the sinister sniler

#extradirty

izzy's playlists!
šŖ¼
Peter Solarz
styofa doing anything
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Cosimo Galluzzi

if i look back, i am lost

romaā
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
No title available
h
Show & Tell
Xuebing Du

titsay

ellievsbear
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Product Placement

oozey mess
sheepfilms

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Lithuania

seen from Japan

seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Sweden
@druidbottles
the sinister sniler
大人ć«ćŖć£ćć¼č¹ é”ę by ć㯠[Twitter/X] ā»Illustration shared with permission from the artist. If you like this artwork please support the artist by visiting the source.
Remember when joining fandom as a younger person meant lurking for a bit and figuring out the vibe and etiquette instead of coming in on day one and calling people weirdos for liking weirdo shit in the weirdo factory.
World is mine š
Mareach comic I probably won't finish but this scenario with them is something I've always wanted to draw hehe
Strange racists and homophobes on the internet seem to have access to an alternate way cooler version of TV than me. "every white character on TV is in an interracial relationship" "every show has a gay couple in it" "main characters keep having to secretly be bisexual and nonbinary" "every show has gratuitous full frontal nudity" like damn promise?? What channel???
i wanted modern midlink and then i remembered i have free will
Yurislop. Go!!!
Let me settle the 'is it fetishism and is it bad?' debate once and for all:
Being attracted to any kind of body is normal. Fat bodies. Trans bodies. Disabled bodies. All normal. Being extra attracted to a specific kind of body is normal too. Totally normal to have a type.
Not unlearning the societal stigma attached to those kinds of bodies, the people who inhabit those bodies, and the people who fuck them, to the point where you do any of the following:
Only want to date/fuck the person in secret.
Reduce the person to the feature that you desire and ignore the rest of who they are as a person.
Expect the person to be a walking porn fantasy instead of a real person with their own sexual preferences and boundaries.
Would no longer love the person if the stigmatized aspect of their body changed.
Consider yourself superior to the person, think the person should be 'grateful' that you love their body, etc.
See the person as a temporary adventure while planning to eventually settle down with someone whose body isn't stigmatized.
Is bad and harmful and you shouldn't be dating anyone until you've worked on your shit, because this makes you a very terrible partner. This doesn't mean you are a bad person with bad-fetishist-desires who can only desire people badly, it means you need to unlearn societal stigma so you can be a better partner to the people you desire.
Thank you for coming to me ted talk.
itās such a shame that despite the millions of books, movies, and tv shows out there, no one has EVER managed to write a woman well. yeah, believe it or not, itās never happened, not even once! and since iām incapable of enjoying characters that ARENāT well written, iāll just have to keep ONLY enjoying well written men, like tony stark
Cr: batgirl 2000 and Iām loving it soooooo much I love oracle sheās so cool Iām 30 issues in and ugh I canāt stop also I have a job again so Iāll draw Tim drake in any unfortunate situations I find myself in
this is kind of incredible
Longtime readers may be aware of how much I relish an excuse to bully a company, so I'm sharing the wealth;
Clothing company Patagonia is currently sueing drag queen Pattie Gonia for "irreparableā harm to their brand.
To be clear; Pattie named herself after the region in South America.
So Pattie is asking people to politely ask Patagonia to drop the lawsuit.
I'm extending the invitation to all of you, because sueing a drag queen for 'infringement' in the current political cultural landscape is vile. Especially a drag queen who has raised millions of dollars for non-profits, uses her platform to raise awareness for climate activism, and fully aligns with Patagonia's apparent climate-conscious mission statement.
They're claiming they're sueing for $1. They're actually asking her to stop using her name, and pay over $1 million in legal fees. They're straight up harassing her.
In contrast, drag queen Jan Sport has a Jansport bag line. It's that easy to just... work with a queen.
Anyway. Be respectful(ish), but feel free to be annoying on Patagnoia's socials, asking them to 'DROP THE LAWSUIT'
I think they have a twitter and tiktok too!
This is being discussed heavily on Bluesky, such as here.
Patagonia is suing specifically for trademark infringement, and they're suing for the sum of $1. If they don't sue, then that means they could lose the trademark. They aren't trying to "silence" them or prevent them from using the name, they're specifically protecting their company trademark. They'd have to sue *anyone* who was using such an obvious knockoff of their logo; in this case it happens to be a drag queen.
you'll have to forgive me for not weeping for a billion dollar company's trademark being violated
Go nuts. The point is that this isn't a company trying to dogpile on a drag queen, it's a company following a standard legal practice to protect its trademark. Disney does it all the time.
