noise dept.
KIROKAZE

Jimmy Eat World
Claire Keane
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Interview Vampire Daily

ellievsbear
đ
No title available
RMH
$LAYYYTER
untitled
macklin celebrini has autism
Doug Jones
Noah Kahan
The Bowery Presents
occasionally subtle
Cosmic Funnies

Discoholic đȘ©
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from Chile

seen from Argentina
seen from United States
seen from South Africa
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Costa Rica
seen from Bolivia
seen from Jordan
seen from United States
seen from United States
@disorientingbrownness
the reason why the smugglers in star wars are the good guys and the bounty hunters are the bad guys is bc ppl who rebel against authority are dope and ppl who help the cops are lame
The enjoyment I get from removing the wax packaging from a lil cheese wheel is immediately aligned with entertainment zoo animals get when they have to solve a puzzle or get into a box to find a treat. Iâm just an ape and the babybel cheese people are my enrichment team
I think about this post a lot. I talk about it a lot. Itâs to the point where, at work when we donât like someone, we go, âthat person is NOT on my enrichment teamâ because apparently the biggest insult, we think, is that that person is not successfully zooing us.
this is incredible thank you for telling me
Texas gothic
âą âDonât mess with Texasâ they repeat. Over and over, you donât know why or what it means but you donât question it. You fear what will happen if you do. âą Itâs summer again you donât remember when the last time it wasnât summer was. Itâs getting out of hand your ac is screaming. âą âThe stars at night are big and brightâ you chant with the others and clap 4 times âdeep in the heart of Texas.â When did you learn this? When did anyone learn this? But you donât question it. No one questions it. âą You pledge to Texas right after the US, you fear what will happen if you donât. What wrath it might invoke. âą There are bluebonnet on the side of the highway. They werenât there yesterday. They call you. They beckon everyone to take pictures. You donât dare pick one, no one does. âItâs illegal to pick the state flower.â Is repeated in whispers. You donât know what happened to the last person who said it was ok to pick them no one does. âą Homecoming, itâs always homecoming. The mums are everywhere some girls you see are more mun than girl. You fear they are being consumed by the ribbons. You say nothing. âAre you going to the homecoming game?â Of course you are everyone does. Though you donât understand this tradition, itâs key to not infuriate some sleeping football god. âą Baseball, you donât play sports, never have. Youâve never even watched a game of baseball but you know all the rules. Of course you do this is Texas. âą There is a gun being passed down in your family, âyou will get it nextâ they repeat âitâs a great honorâ you donât question it. Because you know it will anger the spirits if you donât continue the tradition. âą Thereâs a new Wattaburger. you donât remember it being there before. You donât remember its construction. Itâs always been there hasnât it? âą You donât have horses. Youâve never ridden a horse. But you know how. Itâs in your blood. âą You donât remember the last time you werenât sweating. You swear you would make a deal with a demon for some rain. You almost resort to going to the crossroads. They say it worked last time. You know children who have never seen rain. âą You donât remember buying cowboy boots. But theyâre there in the back of your closet. They always have been. âą You enter the diner, everyone stares at you. The waitress has red lipstick on her teeth. No one points it out. She calls you âhunâ âą Everything is deep fried, you begin to wonder if you are deep fried. âą Everything is shaped like Texas. The shape has lost all meaning. âą âEverything is bigger in Texasâ they cheer like its a good thing. They momentarily forget about the things that lurk outside your house at night. Those are bigger in Texas too. âą The bugs seek shelter in your home. People say theyâre just looking for water. But is that all? âą âBless you heart!â The old ladies cry. They sound angry, you are embarrassed though you donât know why. âBless youâre heart!â Rings over and over. âą Thereâs another Baptist church on that street corner. Was it always there? Of course it was. But something tells you it wasnât.
me watching monsters inc as a kid: how did it take so long for anyone to figure out that human child laughter not only produced energy like screams, but was more effective, and that children arenât actually dangerous at all?
me watching monsters inc now: monsters incorporated, a multi-billion dollar corporate giant, stood to make extra profits off a scream shortage because low supply with high demand makes it possible to charge a fortune for a necessary commodity and everyone has no choice but to pay the high prices because they canât go without electricity. Therefore Monsters Inc, as well as any other major powers that may have existed at the start of the era of using scream energy, fabricated the idea that only screams could generate sustainable energy sources in order to create artificial scarcity, because laugh energy was far easier to obtain and far more efficient, and therefore stood to lower the value of energy due to surplus. They also fabricated the idea that human children were toxic, in order to a) make other monsters too afraid to go near them to do research and possibly discover the secret of laugh energy, and b) to make monsters so afraid of going near them that there is a shortage of scarers, making it harder for rival companies to rise up and create competition. Even in the monster world, capitalism is based on lies, greed and cruelty, and even monster companies have no qualms about using and abusing children to maximize profits.
so uh
i just discovered a youtube channel that does entirely live action remakes of spongebob episodes to get around the fact that you cant post the actual episodes
and theres actually a lot of effort put into this?????
