier this year, the “junkification of Amazon” has made it nearly impossible for users to find a high-quality product they want — instead diverting people to ad-riddled result pages filled with low-quality products from sellers who know how to game the system.
All of these miserable online experiences are symptoms of an insidious underlying disease: In Silicon Valley, the user’s experience has become subordinate to the company’s stock price. Google, Amazon, Meta, and other tech companies have monetized confusion, constantly testing how much they can interfere with and manipulate users. And instead of trying to meaningfully innovate and improve the useful services they provide, these companies have instead chased short-term fads or attempted to totally overhaul their businesses in a desperate attempt to win the favor of Wall Street investors. As a result, our collective online experience is getting worse — it’s harder to buy the things you want to buy, more convoluted to search for info
Cory Doctorow has a similar concept of enshitification:
Here is how platforms die: First, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.
…
This is enshittification: Surpluses are first directed to users; then, once they’re locked in, surpluses go to suppliers; then once they’re locked in, the surplus is handed to shareholders and the platform becomes a useless pile of shit. From mobile app stores to Steam, from Facebook to Twitter, this is the enshittification lifecycle.
…
Enshittification truly is how platforms die. That’s fine, actually. We don’t need eternal rulers of the internet. It’s okay for new ideas and new ways of working to emerge. The emphasis of lawmakers and policymakers shouldn’t be preserving the crepuscular senescence of dying platforms. Rather, our policy focus should be on minimizing the cost to users when these firms reach their expiry date: Enshrining rights like end-to-end would mean that no matter how autocannibalistic a zombie platform became, willing speakers and willing listeners would still connect with each other.
-Cory Doctorow. The ‘Enshittification’ of TikTok (archive link)
To add to this, I believe Tumblr has evaded some of this because of it having always had a niche audience and an abundance of porn. But the first steps of enshitification on Tumblr are the 2018 porn ban and the release of Tumblr live. Let’s be loyal to the community and not to the platform.
it does feel a little bit like being gaslit that the internet is slowly getting worse in barely perceptible ways- it’s validating to see an article that says, “yes, it’s not that you’re getting old and somehow losing your google proficiency, GOOGLE IS WORSE THAN IT USED TO BE.”
Amazon literally shows you fewer search results if you sort by user reviews instead of “Amazon recommended”, and I remember that it didn’t used to do that
You’re welcome
This is the most useful thing I’ve ever reblogged.
i used to think when people said my cousin twice removed that their cousin must’ve did some fucked up shit to get kicked out of the family twice
When I found this the first thing I thought was “now I can find out how Count Olaf is related to the Baudelaire children.”
So would that make the gender neutral version of aunt/uncle “zeroth cousin once removed” or “first cousin negative once removed”? “First cousin once returned”?
The Glorious 25th May, how do they rise up?
A video analysis of the difference between Joule joining Kelvin and Kelvin joining Joule.
(Source)
@ablakmacska (k)
PUPPERS AND KITTERS
genuinely, we should bring back bumppads and other bits of padding to get a fun fashion silhouette in our clothing. Forget all this stuff about "flattering your natural body type" or "getting the perfect body" or whatever. Let's just put some fake ass and thighs into the skirt and call it a day.
I mean, this is the thing. For a large chunk of human history, nobody thought your actual human body was supposed to be shaped like the currently fashionable silhouette.
Like, a given person’s ability to meet the standards of fashion was very much tied to wealth and class, but the standard was “be able to strap on the various foundation garments required to fill out the dress, which is ideally made from as much expensive fabric as you can possibly afford.”
A lot of people today talk about stays and corsets as instruments of torture, but they don’t seem to notice that we absolutely do still have a fashionable silhouette that changes cyclically. It’s just that now, if the clothes don’t fit you right, the problem is not your lack of crinoline/bum roll/sleeve supports/bustle/bust improver/whatever — it’s just you. Your body is the thing you’re supposed to change.
And, frankly: fuck that.
Valerie Steele discuses it in her book The Corset: A Cultural History as never actually having got rid of the corset, its just we internalised it & made it all about shaping the body through extreme diet, extreme exercise and plastic surgery.
And I honestly think that's much more damaging to one's mind than padding the shit out of your figure to get this season's wacky shape.
And the thing is that some version of the fashionable silhouette was available for everyone. There were free patterns included in magazines so you could make your own stuff if poorer. The Pretty Housemaid corset was designed specifically for housemaids who would be stooping a lot (like to lay fires). It had an extra busk to help prevent the main one from bending out of shape & breaking. To keep the price point low it was stiffened mostly with lengths of rolled up paper! (Instead of fabric cording or using whalebone or steel). It was available in both standard sizes and to order, so even servants could get something better fitted if needed.
