Lorraine Inzalaco – Insatiably Yours
No title available
h

Kiana Khansmith
AnasAbdin
we're not kids anymore.
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
d e v o n
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

@theartofmadeline
Keni

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
No title available
wallacepolsom
ojovivo
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Claire Keane
RMH

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
seen from Romania
seen from Poland
seen from Romania
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Ireland
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
@cloud-belly
Lorraine Inzalaco – Insatiably Yours
Cross-dressing in Photographs of 1920s and 1930s Egypt, Palestine and Lebanon X
when hets are like “i’m pansexual and genderqueer so all my relationships are technically gay xD” like cool im a lesbian so all my relationships are actually gay
i LOVE dr kathleen stock ❤️
extra big eff you to all the misogynists calling her a man because she’s a gnc lesbian they don’t like. dr stock, who doesn’t wear skirts and makeup, who has short hair and dresses comfortably will forever be more of a woman than a male. (& much better looking 👀 -a lesbian)
this person commented this and then blocked me… weird. but 1) the issue isn’t “misgendering” it’s the blatant homophobia & misogyny of saying a woman who is gay &/ gnc is actually a man or somehow trying to be a man and the implications that has. 2) the very obvious difference between kathleen stock and tw is that “trans women” are men. “how can a masculine looking lesbian be a woman but a male who’s FEM can’t be???” Is actually not as hard hitting as you would like it to be. and 3) kathleen stock gets constant threats of violence, homophobia, got bullied out of her job with 0 support for her employer or union for VERY mild opinions, I have never ever treated anyone, much less someone as undeserving as dr stock that poorly, and I have never seen any radfems behave that way either.
Expressions of anger and rage are not a disqualifying factor in the masculine disposition. Anger in men is often understood, or excused, as reasonable or just. Anger in men may even be cast in a heroic mold a righteous response to an insult against honor that will prelude a manly, aggressive act. Because competitive acts of personal assertion, not to mention acts of outright physical aggression, are known to flow from angry feelings, anger becomes the most unfeminine emotion a woman can show.
Anger in a woman isn't "nice." A woman who seethes with anger is “unattractive.” An angry woman is hard, mean and nasty; she is unreliably, unprettily out of control. Her face contorts into unpleasant lines: the jaw juts, the eyes are narrowed, the teeth are bared. Anger is a violent snarl and a hostile threat, a declaration of war. The endless forbearance demanded of women, described as the feminine virtue of patience, prohibits an angry response. Picture a charming old-fashioned scene: The mistress of the house bends low over her needlework, cross-stitching her sampler: "Patience is a virtue, possess it if you can/Seldom seen in women, never seen in man." Does the needle jab through the cloth in uncommon fury? Does she prick her thumb in frustration?
-Susan Brownmiller, Femininity
stormé delarverie’s hangover remedies published in the town talk, january 1995
I remember seeing all these ex-radfems be like “getting to know men made me realise it’s not so black and white and that there’s NUANCE” and it’s like, ok it’s been a couple of years since I created this account and since then I have gotten to know and befriended a lot of men, I’ve seen a lot of complex, nuanced behaviour and beliefs from them. None of it has undermined my radical feminist ideology. Men can be kind and loving, women can be cruel and abusive, but that does not change that we live in a patriarchy created to benefit men through the exploitation of women. And when men have cruel interests, intentions and stakes, they are benefitted and encouraged in every way possible. Every institution is based on these structures, and ultimately every personal relationship is affected by these dynamics. All men have misogynistic tools at their disposal. This is real life, there are so many shades of people and behaviour, but none of this undermines radical feminism.
be forced to carry a baby and maybe youll know what its like to be forced to be something you dont want to be. the only way you'll learn is when its your turn to be demonized
Are you seriously comparing the basic human right to terminate an unwanted fetus to cosmetic surgery?
Gosh I love her so much.
So sick of “spreading awareness” and wear ____ color while watching men do fucking nothing I love JKR I hope she gets richer every day
this new round of bots are next level. what the fuck is this
"My husband is dead, I want only torture"
Are they dancing? Or are they fighting?
Chile lemme reblog god from the machine
This just goes to show that even the most priviledged women, white, rich and royals on top of that, are still oppressed because of their female sex.
It amazes me that hordes of men will act like this and then - en masse - deny that they view penetrating women as an act of dominance and conquest.
Princess Diana??? She’s fucking dead Jesus fucking Christ
we train young girls to ignore their hunger, to walk and stand and sit like ladies, to paint over or cover their pimples and stretch marks and cellulite, and then we are shocked when they grow up and become women who are alienated from their own bodies
whenever tras talk about jkr it’s so funny because it goes like
tras: she said [some ridiculous bullshit]
normal people: when did she say that?
tras: i don’t know but i bet she did say it
Will never not be funny
I’m more excited to hear terms like “his husband, her wife, his boyfriend” than everyone to say ‘partner’ instead
This book should be considered a radblr staple!
Includes bibliographical references
I don't think it's a coincidence that its mostly traumatized women who aren't going to therapy who are the receivers of CNC, actually. I don't think it's a coincidence that it's mostly straight men who are the perpetrators in these rape fantasies, actually. I don't think it's a coincidence that the rise of CNC happened not so far away from when women started speaking about their horrible sexual experiences, actually. And I cannot believe "fantasizing about raping someone is bad" is a Puritanical Christian Take now lol.