Rebels at Heart.

Liberty Leading the People. South Asian. Intersectional Feminist. She/Her. A fan of rebel characters. Also, if you like my content, drop a few dollars in my Ko-fi account (link is in the pinned post); that'd help me a great deal!

[dushman-e-jaan]

Links to my Ko-fi account and posts.

Urgent help is needed for a Pakistani Friend: she’s a victim of domestic abuse and the Pakistani floods’ socioeconomic impact has worsened her household’s condition. Please, check this link for further details and donate and/or spread the word.

Here’s the link to my ko-fi account as I want to earn from my creative endeavors. If you enjoy my content; would like some editing done for your stories, posts, etc.; and want to learn Chinese (till HSK 5), drop me a few dollars. It’d help me a great deal!  A big thanks to all of you in advance!  

This post has all of the important links to my important posts, and I’ve categorized them as efficiently and effectively as possible; it also includes the Climate Change and Politics’ sections. This will be updated from time to time to add non-fictional content, as well.

Currently Writing: Nothing in particular.

(Kindly, don’t reblog this and only use this as a resource.)

The previous pinned post is here. It was getting too crowded, so I decided to make another one; some of the important posts have been removed from the previous one and added to this one.

Original Writing

Children of the Woods (short horror-story) - Source

Personal Content

Books, essays, and articles recommendations on literature, literary criticism, and editing - Source

The cultural clashes in regard to sex, wars, and taboos--Ask (Source)

General remarks on the concepts of characterization, plot, and narration--Ask(s) (Source) (Source)

The Fandom’s absurd biases in regard to collective punishment, radial politics, and status quo (Source) (Source) (Source) (Source)

Criticism and Criterion (Source)

Art, Morality, and Didacticism--Ask (Source)

Magic Circle: Video-Games, Narrative, and Literacy (Source)

Western media and its dominance at the expense of all else--Ask (Source)

Death of the Author and its implications in the post-modern world--Ask (Source)

A short commentary on Fandom Culture and online discourse that stems from it - Source

Uchiha Sasuke, Uchiha Clan, and Criticism

How would Sasuke's revolution unfold? An ask posted by Persephone-darkness - Source

Words, violence, and respectability politics - Source

How many Sharingans were procured after the Uchiha Massacre? Additional Content - Source

Death of the Child - Source

Of Compassion, Legacy, and Freedom ... Source

Truth, Violence, and Justice—A short critical commentary - Source

“Less is More” or “More of What’s Less”? - Source

The Uchiha Clan’s “Prestige” - Source

War is a force that gives us meaning - Source

Bigotries aren’t ‘one size fits all’ garments - Source

Why didn’t the narrative validate Sasuke’s radical shift from Konoha’s Will of Fire to Revolution? Additional Content - Source

A Short Commentary on the Raikage’s reaction to Bee’s kidnapping, and yet another reason why the Kage Summit Arc remains to be the best arc in canon - Source

“Violence is never the answer!” sayeth an anti-Sasuke wanker. Source

In defense of Fugaku - Source

Sasuke’s character and how the fact that his ability to cause ‘disruption’ creates issues for his haters - Source

A Parallel Between Sasuke and Hashirama? Maybe - Source

A short commentary on Sasuke’s characterization in the Kage Summit Arc- Source

Tit for tat! Source

Kill the “Healer Sasuke” trope with hell-fires! Source

The “nuances” of war machinery - Source

Legacy Undone - Source

The “point” is that there’s no point. - Source

The Uchiha Massacre... or Genocide?  Pt I. - Additional Content - Source

Uchiha Sasuke, Canon Feats, and Misconceptions

Why Sasuke didn’t kill Obito after he found out the truth of his involvement in UCM? Short commentary - Source

How the Rinnegan is awakened by the Indra’s Transmigrant - Source

Distinctly potent and voluminous Chakra is canonically associated with a single clan - Source

Itachi’s list of A- and S- Rank Anbu Missions is absurdly short - Source

The misconception that Sakura and Hinata answered all the questions right in the Chūnin Examinations - Source

Miscellaneous  Commentary and Criticism

The Wave Arc isn’t as “complex“ as you think it is--back and forth discussion with another poster - Source

From Neo-Liberal Feminism to exclusion of Radials in the Consumerist Market—a Brief Commentary on Consumer-Friendly Narratives - Source

A short commentary on the mainstream “feminist discourse” on Naruto - Source

The Centrist trash-heap that proliferates Naruto Discourse - Source

A short post in defense of Kishimoto as a writer - Source

Yaoi Fandom and misogyny - A discussion - Source

A long rant on Naruto Fandom and its Shipping and Fix-it obsession - Source

A back and forth on as to why Sasuke is a far better realized character, with thematic and narrative depth, in comparison to Kurapika and Zuko - Source

Uchiha Itachi: A Walking Paradox

Itachi’s nowhere near as Talented as Sasuke - Source

Kishimoto was on the right track with Itachi ... Source

Itachi’s character is whatever Sasuke’s character requires him to be - Source

Yet another ‘problem’ with Itachi’s characterization - Source

Senju Tobirama: A Well-Meaning Bigot, an Oxymoron

Short commentary on Tobirama so-called rational, fair, and just “qualities” - Source

Tobirama Fandom and the abuse of the term ‘Monopoly’ - Source

How Tobirama and his policies fit the Fascism criteria - Source

Tobirama Senju’s Policies and the Uchiha Genocide. Additional Content - Source

The very obvious parallels between Orochimaru, Danzō, and Tobirama (a short post) - Source

Haruno Sakura: Fandom, Feats, and Criticism

A Sakura Fan’s comical rant on “potential” - Source

“Press on the assigned Chakra-Control button for the win!” - Source

The lack of thematic weight with Sakura “fix its”. Source

Sakura’s characterization in the Kage-Summit Arc is impeccable! Source

Sakura’s Mokuton and “Sharingan-Rivelling” Genjutsu is fucking absurd! Source

Uzumaki Naruto: Misconceptions and the Protagonist Syndrome

Naruto took up Pain’s philosophy and took all the credit - Source

Naruto’s idealistic Fascism: A short commentary - Source

Hyūga  Hinata: A Character That Merely ... Exists.

