I am your daddy
d e v o n

No title available
đȘŒ
macklin celebrini has autism
trying on a metaphor
Cosmic Funnies

titsay
styofa doing anything
h
hello vonnie
occasionally subtle
taylor price

#extradirty
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
AnasAbdin
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

if i look back, i am lost
Misplaced Lens Cap
we're not kids anymore.
seen from India
seen from Poland
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@corralline
I am your daddy
george: woah! why did you just smack my butt?! john: oh, sorry, mate, I couldnât see your face when you were bending over. I thought you were paul george: oh, okay george: george: wait, what
John:Â God, Paul. With that hat you look like a girlÂ
Paul: Iâm a pretty girl? -w-
John: ÂŹ////ÂŹ
TenĂa que dibujar esto xD Vi este dialogo y pos, aquĂ estĂĄ
Had to draw this xD I saw this dialogue and, here it is
I reckon this actually happened between john and paul
john: oi macca wanna come over anâ write songs
paul: canât johnny I have a date
john:Â
paul:
when you pose with your bff
 marry me
cuties
I donât want to ruin peopleâs imagination and excitement (I too ship mclennon pretty hard), just stating my opinion on this matter:
I think people have way too much wishful thinking about john and paul being involved in something romantic. yes, so john was bisexual, but he was obviously more on the women part, than the men one, and it was also clearly implied that he was more curious and prone to experimenting than bisexual in the true sense of the word.
also, paul confirmed john had never come onto him, and he seemed quite truthful about it, and I donât understand why paul would lie after so many years in which john has been dead. paul had some homosexual display on screen too, just for the show, and I believe he would have said if he and john had something just to get more publicity. especially now, when bisexuality and homosexuality are everywhere in media and not seen as a controversy anymore.
I donât think people know what it is like to have a bisexual close friend - in all seriousness now, my best friend is bisexual, but she has never seriously come onto me, because she knows she would ruin our friendship. you get to fun kiss your bisexual friend a few times, if youâre into experimenting, and thatâs it.
at most, john and paul probably kissed for the lulz, but I donât think there was something more than this. there is such thing as powerful friendship without romance, which is even stronger than actual romantic love. john himself had stated how paul was like his brother, and john was a pretty straightforward and blunt guy, he would have talked to someone about it, if there was more.
If John hinted on Paul, he wouldnât really talk about it and bring all the situation. That is not Paul, heâs not a whore for publicity, let alone talk about secrets of his dead friend, things he might not even want to remember, if McLennon was true. Paul is not cautionless and living wildly, fuck what the press would think. Paul donât like to talk about his personal life. And also, letâs just notice that Yoko talked about John having desire for Paul before, but later she sued the guy who wrote things she said herself and even authorized the publication and NOW SHE DOESNâT EVEN MENTION PAUL ANYMORE. Can you guess who doesnât wants to talk about it? Also, John asked himself about a possible relationship with Paul. Why such a thing? He talked about how people never asked them about their closeness and how it was oddâŠeven for him. And Paul actually said he was keeping the âjuicy stuffâ for after Yoko and Cyn died. John stated that he was replacing Paul with Yoko and that Paul was the first love of his life, Yoko the second. May be only in an intelectual way? Yes. Itâs possible that there are more than meet the eyes? Also, yes.
And also, people keep thinking that just because someone dated more women they are a hetero who experimented. Like, Feddie Mercury dated more men, so he was homo, but he also like womenâŠbut he was homo because he dated more man? Or, Iâm a woman in a relationship with a man, so my bissexuality is on hold, and NOW IâM HETERO????? Sexual orientation doesnât change. John understood it better than people nowadays
I have sexual attraction for both, Freddie did and John Lennon did. We are bissexuals. Bissexuals are not people that goes kissing around to keep the balance between men and women. I donât know who created this idea but thatâs not how it works. Itâs how we feel. Just because John had more âon the spotlightâ relationship with women, it doesnât mean his attraction to men doesnât count. âExperimentingâ, as far as the possible word goes, happened in Hamburg and that old history of two beatles with drag queens or sort of, one of them being John Lennon himself. More than that, like other stories goes, are a whole another thing.
