Do not blame me for who I am. The doctor prescribed me 20 mL of #the lost boys musical twice a day.

tannertan36
No title available
Cosmic Funnies

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

oozey mess
Show & Tell
No title available
Jules of Nature
tumblr dot com

No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
ojovivo
No title available

No title available
macklin celebrini has autism

No title available
occasionally subtle

if i look back, i am lost
Keni
seen from Philippines

seen from Australia

seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from Australia
seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from India
seen from Australia

seen from Hong Kong SAR China

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Netherlands

seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
@davidfangs
Do not blame me for who I am. The doctor prescribed me 20 mL of #the lost boys musical twice a day.
oxidized copper is such a beautiful color palette. The rich reds with the cool teals. Such a vibrant combo. No one is doing it like her.
[ID: Photos of an oxidized copper plate, an oxidized copper pipe, and oxidized pennies. End ID]
hello gorgeous do you come here often
recently when im tempted to say 'i'm gonna kill myself' i try to correct it into saying "im gonna walk into the river and become a trout" or some other form of that. this is my new thing
btw this has graduated into me just saying "the trout population will be affected" and then not elaborating
this post has genuinely helped me so i used it as inspiration for today’s hand lettering practice
One challenge of representing minorities on screen has been the idea that if a character is flawed that will be taken as representative of that minority group because this is the only person in the group on screen. And for a long time, this contributed to complex interesting white characters and boring minority side characters.
The Pitt doesn't do this. Its core characters are almost all deeply fucked up. But it is diverse enough to not have each of those characters be the only person of their particular group represented on screen.
For example, Samira has some major flaws as a doctor - caring but very slow, orders too many tests, can't take feedback, isn't a team player. But that's clearly not because she's an Indian woman. Have you seen Shamsi? She's efficient, bad ass, a little mean. Have you seen Victoria? She's young and smart and figuring shit out. They have flaws but their flaws are different. This helps show they aren't meant to be flaws of a group but flaws of a specific character. Samira's flaws are because she's a complex character. They aren't because the show is pushing a narrative that Indian women make bad doctors.
Did Baran continue to work an entire shift while having seizures then almost start driving? Yes. But are we meant to look at that and say people with disabilities have bad judgment and can't be trusted. No. So clearly not. We see Caleb, Mel, Becca, multiple characters with disabilities on screen. And we understand Baran to be a capable and compassionate doctor, the show goes out of its way to show us that. But it also shows her coping with shame about her disability and how that's complicated by the ways she has to navigate the workplace as a woman and as an ethnic minority. She's meant to be a complex character. We're not supposed to look at her and say people with disabilities, women, or people from the SWANA region are incompetent. If someone thinks that's the right reading here then it's time to go back to go back to elementary school literature class.
Likewise, Robby, a Jewish man with severe mental health conditions, should be allowed to be a complex character. Does he sometimes do things that are sexist? Yes. Is he falling apart and lashing out? Yes. And I think people have grasped that this isn't a statement abou5 how people with depression or PTSD are bad. There are other characters with PTSD, Abbot most notably, who handles his PTSD very differently. So we can see Robby's struggle as his own, as a complex character. But when it comes to the fact that he's Jewish, even though there are multiple other Jewish characters on screen, including Lena who is a caring death doula and nurse, and multiple Jewish patients from different racial and class backgrounds, somehow Robby becomes a justification for a whole load of antisemitic tropes to be dragged into the conversation.
I hate that the Pitt fandom sometimes makes me wish the show didn't make Robby Jewish. I want to be able to watch a show where a character is Jewish but isn't a paragon of virtue. I want to not have fans bringing antisemitic tropes to every conversation of this character or the actor who plays him.
I want to be able to see complex female characters and complex character from all racial and ethnic backgrounds and characters with disabilities represented on screen and be able to see them fuck up and be deeply flawed and struggle just like we've seen messy fucked up white characters on screen for so long.
This fandom needs to stop asking for every woman of color to be a paragon of virtue on screen. And it needs to stop rhetorically tying every flaw of a Jewish character to millennia old blood libels. Please. Otherwise, all that happens is we are stuck with complex, flawed, messy white characters and the most boring minority characters because everyone is too afraid to put a messy character into the world who might be seen as a bad representation for their group.
THANK YOU FOR SAYING IT!!!!
Also we (fandom/audiences/anyone who's discussed the importance of representation and diversity in media over the years) LITERALLY fought and pushed for this kind of culture/show - this was the GOAL!!! (and my god did it feel impossible at times).