What did Hinata do, with Naruto as her inspiration? Source

Misconceptions and Elaborations on Canon Abilities

Sasuke blunted his Chidori to make it non-lethal during the final show-down at VOTE I - Source

Sasuke and Naruto are two of the few most powerful Transmigrants - Source

Anbu isn’t a rank! Source

The faulty discussions on “parallels” in canon--Additional Content - Source

Sasuke and Naruto aren’t Reincarnations of Indra and Ashura! Source

Fan-Fictions and Reviews

Final Fantasy X: A Review. (Source)

Frayed Truths by Reckless Writer. (Source)

Review: Kill Your Heroes by Evil is a Relative Term (Source) (Source)

Loyalty: An unintentional lampoon on the “child soldier” phenomenon. (Source)

Three Best Sasuke-Centric Fan-Fictions! (Source)

The anti-Sasuke SI and Itasaku Fictions take themselves so fucking seriously! (Comments on A World Full of Monster by Fahad09) (Source) I need to recheck the source for this as it appears that I’ve accidentally deleted the link.

Mother-Fuckers why? (A lampoon on Naruto-Centric Fan-Fictions) (Source)

My Art

Sasuke and Itachi drawings - White Charcoal - Source

Taka Sasuke - Pen and Charcoal - Source

Crow - Black Charcoal in scribbles - Source

Climate Change

A Back and Forth Discussion on Climate Change - Source

A Short Commentary on Climate Change and Degrowth - Source

Being “nice” isn’t a window to good character. Source

How Meat Eating and Industrial Farming affect the most vulnerable in the Global South - Source

Bay of Bengal: depleted fish stocks and huge dead zone signal tipping point - Source

'Solastalgia': Arctic inhabitants overwhelmed by new form of climate grief - Source

Climate Change and the increase in risks of new viruses emerging - Source

‘Heat dome’ probably killed 1bn marine animals on Canada coast, experts say - Source

'Silent death': Australia's bushfires push countless species to extinction - Source

The massive harm inflicted on the environment due to meat-eating and Industrial Farming - Source

‘Matter of great concern’: Microplastics found in placentas of pregnant women for first time - Source

The Plastic Problem and The Hyper-Consumerist. Source

Eco glitter causes same damage to rivers as ordinary product – study - Source

Why do people hate ‘Vegans’? Source

Meat-head Masculinity and the Soy Boy Culture. Source

Politics, Imperialism, and War on Terror

Imperialist Feminism and Liberalism - Source

Barack Obama: Imperialism’s Symptom or a Disease? Source

Excerpts from Barack Obama’s book - Source

To be or not to be a “leftist“, is that the question? Source

George W. Bush Can’t Pave His Way Out of Hell - Source

Biden Requests $753bn Military Budget, Largest Since WWII and another companion piece on Pentagon’s ‘bottomless pit’ of resources - Source

The “woke” CIA psyop - Source

Yemen, Afghanistan and Syria top list of gravest humanitarian crises - Source

US, Allies Drop 46 Bombs Per Day for 20 Years - Source

Facing Years in Prison for Drone Leak, Daniel Hale Makes His Case Against U.S. Assassination Program - Source

More videos on Afghanistan Crisis: “USA’s occupation has been privatized” and “I’m a compassionate conservative,” George Bush - Source

Palestine

The Plight of Palestine - A Documentary - Source

Behind Israel’s Troll Army on Twitter - Source

Afghanistan

USA’s brutalities against Afghanistan - Source

USA’s death-squads in Afghanistan - Source

How Peace is Possible in Afghanistan - Source

Iraq

Joe Biden Was One of the Iraq War’s Most Enthusiastic Backers - Source

Syria

Syria: US Stealing Grain and Oil, Building Up Military Bases – Turkey Guilty of War Crimes - Source

China

America’s True Goals and Upcoming New Propaganda Push - Source

The US is Set on a Path to War with China. What Is to be Done? - Source

NY Times’ pseudo-expert accusing China of genocide worked for far-right cult Falun Gong’s publicity arm - Source

[dushman-e-jaan]

I'm going to take a break from on here, and I can't be certain that when it'd end. I was working towards something, and yesterday, I heard a really bad news about it. I've not been well since then, as if it completely broke me. I'm shocked that I didn't physically scatter in the wake of it. It sure as hell felt that way.

I don't know when I'd recover, but I'm in a terrible place right now. Not sure what else to say here. (It isn't as if I post anything indispensable here, anyway.) Hopefully, you all will understand.

[dushman-e-jaan]

EXCLUSIVE: In the ’80s, Joe Biden Speculated to Israel’s PM About Wiping Out Canadians

In 1982, then-Senator Joe Biden met with Israel’s leader amid its bloody invasion of Lebanon. Biden expressed support for the campaign, and

"Some of the details of what Begin recalls Biden telling him are genuinely shocking, but they seem to now be largely forgotten in Israel — especially a hypothetical Biden floated about the United States bombing cities in Canada. “If attacks were launched from Canada into the US,” Biden remarked, “everyone here would have said, ‘Attack all the cities of Canada, and we don’t care if all the civilians get killed." "

Pankaj Mishra · The Shoah after Gaza

Memories of Jewish suffering at the hands of Nazis are the foundation on which most descriptions of extreme ideology and...

"In 1982, shortly before Reagan bluntly ordered Begin to cease his ‘holocaust’ in Lebanon, a young US senator who revered Elie Wiesel as his great teacher met the Israeli prime minister. In Begin’s own stunned account of the meeting, the senator commended the Israeli war effort and boasted that he would have gone further, even if it meant killing women and children. Begin himself was taken aback by the words of the future US president, Joe Biden. ‘No, sir,’ he insisted. ‘According to our values, it is forbidden to hurt women and children, even in war … This is a yardstick of human civilisation, not to hurt civilians.’ "

Also, that's not just any Zionist, but one of the most hard-line zionists of the nakba days: leader of Irgun when they bombed the King David hotel, and later founding Netanyahu's Likud. He was also likened to the nazis by Arendt and Einstein in 1948, when the blood from holocaust had barely dried. Imagine being too extreme for that sorta guy!

[dushman-e-jaan]

Man, this shithole of a country (Pakistan) is stirring again, and this time, over the drama Barzakh that depicts homosexuality, apparently; and this isn't the first drama of its kind that was taken down: any drama that even slightly offends this illiterate horde of gutter-dwelling morality-peddlers gets taken down easily over threats of extreme violence; that's the only thing the "shareef men" here have learnt since childhood: rote learning about "quam-e-loot" and the "biblical consequences" of that ass-fucking; you see, it's going to hurt more than just your arse! Stand up, people. We've arrived at nirvana, because God would grant them 95 virgins for defending his honor over a drama serial! (It was taken down before I could see it.) You know how it goes with the haram and hallal crowd over here, and now, the poor female actress, Sanam Saeed, is getting harassed over social media. How fucking predictable are you lot? Straight out of the pages of Pavlov's experiment.

