I like the beatles now. the beatles are cool.

[corralline]

I am your daddy

[-foreverclass-]

[-foreverclass-]

[mclennon-explosion-deactivated2]

[sgt-peppers-blog]

[mclennonaniac]

george: woah! why did you just smack my butt?! john: oh, sorry, mate, I couldn’t see your face when you were bending over. I thought you were paul george: oh, okay george: george: wait, what

[evang-jae]

John: God, Paul. With that hat you look like a girl 

Paul: I’m a pretty girl? -w-

John: ¬////¬

Tenía que dibujar esto xD Vi este dialogo y pos, aquí está

Had to draw this xD I saw this dialogue and, here it is

[mclennonaniac]

I reckon this actually happened between john and paul

john: oi macca wanna come over an’ write songs

paul: can’t johnny I have a date

john: 

paul:

[corralline]

[corralline]

when you pose with your bff

[corralline]

 marry me

[corralline]

cuties

[corralline]

I don’t want to ruin people’s imagination and excitement (I too ship mclennon pretty hard), just stating my opinion on this matter:

I think people have way too much wishful thinking about john and paul being involved in something romantic. yes, so john was bisexual, but he was obviously more on the women part, than the men one, and it was also clearly implied that he was more curious and prone to experimenting than bisexual in the true sense of the word.

also, paul confirmed john had never come onto him, and he seemed quite truthful about it, and I don’t understand why paul would lie after so many years in which john has been dead. paul had some homosexual display on screen too, just for the show, and I believe he would have said if he and john had something just to get more publicity. especially now, when bisexuality and homosexuality are everywhere in media and not seen as a controversy anymore.

I don’t think people know what it is like to have a bisexual close friend - in all seriousness now, my best friend is bisexual, but she has never seriously come onto me, because she knows she would ruin our friendship. you get to fun kiss your bisexual friend a few times, if you’re into experimenting, and that’s it.

at most, john and paul probably kissed for the lulz, but I don’t think there was something more than this. there is such thing as powerful friendship without romance, which is even stronger than actual romantic love. john himself had stated how paul was like his brother, and john was a pretty straightforward and blunt guy, he would have talked to someone about it, if there was more.

[amclennonblog]

If John hinted on Paul, he wouldn’t really talk about it and bring all the situation. That is not Paul, he’s not a whore for publicity, let alone talk about secrets of his dead friend, things he might not even want to remember, if McLennon was true. Paul is not cautionless and living wildly, fuck what the press would think. Paul don’t like to talk about his personal life. And also, let’s just notice that Yoko talked about John having desire for Paul before, but later she sued the guy who wrote things she said herself and even authorized the publication and NOW SHE DOESN’T EVEN MENTION PAUL ANYMORE. Can you guess who doesn’t wants to talk about it? Also, John asked himself about a possible relationship with Paul. Why such a thing? He talked about how people never asked them about their closeness and how it was odd…even for him. And Paul actually said he was keeping the “juicy stuff” for after Yoko and Cyn died. John stated that he was replacing Paul with Yoko and that Paul was the first love of his life, Yoko the second. May be only in an intelectual way? Yes. It’s possible that there are more than meet the eyes? Also, yes.

And also, people keep thinking that just because someone dated more women they are a hetero who experimented. Like, Feddie Mercury dated more men, so he was homo, but he also like women…but he was homo because he dated more man? Or, I’m a woman in a relationship with a man, so my bissexuality is on hold, and NOW I’M HETERO????? Sexual orientation doesn’t change. John understood it better than people nowadays

I have sexual attraction for both, Freddie did and John Lennon did. We are bissexuals. Bissexuals are not people that goes kissing around to keep the balance between men and women. I don’t know who created this idea but that’s not how it works. It’s how we feel. Just because John had more “on the spotlight” relationship with women, it doesn’t mean his attraction to men doesn’t count. “Experimenting”, as far as the possible word goes, happened in Hamburg and that old history of two beatles with drag queens or sort of, one of them being John Lennon himself. More than that, like other stories goes, are a whole another thing.

