🎂💕🌟✨
One Nice Bug Per Day
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

PR's Tumblrdome
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

Love Begins
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Discoholic 🪩

roma★
Xuebing Du

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
i don't do bad sauce passes
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
we're not kids anymore.

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

pixel skylines
art blog(derogatory)
No title available
AnasAbdin

tannertan36
$LAYYYTER

seen from Dominican Republic
seen from Netherlands
seen from China

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Argentina
seen from Germany
@curseanon
🎂💕🌟✨
Heart eyes
She's ONLY mine ❤️🔥🦌🌈
Are there any consistent qualifications in Marioverse monarchies as to what qualifies as a prince/princess or a king/queen since we usually always see only one or the other per kingdom? Feels like a case by case basis, but I wonder if there’s any consistency we can gather.
King is the easiest to define. It seems that any adult male ruler of a territory or race is considered a king. We see this with King Bowser, Ōsama, King K. Rool, the Kings of the Mushroom World, King Fret, King Nimbus, King Mousta, King Bask, King Kaliente, King Boo, King Bob-omb, etc.
Prince is also quite easy. It seems that immature male progeny of previous rulers as well as the male relatives of living rulers, regardless of age, are considered princes. For the former, we can see young Prince Bowser from the Yoshi’s Island games and Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time as an example, while for the latter there’s Prince Bowser Jr., Prince Peasley, Prince Pine, Prince Pikante and Prince Mallow. Princes will become Kings once they’ve reached adulthood and their parents die or abdicate the throne. The odd one out here would be Prince Dreambert, but we don’t know if he’s technically reached adulthood or if he had living parents before Antasma’s attack on the Pi’illo Kingdom, so I think this definition still stands.
As for princesses and queens, things are a little more tricky. We know that immature female progeny of the previous rulers as well as the female relatives of living rulers, regardless of age, are considered princesses, as we see with Baby Peach, Baby Daisy and Baby Rosalina, as well as Princess Shokora, Princess Shroob and Princess Rosalina. However, we’ve seen adult female rulers referred to as both princesses and queens, so where is the line drawn between one or the other?
Well, I think it has to do with marriage. Adult female rulers who have never been married are relatively consistently referred to as princesses. We see this with Princess Peach, Princess Daisy, Princess Eclair, (the older) Princess Shroob, the Sprixie Princesses and even Princess Lipid.
However, the games seem to imply that through marriage female rulers become queens:
“Tatanga hypnotized the people of all the kingdoms so that he could control them in any way he liked. In this way he took over Sarasaland. Now, he wants to marry Princess Daisy of Sarasaland and make her his queen.”
[Source: Story, Page 3, Instruction Booklet of Super Mario Land, April 1989]
“Yes...? What is it, dear?... WHAT?! You're asking ME to...? Gracious! You're serious, aren't you? Why, I don't know what to say! Dear me............ I've made my decision... At the request of the Prince, I agree to become his queen. (Queen... Valentina...Ooh! It just makes me SHIVER!!) Well, that's that! Back to your business, everyone!”
[Source: Valentina, temporary usurper of the Nimbus Land throne, Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars, May 1996]
This idea aligns with Queen Nimbus, Queen Jaydes and Queen B., who are married to kings, and is further supported by characters such as Queen Bean, Queen Squirpina XIV or Queen Croacus II, who were likely married at one point based on the presence of their children.
However, it doesn’t seem to be quite as foolproof. There’s the Shadow Queen, Banana Queen, Honey Queen, Queen Merelda and Madame Mirage who, while we don’t know their marital statuses, likely fall outside of this definition. There are workarounds, of course. It’s possible that some of these women are or were married off-screen or are self-proclaimed queens. It’s also possible that the Queen definition extends cover to the “mother” of a race, though that’s all getting a bit deeper into speculation.
These remain my best guesses with the current information we have.
The grand wedding 🔔🎊
This is my gift for the secret Santa exchange in RB Discord for Oph
Episode 8 predictions
Royal! AU
End Of The World
I know the feeling.
It's been a long time since I've drawn from this AU and since it's almost a tradition to make a family portrait-esque drawing when you have a charlastor fankid I finally wanted to make one of my own too hehe
messy garcy thing from a while back, figured id at least clean it up a bit since i doubt ill finish it :’)
flynn lifting lucy out of the lifeboat from 2x06 ❤️❤️
thank you @twilight-deviant for the idea!
What made you jump ship from Wy/att and Lucy to Flynn and Lucy?
The whole Jessica coming back to life thing.
Wyatt dealt with his feelings about Jessica/Lucy in a very poor manner. He chose Jessica but won’t let Lucy go, and gets angry when he feels she’s moving on. He wants them both but he can’t have them both and he couldn’t deal with that fact like an adult. Instead he came off as a whiny and entitled teenager.