Funny story that bacha bazi (fucking little boys, though it roughly translates into dancing boys) is so common in KPK (and Afghanistan). 95% of the truck drivers are pedophiles that rape little boys who've run away from their homes in the wake of abuse, for which there's no protection over here; just rudimentary laws with zero implementation. Trans community isn't given any jobs, and the only reason for that is that they're there to be sexually exploited, raped and murdered even, by the closeted "civilized men". The top pornography searches not that long ago from this country were child rape and sex with animals. Time to hold my head high. What an achievement! I'm not even making this up; you can confirm it from google should you wish. All hallal, because no body sees it. You see, if you show it, that's encouraging it. Kinda like that "it's problematic!" yelling FF-writing chodes on here. When, in reality, homosexuality has never been depicted in our media, yet rape of boys and chakla (prostitution of young men) is so fucking common here. Gee, I wonder why? It's almost as if our society is A-O-K with rape, prostitution, and sexual slavery, as long as it's kept under wraps; the moment it's discussed, that's when the issue arises for the "family people". The moral rot here is deep, and there's no fixing it now, because these people aren't interested in fixing it. Why? Because discussions could mean laws and laws would mean consequences in the wake of these practices. They don't want that as the absence of any legislation means that they can have their cake and eat it, too; they can show a veneer of religiosity whilst fucking some little boys in the back-alley; and this is so common that I shit you not.

It's also funny how women are always the leading commenters in these harassment campaigns, as if the bitches feel threatened with the prospect of male rejection in the wake of "homosexuality's depiction". Where else would they go if men started fucking men? Oh, no! Gotta protect my marriage turf! (Trust me, most middle class and up women aren't victims of anything but themselves; I went intersectional for this very reason, because "internalized misogyny" has been weaponized by a lot of liberal women to let these blood-thirsty cunts off the hook and not make them face consequences of their own actions; equity means that everyone's responsible, not just men.) They're pretty much silent over the fact that kids from poor families are kept as servants by middle class and up women (a practice that's extremely pervasive); and many a time, these same children are beaten viciously, rendering them handicapped for life; beaten to death even at times; and then they do the razi-nama (payment to the families of the victims) for a little sum of money, which is also legal, and everything goes away. Crickets. That's all I hear from these deeply moral harpies. And why wouldn't they be silent? Their own homes use this child slave-labor for a pittance. They're also mostly mum over the fucking of little girls via child marriages, which is pretty much legal here in many remote areas; but out of sight and out of mind; and those little twerps would die, anyway, from poverty; so why bother? So is marital rape. So is sexual abuse by family members. I can on and on and on, and the peak morality of this fucking gutter would never reach the brim. Are you all feeling hallal yet? An evil drama vanquished. Nation saved. Kids emancipated. Hear hear!

[dushman-e-jaan]

Karin has healed Sasuke a total of 2 times in the entire manga...

...and not one of those times involved fatal injuries. No, really! All right, 2.5 times if I'm charitable, but we'd get to that later; so I don't get where the claims about her healing Sasuke "multiple times" during any of the battles even come from, because the only time Karin ever healed Sasuke during battle was that battle against Bee. That's it. It goes to show that either this fandom has absurdly poor reading comprehension and media literacy (straight in the gutters); or it just hates this character's guts because it feels that he slights its person-hood. We can all agree that it's both. It's as if, with this fandom, God aimed biblically low and then said, "fuck it!" and settled for that. Like Sasuke settled for Sakura in Boruto. I can't think of a better analogy than this—I'm sorry, but it's true; I crossed my heart and everything down there—I swear!

Anyhow, onwards and forwards. The first time we were shown Karin healing Sasuke was during that "stabbing" incident, which didn't go as you imagined it did:

As you can see that Sasuke himself had made the stabs non-lethal via the timely usage of Raiton, which showed his reaction speed to be faster than Bee's; and that was the only time Karin ever healed Sasuke during that Bee battle and the only time she ever healed him during any battle. Anyone who claims otherwise is just a shit-stirring chode at this point. A troll that's perpetually toxic and makes navigation through these fandom spaces insufferable. Don't even bother engaging with this lot. Also, here's that scan that shows the statement from Bee that Sasuke's speed is as fast as cloaked Ae's speed:

So I'm not making this claim—Bee is. In fact, Sasuke would've been faster had he fully healed himself through a good rest. This is confirmed by 4 people, including Sasuke himself. I won't bother with the scans as I've already posted them before in that Sasuke versus Bee post. It's fairly lengthy, requires a clean-up, but you can give yourself a little trouble and look for it.

The second time Karin healed Sasuke is when Obito pulled the unconscious Sasuke into his pocket-dimension and Karin, as well, and ordered her to heal Sasuke, who'd lost consciousness due to chakra exhaustion:

(I'm posting full scans, including the unimportant bits, so that I'm not accused of doctoring the images.)

That's 2 times. Good? Now, remember when I said at the start that Karin healed Sasuke 2.5 times? Well, here's why: when she was healing Sasuke whilst Danzo was dying, her healing was interrupted by Mokuton overtaking Danzo's body. This is shown in the following images:

Immediately, Sasuke stopped biting her and proceeded to finish off Danzo; and, well, Karin, too, but that's a different matter. What's important is that Sasuke's low on chakra, enough that Obito asks him to go and rest (this is after he'd stabbed through Karin to get to Danzo):

Then we see Karin saying that she'd healed Sasuke:

Which, curiously, is different from other translations:

This is further backed by the fact that Sasuke was shown to be completely exhausted after he'd used Susanoo once and just two Chidoris. After that, he could barely stand up:

And Obito's shown to back up his statements again that Sasuke needs to return to the hideout and get some rest:

Look carefully, because the panel (middle portion) shows that Sasuke's trying to get up, but can't seem to and is huffing and puffing. He's that exhausted, so there's no way Karin healed him fully as he used the hell out of Susanoo, Amaterasu, Genjutsu, and other Ninjutsus against Danzo. Remember, he made Danzo deplete all the chakra that fueled the nearly dozen or so Sharingans in his arm (every time the Sharingan eye closed in his arm, Karin observed that his chakra plummeted). In fact, we weren't even shown all the frames of the battles. Just the important bits as the fight was going on in the background whilst Obito explained away Izanagi. So it was never a step by step showing of the battle.

Good? Are we done here? So 2.5 times in the entire manga it is. Not many times. Certainly not multiple times in the same battle. All fan-fiction. All made up. You know how it goes with this fandom that's a rabid pack of incels and femcels. The Sasuke hate is just an icing on the cake in regard to their usual antics. It's just like clockwork with this fandom at this point. Predictable and repetitive.