And guess what? The only woman I loved IS ONE OF MY BEST FRIENDS! (yeah, I’m going to say it), and she doesn’t love me back this way. We kissed, she’s bi too, we would go all the way if we had the chance, but, at the end of the day, she doesn’t love me. She loves everybody, polilove, and I would get hurt in the middle of it. It wouldn’t mean to her. But I’m ok with it, I don’t cry like “oh my goood, friendzone”, and I’m in a relationship with a man. So now, my desire and attraction for women doesn’t count? 

People keep getting us wrong. Kiss for a laugh? It is so treated like this, that it took me time to understand how I felt. To feel my heart beating faster. This is my sexuallity, not a joke or an experiment. If your friend is ok with it, fine. You work this out great and I love the idea of John and Paul kissing in Paris, just for the feel (because, I personally don’t think they went really far on physical stuff). As for me, a bissexual in love with her best friend, I only kissed people that I found attractive in some way. There are lots of kinds of friendships out there, keep the possibilities open.

Sorry, I’m in a McLennon bf since that anon came here and all…

Fuck I’ll have to delete this….

[corralline]

woah man, I didn’t want to hurt you in any way, I just said how my bi friend feels. there are lots of people, there are lots of bisexuals, and there are various types of bisexuality: bisexuals who have an inclination towards men and bisexuals who have an inclination towards women. I still believe john was the second type. john has always been a wilder type of guy, he did things just for fun on many occasions (his experience with brian was this - he didn’t take it seriously, he just wanted to experiment and did it more for brian). I also sustain what I have said: I don’t believe john was in love romantically with paul. the beatles always claimed how they loved each other and this is how artists are - I have heard actors and singers calling each other ‘the love of their lives’ because of how close they were, almost like soul mates, not because they were necessarily romantically in love with each other. there isn’t any clear proof that john and paul had something, because if they had, something would have come out eventually (just like in john and brian’s case). john was a joking and sarcastic guy and he always made jokes on paul’s account, which is why he himself made that joke about him ‘fucking paul’.  he may have felt attraction for paul, but I don’t think he seriously wanted to bang him, and I repeat what I’ve said: john himself had stated how paul was his ‘brother’, and john was very blunt. people can believe what they want in the end, if believing john and paul were romantically involved makes you feel better, then go ahead. I just stated how I don’t seriously believe such a thing.

[amclennonblog]

relax, I’m being bitchy, or sesible too much these days…

Now I’ll talk because I just like to talk about it…

I think John and Brian’s stuff came out because people openly asked about it (to the point John almost killed a guy, the guy asked him) and they are not here anymore to keep it away if they were not confortable with it. Once I read or heard Paul is too powerful to mess with. You don’t go on the press saying what you want about him if you don’t want to be screwed for the rest of your career. If he doesn’t want it to come out, it won’t. Philip Norman played with fire by publishing that paragraph in his book and he got burned. I, as a no one on tumblr, am affraid of talking about it sometimes…hahahaha.

Also the only person that really talked about Brian and John was Pete Shotton and now Yoko. Paul denied it, as in John never said anything to him. Paul is a know nothing about John’s sexuality for the press. He stated John was not gay (bi) because if he was, there would have been a hint. And he was pretty strong about it, “I would have noticed” “If he was gay, I think there would have been a hint somewhere”. And how come he never noticed if he was that close as he think he was? He may have noticed, but then he would be lying…why? 50 years later, Yoko herself talked about it…and he keeps his mouth shut. That’s what bothers me. If they were friends to the point Paul never knew, they weren’t nearly as close as Paul produly says they were. If Paul knew and is hiding and lying, there is something in this he is not comfortable letting go…

I don’t know how they felt. The only thing I believe strongly is something I read once, that there were things unsaid and unsure between them. As an author said (I think he was psychologist, tho I’m not sure), John had strange feelings for Paul, whether he was aware of it or not, that’s what gave their relationship a different and confused sense. He analysed them and their dynamic, it changed my views. But, this belief is my lower guess…the highest are kisses, that would give a physical edge to the strange feeling, but it wouldn’t be as taboo as in the first option, as for possible. But there are things to come out yet. 