Notable addition:
@black-tiger-of-evil
@jennysdimples
@misanthropocene
Civil rights violations in the US today doesnât look like the bad cops on TV, it more often looks like the good cops on TV
How many times in your favorote cop show have they kicked in a door and searched a home without a warrant?
How many times in your favorite cop show have they questioned a suspect without their lawyer present and after the suspect has clearly stated they donât want to talk?
Special question to fans of Criminal Minds: how many times have the BAU purposefully taunted the unsub in a standoff to the point that they become agressive and the agents then shoot the unsub?
By the way, to be clear on the door kicking thing, I am very specifically talking about the following line Iâve seen countless times:
âHey, did you hear screams/smell drugs inside?â
And like itâs always shown as a flimsy excuse, yet, still the right and good thing to do
The one where they make the suspect talk without a lawyer is so common itâs actually ridiculous.
Or the one where they get mad at a perp for having a shitty attitude/mocking them and end up losing their temper and using unnecessary force is always framed like the police had no other choice. Because the perp insulted their wife or dead colleague so obviously they deserve some brutality
also when the cops maybe donât do anything wrong, but the show frames it as âif only we could violate human rights a LITTLE, then we could solve the case!â or even that the law is preventing them from doing their job. e.g. the stodgy old judge wonât give them a search warrant, the arrogant psychiatrist wonât hand over their patientâs information, the team has to do things by the book this time(!) because the FBI/internal affairs/the media are watching them.
the number of times the police stalk someone because theyâre âsureâ theyâre the culprit, even when they have no evidence and their captain tells them not to, but itâs justified in the end because they wee right of course, looking at you SVU.
the juggalos hate trump, guy fieri is an lgbt ally, & smash mouth is pro-cunnilingus: the entities are growing stronger & soon, with the powers of faygo, ranch, & ska, they will merge to their final form, the One who shall destroy fascism in america as prophesied by the Gods
#iâll take whatever at this point
Homestuck predicted this I just want to remind everyone
42,000 matches .
when it all turned black with only a little fire on the side it looked like a hole burning into reality
Photograph from the series âFault Line: a portrait of East Austinâ by John Langmore (2008)
@disorientingbrownness
âWhat if raccoons figured out the secret to starting fires?â is the scariest hypothetical question my dad has ever posed
thatâs the distinction between goblins and raccoons
Solidarity, not allies.
The more I look at it, the more I think one of the worst thing to happen was that people started replacing the concept of solidarity with the concept of allies.
Solidarity was this amazing idea that weâre all getting screwed over by the systems and the way we fight back is by working together. And that means doing work against forms of oppression that you donât experience and following the lead of people who experience that form of oppression because itâs their struggle. But youâre there as a partner, as a comrade. And you know theyâll be there for you if you need help in your part of the struggle. Thatâs solidarity.
Allyship has none of that. itâs a one-way relationship that carries in it a form of authority, and where there is authority there is harm. The failures of this system are everywhere.
You have the exploitative savior ally who is always looking to find the most oppressed group to ally themselves for in order too look like the coolest person, pushing themselves into spaces and exploiting peopleâs struggles for ally points.
You have the perfectionist ally who will only ever do work once theyâre sure that theyâre found the most perfecrt âgrassrootsâ, never problematic in any way movement, rehardless of where their help is actually needed and useful.
You have the drone ally, only ever following directions and wasting all their potential to contribute anything meaningful, terrified of doing any thinking or acting for themselves that may at some point set them âcalled outâ.Â
You have the oppressed person or group who sees allies as convenient punching bad to work out their rage on, piling on them the hatred and contempt they wish they could pile on the system.
You have the oppressed person or group that treats allies as defined entirely by their allyhood, ignoring that they have struggles of their own and treating them as disposable. Shouting âallies to the frontâ when the police brutality hits without a thought to the previous traumas and vulnerabilities of individual allies.
In all of these ways and more we are hurting each other, feeling unsafe around each other, becoming estranged and embittered with oneanother.
The concept of privilege has brought us some very useful things that help us be better activists and better humans to each other, but when I look at the way that is translated to the concept of allies, I mostly see us being worse activists and worse humans to each other than we are when we act out of the concept of solidarity. Being in this fight together means taking care of each other.
To sum a lot of my thoughts up, I think anarchists should acknowledge the threat of authority even without a state. Violence is not anti authoritarian and neither is revolution. That doesnât mean theyâre equal to the actions of the ruling class or other oppressors. There is no one âauthorityâ that is the state alone. Itâs silly to say so and then accuse leftists of being authoritarian for saying the same about suppressing opposition, which you have to do to 1) have a revolution and 2) make sure post-revolution there isnât a complete mess or war tearing society apart. This is essential to communists.
âThey demand that the first act of the social revolution shall be the abolition of authority. Have these gentlemen ever seen a revolution? A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon â authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionists.â
-EngelsÂ
âAnarchists are opposed to every kind of violence; everyone knows that. Â The main plank of Anarchism is the removal of violence from human relations. Â It is life based on the freedom of the individual, without the intervention of the gendarme (police). For this reason we are enemies of capitalism which depends on the protection of the gendarme to oblige workers to allow themselves to be exploited - or even to remain idle and go hungry when it is not in the interest of the bosses to exploit them. Â We are therefore enemies of the State, which is the coercive, violent organisation of society.