[dushman-e-jaan]

Susan Wojcicki, Former YouTube CEO and Influential Google Exec, Dies at 56

Susan Wojcicki, who served as CEO of YouTube and was one of Google's first executives, has died. She was 56.

Rest in piss, fucking cunt.

[dushman-e-jaan]

Let's be honest with ourselves: this fandom has no clue about the terms its uses, abuses, and vomits out at the drop of a hat and then, somehow, feels extremely full of itself. The terms that are grossly misused are as follows: depth, complex (complexity), character-development (CD), and redemption. Let me course-correct this from the onset: a character doing something you happen to disagree with, no matter what the context, isn't a writing mishap; it's fumbling the understanding of the context; and yes, I know, opinions are like arseholes and everyone's got one, as the adage famously goes; but I'm not sure why the rest of us have to peer long, hard, and intrusively at the opening to your fabled pot of gold. Catch my great wind?

First and foremost, there are over 90 replies in this thread, and most of them offer a different opinion and/or facet of opinion in regard to the character and its role in canon. Easy enough. This, my dearest followers, is what we call depth. Yes, it's its undisputed definition in literary context: the more you can speculate, debate, and opinionate about a character, contextualize it from varied perspectives, regardless of your likes and dislikes, the more depth a character possesses. I mean, honestly, what do these fan-fiction (FF) writers think depth is? Some un-scaled puddle of...goodness, likability, and relatability in a character's bosom? Be sincere, what? And this is the only character that brings out these visceral responses, for good or for ill. So yes, the character, indisputably, has the most depth in canon--in many manga canons, in fact, as you'd come across very few characters like this in post-modern media. To be blunt, a character that garners a definitive opinion from the masses? One that's universally beloved? Reviled? That character has very little depth as there's very little to speculate on.

To elaborate on the other point before I tackle the blights that are CD and redemption, I'd say this: when people make a tiresome list of what Sasuke shouldn't have done, do they realize that they're writing so many aspects of a single character? You do realize that that's complexity, right? Are we on the same page? Good, because I don't think you people know anything about a single word/term that you abuse, and it's absurd, if anything. Once you write out these long and embarrassing dissertations on one character, you're, inadvertently, admitting to the character's many dimensions; and a character doesn't even require multiple dimensions to be complex; a single dimension that's intimately explored and given many perspectives is perfectly complex.

Simply because you hold disagreements in regard to the actions he took, the way he conducted himself, and his overall psyche doesn't mean that each and every one of these decisions, aspects, and goals aren't aspects that make up a single character. Flattening everything to meanness is such a fandom thing to do, when you're the ones making up these lists of his "transgressions". The same transgressions that are tangible character aspects. What else do you think complexity is? Throwing in caveats about "inner conflicts" (dear gods, this phrase is juvenile as it means pretty much nothing in the grand scheme of things) doesn't drag any fruitfulness to this stale discourse. It just makes it more ridiculous, because conflicts can be...endlessly diverse. To demand that a character ought to display this set of conflicts that "I approve of" and not the other...? What's the argument here? It just comes across as a toddler throwing his toys out of the pram and having a tantrum episode. It's not very productive and demands from the characters only behaviors that you approve of, are familiar with, and find "likeable".

And which aspect of the manga Sasuke doesn't single-handedly helm? Haku, Kimimaro, and Nagato? All their narratives ended into him and vanished. (What makes Sasuke more complex than Nagato are the multiple climaxes Sasuke's narrative has and Nagato's doesn't.) The Uchiha Clan, shinobi dissidents, and child soldiers? What becomes of children when they're cast into constant turmoils that are intended to lift them up? Ironies that destroy many but remake few? The lost boys, angry youth, and isolated children? The spirit of youth that intends to deliver a different future, away from the generational trauma, the Curse of Hatred? Come on! You can't tell me that that's not exceptional characterization. Your disagreements don't take away from the many lists that you write out. They're there. They exist. They define the character. That's just what complexity stands for!

Moving on, then we've got the dreaded CD and redemption. I'm sorry, and I've beaten this dead horse to mush at this point, this word is utterly pointless in spite of the the fact that it's peddled relentlessly in mainstream discourse, because, apparently, even "character regression (CR)" is a thing now. As if characters are some sort of donkey-carts that go forward and then lurch backwards, never quite reaching their destinations; and not, I don't know, entirely fictitious entities that are make-believe instruments to make some sort of point--or not. Basically, what these FF-obsessed tools firmly believe is that becoming a "good person", whatever that means in a hyper-militaristic context, is what CD is, when CD isn't exactly a thing. Characters are either dynamic or not. (There's an in-between state according to some critics, but I personally don't agree with it.) Whatever a character does to be dynamic is completely irrelevant. This fandom needs to let that sink in, but, Lords, is that cranium fucking thick! The reading comprehension and media literacy? Stuff of tragedies.

I've highlighted The Redemptive Self: Stories Americans Live By (Dan P. McAdams) many times on here, and I'd do so again as this is what these readers think amount to good stories, not any other ones; and this is the mold Sasuke has to fill to be considered a "good character", when, in reality, this is a caricature that has to follow, and to use the terms FF aficionados might get, expected "story beats" to reach a conclusion that's the same for all these "misfits"; you, basically, "rise above yourself" and some other bumper-sticker hog-wash Western sentimentality like that, because that's the American Dream and the western dream, one which is deeply entrenched in Christian ethos, believe it or not. In short, you turn yourself into "the best version of yourself" and reach some sort of heights in the status-quo (which, in very simple terms, just means the established elements of normalcy in a particular social-system).

That'd naturally require the character to behave in a way that's considered socially good, acceptable, and well, endorsable; to cut the long chase short, your perfect integration into the status-quo is what ought to be the destination every character has to arrive to. Should arrive to. Ought to arrive to. It's imperative that this is where it ends up; otherwise, the writing and/or character is "bad", didn't live up to its potential, and others deserve better and it deserves less. You see where I'm going with this? A character being deserving of something or undeserving of something is purely a transactional social attitude that's very much a part and parcel of American redemptive stories (western stories). Christian stories. There's almost this "sinner ending up in a personal hell" argument here, which is so easy to see as, frankly speaking, ending up "all alone", without romance at the end of this journey, is such a post-modern capitalistic "dating market" argument that you can't help but split your sides with laughter at the cheapness of it all. Of course, if you end up in jail, in physical isolation, on top of the social isolation, without a partner, then even better. That'd ought to show the character! That'd ought to send the message across that it "faced the consequences of its actions", paid its dues for treating the well-meaning friends and potential please-beat-up-my-pussy hopefuls. Never mind that the entire status-quo is built from the ground up on the very ugly military mores that are maintained through the honest-to-kami methods that can only be labelled as fascism; but its denizens blush with national spirit and communal murder-sprees and some "poor women tears", too; so all is well and good and disruption has to be discouraged, or you'd have the Sasukes on your hand, the manifestations of the dream's end; hence, this fandom's koo-koo obsession with punishments and redemptions.