The show introduces us to Wyatt through his wife and his mission to save her. Jess is such a huge part of his season 1 plot and she’s the core of his character. (Almost every conversation he has is about Jess and he mentions her at least once an episode in season 1.) She deserved more care and respect from the writers. Everyone saw the Rittenhouse twist a mile away (it’s been done twice with Lucy already, with her mom and dad) and yet the writers still chose to go there. It felt like the writers had to make Jess a villain so they could write a breakup between Wyatt and Jess where he didn’t come off as the asshole who leaves his (previously totally devoted to) wife for another woman. If they were going to insult Jess like this they never should have brought her back in the first place. As I said we were introduced to Wyatt through his fight for his wife and that was the reason I loved him so much. By corrupting his relationship with his wife they effectively destroyed anything I liked about Wyatt. And I saw through the writers whole “oh, poor Wyatt trapped with his evil monster wife :(” schtick.
Wyatt was skirting around adultery all of season 2 but never actually committed to it because he’s “such a good guy”. And then when Wyatt found out Jess was Rittenhouse at the very end of the episode he tells Lucy he loves her. That means only a few hours later. That’s fast as fuck for just losing your wife and it gave me the impression he was just waiting for an excuse to run back to Lucy.
Wyatt made Rufus’s death about his feelings for Lucy. Everyone is traumatized and Lucy is beaten and broken (physically and emotionally) and Wyatt just had to tell Lucy he loved her. And notice how Lucy did not respond (although the viewers know she loves him) and instead redirects the conversation back to Rufus (”I can’t believe he’s gone”) because she literally cannot handle the conversation at the moment. She’s too fucked up, so much as happened and she’s drained.
Which brings me to my final point: season 2 simply revealed to me that Wyatt’s love for Lucy is selfish. He doesn’t think about how it affects Lucy or Jess. He doesn’t have tact to know when to just let something go. He only thinks about himself and what he wants and feels. And I hate it.
One of the season finale spoilers was that Flynn or Wyatt will witness a moment between the other man with Lucy and will be the bigger person and not interrupt. I thought it was going to be Wyatt because he has been selfish all of season 2 and it would be growth for him to once in his life not insert himself into Lucy’s. And it turned out to be Flynn! Which I was not expecting at all because Flynn had continuously throughout season 2 removed himself from the situation when Lucy and Wyatt were having a moment. He never interrupted or interfered and so it’s not exactly groundbreaking for him to continue that behavior in the finale.
There’s so many things I hate about how Wyatt interacts with Lucy but this is all I’ve got off the top of my head. (There’s definitely more.) And I really did love them in season 1. I’m especially mad because so much has happened but the writers seem to be trying to pretend everything is the same between seasons 1 and 2. Pretending like Wyatt’s wife isn’t alive and pregnant. Pretending that Lucy/Wyatt are still an option. It’s just insulting to Lucy. She deserves better.
Like how is it supposed to end at this point? Jessica “tragically dying” (AKA getting the fuck outta the way for Lucy) and Lucy raising her child with Wyatt? No thanks.
EDIT: I just realized I never mentioned Flynn in this answer, and I think that’s because me disliking Lyatt now has nothing to do with Flynn. I have always enjoyed Garcy’s dynamic since season 1 and a few choice scenes in season 2 made me realize their feelings are beginning to shift to romance. And I’m a huge slut for slow-burns, and I love all their scenes, so naturally I began to ship them as well. :)
There's this photo of a stag and a doe going around on twitter/bluesky atm and have seen two people redraw it as charlastor and like 4 more expressing wanting to do the same so it might become a trend... I couldn't resist doing the same, it's so fun
Ruddy Hotel
(Hazbin Hotel Swap AU - Part 4)
Close ups and some characters' information
Bonus: Eden trio and Eve doodle
(Part 1) (Part 2) (Part 3) (Part 5)
Hazbin Hotel (AU) - The Executioner Chapter 1 - The Origin
Canonical Abel revealed!
With the official post of the series revealing Abel's design and color palette, many artists will keep their designs in their respective AU (Alternative Universe). I will do the same, this will probably be applied to Cain as well.
Remembering that this is not a criticism of the original. I just don't want to discard my design.
Post:
“What did you do?” Adam asked.
Cain—his first born, the first ever born—looked at him with eyes wide and terrified. Adam’s eyes, Eve would say, the same brown of rich, rain-watered soil.
“I don’t know,” Cain said. “I don’t- Dad, I don’t know. Why won’t he wake up?”
Cain’s lip trembled, hands clasped tightly together, tears welling and falling in great fat drops. He was still so young, younger than Adam had ever been. His knees were knobbly and his wrists thin and he barely came up to Adam’s chin. Big enough to work, to till the fields and pull the weeds and harvest the crops, but small enough to curl tight in his mother’s arms when lightning cracked the sky.
On the ground was Abel, even younger yet. He tended the flocks and kept watch for anything that might want to harm them. He was good with them—gentler than Adam understood, though Eve told him to let him be. Even now several sheep creeped closer, braying nervously at the sharp scent of iron.
Abel was still shorter than Eve. He had a gap in the far back of his mouth where the last of his molars had popped out only a handful of days before. He had freckles that showed up in the summer sun, as if he had grown them there, all over his face and shoulders and arms.
“Dad, what do I do? What can I-?”
Abel’s eyes were open, looking to the sky that they so resembled, but they didn’t see anything. Somehow, Adam knew. Abel wouldn’t see anything ever again.