And guess what? The only woman I loved IS ONE OF MY BEST FRIENDS! (yeah, Iâm going to say it), and she doesnât love me back this way. We kissed, sheâs bi too, we would go all the way if we had the chance, but, at the end of the day, she doesnât love me. She loves everybody, polilove, and I would get hurt in the middle of it. It wouldnât mean to her. But Iâm ok with it, I donât cry like âoh my goood, friendzoneâ, and Iâm in a relationship with a man. So now, my desire and attraction for women doesnât count?Â
People keep getting us wrong. Kiss for a laugh? It is so treated like this, that it took me time to understand how I felt. To feel my heart beating faster. This is my sexuallity, not a joke or an experiment. If your friend is ok with it, fine. You work this out great and I love the idea of John and Paul kissing in Paris, just for the feel (because, I personally donât think they went really far on physical stuff). As for me, a bissexual in love with her best friend, I only kissed people that I found attractive in some way. There are lots of kinds of friendships out there, keep the possibilities open.
Sorry, Iâm in a McLennon bf since that anon came here and allâŠ
Fuck Iâll have to delete thisâŠ.
woah man, I didnât want to hurt you in any way, I just said how my bi friend feels. there are lots of people, there are lots of bisexuals, and there are various types of bisexuality: bisexuals who have an inclination towards men and bisexuals who have an inclination towards women. I still believe john was the second type. john has always been a wilder type of guy, he did things just for fun on many occasions (his experience with brian was this - he didnât take it seriously, he just wanted to experiment and did it more for brian). I also sustain what I have said: I donât believe john was in love romantically with paul. the beatles always claimed how they loved each other and this is how artists are - I have heard actors and singers calling each other âthe love of their livesâ because of how close they were, almost like soul mates, not because they were necessarily romantically in love with each other. there isnât any clear proof that john and paul had something, because if they had, something would have come out eventually (just like in john and brianâs case). john was a joking and sarcastic guy and he always made jokes on paulâs account, which is why he himself made that joke about him âfucking paulâ.  he may have felt attraction for paul, but I donât think he seriously wanted to bang him, and I repeat what Iâve said: john himself had stated how paul was his âbrotherâ, and john was very blunt. people can believe what they want in the end, if believing john and paul were romantically involved makes you feel better, then go ahead. I just stated how I donât seriously believe such a thing.
relax, Iâm being bitchy, or sesible too much these daysâŠ
Now Iâll talk because I just like to talk about itâŠ
I think John and Brianâs stuff came out because people openly asked about it (to the point John almost killed a guy, the guy asked him) and they are not here anymore to keep it away if they were not confortable with it. Once I read or heard Paul is too powerful to mess with. You donât go on the press saying what you want about him if you donât want to be screwed for the rest of your career. If he doesnât want it to come out, it wonât. Philip Norman played with fire by publishing that paragraph in his book and he got burned. I, as a no one on tumblr, am affraid of talking about it sometimesâŠhahahaha.