It's a sort of minced up post-modern Christianity and its promises of redemption in which every individual's trajectory has to be the same and the destination has to be the same; only then, all of them can hold their head high and live normally, naturally, and beautifully; sure, you can make some pit-stops at "acting a little uppity" stations, but no crai-ah-zee detours, please; however, you're also magically hyper-individualistic for some reason. The very product that's sold in this post-capitalism neo-liberal pandemonium; and we'd be visiting this castle in hell soon enough. (It's the sort of comical contradiction they're not intellectually equipped to rationalize; they're fucking stupid, you see.) So "lift yourself up by your boot-straps", follow a trajectory that's socially acceptable regardless of the socio-cultural context, and then be a good fucking person...? Did I get it right? I'm shocked that you mother-fuckers don't go to the Church every Sunday morning. Thump your bibles real hard. Tighten your good-man belts and fuck your trad-wives before you head out; and if you're the holder of the other equipment, then pleat your aprons. Hold up your skirts in folds every morning and sometimes after lunch, too. And pull down the knickers to do God's duty for the prevention of The Great Replacement. Seriously, just look at these replies that are dripping thickly with dollar-store American morals, and for what? In defense of an establishment and its die-hards for whom even genocide isn't off the table? This almost reads like farce, but rest assured, like most American fuckers, they're dead serious! (Kishimoto wasn't even close to this level of superficiality at the worst "we don't talk about those things" he wrote.)

What I want to know is this: what does any of this have to do with "good writing"? I'm beside myself with curiosity. It's a way to write, sure. Not the way to write. It's not even a good way to write. Yes, it's placatory, provides you with the much-needed reassurances to simmer down your social anxieties, as laughable as it is; but I didn't know that you were this writing's torrid kernel, effects of post-modern moral pinnacles, its very moral nexus (lol?), not the character; and, to top it off, redemption isn't even a concept in Japanese thought; and it wasn't so after many aspects of Buddhism were taken into Shinto, which ran concurrently with it later, via Chinese influence. Same for Confucius thought that became so deeply embedded into Japanese philosophies in the Edo Period. Bushido was basically Confucian. Why do you want a Japanese manga, whose culture and syllabary (Japan didn't even have one before Chinese influence, which is why Kanji is a thing) was very much moulded by Chinese thought, to go through the motions of Christian dogma? This is a question this fandom has to ask itself as to why it wants this manga to turn into a dogmatic tale of religiosity? Christian religiosity? Hip Christian religiosity, if I bite my tongue for a moment. One that's acceptable to supposedly atheist readers? (What's funnier is that Christianity makes up the heart of modern, post-religion Western system; the perfect irony, though I don't expect these illiterates to be very enlightened on this front.)

What this manga does with sublime simplicity is that it culturally rejects, with an iron-fist--a chidori-fist--and delineates the glorious obliteration of the notions, the American ones, that the land you call home and its perfect status-quo is a place of endlessly opportunity and prosperity, without any kinks in the system in sight; and that all the imperfections are merely surface-level and not what the system is, the reality of the conditions people reside in. The conditions the children reside in.

Last but certainly not the least, the reply on "fallen angel" is so absurdly stupid that I'm shocked it was even made. Which "fallen angel" is this poster talking about? Christian? Naturally, angels, as most people know them, are entirely Abrahamic; and I highly doubt that this poster knows much about other two, Judaism and Islam, as he seems pretty kooky. (Don't want to get into as to how this concept is almost entirely taken from Zoroastrianism, but let's leave that be; his head might blow up to pieces with the information overload.) If so, which one was redeemed? Did it happen in his favorite ecchi anime/manga, High-school DxD? Which one, then? (Fuck Lucifer; I absolutely despise that show.)

The Sin, which occurred before The Original Sin, one that set everything into motion, was about the desire to attain equity with God. That, in religious doctrine, is not only an unforgivable sin but also completely deserving of eternal damnation. I don't believe this guy knows what "infinity" entails; otherwise, he'd have spared us all that absurd word-salad. If not that, what else? Satan from Paradise Lost? The Epic that constructed the way for these "anti heroes", as you mother-fuckers call it? Which part of that Epic is about redemption of the fallen? Because when you fall in biblical terms, you fall so far down that even wings can't carry you out, because that pit, that pandemonium, is eternal. Literally and metaphorically. As God, Omni (all) personified, personally struck you down; he made it his business to make your life a living hell. Literally, fellas. No one's defeating an abstraction into which all concept of change, time, and possibilities go to perish. You'd have to transform (into the great serpent) and trick to wriggle free yet remain all the same to inflict things in the same, here it comes, negative space. You don't say? The more things change, the more they stay the same. Only now, it's forever and ever and ever! I can't stress enough that just how stupid that comment is; but his waifu-for-laifu in DxD told him that it's possible, so you better believe it, fr!

This parliament of highly enlightened FF-connoisseurs have to realize that not all spaces are transmutable. You can explore that space, improve it somewhat even, but you can't change it--not always; and that's the reality of spaces, of contexts, of writings. If you don't get this, you'd be like that guy in the screen-shots, eternally bitching about "who didn't deserve what" whilst you pen out your gargantuan pile of refuse, one that holds many of your make-believe redemptive tales; and something about that, like these people and their discourse, is very stale.

[dushman-e-jaan]

The UK riots can only be described as modern day pogroms, lynchings (gods, they tried so hard to be successful on this front), and good ol' white supremacy. If something short of a life sentence is handed out to these people, who by the way tried to burn down an entire building full of refugees, then I don't know what to day.

Some people in the UK, as shown through polling, still think that their concerns are "legitimate"? Are they? Mother fuckers, no body wants to come to your racist, white shit-holes. Are you kidding me? The only reason they do is that you've destroyed their homelands, left them destitute, and have hoarded their resources. They don't just have to seek your fucking permission to come to the lands built on their backs; they've got the right.

You don't want these people at your doorstep? Quit engaging in these fascist wars and economic terrorism, and no body would come to even spit on you. Fucking maggots, think that they're so special whilst completely decoupling themselves from the context of economic and military terrorism they inflict upon these people and have been inflicting on them for decades.

