
Discoholic 🪩

PR's Tumblrdome
hello vonnie
$LAYYYTER
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

JVL
cherry valley forever
Stranger Things
Misplaced Lens Cap
Show & Tell
art blog(derogatory)
Three Goblin Art
d e v o n

ellievsbear
tumblr dot com
Peter Solarz
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
styofa doing anything
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from New Zealand

seen from United States
seen from Australia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States
@dootingmachine
hai
Why I don’t like JaruJaruJ (as a theorist)
I’ve been a fan of Jaru’s work ever since 2022 and I watched his videos on time loop theory and Deltarune being an alternate timeline. Even if I don’t agree with a lot of his theories, I was able to respect him regardless.
That’s changed. His recent Asriel’s Dust 2.0 theory has stirred much ire from the Deltarune community. This is because it cherry picks evidence while ignoring blatant counter evidence, uses evidence for Asriel Knight as if it’s not also Dess Knight evidence, reduces Dess to “popular rebel girl”, reduces Kris down to “jealous younger sibling who wants Asriel’s attention”, refusing to refute Player Soul theory outside of “lmao gamers can’t flirt”, accidentally implying that Dess would mentally torture her sister in a blatantly romantic way, and so much more. The greatest crime this theory commits is what I consider the cardinal sin of internet theorizing: saying that all evidence against your theory is just the author lying to you and a “clever misdirect”. Examples include Ralsei saying “Darkners patterned after a loved one TEND to appear in specific darknesses”, the Knight having antlers, Carol saying “YOU are welcome here anytime”, and Raise Up Your Bat. The reason this is bad should be obvious. If everything is a misdirection, then you can make an argument for anything. I could say the Roaring Knight is actually Nightmare Knight from Cucumber Quest and that anything disproving that is just a misdirect from Tricky Tony.
Jaru’s mindset is a product of an incredibly harmful mentality first seen in the FNAF community that believes that the author of a mystery is a malicious trickster who rewrites the story when people get it right and is the enemy of the theorists. In actuality, if a theory “gets it right”, Toby will remain quiet as the theorists are left in uncertainty until the new chapter drops. There’s also a belief that the popular theory is always wrong, no matter what, because Kris Knight was wrong. What makes Dess Knight different is that only people who are relatively deep in the fandom would really know who Dess is, meanwhile she’s only mentioned a total of 5 or 6 times in game. The current equivalent to Kris Knight is not Dess Knight, but Carol Knight, because like Kris, she is blatantly tied to the main plot in a way we don’t understand yet. Also Kris Knight theory got all the evidence right outside of Kris actually being the knight.
Another misunderstanding Jaru has is what in Deltarune is actually a misdirect. He’s completely convinced Asriel is dead in Deltarune because it would be shocking, however Asriel being alive is already a twist on what we know. Why would Toby use the same plot point twice? Many Deltarune fans are seemingly traumatized by the opening of chapter 2 because it killed the “Kris will kill everyone” theory, but where would the plot of gone if that was true? That would just be a lazy rehash of the genocide route and toss aside all the interesting things chapter 1 set up. It also serves as characterization for Kris and shows us that they seem creepy but are just a weird kid.
What makes Jaru so infuriating as a theorist is that what he is doing isn’t trying to guess what happens next in Deltarune, it’s attempting to cram the heart shaped peg that is Deltarune into the triangle shaped hole of the story HE wants it to be. Many Jaru defenders will say that his critics don’t like that Jaru is challenging the popular fanon theories, but other theorists, such as CammyboiG and Spookydood, have done so and not received as much hate. The difference is that other crack theories, such as Toilet Theory or Woody Theory, acknowledge and try to work with the themes of Deltarune. Meanwhile Jaru seems to be actively fighting against it because he’s too pretentious to write his Asriel AU fanfic.
To put it as nicely as possible, Jaru’s theories are some of the only ones that I’d consider “what if Toby wrote a bad story” theories. “Dess Knight is too obvious” do you know what foreshadowing is? Stories don’t just jerk in random directions to dunk on the audience, why would any writer do that? Jaru’s theories actively spit on Toby Fox’s writing abilities by insinuating that he’s so uninspired and uncreative as to make pointless contrivances to get one over on the player while lazily repeating the same story he told in Undertale. I dare say he just doesn't like Deltarune and he's in denial about it. I don't hate Jaru, I'm just frustrated that he's refusing to think about Deltarune's message beyond control and your choices not mattering. You have creative potential, Jaru, but I recommend you just write a book or something like that to get your ideas out there.
At the end of the day, Deltarune is not a math equation or a trolling contest, it is a STORY with something to say. So if you want to make a theory about it, then you need to think about what that thing is.
ralsei galsei baby lets go
I am 100% for a transfem Ralsei possibility but I am just not sure about using post transition pronouns upon a character that may not transition. This is more a personal foible for me to work through than a request for the fandom to change their terminology...
On one hand, in a completed work, I get using the post transition pronouns for a character who transitions while discussing the entire thing, there's continuity there, it helps the transition appear as not a sudden change, but like the revelation it ought to appear as. On the other, while it's VERY POSSIBLE and there is CONVINCING EVIDENCE, we do not have a confirmation. Is the evidence convincing enough to risk being wrong? Does that not matter, and if it is wrong the pronoun use shifts into expressing towards a transfem AU Ralsei??? I am certainly overthinking this, but I think overthinking is fun! and I would like thoughts on this from someone more invested in this than I.
Frankly i think it depends. In my opinion- within the context of theorizing that a fictional character will be revealed to be trans, we are conceptualizing a potential version of the character. That potential version, in this case, uses she/her. The fact that she uses she/her is currently as canonical as the fact that she's transgender, by which i mean - it isn't (at least not on an explicit level).
