#extradirty
izzy's playlists!
šŖ¼
Peter Solarz
styofa doing anything
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Cosimo Galluzzi
if i look back, i am lost
romaā
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
No title available
h
Show & Tell
Xuebing Du
titsay
ellievsbear
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Product Placement
oozey mess
sheepfilms
seen from Germany
seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from Bosnia & Herzegovina
seen from United States
seen from TĆ¼rkiye
seen from Libya
seen from Germany
seen from United States
@diristine
18+ ACCOUNT
I suppose its time for an introduction
Hello! Iām Diristine/Paxton. Iām 21 years old and answer to any pronouns really. SCP fan.
I share my au and characters with my hubbiest hubs @clefrot
Feel free to send asks within reason.
Pronoun Page Here Ig
As it is pride month we shall allow the public access to scp-113
At this point, if you use twink incorrectly, Iām blocking you.
Except my best friendās mother, who thought it meant TWo Incomes No Kids.
Happy PRIDE to all you TWo Incomes No Kids out there.
In the club
Every fanart i see of rocky and adrian is just this and i love it
[Image ID: a very simplified drawing of a large blue triangle with five short lines sticking out of the bottom of it, representing legs. next to the large blue triangle is a small rectangle, barely a quarter of the height the triangle. the small rectangle is coloured in brown, and also has five short lines sticking out of the bottom of it. /.End ID]
Slow sex, dark room, soft music and eye contact š„
the way teenagers are treated these days is wild. when i was a teenager we were all watching porn, jerking off, and going to horror movies with 3000 gallons of blood. Nowadays they make kids get a permission slip to watch anything darker than Barney the Dinosaur. Insane.
Every year we infantilize teenagers more and more and act surprised when they grow up to be terrified, angry, emotionally stunted adults.
& then for some reason people fixate more on "ugh these teenagers just want to be treated like babies!!! teenagers are to blame for the rise in puritanism!!!!!" than how this is a very obvious example of ageism and the increased control over a socially vulnerable and exploited group
I think a commonly overlooked part of this coddling is that it teaches kids and teenagers to be afraid of things they don't need to be afraid of, which is exactly how they end up as "puriteens". I remember as a child being terrified to change the channel on the tv because I had ended up with the impression that seeing even seconds of an R rated movie or tv show would give me nightmares. And then as a tween every time I saw swearing I felt sick to my stomach because I had been taught such a thing is bad and harmful. I think I would have suffered less if I hadn't been raised with everyone around me acting like mature media was so bad. By the time I was a teenager I had figured out this was bunk, but understandably a lot of people don't. By making this whole system worse and stronger you have teens who have been told that seeing explicit or dark media Will Harm Them, and so they act in ways that would be appropriate if it really was the info-hazard it's implied to be.
^^ never heard anybody specifically talk about this but yeah. parents acting like sexual or any "dark" content in a story or show was going to put bad things in my head that were going to be there permanently just gave me a deeply distressing sort of contamination anxiety
NON-freaks dni. This is a freaks only zone
A live-action, feature-length horror adaptation of the hit video game.
AN SCP MOVIE COULD HIT THE BIG SCREEN!
From the Kickstarter: "When the SCP Foundation's Site-19 is overrun by the anomalous horrors it was built to contain, the facility's eccentric Site Director and a D-Class prisoner with uncanny luck must survive the breach and uncover the apocalyptic conspiracy behind it.
[...]
Our big-screen vision for the SCP Foundation is influenced by movies likeĀ Aliens,Ā The Thing,Ā Annihilation,Ā The Cabin in the Woods,Ā Beyond the Black Rainbow, andĀ Jurassic Park, as well as video games likeĀ ControlĀ andĀ Portal.Ā This is a fast, sweaty, surreal sci-fi horror film built around what makes SCP great: terrifying anomalies, impossible moral choices, and a bureaucratic machine trying to contain forces beyond human understanding."
I have no words for how excited this makes me, or how devastated I would be if this fails. They need 750k (see the stretch goals) to make a fully developed movie, and we, the indie film community, are obligated to make that happen.
And for everybody who sees this, SCP fan or not: please, please, donate, spread the word, REBLOG - if I see even one like on my post, I will personally throw you into containment. REBLOG this with all your might to spread the word because this is an opportunity that MAY NEVER COME AGAIN. Spread this link everywhere, even places you don't think it would spread, every social media you have, everything.
THIS IS OUR CHANCE!!! DON'T WASTE IT!!!
IMPORTANT SCP SITE NEWS: New authors have more things to fear when posting. Letās talk about the āSecondary Mainlist Curation Standard.ā
If youāre not a chud who spends all their free time on the SCP websiteālike meāthen you probably havenāt heard about the Secondary Mainlist Curation Standard proposal. So, Iām here as SCPaul Revere to break it down to you non-website dwellers (and explain why itās bad).
First: What is the Secondary Mainlist Curation Standard?