And that worm Keir Starmer? Well, perhaps you ought not to have fanned extreme Islamophobia in regard to the backing of that genocidal state and your country's personal white supremacist project, Israel, and these nazis wouldn't have come out of their gutters and wouldn't have been emboldened. Fucker looks like he's sweating buckets now.

[dushman-e-jaan]

Study: 61% of men don't see forced sex with acquaintance as rape

When asked whether they viewed forced sex with a spouse as rape, only 8.5 percent of women and 7.3 percent of men said yes.

And someone in the haaretz article's comments is going, "it's a different culture, bro!":

A neurotic society that functions through fascism thinks in fascism, as well. What a shocker.

[dushman-e-jaan]

I see that, predictably, Neil Gaiman still has a dedicated following on tumblr, even after all the accusations that have come out against him. (Another one came out not even 12 hours ago.) I suppose, #metoo was always a fad to appear hip and progressive and not something meant to start conversations about how people in positions of power commodify youth (of men and women) and exploit it, because they can. Their wealth and power allows for it.

All that was dropped on the wayside, and now, we're at the crossroads of #metoo, but only if it's relatable and not about my allies. Fuck, this dude wrote this way back in 2004, showing his desire to be the wolf to the little red riding hoods. (Apparently, it was an open secret that he behaved in this manner; if so, why was he never held accountable?) How did no one scrutinize him after this is impressive; however, wanking to your queer-friendly ally takes precedence over everything else. It's as if we're back at the "Depp defense-force era"; and like Heard, new targets have been found to safeguard the interests of powerful men.

To put it bluntly, I'm not surprised that all this didn't even make his fandom flinch. After all, it isn't as if liberals believe in anything. This and the unabashed fellating of Harris tells us as much, so spinning about superficial "political vibes" is all they can manage; and what better way to do that than grab hold of the personifications of the said superficiality. It's just that easy.

[dushman-e-jaan]

Exclusive: Two more women accuse Neil Gaiman of sexual assault and abuse - Tortoise

First on-the-record allegations against the author allege abuse going back to 1986 and reveal another non-disclosure agreement, this one wit

It's never just one or two women. The floodgates have opened, so I'm expecting many more.

Anyhow, can we scrub this guy's "ally status" off the chalkboard now? Amanda Palmer, his ex-wife, was also complicit from what I'm reading (she helped him recruit college-aged girls to sleep with). Can we throw her into the pit with him, as well? That'd be great.

[dushman-e-jaan]

Deeply unfashionable but wildly successful: author Neil Gaiman is living his own fantasy

Neil Gaiman was born Jewish, raised a Scientologist and educated by the Church of England. The perfect background for a fantasy writer?

This...clears everything up for me. Is tumblr still batting for this maggot? Calling this some sort of "anti-trans-ally/terf psyop"? My goodness. Happy for you guys and your pathetic fixation on para-social relationships.

[dushman-e-jaan]

Current election poster in Germany

They've banned the keffiyeh and Palestine flag, considering them to be anti-semitic symbols, but they've brought this old classic back. How endearing! It's protecting the white kids and everything! Never change, Germany, never change.

[dushman-e-jaan]

Source

Sigh, it's that day of the week/month again. It's time to dust your mittens and put this fandom back where it crawled out of. Hurry, it might start spreading, multiplying!

Jim Morrison stated: women look wicked when you're unwanted. 

I’m going to turn this on its head and say it like it is: Sasuke looks wicked when the women who give chase to him (women like Sakura) are unwanted. 

Ah, yes, feelings. Very sensitive. Very precarious. Very identity defining. Where would we all be if we didn't belch out our fee-fees that rolled out of the hospital bed, hurt at places, to cry out about Sasuke and his meanness? Feminism was invented for this shit! Heck yeah!

And it's always about these damned screen-shots, isn't it? You know what? I'm going to get straight to the point, cut through all this "feminism fluff": How else should he phrase his feelings, a little boy who’s extremely traumatised from, you know, the genocide and torture he experienced? There's absolutely nothing wrong with how he expresses himself. He’s blunt, to-the-point, and has a no-nonsense approach, which, frankly, I find to be very refreshing compared to the passive-aggressive way in which Sakura functions, in which most people function. Also, this intense, hyper-fixation on “careful wording” has morphed into a war against authenticity. Just how many times should anyone run a sentence-marathon through his mind till he acquires the permission to utter it? (And since you people lack reading comprehension, I’d throw in a disclaimer here: this isn’t a free licence to be racist; I’m talking about being generally honest in conversations.)

Why should Sakura’s feelings be pedestalized? Why should any woman's, any person's feelings be pedestalized? I don’t understand this mantra that’s constantly peddled by Sakura fandom and their “pop feminism adjacent ilk” at all. It’s pointless, means nothing, and adds nothing to the conversations at hand. Seriously, humour me, why are her feelings and personhood sequestered, nearly consecrated, from the world she belongs? Cherry-picking the scans of a boy who wants nothing to do with her, highlighting that how sad she is, because he called her irritating? When, in the grand scheme of things, this is pretty…mundane stuff. Not very chummy, but hardly malicious. Is he out to get womankind, subjugate them, every time he utters the "that which must not be spoken" (irritating)? Sincerely, what’s with this weaponizing of her tears and womanhood to peddle “she deserved better”? It’s one of the hallmarks of white feminism. It’s fascinating how much you lot project onto Sakura to play this tired old game that leads nowhere.

And frankly, all that character analysis? Yes, that’s precisely why I’d have never been interested in reading such a stale, boring, and hysterically mediocre character like that. Yes, her insecurities drive her character. Yes, she feels inadequate. Yes, that’s why she latches onto Sasuke. And yes, his rejections only make her feel more unworthy, which is why she chases so desperately as she’s constructed her worth around him. We get it; however, what does it do in regard to the world around her? The story of a middle-class girl who overcomes her insecurities and moves on from a boy…whilst the world remains embroiled in brutal warfare, a war-machine that’s nigh unstoppable, one which demands sacrifices and leaves countless children ruined in its wake? That reads like some kind of parody. Why would anyone read the former over the latter? Can someone give me one appropriate reason? Any reason for this manga to contort into a slice of life snippet of a middle-class girl-dreamer's life over...whatever is happening in the war-zone? The point of the manga?