Everyone's clothes were tailored to fit them, even if the clothes were hand me downs from an elder sibling altered to fit, or bought cheaply from the equivalent of a thrift store. They'd often be dresses way out of fashion, but it was common to rework a dress to suit the new silhouette.
It was a completely different mindset of how to approach clothing the body & how to conceptualise the body. Women were always doing it wrong though according to the men. They were so very against corsets on women as they were "vanity" and "against nature"🤦♀️ I so hate that people think it was men forcing corsets on women & so have stigmatised an important foundation garment (way better than a bra for bust support plus free back support thrown in -win win). Like most people only laced down by about 2". They might buy a corset 4" smaller, but this was usually to leave a gap between the lacing. 2" reduction is achievable for me immediately on lacing up even when I haven't done so for months. Though I have easily laced down to 4" reduction without much effort & have owned corsets with a 6" reduction if fully shut (never wore them fully shut though as I didn't train long enough). I'm a natural hourglass and my waist seems to handle being squished fairly easily though. But most people only laced down enough to account for the bulk of the clothing being worn on top of the corset and underwear (chemise under corset always). Just enough to stop the corset shifting up and down on you.
If you've worn elasticated waist trousers of any kind then you've likely already experienced up to a 2" reduction without really realising it. Though its way less comfortable than a corsets as elastic keeps working its way tighter. Corsets stay put at what you lace them to & the body can reach a pressure equilibrium. It legit feels like a comforting hug. If you're a fan of deep pressure therapy you'll likely love wearing a corset.
Anyway, I've gone off on one & really need to sleep since its gone 3am (ooops),
yeah, this.
can we go back to fashion being something you add to your body for decoration rather than something your real human body is expected to be :/
also hell yes to the deep pressure therapy thing. the only reason i laced up yesterday was because i was really nervous for an exam & wanted the compression for comfort. it really lessened the anxiety-related stomach discomfort and helped clear my head—and my exam went smoother than i expected :)
ALSO also, if you saw that bit about not being able to close a corset because that poster hadn’t trained enough, and you went “D: it literally changed your body that’s fucked up,” I want you to do me a favor.
Go into a room with a mirror, and take your bra off, and run your fingertips over the tops of your shoulders.
Bras have changed your body. And if you’re still not convinced, here’s a photo you need to see. Warning for folks at school at work that while it’s an anthropology photo, it does feature topless women, so you might want to come back later.
.
.
.
.
.
The African women in this photo asked the white woman about her bra, so she took it off so they could compare. Look how full and bouncy her breasts are by comparison to to the African women, whose culture does not wear tops of any kind. I haven’t worn a bra in almost a decade and you know who in this picture I look like? The woman on the far right. And you’ll notice she isn’t particularly large. If we threw her in a bra she’d probably be a B-cup. She’s just never trained her breasts because that’s not a thing in her culture. (As a sidenote: I first heard this story many years ago and struggled to even find the photo. I don’t have names for any of these women, I’m sorry.)
Bras change your body too. You’re just so used to that being the normal way of things that you never noticed.
Today I found out one of my desk neighbors is Jewish, but hasn't been observant since his bubbe died.
He mentioned that he hasn't had matzo ball soup in years.
So I only have one choice.
There only was one choice.
And now to let it simmer for three thousand years
This is why you simmer for millennia. That golden color. The depth of flavor and rich mouth feel.
I have two Extremely Jewish posts doing the rounds right now: this one, and my chanukah season desk decorations. They jointly give a pretty accurate picture of who I am as a person.
I will spend time and money to decorate my desk out of distilled spite.
I will spend time and money to prepare food, especially for semi-orphaned fellow Jews.
But these are both Jewish values.
What? My soup post would make Twitter discourse??
there was someone on twitter who made chili for their college aged neighbors who had a ton of pizza boxes outside so that they could have an actual meal and there were, like, insane 30-tweet threads about boundaries and consent and food allergies and people getting mad about things just for the sake of getting mad about things.
I just felt the concentrated disdain of 1000 generations of my family, every one of them distilling love and care into nourishment for their families and communities, wash over me like a tidal wave. I swear a blood feud on those Twitter twerps. I will drown them in chicken broth.
cooking question: why onion peel on onion in soup?
Cooking answer: because none of that stuff is staying in the final soup, and the peel helps deepen the color
'K
[Image description: tag on a reblog "hey OP give me ur spice mix this fucks"]
[Image description: picture of herbs piled on a piece of cheese cloth with text superimposed: ginger, nutmeg, herbs de provence, and pepper]
Wait, I had thought those were potatoes! Does the ginger stay in the soup? Do you make the broth with those big ol’ chunks and then fish them out later? Now that I’m looking closely, is this a cheesecloth spice/herb wrap to be able to pull all that out easily?