I feel it's smoother to discuss it that way - we are discussing a potential Ralsei, so we use she/her to discuss that potential Ralsei. Otherwise we're saying "he's a trans woman" which can sound Odd (no shame to women who use he/him, i just mean that it sounds like both misgendering her while acknowledging her as trans).
Of course this is not something that can be extrapolated to irl this way, but it works for a fictional context. I do agree on the value of respecting a character's current identity even when predicting future developments. But like - we are not meant to examine real life people for future plot beats, but we are expected to do so for fictional characters. I think the same applies to gender as well - we are allowed to engage in Ralsei as a character and to conceptualize ways that character may change, and the language can reflect that to communicate it better.
The line where misgendering current ralsei becomes a problem lies in the motives behind it. As an example, misgendering Bridget Guilty Gear is motivated by transphobia. But here, the motives are simply to reinterpret Ralsei's character arc through a potentially transgender lens, so I don't think it's a problem.
ralsei galsei baby lets go
I am 100% for a transfem Ralsei possibility but I am just not sure about using post transition pronouns upon a character that may not transition. This is more a personal foible for me to work through than a request for the fandom to change their terminology...
On one hand, in a completed work, I get using the post transition pronouns for a character who transitions while discussing the entire thing, there's continuity there, it helps the transition appear as not a sudden change, but like the revelation it ought to appear as. On the other, while it's VERY POSSIBLE and there is CONVINCING EVIDENCE, we do not have a confirmation. Is the evidence convincing enough to risk being wrong? Does that not matter, and if it is wrong the pronoun use shifts into expressing towards a transfem AU Ralsei??? I am certainly overthinking this, but I think overthinking is fun! and I would like thoughts on this from someone more invested in this than I.
I've thought about this too in relation to my own work! Ultimately, while it's good to respect the identity of a real person who can clarify their pronouns, characters are just that: characters! Changing up their pronouns is just about the same as doing a personal redesign or interpreting a work differently. No one's getting hurt, so it doesn't really matter. Ralsei wouldn't take issue with it because he/she/whatever is a fictional character (which is very funny to say in the context of Deltarune). It's sort of like how I'd never call someone a twink unprompted but I can look at Link from Breath of the Wild and go "yeah I want that twink obliterated" and it's fine.
That makes a lot of sense! I guess my own neuroses just lit up when someone said something that could technically be wrong. Thinking about it... yeah Ralsei would accept being called she. Ralsei would also accept being crushed into a sphere and bounced around though, so maybe that's not saying much, but especially considering Ralsei's... whole... darkner crisis, swapping around their pronouns while discussing them wouldn't be very distressing.
ralsei galsei baby lets go
I am 100% for a transfem Ralsei possibility but I am just not sure about using post transition pronouns upon a character that may not transition. This is more a personal foible for me to work through than a request for the fandom to change their terminology...
On one hand, in a completed work, I get using the post transition pronouns for a character who transitions while discussing the entire thing, there's continuity there, it helps the transition appear as not a sudden change, but like the revelation it ought to appear as. On the other, while it's VERY POSSIBLE and there is CONVINCING EVIDENCE, we do not have a confirmation. Is the evidence convincing enough to risk being wrong? Does that not matter, and if it is wrong the pronoun use shifts into expressing towards a transfem AU Ralsei??? I am certainly overthinking this, but I think overthinking is fun! and I would like thoughts on this from someone more invested in this than I.
Burn-in memory
Watching this a billion times over now
“Why won’t they look at me?”
food that tastes funny and has silly names, also Noelle is here hi Noelle!!!!
boss makes a spider i make a slime. that's why i . thas why, tthats why i uhhh. t. thawhy
t.gats why i can't think up an end to the rhyme
GET BACK TO WORK
this scene
Me when I’m next
Bip's avatar is also literally made of vectors (in Clip Studio Paint) though in these AMAs I usually draw their body instead because it's faster.
PATREON | Runaway to the Stars
Coooooooooooool AI practical stuff
"This week I discovered the same pattern, executed by Google. Google Chrome is reaching into users' machines and writing a 4 GB on-device AI model file to disk without asking."
Google Chrome is downloading a 4 GB Gemini Nano model onto users' machines without consent, with no opt-in, no opt-out short of enterprise t
pretty sure I did the chrome//flags thing a while ago, but also i switched to firefox, which is not without the occasional bullshit, but is vastly less bullshitty than chrome. This is why I treat genai "features" like the invasive blackberry bushes they are: cut, root, burn, and vigilantly watch for new shoots to uproot. I'm 54 years old and the world got by fine without genai for most of my lifetime.
tags via@KKglinka #psa#having read the article#it's not clickbait#chrome is reaching#across all chromium browsers#to link a prepatory structure#this malware packet#will therefore occur#with all chromium browsers#it has nothing to do#with the actual ai interface#instead chrome is either#using your personal computer#as part of a cloud server#the way bitcoin malware works#or it's recording your own#actions on the computer#with a continuously active#background module#either way#that's malware#a 4gig trojan virus
The only ways to make the deletion stick are to disable Chrome's Al features through chrome://flags or enterprise policy tooling that home users do not generally have, or to uninstall Chrome entirely
...
Adding the file took zero clicks. Removing it requires (a) discovering the file exists, (b) understanding what it is, (c) navigating into a hidden user profile path, (d) deleting it (and on Windows, also clearing the read-only attribute first), and (e) accepting that Chrome will silently re-download it on next eligible window unless the user also navigates chrome://flags, enterprise policy, or platform-specific configuration tooling to disable the underlying Chrome Al feature. None of those steps is documented in the place a normal user looks - none of them is even hinted at in default Chrome.
Tasque Painting for fun :)
The nurse called out. Luckily Tasque came in early