Andrea Calisi (Italian b.1968), The Bridge and the Blue Knight, 2026, Illustration

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Monterey Bay Aquarium
dirt enthusiast
Stranger Things
todays bird
trying on a metaphor

Kaledo Art
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

No title available
will byers stan first human second

JVL
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
One Nice Bug Per Day

shark vs the universe
Mike Driver
NASA
cherry valley forever
No title available
hello vonnie
AnasAbdin

seen from Iraq
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from Austria
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Colombia

seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Italy

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from Thailand
seen from United States

seen from South Korea
@dreamy-boogie
Andrea Calisi (Italian b.1968), The Bridge and the Blue Knight, 2026, Illustration
Flower Meadow - Alexander Max Koester , 1915-20.
German , 1864-1932
Oil on canvas on cardboard , 48 x 65 cm.
new uterine lining just dropped
a little reminder! by annalaura_art
Dune: "Beware Your Heroes"
One thing I find fascinating about the saga of Dune is that there's a VERY clear message against having faith in heroes.
Frank Herbert treats heroes as inherently untrustworthy, even less so than other men, as if to say that "A politician will ruin your life, but you can fight back. A bad religion will ruin your descendant's lives, but someone will eventually question it. A hero will ruin everything you ever cherished, and what's worse, you will ask them to do it. And by the time anyone figures it out, it will have been far too late to fix it."
Frank Herbert was, at his core, a political cynic and a philosophical realist. He didn’t just question the idea of heroes—he actively feared them. Not because they were evil, but because of what society does in response to them. To Herbert, a tyrant is dangerous. A charismatic revolutionary is dangerous. But a messiah? That’s the extinction of agency. A messiah is fatal.
Herbert once said:
“The bottom line of the Dune trilogy is: beware of heroes. Much better to rely on your own judgment, and your own mistakes.”
But what’s so radical is how Herbert illustrates this. He doesn’t do it with lectures. He lets the reader feel the seduction—you cheer for Paul, you want him to win, to become the savior. And then, once you're invested, he shows you the giant pile of bodies shoved out back behind the Arakeen shed which that success had cost.
The first novel tricks you. It seems like the classic mythic arc: Boy is born to greatness -> Trains hard -> Gains wisdom -> Defeats the Evil Lord -> Becomes the True King.
But then Herbert pulls the rug out from under the narrative: Paul becomes emperor, yes, but at the cost of countless lives, and his rise unleashes a jihad across the stars, killing untold trillions more. He tries to prevent it, but can’t. Every path he seeks that would avoid the Jihad leads to the ruin of himself and those he cares about, and in the end, the very faith that he finally allows (having exhausted every other option) to be placed in him becomes the never ending engine of catastrophe.
He’s not evil. He genuinely tries to resist the path laid out before him. But he’s trapped, because the very people he tries to save won’t let him choose otherwise. Their belief becomes his cage.
In Messiah, Paul says:
“I wanted only to rid the universe of Harkonnen tyranny... I didn’t want to found a religion. But it’s there.”
By the time he abdicates in Messiah, he’s less a man than a martyr. And the machine of faith rolls on without him. The machine no longer needs the turnkey which gave it life. It will go on and on and continue to spread misery in his name long after he's gone.
Paul is terrifying not because he wants to be a god, but because he tries not to be, and fails. And that’s the horror: the people will believe in something. If not you, someone worse. And if you refuse, they’ll make you holy anyway.
It’s the inversion of the classic “Reluctant Messiah” trope: most stories treat that as a sign of humility. Herbert treats it as a death sentence—a loss of agency, an erosion of the self, and ultimately the seed of empire-wide genocide.
Yet the real horror is what follows.
Paul’s son, Leto II, embraces that messianic role—not out of pride, but because he sees that it’s the only way to break the cycle.
And so, he becomes a god. Maybe not a literal one, but definitely one in all the ways that actually matter. God enough. As such, he rules for 3,500 years, becoming a literal misshappen monster, with only the barest human qualities left identifiable in him. His reign as God Emperor crushes all freedom, all culture, all choice.
Why? To teach humanity the most painful lesson possible: Never again put your fate in one man’s hands.
And it works. But only because he sacrifices his humanity to do it. And even then, it only works for a while. By Heretics of Dune, mankind is already forgetting the lesson, and already backsliding into the Bad Old Ways from the Bad Old Days before the Imperium.
Everything Paul did and enabled was for nothing. He destroyed the Harkonnens, yes, and he avenged his father, yes. And had he been able to stop there, it would have been a happy ending. But try as he might, he couldn't. And his actions directly plunged the universe into over 4000 years of suffering and cultural regression.
It's less "deconstructing" Joseph Campbell's Hero's Journey at this point and more dissecting its corpse under a magnifier and a buzzing lamp.
Herbert, a political journalist, wasn’t writing abstract sci-fi. He was writing an allegory for the 20th century and beyond:
The rise of charismatic dictators (Hitler, Stalin).