[corralline]

I don’t think paul is as ‘powerful’ as some people want to believe to the point where there wouldn’t be any screwed up rumors about him either, I mean there were lots of wacky rumors regarding paul (e.g: him not being paul, him actually being an impostor, he also flirted with brian to get his way, plus he kissed a guy in front of the cameras), I don’t think paul cares about what people say about him. and the same was for john. which is why I don’t think paul lied, he actually told the truth. there wasn’t any romance involved with the two of them, their bond was stronger than romance itself, they were brothers and beyond that, they were soul mates. they loved each other strongly, but not in a romantic kind of way. john was in love with yoko romantically - paul himself said how it took a lot of time for him to accept that john was in love with yoko, and how he passed onto john’s secondary plan. paul always had a somewhat jealous behavior regarding the people that got too close to john (first stuart, then yoko), because he was supposed to be john’s closest person, he was john’s almost soul mate. but for them to want to be romantically involved, I don’t think any of them had ever wanted that. romance always ruins everything.

[corralline]

I don’t want to ruin people’s imagination and excitement (I too ship mclennon pretty hard), just stating my opinion on this matter:

I think people have way too much wishful thinking about john and paul being involved in something romantic. yes, so john was bisexual, but he was obviously more on the women part, than the men one, and it was also clearly implied that he was more curious and prone to experimenting than bisexual in the true sense of the word.

also, paul confirmed john had never come onto him, and he seemed quite truthful about it, and I don’t understand why paul would lie after so many years in which john has been dead. paul had some homosexual display on screen too, just for the show, and I believe he would have said if he and john had something just to get more publicity. especially now, when bisexuality and homosexuality are everywhere in media and not seen as a controversy anymore.

I don’t think people know what it is like to have a bisexual close friend - in all seriousness now, my best friend is bisexual, but she has never seriously come onto me, because she knows she would ruin our friendship. you get to fun kiss your bisexual friend a few times, if you’re into experimenting, and that’s it.

at most, john and paul probably kissed for the lulz, but I don’t think there was something more than this. there is such thing as powerful friendship without romance, which is even stronger than actual romantic love. john himself had stated how paul was like his brother, and john was a pretty straightforward and blunt guy, he would have talked to someone about it, if there was more.

[amclennonblog]

If John hinted on Paul, he wouldn’t really talk about it and bring all the situation. That is not Paul, he’s not a whore for publicity, let alone talk about secrets of his dead friend, things he might not even want to remember, if McLennon was true. Paul is not cautionless and living wildly, fuck what the press would think. Paul don’t like to talk about his personal life. And also, let’s just notice that Yoko talked about John having desire for Paul before, but later she sued the guy who wrote things she said herself and even authorized the publication and NOW SHE DOESN’T EVEN MENTION PAUL ANYMORE. Can you guess who doesn’t wants to talk about it? Also, John asked himself about a possible relationship with Paul. Why such a thing? He talked about how people never asked them about their closeness and how it was odd…even for him. And Paul actually said he was keeping the “juicy stuff” for after Yoko and Cyn died. John stated that he was replacing Paul with Yoko and that Paul was the first love of his life, Yoko the second. May be only in an intelectual way? Yes. It’s possible that there are more than meet the eyes? Also, yes.

And also, people keep thinking that just because someone dated more women they are a hetero who experimented. Like, Feddie Mercury dated more men, so he was homo, but he also like women…but he was homo because he dated more man? Or, I’m a woman in a relationship with a man, so my bissexuality is on hold, and NOW I’M HETERO????? Sexual orientation doesn’t change. John understood it better than people nowadays

I have sexual attraction for both, Freddie did and John Lennon did. We are bissexuals. Bissexuals are not people that goes kissing around to keep the balance between men and women. I don’t know who created this idea but that’s not how it works. It’s how we feel. Just because John had more “on the spotlight” relationship with women, it doesn’t mean his attraction to men doesn’t count. “Experimenting”, as far as the possible word goes, happened in Hamburg and that old history of two beatles with drag queens or sort of, one of them being John Lennon himself. More than that, like other stories goes, are a whole another thing.