A lot of liberal women just adore this…fairly passable character, because, as this woman (who’s over thirty, if her posts are anything to go by) stated, she sees herself in her. Yes, her being a middle-class chaser is the point, but it ought to begin with and end on that point. There’s no need to extend it beyond more than it is, because there isn’t anything more to this, but Sakura fandom just refuses to get this. 

They just love to prove, look, she’s got all the fucking haters but she’s still got her own career, a hot husband (great replacement for Sasuke, because you’ve got to stick it to a minority-coded cartoon), and some brood to boast her fertility! Wow, so goddamn subversive! Who would’ve thought of that? It isn’t as if all the Sakura-Centric FFs choke the gutters of this self-inserting syndrome. Another one into the pit! You see, she’s this hidden hero for the “white proletariat”! Basically, any successful woman who makes it big and moves on from some “man” is now magically a feminist. Heck, you don’t even require that, just a cunt, and fuck it!, you’re inherently a feminist. Throw in a quality “man” that makes her shiver around his “Sasuke’s replacement timber”, and by the gods, your brand of activism is just in the post-modern woman bag! When, truly, it’s just a pathetic personal self-defence against the online attacks—the sort of “girl friend’s feminism” they can’t let go of. A palatable feminism slop that you can print on a t-shirt or a cup, even churn out supposed mic-drop FF quotes, and feel smug about it all. For the ladies, you know.

Sakura’s “white-middle-class female-liberation” narrative is basically Western antifa at this point. When it’s election year, it’s “Trump bad and defeat fascism by voting it out”, and here, it’s “Sasuke’s bad and defeat fascism through my white-woman stand-in finding love, success, and kids in a war-torn world, because it ought to be about me and not some minority-coded characters over there”. 

And who’re “all these girls”? Who’s we? Is there a quasi-Naruto-verse liberal in your pocket? Turning Leaf’s dearth of “power fantasies” for female fascists into a palatable rainbow imperialism, a ladder to female success, is something else—and these fanfictions read like that CIA recruitment ad: aggrandize the womankind who leave their family, cat, and kitchen behind to join the military’s “cause”. What? Is this supposed to be some badge of honour? Lord forbid, feminism? Fuck this petty apologism. It happens all the time in these spaces that have been utterly polluted by these white feminists (or proponents of white feminism); and when they read a little ahead in canon, grease their dried-out brain-cells with the lubrication of reading comprehension, and watch their “girl-boss candidate” shit the bed in every fucking panel that concerns the criticism of the military industrial complex, all these “pragmatic progressives” hysterically cry in their chicken tenders and then cry foul—a lot. A fucking lot.

Liberals with their petty sloganeering like black lives matter, science is real, and “military women deserve better”—what does it have anything to do with what Kishimoto is tackling? There has to be some “connect the dots” there, no? To make it make sense? What’s the end-game here? Oh, I know, the lost boys don’t require closure and justice; what they really, fr, require is a good pussy and socio-political assimilation to turn into one of the good ones in status-quo. Domestication through liberal cunts, pun intended, and all the romance genre these days revels in that. That’s where Sakura’s “she worked so hard to turn herself into a medic” tantrums come in very handy. Here’s the thing, society isn’t some sort of hospice you can cure; and to contextualise this, Sasuke isn’t terminally ill and doesn’t need comfort from the likes of her. The comfort he refused, in your view. A transgression for which he has to pay!

All this misinterpretation of what Naruto stands for reminds me of the debacle that’s the Hunger Games, a book series that was inspired by Iraq War; yet all it did was glorify Lawrence, an open Zionist, and her quirky memes. it’s the best illustration of creating the market of relatability for a populace that entirely benefits from privilege, and Sakura is privileged, because there's nothing wrong with her life, in her life, about her life—extremely privileged, unlike the children akin to Sasuke; and what’s funny—funnier, in fact—is that what people trip over is that Sakura's love for Sasuke is shallow, when the main point—the point—of her character is that her entire outlook on the shinobi world is hilariously shallow, and that was what Kishimoto implied when he called her a sort of “weak-link” in one of his interviews. 

She doesn’t understand Sasuke—anything beyond her own world, just like the readers that see themselves in her. And that’s extremely ironic! Which is why it's comical how the people that constantly repeat ad nauseam that Sakura’s such a “badass girl-boss” are the very same people that turn around and demand that Sasuke ought to treat her like a fragile little flower when she was a fully trained soldier that specifically sought Sasuke out to kill him. Why? Because strings of slime hang down from her vag whenever he’s in the near vicinity. He ought to honour that. It’s his fault for arousing her nether regions, the dreams that scale the road to shtupping! You lot sound exactly like the vermin on Fresh and Fit, only with a vagina down there—I’m not even kidding! The fucking sexual entitlement, the greasy responses, is there for all to see, and by God, this male character isn’t even real! (One can only wonder how you behave in real life in the wake of rejections.)

The problem is that the crowd that operate in this way are mostly Western liberals, and for them, the only people that deserve any sympathy are the "perfect victims": ie, people who are just being killed, because otherwise, it’s just "hate”—curse of hatred, ha-ha, psyche! As soon as any of said victims, fictional or real, retaliate it becomes very, very "complex". And if these “imperfect victims” believe in anything that isn't liberalism, then they're very obviously evil and anything they do within that framework can only lead to more evil. The solution? More white, middle-class women to off-set these “evil men”, of course, because “women are wonderful”. There’s no self-reflection, no historical contextualization as to why any of this got so bad. Nope. “More female prison guards, drone pilots, and Hokages”, because it’s, you know, very complex.

These are just extremely stupid historical cliches that have found their way into this post-modern western liberalism and the ideals of liberal feminism as an extension, supplemented by the tunnel-visioned views of Western politics, which, basically, is socio-political and cultural illiteracy by fitting everybody into a very tight political compass, and judging them by that idea. It’s extremely childish. Just wishy-washy moralism. It stinks. 

That’s why there’s an entire market of “emotionally marketing yourself as good”, weaponizing relatability and identity, and the janitorial concern-trolling that follows this brand of “self commodification”. Why else do you think self-help seminars and the wackos that run them are such a hit with this populace? That’s why their version of “benign sexism” is so popular: female agency is only agency if she brutalises men; otherwise, it’s just wife battery, irrespective of context. Which is why the “abuser” allegations are so appealing to them; it’s a worn out argument that's meant to gain them sympathy by default. It reminds me of the “French white feminists”, fascists, basically, coming out of the white supremacist wood-works to comment on the youth riots that started in the wake of the killing of a non-white kid. Apparently, “it’s always the men” was their response to this. It’s almost as if this is what this parliament of wankers stops at, as well: “it’s always the men”, and as Sasuke is the eternal source of Sakura’s shame, their shame, he’s treated the same way. It’s all benevolent sexism as if Sasuke, men in general, owe privileged women some sort of debt, and if they don't come through, well, watch out, because it's the white women's turn now; and they'd make you pay, if not in real life, then in their FFs! (Too bad, so sad that the world-order is shifting at neck-break pace, and the crown, once it's transferred to you, would be riddled with turd, remnants of white supremacy's glory.)