Also the only person that really talked about Brian and John was Pete Shotton and now Yoko. Paul denied it, as in John never said anything to him. Paul is a know nothing about Johnâs sexuality for the press. He stated John was not gay (bi) because if he was, there would have been a hint. And he was pretty strong about it, âI would have noticedâ âIf he was gay, I think there would have been a hint somewhereâ. And how come he never noticed if he was that close as he think he was? He may have noticed, but then he would be lyingâŠwhy? 50 years later, Yoko herself talked about itâŠand he keeps his mouth shut. Thatâs what bothers me. If they were friends to the point Paul never knew, they werenât nearly as close as Paul produly says they were. If Paul knew and is hiding and lying, there is something in this he is not comfortable letting goâŠ
I donât know how they felt. The only thing I believe strongly is something I read once, that there were things unsaid and unsure between them. As an author said (I think he was psychologist, tho Iâm not sure), John had strange feelings for Paul, whether he was aware of it or not, thatâs what gave their relationship a different and confused sense. He analysed them and their dynamic, it changed my views. But, this belief is my lower guessâŠthe highest are kisses, that would give a physical edge to the strange feeling, but it wouldnât be as taboo as in the first option, as for possible. But there are things to come out yet.Â
I donât think paul is as âpowerfulâ as some people want to believe to the point where there wouldnât be any screwed up rumors about him either, I mean there were lots of wacky rumors regarding paul (e.g: him not being paul, him actually being an impostor, he also flirted with brian to get his way, plus he kissed a guy in front of the cameras), I donât think paul cares about what people say about him. and the same was for john. which is why I donât think paul lied, he actually told the truth. there wasnât any romance involved with the two of them, their bond was stronger than romance itself, they were brothers and beyond that, they were soul mates. they loved each other strongly, but not in a romantic kind of way. john was in love with yoko romantically - paul himself said how it took a lot of time for him to accept that john was in love with yoko, and how he passed onto johnâs secondary plan. paul always had a somewhat jealous behavior regarding the people that got too close to john (first stuart, then yoko), because he was supposed to be johnâs closest person, he was johnâs almost soul mate. but for them to want to be romantically involved, I donât think any of them had ever wanted that. romance always ruins everything.
I donât want to ruin peopleâs imagination and excitement (I too ship mclennon pretty hard), just stating my opinion on this matter:
I think people have way too much wishful thinking about john and paul being involved in something romantic. yes, so john was bisexual, but he was obviously more on the women part, than the men one, and it was also clearly implied that he was more curious and prone to experimenting than bisexual in the true sense of the word.
also, paul confirmed john had never come onto him, and he seemed quite truthful about it, and I donât understand why paul would lie after so many years in which john has been dead. paul had some homosexual display on screen too, just for the show, and I believe he would have said if he and john had something just to get more publicity. especially now, when bisexuality and homosexuality are everywhere in media and not seen as a controversy anymore.
I donât think people know what it is like to have a bisexual close friend - in all seriousness now, my best friend is bisexual, but she has never seriously come onto me, because she knows she would ruin our friendship. you get to fun kiss your bisexual friend a few times, if youâre into experimenting, and thatâs it.
at most, john and paul probably kissed for the lulz, but I donât think there was something more than this. there is such thing as powerful friendship without romance, which is even stronger than actual romantic love. john himself had stated how paul was like his brother, and john was a pretty straightforward and blunt guy, he would have talked to someone about it, if there was more.
If John hinted on Paul, he wouldnât really talk about it and bring all the situation. That is not Paul, heâs not a whore for publicity, let alone talk about secrets of his dead friend, things he might not even want to remember, if McLennon was true. Paul is not cautionless and living wildly, fuck what the press would think. Paul donât like to talk about his personal life. And also, letâs just notice that Yoko talked about John having desire for Paul before, but later she sued the guy who wrote things she said herself and even authorized the publication and NOW SHE DOESNâT EVEN MENTION PAUL ANYMORE. Can you guess who doesnât wants to talk about it? Also, John asked himself about a possible relationship with Paul. Why such a thing? He talked about how people never asked them about their closeness and how it was oddâŠeven for him. And Paul actually said he was keeping the âjuicy stuffâ for after Yoko and Cyn died. John stated that he was replacing Paul with Yoko and that Paul was the first love of his life, Yoko the second. May be only in an intelectual way? Yes. Itâs possible that there are more than meet the eyes? Also, yes.
And also, people keep thinking that just because someone dated more women they are a hetero who experimented. Like, Feddie Mercury dated more men, so he was homo, but he also like womenâŠbut he was homo because he dated more man? Or, Iâm a woman in a relationship with a man, so my bissexuality is on hold, and NOW IâM HETERO????? Sexual orientation doesnât change. John understood it better than people nowadays
I have sexual attraction for both, Freddie did and John Lennon did. We are bissexuals. Bissexuals are not people that goes kissing around to keep the balance between men and women. I donât know who created this idea but thatâs not how it works. Itâs how we feel. Just because John had more âon the spotlightâ relationship with women, it doesnât mean his attraction to men doesnât count. âExperimentingâ, as far as the possible word goes, happened in Hamburg and that old history of two beatles with drag queens or sort of, one of them being John Lennon himself. More than that, like other stories goes, are a whole another thing.
