is this anything
Show & Tell

ellievsbear
Monterey Bay Aquarium
sheepfilms

tannertan36
official daine visual archive
No title available
ojovivo
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Andulka

★

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Cosmic Funnies
cherry valley forever
No title available
Stranger Things
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Cosimo Galluzzi

seen from Netherlands

seen from Italy
seen from Italy

seen from Hungary

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Finland
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from China

seen from Sweden

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from France
seen from Malaysia

seen from Finland

seen from Serbia
@cliban
is this anything
ACTUALLY heres another one i quickly animated of rocky beating the shit out of grace
my personal take on the matter
more of these. and GREEN IS HERE THIS TIME 🎉
5001 being divisible by 3 doesnt feel right
Shortcuts to determine if an integer is divisible by:
This is a given.
If the last digit is divisible by 2 (a.k.a. even), then so is the whole number.
If the sum of the digits is divisible by 3, then so is the whole number. The recursivity of this means that if the sum has multiple digits, you can add them up again until you get a single digit and see if it's 3, 6, or 9.
Like the rule for 2, but check if the last two digits are divisible by 4.
If it ends in 5 or 0.
If the rules for both 2 and 3 apply.
No shortcut. Alas.
Like the rules for 2 and 4, but check if the last three digits are divisible by 8. (Yes, this pattern keeps going for 16, 32, etc.)
Like the rule for 3, but the sum of the digits (or the sum of the sum of the digits, etc.) must be 9.
If it ends in 0.
11. Put alternating + and - signs in front of each digit such that the last digit has a + sign (so for 5001 it's - 5 + 0 - 0 + 1). If the answer is divisible by 11, so is the original number. This is recursive like the 3 and 9 rules.
7: Subtract twice the last digit of your number from the number you get by ignoring the last digit. If the result of that operation is divisible by 7, so is your original number (eg, 91 -> 9 - 2×1 = 7, so 91 is a multiple of 7). As with the rules for 3, 9 and 11 this rule is recursive (2261 -> 226 - 2×1 = 224; 224 -> 22 - 2×4 = 14; 14 -> 1 - 2×4 = -7 and so 2261 is divisible by 7).
It's not a fast way of checking if a number is a multiple of 7 (you honestly may as well just do the division), but it does work.
picklesbaseball
looking. at you
homunculus let out into the yard for a few minutes of recreational getting thrown from the roof time
Go! Rocky, Go!
I love you all, you can all be sexy men.
Ryland Grace and his popularity as a character feels like such an important step in repairing the cultural tsunami left by the long running trope of every genius character needing to be an insufferable asshole to everyone in a ten mile radios about it.
Conversely, Eva Stratt is doing wonders for repairing and inspiring a appreciation for commanding women with dubious moral convictions who are fully willing to bend laws for the greater good without hesitation.
And together they are doing brilliant things by not kissing or hooking up even once.
their polyamorous swag
ah fuck im imagining it
why are the windows 7 minimise maximise and close buttons fucking on my dash
Tumblr Sexyman Contest 2026 Final Round
Senshi (Dungeon Meshi)
Ryland Grace (Project Hail Mary)
Mr. Ant Tenna (Deltarune)
Tenna art by @9Aaaalt29 on twt
Guys it’s only been 3-4 hours wtf
tumblr being real normal about this one
girls yearn for popular media with a butch as a main character
“I don’t put politics in my stories” is the literary equivalent of a cishet guy going “I don’t have pronouns”
not many people know this but when talking about your multiple pronoun-using friend you build up a combo meter for every subsequent unique pronoun you use
reading a negative review of something you love written by a person who very clearly didn’t understand it at all
reading a positive review of something you love written by a person who very clearly didn’t understand it at all
Reading a negative review of something you hate by someone who very clearly didn't understand it at all and hates it for the wrong reasons