i just used a big word incorrectly in an essay this is the lowest i have ever been
RMH

pixel skylines

ellievsbear
Not today Justin
EXPECTATIONS

Kiana Khansmith
art blog(derogatory)

#extradirty
Sade Olutola
No title available
Misplaced Lens Cap
Today's Document

shark vs the universe

JVL
we're not kids anymore.
tumblr dot com
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
YOU ARE THE REASON

if i look back, i am lost
Monterey Bay Aquarium

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Fiji

seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from Russia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Dominican Republic
seen from Egypt

seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia
seen from Argentina

seen from United States
seen from Mongolia
seen from Germany
seen from Algeria

seen from Finland
seen from South Africa
seen from Bangladesh
@darklorddiscount
i just used a big word incorrectly in an essay this is the lowest i have ever been
i thought my life was stabilizing and that it wasnt going to be ruined by another fictional universe
but then like
firefly
First | Second | Third | Fourth | Fifth | Sixth | Seventh | Eighth | Ninth | Tenth | Eleventh Photography by LJinto @ C2E2 '13. ~~~Please do not delete Photo Credits!~~~
This group really was incredible. We were missing a couple of the doctors and our friend stepped up for the 1st that weekend, and we actually FOUND our 3rd at the con center. It sounds like a fairy tale how this group came together and it was glorious.
These girls all have a special place in my heart. and i hope this group forged strong friendship between everyone. All these ladies are beautiful and super glad to be apart of it all
Kinda perfect timing us getting these photos so close to the anniversary ;3
shoutout to the other 5 people on here other than me that don’t watch supernatural
How Moffat Ruined Doctor Who For My Little Sister
[DOCTOR WHO SPOILERS AHEAD]
Submitted by holycheeseandcrackers
Right, so, anyone who follows me knows that I am Not A Moffat Fan.
I have absolutely no expectations or high-hopes for the new season of Doctor Who, (he’s put me right off Sherlock, I probably won’t even watch the new season of that), and to be honest, I am exhausted with pointing out his poor writing, his use of queers as punch-lines or to ‘sex things up a bit’ and his horrendous portrayal of women. Not to mention the fact that he has utterly destroyed a show that was a part of my childhood, hugely important to me, and influenced my further explorations into fantasy and sci-fi. I have made and reblogged countless posts about how disappointed and angry I am, and at this stage I really just feel like ignoring everything until someone more competent replaces him.
I can remember the exact moment that I realised how bad the writing in Doctor Who had become:
“I don’t get it, one minute she wants to marry you, the next minute she wants to kill you!”
“She’s been brainwashed, it probably makes sense to her. Plus, she’s a woman. Oh, shut up!”
That scene was like two slaps in the face for me. First I am told that the Doctor (my Doctor) now considers my sex to be irrational and over-emotional. Then, after that, I am told that I am not allowed to complain about this. I am not allowed to say anything. I am told “Oh, shut up!” in manner which suggests that if I protest, I clearly just don’t have a sense of humour.
By the Doctor. The Doctor said that. I can’t even imagine 10 or 9 saying anything like that. It was like the Doctor had become Moffat’s mouth-piece.
After that scene, I literally just sat there, practically in shock, going Oh, wow. That one cut deep. Oh wow that was bad.
So when I watched Asylum of The Daleks, I couldn’t even be bothered. I could not. Even. Be. Bothered. I watched as the pointless, nonsensical plot meandered along, not even able to gather the strength to wonder
Why the hell there are suddenly shitloads of Daleks,
Why the Doctor has a new nickname (The Predator) that is also apparently age-old that we’ve never heard of,
How Skaro has magically appeared again,
Why Moffat thinks we all have the attention span of five-year-olds (a continuing theme)which means he has to break up an important couple off-screen and then BOOM reunite them in the same episode before it even sinks in and we can actually Give A Fuck (Again, a continuing theme – Moffat, I am not going to Give A Fuck about Mels if you cram her down my throat in a montage, and then shoot her, and then have her be River Song all in the space of ten minutes),
Why Amy’s only concern with the whole children thing is ‘oooh poor Rory’ and not ‘actually I was trapped by a freaky cult and forced to give birth against my will so yeah, no, won’t be doing that again’ – Seriously, when she said “I can’t have children” I IMMEDIATELY assumed she meant that it would be mentally too traumatic for her.
Why the hell Moffat thinks he can smugly claim that he represents queers in the show when he keeps pulling shit like “I went through a phase” and then has the character say that they only mentioned their girl-on-girl experience because they’re flirting.