But if a man of honour declares that he believes it stupid  and barbarous to argue with a stick in his hand; that it is unjust and evil to oblige a person to obey the will of another at pistol point, is it, perhaps, reasonable to deduce that that gentleman intends to allow himself to be beaten up and be made to submit to the will of another without having recourse to more extreme means for his defence?
Violence is justifiable only when it is necessary to defend oneself and others from violence. It is where necessity ceases that crime beginsâŠ
The slave is always in a state of legitimate defence and consequently, his violence against the boss, against the oppressor, is always morally justifiable, and must be controlled only by such considerations as that the best and most economical use is being made of human effort and human sufferingsâ
â Errico Malatesta
replace violece by authority and youâve got a response
also an other
2. Should a chain of local revolts spread and intensify to the point where it manages to destitute the constituted power structures enveloping us, collapsing their symbolic hold over the hearts and minds of its subjects and exposing the coup de force that always underpins them, we must attack any effort to replace it with a newly signifying âconstituent powerâ. As some friends stated recently: The legitimacy of âthe peopleâ, âthe oppressedâ, the â99%â is the Trojan horse by which the constituent is smuggled back into insurrectionary destitution. This is the surest method for undoing an insurrection â one that doesnât even require defeating it in the streets. To make the destitution irreversible, therefore, we must begin by abandoning our own legitimacy. We have to give up the idea that one makes the revolution in the name of something, that thereâs a fundamentally just and innocent entity which the revolutionary forces would have the task of representing. One doesnât bring power down to earth in order to raise oneself above the heavens.
3. In other words, the revolutionary process must not be understood as the constitution of a new law or constituent social body, but should rather be measured by our capacity to destitute the governmental and economic mechanisms of labour, and of the capture of life more broadly. Beyond the simple destruction of power lies its deactivation.
-K. Aarons - No Selves To Abolish: Afropessimism, Anti-Politics and the End of the World
this is what is mean by â the abolition of authorityâ
you may not be fan of anti-authority as a rethoric but the criticism of this type are misrepresention
anyway governmental communist adressing only the notion of authorithy when criticizing anarchism feel often as a an easy way out to responde to anarchist without adressing the critic of government and law
To accept the tutelage of the law yesterday, to reject it today and take it up again tomorrow, this is the way Catholics, socialists, parliamentarists in general act. It is illogical.None of their acts has a logical relation with that of the day before, no more than that of tomorrow will have one with that of today.Either we accept the law of majorities or we donât accept it. Those who inscribe it in their program and seek to obtain the majority are illogical when they rebel against it. â Albert Libertad, Down with the Law! (1906)
Government is the consequence of the spirit of domination and violence with which some men have imposed themselves on other, and is at the same time the creature as well as the creator of privilege and its natural defender.
It is wrongly said that today government performs the function of defender of capitalism but that once capitalism is abolished it would become the representative and administrator of the general interest. In the first place capitalism will not be destroyed until the workers, having rid themselves of government, take possession of all social wealth and themselves organise production and consumption in the interests of everybody without waiting for the initiative to come from government which, however willing to comply, would be incapable of doing so.
But there is a further question: if capitalism were to be destroyed and a government were to be left in office, the government, through the concession of all kinds of privileges, would create capitalism anew for, being unable to please everybody it would need an economically powerful class to support it in return for the legal and material protection it would receive.
- An Anarchist Programme by Errico Malatesta
(see also malatesta on the dictatorship of the proletariat)
âŠ
âaccuse leftists of being authoritarian for saying the same about suppressing oppositionâ
the anarchist donât accuse governmental communist of authoritarianism because they supress bourgeois/reactionnary power but because they supress working class opposition from other political parties to independant trade union and autonomous working class action
i give as i have said elsewhere
âsome gov communist do have a commitment toward democratic procedure in the correct logic that that itâs not by dishminishing the accountablility of the government that you create workerâs power and decrease abuse and that on the contrary it would lead only to yet again exploitation and domination
but in the same time i do also find the others gov communist somewhat logical in the sense  that in a governmental logic a commitment to a democratic state of right is a hassle for implemanting anti-capitalist policies and would just cause a return to capitalism with all its ill and the crushing or stifling of the working-class struggleâ
@someonekilljeffbezos Â
âArtists, to be truly revolutionary, must go so far as the Russian group âVoinaâ and declare war on reality. Their medium must be fire; their canvas, the streets. They must invade, not the conservative establishment galleries like the Dadaists, but the galleries of the very artists who presume to be rebels, as did anarchist artists from Occupy Wall Street. Opposition, as a posture and not a practice of war, is a function of power whose purpose is to neutralize desire. Desire is a faculty that learns over time. If it is allowed to crystallize into relationships, it soon becomes too wise to be fooled by the lures of commodities. The desert must always be shifting and advancing, so that the objects of desire remain ever on the horizon: this is the indispensable job of the cultural workers.â
â here⊠at the center of a world in revolt
âThe only interesting project is the liberation of everyday lifeâ