The messianic energy surrounding revolutionaries (Mao, Lenin).
The weaponization of religious belief in politics (theocracy, nationalism).
The transformation of movements into myth—and myth into mandates.
To Herbert, the most dangerous thing a society can do is surrender its future to a single narrative, a single person, or a single path.
He didn’t hate religion. Or power. Or leadership. He feared unquestioned belief. That’s Dune's entire soul.
Frank Herbert didn't just warn us about tyrants—he warned us about ourselves. About our tendency to crave heroes. To beg someone else to take responsibility. And how that craving becomes the chains of history.
Dune isn't about sandworms. It’s not about spice. It’s a warning label in mythic clothing:
"Do not worship this man. He will destroy you. And the worst part is, You will ask him to."
Beware your heroes, indeed.
Wondered how cream cheese wound up in sushi, turns out this lovely lady, Ai Saito, came up with it! It's a Jewish and Japanese combo, made possible in Philly!
Rudolf Sieck
we seriously need to stop conceding to the personhood trap when it comes to abortion rights. is a fetus a person? thats a spiritual question. i dont care about the answer. should another person dictate what someone can do with their body? simple answer: no.
like if a fetus isnt a person it has no right to my body and if a fetus IS a peson it also has no right to my body because there is no other context in which we are required to put ourselves at risk of physical harm to preserve another persons safety or even life.
you dont have to save someone from drowning even if youre a strong swimmer. even in death youre not required to donate organs and that could save several people. you can kill someone if you truly believe your safety is at risk. we dont mandate preservation of life over autonomy in any of these circumstances.
Anemone woods, May 2026.
岐阜横蔵寺 // Yokokura-ji Temple, Gifu
text: [ “Some of you have forgotten that only three years ago you were perfectly capable of writing an essay, writing a eulogy, telling a bedtime story to a child, and it should worry you that powerful companies have convinced us we can’t do things we’ve been doing for 5000 years.” ]
And they're absolutely specifically pushing it, make no mistake. It's not just a matter of "it's there, it's convenient, so people are going to take the path of the least resistance", but it is a legitimate and concerted effort on the part of these companies to get people to outsource all these things to their models.
They're preying on insecurities to do it. Yes, you can write an essay - but can you write a good essay, they ask you. Do you not want to improve your output? Do you not want people to think of you as competent and very clever? Why go through the mortifying process of failing and failing and failing until you succeed if you can just skip the "learning" part of doing, and simply generate a ready-made product?
I'm preaching to the choir here obviously but it's a concerning thing to witness nonetheless. My kid is 6 next week and I've been teaching her that failing at things is morally neutral and in fact necessary even before the advent of AI, but it's becoming ever more important that we teach the kids that criticism and failure and discomfort aren't necessarily bad things, but just a part of the growth process.
me, every single time i see people (especially women) talking about the divine feminine energy, or the sacredness of the womb or whatever it is now:
[image description: a two-panel photo of a person dialling a number and then placing the phone to their ear. the contact is saved as ‘Ursula K. Le Guin’ /end ID]
context is this quote by her:
But I didn’t and still don’t like making a cult of women’s knowledge, preening ourselves on knowing things men don’t know, women’s deep irrational wisdom, women’s instinctive knowledge of Nature, and so on. All that all too often merely reinforces the masculinist idea of women as primitive and inferior – women’s knowledge as elementary, primitive, always down below at the dark roots, while men get to cultivate and own the flowers and crops that come up into the light. But why should women keep talking baby talk while men get to grow up? Why should women feel blindly while men get to think?
This includes MAGAs and fascists, btw.
Humans are capable of incredible evil and can cause untold harm onto each other.
We don't get to exclude humans who commit great evil from humanity just because it is convenient and makes us feel better, because the second we do that we do that we lose the ability to be able to discern that we, ourselves, are capable of these things, as well.
In the wrong scenario, in the wrong mindset, with the wrong cultural conditions, we could be the ones committing that evil.
We must always act as a check on ourselves and each other.
Yes this includes Nazis.
Yes this includes Zionists.
Yes this includes billionaires.
Yes this includes Christian nationalists and white supremacists.
Yes this includes ICE agents and imperial militaries.
Yes this includes racists, misogynists, homophobes, transphobes, ablests and any kind of bigot of any and all political affiliation.
This is not approval, it is acknowledging the evil that all of us are capable of.
I felt—and feel— that it was not German Man that I had met, but Man. He happened to be in Germany under certain conditions. He might be here, under certain conditions. He might, under certain conditions, be I.
^ Milton Mayer, a Jewish man talking about the common Nazi in the forward to his book, "They Thought They Were Free".
Dongni Hou aka 侯冬妮 aka Hou Dongni (Chinese b. 1987, Fuxin, Liaoning Province, China, based Paris, France) - Your new Life is going to cost you your old one. -Brianna Wiest, 2025, Paintings: Tempera on Canvas