On May 12th, 2026, site mod wackdog proposed the Secondary Mainlist Curation Standard. Iāll provide a summary, the actual link is here.
This summary is from poltatherianās essay on the topic (because im bad at summaries). If you want to skip this part, look for the big text under it.
All options below will utilise full automation by the tech team to pick out articles that fall under the threshold automatically.
Each option has two sub-options:
- Unlisting Instead: Unlist the articles instead of deleting them.
-Unlist then Delete: Unlisting the article for an extra brief period (perhaps one month) after the initial one-year period for any potential rewrites, and then deleting them after a short period.
Option A: Under +20 After One Year
Mainlist articles would be expected to reach +20 within one year of posting.
After discussing with community members, I believe this is a realistic and achievable benchmark for new articles and new authors alike.
Articles that fall below +20 after one year would still prompt the deletions timer.
With information from data analysis, this method would free up 333 slots immediately.1
Option A2: Option A with unlisting instead of deletion.
Option A3: Option A but with a short unlisting period prior to deletion.
Option B: Under +10 After One Year
This option would function the same way as Option A, but with a more lenient threshold.
Mainlist articles would be expected to reach at least +10 within one year of posting.
Articles that fall below +10 after the one year would still prompt the deletions timer.
With information from data analysis, this method would free up 71 slots immediately.
Option B2: Option B with unlisting instead of deletion.
Option B3: Option B but with a short unlisting period prior to deletion.
Okay, now that thatās done, hereās why itās bad. (TW OPINIONS)
Iām speaking from my own perspective as an aspiring author. This is heavily discouraging for new authors who want to start writing for SCP. The fear of an article that you wrote, something youāve worked hard on, something youāre passionate about being deleted is horrible. This new standard will do nothing good for the site.
The primary reason (from what I understand) for this proposal is because of 10k-con (context for you non web dwellers, every time SCP reaches a new 1000 slot, thereās a contest held for the number, most recently the 9k con for the 9000 slot.). Slots are filling up too fast for con staff to keep up, and I understand that, but this is NO WAY TO FIX IT!
As poltatherian said in their essay, votes are not a way to rank SCPs. VOTES CAN MEAN ALMOST NOTHING! You can up or down vote for any reason, theyāre not a measure of how good an article is.
So, what can we do about it?
Staff currently have 4 days to discuss as of writing this post. Unfortunately, it looks like many people do agree with these proposals. That being said, thereās also big authors who heavily disagree with it.
What I recommend, promoting niche and low-rated works that you enjoy. If this standard does go into effect, those unknown articles that you enjoy are at risk of being lost. And for the non-website fans: start reading new material, I promise itās good. Iāll even share some low rated articles at the end.
There is one more thing Iād like to discuss before we end this post.
SCP-10000-J by Dr Katalin Bava. This new SCP posted today has sparked a lot of controversyāyou can see the discussion here. Iāll say, Iām a huge fan of it. I think it really reflects the feelings many authors and readers have towards this.
some of my recommendations:
SCP-9451
SCP-6569
ok waiy hold on theres been a change as im writing this
SCP-9397: what was it?
A couple hours ago, user Calibold posted SCP-9397, a direct reference to the last section of SCP-10000-J. It was simply a drawing (resembling a childās) of a woman, titled āDRawing of moMmy.ā You can access the comments here. This SCP has since been deleted, I did not get a chance to archive it.
I think thatās really all from me.
As always, please let me know if Iāve said something incorrect or anything changes. And yes, it is this serious.
gp4k/fourletrword out šš½
genuinely it's no wonder people get more anxious the more they use social media because i bet most people wouldn't even consider these potential issues to worry about until they saw someone else doing it
stay whimsical, forest creature
A mossy friend š±
Earth
@okcoolthanks
in the house of flies
I really think everyone needs to truly internalize this:
Fictional characters are objects.
They are not people. You cannot "objectify" them, because they have no personhood to be deprived of. They have no humanity to be erased. You cannot "disrespect" them, because they are not real.
I know this has good intentions, so I will just add the "how you treat them, even as objects of fiction, can speak about your own character, be careful out there"
Your addition is actually completely antithetical to my message. It is literally the opposite of what I am conveying.
Stop telling people to encourage the cop inside their head.
How you treat fictional characters, given they are entirely objects of fiction, does NOT necessarily speak to your own character, and you do not need to be "careful".
It is not dangerous to imagine dark things happening to fictional characters. It does not mean you are secretly a bad person. It does not mean you unconsciously want to hurt people in real life. It is not a "slippery slope" to doing bad things to people in real life. You cannot damage your brain or turn yourself into a bad person by consuming "dark" fanfic.
I can write tentacle noncon of my favorite character all day long and be a fierce anti-sexual assault advocate in real life because what I do in my head is not the same thing as what I do in real life.
These tags were too perfect to not include
In case y'all need pictures sorry it aint in crayon šļø-