How the fuck Rory thinks that it is healthy, and not at all passive-aggressive to say “I love you more! We both know it!”. Seriously, that is some fucking Mr. Nice Guy TM behaviour right there. I previously liked Rory, though he had his flaws (e.g. his constant inability to trust Amy when it came to the Doctor), but that was a disturbing insight into the way his mind works. He clearly ‘keeps score’ of the things they both do for each other, and that is just wrong. 2,000 years, Rory? You weren’t ASKED to wait. You didn’t HAVE to. But now you’re going to hold that over Amy’s head as Proof I Love You More And You Can Never Top That forever? After everything Amy has been through? Jesus.
Plus there was the weird implication that if Amy did love Rory less, that means she has less love in her for the Daleks to erase. So if she can’t love Mr. Super Perfect Rory, she can’t love anyone? What about her family, her friends? Get over yourself, Rory.
So many other things. Too many other things.
And to be honest, I wasn’t even going to bother complaining about it. I am just shit sick of Moffat, and his failure to listen to any criticism whatsoever, and his brushing off of the concerns of the show’s fans.
But then something happened that has made me very angry, and I feel the need to share.
Read More
Dear Santa please help Kate overcome 2007 and aly & aj in general except for the Potential Break Up song which was musical excellence
ur right i dont need aly and aj life is good
i cant complain
i mean i could but no ones listening
but their image overwhelms my brain, and it feels good (it feels good it feels good)
LIKE A ROLLER COASTER RIDE
HOLDIN ON WHITE KNUCKLES LIKE
WHOA, WHOA (got me feelin like) WHOA, WHOA
“There comes a point where Susan, who was the older girl, is lost to Narnia because she becomes interested in lipstick. She’s become irreligious basically because she found sex. I have a big problem with that.” - JK Rowling
Can we talk about Susan’s fabulous adventures after Narnia? The ones where she wears nylons and elegant blouses when she wants to, and short skirts and bright lipstick when she wants to, and hiking boots and tough jeans and big men’s plaid shirts when she feels like backpacking out into the mountains and remembering what it was to be lost in a world full of terrific beauty— I know her siblings say she stops talking about it, that Susan walks away from the memories of Narnia, but I don’t think she ever really forgot.
I want to read about Susan finishing out boarding school as a grown queen reigning from a teenaged girl’s body. School bullies and peer pressure from children and teachers who treat you like you’re less than sentient wouldn’t have the same impact. C’mon, Susan of the Horn, Susan who bested the DLF at archery, and rode a lion, and won wars, sitting in a school uniform with her eyebrows rising higher and higher as some old goon at the front of the room slams his fist on the lectern.
Susan living through WW2, huddling with her siblings, a young adult (again), a fighting queen and champion marksman kept from the action, until she finally storms out against screaming parents’ wishes and volunteers as a nurse on the front. She keeps a knife or two hidden under her clothes because when it comes down to it, they called her Gentle, but sometimes loving means fighting for what you care for.
She’ll apply to a women’s college on the East Coast, because she fell in love with America when her parents took her there before the war. She goes in majoring in Literature (her ability to decipher High Diction in historical texts is uncanny), but checks out every book she can on history, philosophy, political science. She sneaks into the boys’ school across town and borrows their books too. She was once responsible for a kingdom, roads and taxes and widows and crops and war. She grew from child to woman with that mantle of duty wrapped around her shoulders. Now, tossed here on this mundane land, forever forbidden from her true kingdom, Susan finds that she can give up Narnia but she cannot give up that responsibility. She looks around and thinks I could do this better.
I want Susan sneaking out to drink at pubs with the girls, her friends giggling at the boys checking them out from across the way, until Susan walks over (with her nylons, with her lipstick, with her sovereignty written out in whatever language she damn well pleases) and beats them all at pool. Susan studying for tests and bemoaning Aristotle and trading a boy with freckles all over his nose shooting lessons so that he will teach her calculus. Susan kissing boys and writing home to Lucy and kissing girls and helping smuggle birth control to the ladies in her dorm because Susan Pevensie is a queen and she understands the right of a woman to rule over her own body.
Susan losing them all to a train crash, Edmund and Peter and Lucy, Jill and Eustace, and Lucy and Lucy and Lucy, who Susan’s always felt the most responsible for. Because this is a girl who breathes responsibility, the little mother to her three siblings until a wardrobe whisked them away and she became High Queen to a whole land, ruled it for more than a decade, then came back centuries later as a legend. What it must do to you, to be a legend in the body of a young girl, to have that weight on your shoulders and have a lion tell you that you have to let it go. What is must do to you, to be left alone to decide whether to bury your family in separate ceremonies, or all at once, the same way they died, all at once and without you. What it must do to you, to stand there in black, with your nylons, and your lipstick, and feel responsible for these people who you will never be able to explain yourself to and who you can never save.