Yeah, the cheesecloth gets tied up to create a spice sachet that floats around in the broth like a zesty tea bag. It does not go in a bowl to get served to anyone.
All Star but it’s in a minor key so it makes you question life and realize the years start comin and they don’t stop comin
aka, the theme song to Shrek 9: Shrek’s Third Divorce
FEATURING THE AMAZING @allicatttx
i need a full version of this pls
Sis voice tho!
we need to talk about the fact that for many of the posters in season one, they are literally on opposite sides and/or have a dividing line between them
and now they're literally crossed over in some way for the season 2 posters
THEY'RE LITERALLY ON THEIR OWN SIDE NOW, PEOPLE!
CAN WE TALK ABOUT THIS?
Sandman text posts (part 35)
Just rewatched Calliope episode of The Sandman and it occurs to me that this episode strongly implies that Orpheus is dead and gone??
The Hecate state that he "died in Thrace" (which technically he did in the comics too but he lived on because of Death withholding her gift).
Then when Calliope requests to visit Dream in the Dreaming sometime, in a change from the comics she gives her reasoning as "so we may talk about our son and grieve him properly".
Yet in the comics, it is made clear that Calliope visits Orpheus on the island at least somewhat regularly both before and after her imprisonment. So what she says in the show doesn't make sense unless Orpheus is already dead properly in the show?
But that would be a huuuuuge change to the story so surely thats not the case? I probably missed a lot of discussions about this after the show first came about before I caught the brain worms and had to analyse the comics with a fine tooth comb so I would love to know what others think about this.
@duckland @so-i-grudgingly-joined-this-site @notallsandmen tagging for your thoughts as well as anyone else who wants to answer!
Sorry to add myself even though I wasn't tagged. That's such an interesting point, and I don't think I have seen anyone else discuss it. If that is the case, then it would mean a vastly different direction for the show. I already suspect that it will have a very different ending, one where Dream does pass his function over to Daniel, but not due to Lyta/The Kindly Ones, but due to him making that choice on his own.
The show has already told us that Lady Johanna did a task for him, and we all know what that is... But if Orpheus is dead by season 1, then when did he die? And most importantly... How?
Joining in the discussion here even though I'm probably coping out of my mind and know shit about this :') (as a full disclaimer, I'm a new Sandman fan, have been spoiled quite a lot but haven't read the comics completely, so you are welcomed to dismiss my opinions as just ramblings that should go in the tags)
-
I took it to mean Orpheus is dead-dead in the show because it's such a specific choice of words and because I truly believe the show is meant to go in a different direction than the comics because stories aren't actually how they were but they are as they are told. Even if stories are meant to go back to their original forms (as Dream tells Hob on episode 6), fundamentally, a story is a version of the events. It doesn't change how they happened but it shapes how we remember them.
The way I see it, the show doesn't want to tell us the story we knew (and that we have access to and could go back to anytime) but the story of what could've been had things been different, had Dream made different choices. Like I said, I may be high on copium here but I think there's a reason why we hear Dream narrating the story on episode 1: because all stories should be told once, and the story of what could have been had he acted different and seen all the signals of his demise, is still yet to be told (and who better to tell it than the Prince of Stories). This could mean that, on that episode, we hear Morpheus or that it's Daniel instead, talking about his past self. Either way, it's Dream telling the story.
I have no idea what other things would change, would have to change, in order for Morpheus to make a different choice. But I'm sure we're in for a different version of the story because, like I said, we could go back to the source material if we wanted the 'original' version of the events. Besides, I find it would be quite poetic if, same as Dream, we could get two Sandmen that are both so different but ultimately the same. I wonder if, in that case, the show is supposed to show us Daniel's version of the tale.
Also jumping on, forgive me, but I find this possibility compelling honestly and I agree, the sense I got from the show is either:
Orpheus is dead-dead, super dead, not coming back.*
Orpheus is a severed head on Naxos and Dream knows that but Calliope doesn't.
Option 2 is pretty horrifying. Honestly, it's damn near irredeemable if Dream hid Orpheus's state from Calliope, Orpheus's own mother. And to a previous point, the Furies saying Orpheus is dead, that does lend to the argument that canonically, in the show, he is dead because they're pretty all-knowing.
I can think of a variety of reasons why Option 1, Orpheus is dead in the show might be true:
Quick Doylist reason: the CGI of a severed head might not only be a pain in the ass to pull off, it might just look stupid on television or even funny looking. There's plenty of stuff that works in the comics and doesn't work on screen. They might have just made the decision that the severed head couldn't be done without looking goofy or just being way too horrifying.
The ambiguity: Look, the comic is super ambiguous about whether Orpheus is actually dead in that state of being a severed head. On the page, they seem to imply that he "died long ago" but he takes a lot of actions and, quite frankly, is pretty obviously alive by some definition. When Dream says Orpheus, "Died long ago" it doesn't feel objective, it feels like his subjective opinion he uses to comfort himself and that he is lying to himself.
