I need james moriarty dead yesterday. I'm genuinely soooo sick of watson (A MAIN PROTAGONIST) getting shafted for moriarty in sherlock holmes adaptations. "Heated rivalry" my ass I literally don't gaf.
Say it louder for the people in the back.
Removing watson and thus the whole watson-holmes dynamic in an adaptation literally makes no sense to me. Watson is the NARRATOR. One of the most interesting things about the books is that we are experiencing Holmes from Watson's first person pov, and therefore we get the same enchantment and surprise Watson does from watching him work. We are simply a bystander in holmes' investigation. Why do we think stories such as the blanched soldier and the lions mane weren't a hit when they first came out? Watson wasn't there and we therefore we got the story from holmes' pov instead, by nature removing the mistique, as that just isn't the way Holmes retells/experiences events.
Whatever happened to "I am lost without my Boswell". Why am I even watching a Sherlock Holmes adaptation without the secondary main character, whose relationship with the main character is a staple of the series? Because people want 'toxic yaoi'? Maybe I'm just biased, but watson/holmes is miles more compelling to me and has so much more subtext compared to holmes/moriarty, which has basically zero — and I feel like it undermines their relationship in the books, boiling it down to "oh they were both smart and had a rivalry", when the ACTUAL person who managed to match Holmes' wit is Irene Adler, and I have a lot to say about her being sidelined for moriarty as far as 'smart antagonists' go, but that's for another post. (I agree that this is most likely a product of BBC Sherlock and how they set up his relationship with Moriarty in there).
I also agree without point about this being a product of fear of depicting close male relationships in media for fear of it being gay. Holmes and Watson are SO CLOSE in the stories, and yet even in adaptations that do include Watson, Holmes is constantly using and being dismissive/belittling towards Watson, when they're not like that at all in the books. (Granada, Fawx & Stallion and TGAA for the win, they could NEVERR). Seriously, how are books written in the 19/20th century more queer than some modern adaptations. We are DEVOLVING.

