Maybe she dreams sometimes they made it back to Narnia after all. Peter is a king again. Lucy walks with Aslan and all the dryads dance. Maybe Susan dreams that she went with them— the train jerks, a bright light, a roar calling you home.
Maybe she doesn’t.
Susan grows older and grows up. Sometimes she hears Lucy’s horrified voice in her head, “Nylons? Lipstick, Susan? Who wants to grow up?” and Susan thinks, “Well you never did, Luce.” Susan finishes her degree, stays in America (England looks too much like Narnia, too much like her siblings, and too little, all at once). She starts writing for the local paper under the pseudonym Frank Tumnus, because she wants to write about politics and social policy and be listened to, because the name would have made Edmund laugh.
She writes as Susan Pevensie, too, about nylons and lipstick, how to give a winning smiles and throw parties, because she knows there is a kind of power there and she respects it. She won wars with war sometimes, in Narnia, but sometimes she stopped them before they began.
Peter had always looked disapprovingly on the care with which Susan applied her makeup back home in England, called it vanity. And even then, Susan would smile at him, say “I use what weapons I have at hand,” and not explain any more than that. The boy ruled at her side for more than a decade. He should know better.
Vain is not the proper word. This is about power. But maybe Peter wouldn’t have liked the word “ambition” any more than “vanity.”
Susan is a young woman in the 50s and 60s. Frank Tumnus has quite the following now. He’s written a few books, controversial, incendiary. Susan gets wrapped up in the civil rights movement, because of course she would. It’s not her first war. All the same, she almost misses the White Witch. Greed is a cleaner villain than senseless hate. She gets on the Freedom Rider bus, mails Mr. Tumnus articles back home whenever there’s a chance, those rare occasions they’re not locked up or immediately threatened. She is older now than she ever was in Narnia. Susan dreams about Telemarines killing fauns.
Time rolls on. Maybe she falls in love with a young activist or an old cynic. Maybe she doesn’t. Maybe Frank Tumnus, controversial in the moment, brilliant in retrospect, gets offered an honorary title from a prestigious university. She declines and publishes an editorial revealing her identity. Her paper fires her. Three others mail her job offers.
When Vietnam rolls around, she protests in the streets. Susan understands the costs of war. She has lived through not just through the brutal wars of one life, but two.
Maybe she has children now. Maybe she tells them stories about a magical place and a magical lion, the stories Lucy and Edmund brought home about how if you sail long enough you reach the place where the seas fall off the edge of the world. But maybe she tells them about Cinderella instead, Sleeping Beauty, Rapunzel, except Rapunzel cuts off her own hair and uses it to climb down the tower and escape. The damsel uses what tools she has at hand.
A lion told her to walk away, and she did. He forbade her magic, he forbade her her own kingdom, so she made her own.
Susan Pevensie did not lose faith. She found it.
"But as for Lucy, she was always gay and golden-haired, and all princes in those parts desired her to be their Queen, and her own people called her Queen Lucy the Valiant."
Answer this with ten random facts about yourself and send to your 10 favourite followers!
uh wow okay thank friend
i did 75 curl-ups yesterday and now i want to cry
i do backstage crew which mostly just means that i make teddy bear wrecking ball videos and disappoint laurel
gamer gurl
um
i want to study space?
my wardrobe consists mainly of sweaters and harry potter t-shirts
i just discovered cream cheese and it was the single most important event of my life
dont call me katie i will punch you except probably not i will just never correct you and after like 7 months of you calling me katie a friend will intervene and it’ll be embarrassing for everyone involved this has happened a lot
martha jones is better than you
??????????
Also, I still occasionally see posts that are like “The Hunger Games fandom makes Gale out to be a monster but then acts like Cato is a-okay”
Don’t get me wrong, they’re both terrible human beings who willingly both attempted and succeeded in committing murder
Except Cato was manipulated, lied to, coerced, and brainwashed from birth into committing his crimes
Whereas Gale’s crimes were all committed of his own free will and under no outside duress
Like, I get where his anger comes from, and his emotions are totally valid and justified, but the way he acted on those emotions in a situation where he was not being manipulated and was free to react as he chose can only be described as “monsterly.”
It’s incredibly difficult for me to address Gale hate posts made in such a vein because I usually go into a boiling rage over them. But I’m going to address this anyway because it’s fucking disgusting and deserves to be called out.
First of all, who the fuck compares Gale to Cato and comes out deciding that Cato is the morally superior one in this situation? Cato had immense privilege in comparison to Gale. Cato grew up in a Career district and benefited from both white and class privilege. He was doubtlessly a victim of manipulation as a minor coerced into the Hunger Games, but he has tremendous privilege over Gale, a man of color from one of the poorest districts in Panem.