... yes, and I also hate Disney? I don't understand what you think you're selling me on here
If you get a soda out of a vending machine and it has a Coca-Cola label but it's actually a knockoff made with ditchwater, that's obviously okay because Coca-Cola is a huge corporation and it's thus fine for someone to violate their trademark.
You can hate Patagonia all you want, but the lawsuit is about anodyne trademark law, not specifically that a drag queen is involved.
and what part of Miss Gonia's schtick is doing the harm equivalent of tricking someone into drinking ditchwater exactly?
...the trademark part.
right, okay, I forgot that she's singlehandedly putting Patagonia out of business by using a silly joke name
if Patagonia loses their trademark, which they would if they didn't sue and win (again for one dollar), there would be no assurance against people putting a Patagonia label on amy dogshit
well I hope Amy Dogshit enjoys wearing the label I think she'll look very nice
Oh my fucking god yāall bootlickers are driving me crazy.
Iām a law student specializing in Intellectual Property, which includes Copyright and Trademark. Iāve studied these subjects and the law is clear that everything yāall said about Patagonia ālosing the trademarkā if they donāt sue Ms. Pattie is absolute bullshit.
Trademarks are only lost if they are abandoned by the user or if the product made by the company becomes so ubiquitous, everyday, and common that people start calling all types of that product by the trademark name. This is called genericide, because the trademark has become so generic, it is no longer an indicator of one singular source. Think Band-Aid or Thermos; we use those terms to refer to the generic products theyāre associated with. We call pretty much all sticky bandages Band-Aids and all containers used to keep things warm in Thermoses.
What Patagonia is doing is actually closer to suing for trademark infringement based on tarnishment, which means the infringer is using the trademark name in a way that makes the company look bad or associates the company with things like drugs or pornography. Queen Pattie Gonia is someone who raises awareness for climate and environmental activism. Nothing about Miss Goniaās use of the name tarnishes Patagoniaās brand.
The only possible argument the company has is that Miss Goniaās queer identity could be seen as not āadult-friendlyā but that very quickly slides into homophobic and moralistic territory that will absolutely be shot down by the court based on First Amendment rights. People are allowed to use ānot safe for work names,ā based on caselaw that states that ālabels that are disparaging or morally offensiveā are a violation of free speech because itās peopleās choice to say and use those names. For example, an all-Asian band applied for the trademark name āThe Chinksā because they were taking the racially disparaging name and reclaiming it. The Trademark Office attempted to refuse to grant the bandās trademark, and when the band sued, the Supreme Court sided with the band.
That got off on a little bit of a tangent, but the long and short of it is this: Patagonia has absolutely no basis for a trademark name. Any IP lawyer would say the same. The reason Patagonia is getting away with a frivolous suit like this is because they know their target is a member of a vulnerable minority. Miss Gonia is 100% correct that they are trying to bully her because they know she doesnāt have the money to withstand a years-long expensive lawsuit.
Itās because of idiotic bootlickers who kiss companiesā asses like this that big corporations can get away with hurting independent creators. Patagonia does not have any chance at winning, but they know that just by filing and announcing their lawsuit against Miss Gonia, they are putting pressure on her to give up. If this lawsuit goes on, even if it doesnāt make it to court and just goes to a judge for a quick summary judgment, Miss Gonia would still have to pay for a lawyer to defend her and lawyers cost more money than the average person has. Miss Gonia would win, but because Patagonia set the damages for $1, even if she did win, sheād still end up in debt because in America, the typical rule is that each party pays for the cost of their own attorneyās fees. The only time the opposing side would pay your lawyerās fees is if you have a contract with them that says so, and thatās usually only used in contracts between businesses or high profile individuals.
What Patagonia is doing is capitalizing on societyās hatred for queer people and anyone resembling a trans woman. Miss Gonia is a drag queen, not trans as far as Iām aware (though please do correct me if Iām wrong) but itās not like a big company cares to differentiate; theyāre just mad that a queer person is using their name in a way they donāt like. Patagonia knows that this particular population has been facing harsh discrimination in society currently. By siding with them, people are actively harming the queer community. Donāt pretend to hide behind trademark law to cover up your prejudices.
eww dude keep your skinny fetish to yourself
i'm always saying this
I love refreshing my dash and liking/replying to people's posts within seconds. #creep