Ableism: Let me be clear, I think the myth Neil was hearkening back to with Orpheus being a talking an undead talking head is based on a story where Orpheus's head has oracular powers after he dies, it's kind of an obscure myth but it is there and I think he was aiming for a sort of mythologically informed horror story around that. A better depiction might have been Orpheus's skull can talk because it would more strongly indicate that he's like a ghost haunting his own severed head, NOT alive by any real definition, more like undead. But quite frankly, if you say a man is dead just because he doesn't have use of his limbs, you're dancing pretty damn close in the real world to some pretty heinous ableism, saying for example that a paraplegic counts as dead. I've felt some discomfort around this ever since refreshing myself on the comics and I wouldn't blame the writers at all for deciding that a live action medium is not the right place to say "Oh no, it's not ableism, it's just an old Greek myth!" Like, nah. Might be better to just not raise the specter of ableism around whether or not Orpheus is defined as alive or dead just because he relies on others for mobility after losing access to his limbs.
And finally, just speaking from experience as a writer, I almost always say Orpheus is dead-dead in my fanfics because it fits the story we see on screen in Sandman better. It just feels right for what we see. This is entirely my gut feeling, so feel free to laugh at me if I'm wrong, but sometimes when you write half a million words of fanfic in a universe you get a bit of a gut feeling about what works and what doesn't in that story. Dream being a grief-stricken divorced dad to an adult son who died, a death that haunts Dream to this day, destroyed his marriage, and left him an emotionally broken and depressed shell of his former self is a story that works for the Dream we see on screen.
A Dream who allowed his son to suffer living death for 2,500 years is not only, quite frankly, monstrous but arguably irredeemable, especially if (as mentioned before) he didn't tell Calliope. It also means any grief Dream might feel is tainted by his ongoing crimes against his son. Any grief we might feel for Dream's suffering is tainted, again, by the fact he's actively allowing his son to suffer living death this whole time. Like that is just really hard to come back from, sympathetically speaking. And I'm not sure his emotional goodbye to his son in the comic is enough (see the aforementioned "the severed head might look too stupid or too gross for television") to redeem that, even if it's a beautiful moment.
Basically, I think there's a lot of reasons to believe Orpheus might indeed be fully dead in the show and I wouldn't blame them if he is.
listen. padme amidala is a freak, okay. ever since aotc i’ve had to listen to bullshit arguments about how awful the prequel romance is, how anakin’s a red flag, blah blah blah. that’s a smooth brain take. first of all, of course he’s a red flag. that’s the point. you think padme doesn’t know anakin is ten pounds of mommy issues in a five pound bag? you think she looked at soggy weeping anakin begging her to love him and didn’t immediately think “yes i definitely will peg him” ?? you think just because she’s a queen turned senator that she isn’t just as horny and feral as he is? anakin wasn’t even pushy about it. he was just “oh btw i’ve been obsessed with you for a decade and live in a perpetual state of emotional agony but thats okay whatever you want is fine with me haha” and padme goes “yea okay i’m into that.” two minutes after he’s assigned to be her bodyguard she gives an obligatory little “i have a bad feeling about this” and then just fucking marries him. this is a woman who wore white to a blood bath. come on.
#I like the prequels more now that I’ve decided to stop trying to shoehorn any character’s behaviors into normal boxes #and instead just asked myself ‘what kind of person would make these choices’ and see the characters as that #Padme seriously wore a black corset to tell him she was very into him but they would not be fucking #instead of saying oh my god who DOES that #I just instead ask myself ‘who does that’ and realize that explains a lot more #here is this wealthy educated and perhaps a little vain woman who sees her childhood hick charitycase friend grew up as a hot goth jock #and oh no he’s still space racist and awkward and yet she goes harder for him after finding that out #she’s absolutely a freak #her being a freak is actually the most polite way to interpret her character #because it intersects so interestingly with this virgin child queen who crowned the emperor shit that’s her actual legacy #to be honest I still have no clue what Lucas intended to say with these characters but tehyre a lot more fun once you turnoff preconceptions #the OT trilogy are adorable and iconic but the PT trio are great because theres something fucking wrong with all of them #just comically tragically the dumbest combination of disordered behavior from a group of protagonists #the OT trio are unlikely but largely successful heroes! The PT trilogy are hyper-competent child geniuses who grew up to be #heavily decorated and famous heroes who break the entire setting forever and I love that for them!
shout out to @superstardestroyer for having the most correct star wars opinion on this website
That’s it, that’s the series
CAL KESTIS meets LUKE SKYWALKER and it goes exactly as you’d expect 🫢