And guess what? The only woman I loved IS ONE OF MY BEST FRIENDS! (yeah, Iâm going to say it), and she doesnât love me back this way. We kissed, sheâs bi too, we would go all the way if we had the chance, but, at the end of the day, she doesnât love me. She loves everybody, polilove, and I would get hurt in the middle of it. It wouldnât mean to her. But Iâm ok with it, I donât cry like âoh my goood, friendzoneâ, and Iâm in a relationship with a man. So now, my desire and attraction for women doesnât count?Â
People keep getting us wrong. Kiss for a laugh? It is so treated like this, that it took me time to understand how I felt. To feel my heart beating faster. This is my sexuallity, not a joke or an experiment. If your friend is ok with it, fine. You work this out great and I love the idea of John and Paul kissing in Paris, just for the feel (because, I personally donât think they went really far on physical stuff). As for me, a bissexual in love with her best friend, I only kissed people that I found attractive in some way. There are lots of kinds of friendships out there, keep the possibilities open.
Sorry, Iâm in a McLennon bf since that anon came here and allâŠ
Fuck Iâll have to delete thisâŠ.
woah man, I didnât want to hurt you in any way, I just said how my bi friend feels. there are lots of people, there are lots of bisexuals, and there are various types of bisexuality: bisexuals who have an inclination towards men and bisexuals who have an inclination towards women. I still believe john was the second type. john has always been a wilder type of guy, he did things just for fun on many occasions (his experience with brian was this - he didnât take it seriously, he just wanted to experiment and did it more for brian). I also sustain what I have said: I donât believe john was in love romantically with paul. the beatles always claimed how they loved each other and this is how artists are - I have heard actors and singers calling each other âthe love of their livesâ because of how close they were, almost like soul mates, not because they were necessarily romantically in love with each other. there isnât any clear proof that john and paul had something, because if they had, something would have come out eventually (just like in john and brianâs case). john was a joking and sarcastic guy and he always made jokes on paulâs account, which is why he himself made that joke about him âfucking paulâ.  he may have felt attraction for paul, but I donât think he seriously wanted to bang him, and I repeat what Iâve said: john himself had stated how paul was his âbrotherâ, and john was very blunt. people can believe what they want in the end, if believing john and paul were romantically involved makes you feel better, then go ahead. I just stated how I donât seriously believe such a thing.
I donât want to ruin peopleâs imagination and excitement (I too ship mclennon pretty hard), just stating my opinion on this matter:
I think people have way too much wishful thinking about john and paul being involved in something romantic. yes, so john was bisexual, but he was obviously more on the women part, than the men one, and it was also clearly implied that he was more curious and prone to experimenting than bisexual in the true sense of the word.
also, paul confirmed john had never come onto him, and he seemed quite truthful about it, and I donât understand why paul would lie after so many years in which john has been dead. paul had some homosexual display on screen too, just for the show, and I believe he would have said if he and john had something just to get more publicity. especially now, when bisexuality and homosexuality are everywhere in media and not seen as a controversy anymore.
I donât think people know what it is like to have a bisexual close friend - in all seriousness now, my best friend is bisexual, but she has never seriously come onto me, because she knows she would ruin our friendship. you get to fun kiss your bisexual friend a few times, if youâre into experimenting, and thatâs it.
at most, john and paul probably kissed for the lulz, but I donât think there was something more than this. there is such thing as powerful friendship without romance, which is even stronger than actual romantic love. john himself had stated how paul was like his brother, and john was a pretty straightforward and blunt guy, he would have talked to someone about it, if there was more.
by membrillita
john: wow the stars are beautiful tonight paul: yeah they are john: you know who else is beautiful? paul: *blushes* who? john: me