But THIS is what was pushed for: a show that doesn't tokenise its minority characters, so they don't have to Be their representation and nothing else, so they can NOT have their stories and arcs revolving around/constantly circling back to them as the queer character or the disabled character or the Jewish character - they can just be characters/people with flaws and interactions and arcs that are not all about one element of them, and so they don't have to represent an entire community on their own, they can just be individuals.
We (as fandom/audience) HAVE to let this happen! We HAVE to stop analysing things with the same perspective and language and attitude that we did in the 2010s because: things are actually finally changing and improving and going where we want and we have to go with them!!! We asked things to change: they changed! Now we have to change with them.
We asked for a show/time where every character could be analysed essentially the same way you would a cishet white guy (which is to say as what was considered the 'default' neutral base that was only influenced by backstory and current story bc he didn't have to be the weight-bearing pillar of an entire community desperate for representation)- and I am about to start begging y'all to imagine/do this unironically, because we are in serious danger as a fandom of undoing what's been done and actually projecting old biases that are trying to evolve and change back onto the things we watch.
What do I mean by this? Okay, solid example: I saw a LOT of fans arguing/complaining that the scene with Baran at the end of season 2 where she breaks down in her car after her shift and realises that she's not safe to drive due to her worsening disability was: all about Robby/that 'Robby made her cry'/that this was her realising that 'Robby was right' and it was 'vindication for Robby'. That right there? That is NOT something the show did. That is something the FANDOM did. That is misogyny perpetuated by the fandom.
The show: had a deliberate gap of multiple scenes/time to distance from Baran and Robby's conversation. The show also very deliberately took her/showed her: OUT of the Pitt/the ED/Robby's in-show domain/place where he still was (which it very very rarely does - this was an exception and a very deliberate and important one) so that she would be in a 'neutral' space/in her OWN space (her car) and in privacy/by herself so this was not being done by or for anyone else, or even so anyone else could witness it - this was a private moment purely for and about her and her coming to terms with her disability and the realities of her situation. It could not have been written/filmed/set-up to be more purely about Baran, and yet...
The FANDOM: made it about Robby. The fandom made a woman's scene and a woman's disability and a woman's story arc about a man. Because fandom is trying so hard to find instances of misogyny and bias (especially from Robby and/or Noah Wyle) that they are creating them where they do not exist/where the show has gone out of its way to avoid forging that connection/where that connection: does not exist. But y'all made it exist anyway. Because it's more important to some of you to have things to get mad at than it is to see and respond to what is actually there. So you see what you expect to see. You see what you WANT to see. And tragically what you want to see is the same thing we've been begging to get the fuck off our screens for YEARS now.
Check yourselves. Do not get sucked in to blindly assuming everything is an act of misogyny or racism or inherent bias. Yes these things still exist, yes we need to be conscious and aware of them and call them out and shut them down: WHEN THEY'RE ACTUALLY HAPPENING. We do NOT need to create bonus instances to get mad at/prove how on the ball and ready to spot Badness we are. Sometimes: a male character and a female character can have a disagreement on screen and it does not necessarily need to contain giant vats of misogyny. Sometimes it's just: two characters have a disagreement on screen and it can be analysed with just that in mind (which is what we GODDAMN WANT!!!!!).
Apply some goddamn critical thinking please. And that means apply it to: the things you are watching, and the things that people are saying about what you are watching. Go back and rewatch the scenes in question. Fact check. Actually start with the most basic 'what is it I am actually watching on-screen now and what is it telling me'. Not 'what do I expect to see/what do I think is going to happen/what do I vaguely remember based on what people have said' what ACTUALLY functionally happens on-screen?
TL;DR: shows are attempting to exist in 2026 meanwhile fandom is stuck in the early 2010s or before and my god it shows and it ain't a good look for y'all.
AU where David treats Marko right and it’s just Pierrevid
sleep is not normal to want and impossible to achieve
really specific trope i like that i feel like can only be explained in a diagram
“His love for David is so huge that he still wants to witness his life.”
“I think any parent, no matter how bad their child behaves, and how bad the path they go down, they will always love their child. David’s not literally my child, but I think I, you know, that’s how I treat it.”
(Paul Alexander Nolan on why Max is filming The Lost Boys performing Have To Have You)
Any kind of truth can set you free
and when i say “there is no platonic explanation for this” what i mean is “there is absolutely a platonic explanation for this but i am choosing to interpret it as romantic because it brings me joy to do so. if this situation would happen to me in real life i would likely read it as platonic and am by no means saying that situations such as this should only be reserved for romantic relationships.”
living in nyc right now is like
This dude is overdue to be a dead vampire!
affirmations:
- it’s fun to be awake & in an upright position
- consciousness is a gift
- i CAN do this anymore