And guess what? The only woman I loved IS ONE OF MY BEST FRIENDS! (yeah, I’m going to say it), and she doesn’t love me back this way. We kissed, she’s bi too, we would go all the way if we had the chance, but, at the end of the day, she doesn’t love me. She loves everybody, polilove, and I would get hurt in the middle of it. It wouldn’t mean to her. But I’m ok with it, I don’t cry like “oh my goood, friendzone”, and I’m in a relationship with a man. So now, my desire and attraction for women doesn’t count? 

People keep getting us wrong. Kiss for a laugh? It is so treated like this, that it took me time to understand how I felt. To feel my heart beating faster. This is my sexuallity, not a joke or an experiment. If your friend is ok with it, fine. You work this out great and I love the idea of John and Paul kissing in Paris, just for the feel (because, I personally don’t think they went really far on physical stuff). As for me, a bissexual in love with her best friend, I only kissed people that I found attractive in some way. There are lots of kinds of friendships out there, keep the possibilities open.

Sorry, I’m in a McLennon bf since that anon came here and all…

Fuck I’ll have to delete this….

[corralline]

woah man, I didn’t want to hurt you in any way, I just said how my bi friend feels. there are lots of people, there are lots of bisexuals, and there are various types of bisexuality: bisexuals who have an inclination towards men and bisexuals who have an inclination towards women. I still believe john was the second type. john has always been a wilder type of guy, he did things just for fun on many occasions (his experience with brian was this - he didn’t take it seriously, he just wanted to experiment and did it more for brian). I also sustain what I have said: I don’t believe john was in love romantically with paul. the beatles always claimed how they loved each other and this is how artists are - I have heard actors and singers calling each other ‘the love of their lives’ because of how close they were, almost like soul mates, not because they were necessarily romantically in love with each other. there isn’t any clear proof that john and paul had something, because if they had, something would have come out eventually (just like in john and brian’s case). john was a joking and sarcastic guy and he always made jokes on paul’s account, which is why he himself made that joke about him ‘fucking paul’.  he may have felt attraction for paul, but I don’t think he seriously wanted to bang him, and I repeat what I’ve said: john himself had stated how paul was his ‘brother’, and john was very blunt. people can believe what they want in the end, if believing john and paul were romantically involved makes you feel better, then go ahead. I just stated how I don’t seriously believe such a thing.

[corralline]

I don’t want to ruin people’s imagination and excitement (I too ship mclennon pretty hard), just stating my opinion on this matter:

I think people have way too much wishful thinking about john and paul being involved in something romantic. yes, so john was bisexual, but he was obviously more on the women part, than the men one, and it was also clearly implied that he was more curious and prone to experimenting than bisexual in the true sense of the word.

also, paul confirmed john had never come onto him, and he seemed quite truthful about it, and I don’t understand why paul would lie after so many years in which john has been dead. paul had some homosexual display on screen too, just for the show, and I believe he would have said if he and john had something just to get more publicity. especially now, when bisexuality and homosexuality are everywhere in media and not seen as a controversy anymore.

I don’t think people know what it is like to have a bisexual close friend - in all seriousness now, my best friend is bisexual, but she has never seriously come onto me, because she knows she would ruin our friendship. you get to fun kiss your bisexual friend a few times, if you’re into experimenting, and that’s it.

at most, john and paul probably kissed for the lulz, but I don’t think there was something more than this. there is such thing as powerful friendship without romance, which is even stronger than actual romantic love. john himself had stated how paul was like his brother, and john was a pretty straightforward and blunt guy, he would have talked to someone about it, if there was more.

[corralline]

by membrillita

[mclennonaniac]

john: wow the stars are beautiful tonight paul: yeah they are john: you know who else is beautiful? paul: *blushes* who? john: me