And then there’s this bullshit statement
Whereas Gale’s crimes were all committed of his own free will and under no outside duress
Oh, I’m sorry. Is the bombing of your home and district not outside duress? Is the premature death of your father in a system that kills and oppresses the men of the Seam not outside duress? Is starving and living in crippling poverty not outside duress? Is having to support your siblings and entire family as a minor not outside duress? Is suffering racism and constant dehumanization at the hands of the merchants not outside duress? Is acting on the belief that you never want to go through that ever fucking again not outside duress? because I sure as fuck think it is.
And I think that Gale’s position as a revolutionary of color coming from an impoverished background is more relevant to the oppression narrative than any shit Cato’s dealt with, particularly when Cato is an individual of privilege whose weaponization was designed to victimize underprivileged participants of the Games and uphold their function. Gale, meanwhile? Gale’s the polar opposite, a man of color from a poor district taking agency into his hands and liberating his people.
Thing is, THG fandom is scared of Gale. Collins herself was scared of Gale and that’s why he received the bullshit treatment and explicit vilification in the narrative. Why are they scared of Gale? Why are you scared of Gale? It’s because he’s an angry man of color. He’s a revolutionary who claims agency and doesn’t balk at making the decision of bombing the Nut, a weapons syndicate that bombed his home and is capable of bombing other anti-Capitol districts, whose destruction will prove essential to the war that liberates him. Did you ever think of that? That this isn’t Gale indulging his petty revenge, but actively contributing to his liberation? Making decisions that ensure never again?
He’s an angry man of color who fights against the Capitol. Indeed, he fights against the Capitol. I’m sorry (not sorry), he doesn’t engage in nonviolent resistance. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Mahatma Gandhi aren’t the only freedom fighters out there whose method of resistance is valid. Violent protest in a state suffering from colonization or dictatorship is entirely valid. Frantz Fanon, David Walker, Malcolm X, and Muhammad Iqbal were all theorists of color who advocated violence for self-liberation. Are they fucking monsters for wanting to be free? Are they monsters for wanting colonized, enslaved and/or oppressed peoples to attain agency and freedom through violence?
What’s sad is that this isn’t applicable only to individual scholars. Let’s consider your bullshit in regards to larger organizations and rebellions. Were the sepoys in the Indian Rebellion of 1857 monsters for killing their white oppressors? Are people of the Syrian opposition in favor of violence monsters? Are Nat Turner and Gabriel Prosser and participants of the Stono Rebellion monsters for leading a slave rebellion and slaughtering whites?
The conclusion I’ve reached? You as a white man are threatened by Gale, an angry man of color willing to dismantle oppressive government via violence.
As a woman of color from a postcolonial nation who has been to Pakistan many times while it was under dictatorship, I’m frankly sickened by your assessment of Gale and the people who unconditionally support it. Your privilege throughout your posts is not only apparent, but blatant. It’s apparent that you’ve never had to live under dictatorship and thus aren’t familiar with the necessities demanded in claiming freedom. I say all this without even touching on the blatant dehumanization of terming a man of color a monster, thus insinuating that he is subhuman for being who he is.
the animators for this movie had a snowflake generator so that every single snowflake in the movie was different and if you don’t think that’s really punk rock idk what to tell u
shame they couldn’t do that with women’s faces
Ooooo snap
what this refers to
The Ravenclaw common room is located high up within a tower and known for its panoramic views of the school grounds. It is a large circular room filled with bookcases and blue furnishings. It is also one of the only common rooms to feature a statue of their house founder. The entrance requires no password but the solving of a riddle asked by a bronze eagle knocker. Incorrect answers result in having to wait outside for someone else to answer their riddle successfully. Once inside you can sit under the impressive starry domed ceiling and listen to the relaxing sounds of the wind whistling around the exterior of the tower windows.
When the closing credits rolled after the original ‘The Hunger Games,’ I thought to myself “eh, not bad.” But I was in no rush to see the follow-up. When the closing credits rolled after Francis Lawrence’s ‘The Hunger Games: Catching Fire,’ after I was able to collect myself, I was fully prepared to run out and get a mockingjay tattoo. Over my heart. With the phrase, “I will lay down my life for you, Katniss Everdeen, because you are the first and finest true hero of 21st century cinema.”
Review by Jordan Hoffman
(via ttreacherous)
FUCK WHOEVER CANCELLED THIS SHOW