This is the primary reason why they gloss up the mental illnesses of various characters and have Sakura cure them (this is pretty much the foundation for all Sakura x insert a traumatised Uchiha here FFs; their pitiful understanding of harrowing war-conflicts and the irreparable damage that’d inflict on its victims, a damage your cunt can’t cure). A lot of people, to be perfectly blunt, are sympathetic to mental illness till the affected individual displays some sort of behaviour that shatters the cosplay versions in their head. Then it’s back to the drawing boards and teaching Kishimoto “how to write”, because only they know how victims of war-crimes would react as, you know, they’re white women oppressed by the patriarchy, its greatest victims; so, of course, all their “plight” is easily translatable into how Sasuke and others like him ought to react, and “respect white women juice” should always be their priority. Not state-dismantling or anything. No, no, it’s this.

That’s why Sakura has turned into this “the pick me final boss” that they dread, because the version in canon, the snivelling girl with petty self-esteem issues that chases down Sasuke to boost her ego, clashes hard with the version in their heads; so they desperately try to fix her; but, sadly, as the old adage goes, there’s nothing new under the sun, they don’t have much creativity in their attempts. There’s no true adventure to be had in their “girlboss stashes”, just some braindead Uchiha male platoon that comes by to lick up her suds as she washes in the showers of white matriarchy. The true adventure is the rabid shippers we made along the way!

And, you see, Madara and Itachi, even Shisui and possibly Obito, too, would’ve treated her right, unlike Sasuke. Source: arse-crack pipe, but it doesn’t stop them from insisting that that’s how canon was supposed to be written till Kishimoto stole their dream-boats; and Itachi that aids-positive character was gentle (lol?), so he’s obviously the better Sasuke. Never mind the fact that Hashirama, Madara’s spiritual brother, couldn’t change him, but Sakura would—if she could, but that Kishimoto, women-independence hater. Why? 'Cause she fucking can. And Itachi that child-torturer and killer, the state’s numero uno throat-goat, didn’t even bother acknowledging her existence in canon; he addressed everyone by the name but her; that doesn’t make her special; that makes her pointless in his perspective. She was simply beneath his considerations. 

Funnily enough, very truthfully, the only time any Uchiha ever bothered to interact with her was when she was either in his face or tried to attack him. Beyond that, they went about their day, not bothering themselves with her, albeit she was in the near vicinity. Heck, Sasuke, the source of their endless woes, didn’t reciprocate no matter how many times she threw herself at his feet—even the prospect of easy sex with her didn’t appeal to him, which is interesting as he’s a teenage boy. Then why would others be any different when canon showed them to be brutally apathetic to her existence at the best of times? Shouldn’t that clue you in that, to some men, women like her would never be of any value? It’s almost as if you want to course correct that and wrap that up in…whatever dollar-store ideology you have on you at the present time.

Fact is, an individual doesn’t exist outside ideology–neither does she and neither do you. Propagating politics of consumerism—identity politics—basically, abandoning class politics in favour of elevating identity politics/categories is hardly the hill you want to bleed out on. This isn’t anything novel and has been discussed to death in sociological research. Even the shipping obsession you have, the idea of “elevation of self through romance” is simply another facet of a capitalistic dream (1, 2, & 3). You haven’t subverted anything, unearthed anything grand, and done anything shocking to move the needle in this discourse. This is all tried, true, and tested slop, your propensity for seeking validation from men of means—just like Sakura’s. In the end, I’d say this: if a woman accomplished something and there’s no man to see it, no man to humiliate and put down for her ascension, does the woman really accomplish anything?

Feminism, my arse!

[dushman-e-jaan]

Israel is escalating this and increasing this genocide's radius. Let's hope that Hezbollah's response is appropriate and puts pressure on this genocidal white settler-colonial state to put an an to its apartheid project.

[dushman-e-jaan]

Source

Yet another one of these idiotic posts; yet another day in this trashy fandom’s saga to showcase to us all their abysmal reading comprehension and their unshakable adoration for turbo-nazis. 

1: Tobirama had no legal right to present hurdles for the Uchiha who preferred their clan over the village. He should’ve understood that before he signed the treaty. Konoha politics aren’t some unchangeable gospel created by God. Laws are subject to change with the time, go through necessary amendments, and none were made by Tobirama who saw it fit to create this problem all by himself. What Tobirama sees and what is isn’t some sort of de facto statement that can’t be challenged. This is the basics of understanding, you know, unreliable narrators which this fandom can’t grasp to save its life. In short, Tobirama’s opinions aren’t immutable facts. To even suggest this is fucking asinine. 

The circumstances in the warring era were the same for all warning clans. Tobirama and his band of Senju thugs aren’t special snowflakes who went through some unique tragedies unknown to warriors. People lost their brothers all the time—so did Madara. Tobirama’s fear is understandable as it arose from the antagonism both clans shared. Tobirama creating policies that illustrate his bias are also understandable. The fandom gurgling his balls to agree with all this as if he’s some sort of "voice of rationality" that can’t be challenged isn’t understandable. These three arguments can be right at the same time, especially when he created policies out of fear and hatred, which makes him far more susceptible to the “curse of hatred” than anyone else. The very same policies that engendered corruption in the entire shinobi realm. 

You can only stretch so much of the goodwill here to give this particular character a pass, when all evidence is magnificently stacked against him. Even Orochimaru called him out. The dude’s jutsus purely exist to sow conflict and engage in deplorable warfare that utilises shambling corpses that require sacrifices. (He never invented a single jutsu to ever deescalate the violence; quite the opposite, all his jutsus exist to magnify them, only now, with his clan and its sympathisers at the helm of this war-machine; before that, they could be subjected to it.) That makes him a seasoned necromancer, so the entire idea of some “benign warrior that saw right through Uchiha bullshit to become the sole voice of reason” is just your slimy masturbation talking. None of this is canon. Write your “nuance” with a clean hand next time.

2: All of this is just pointless speculation backed by nothing. He is racist as he, by your own admission, was prejudiced, which was born of fear. You can dress up this plain and simple aspect as “caution”, but it doesn’t change a thing that he created socio-political disparity of his own freewill, when he could’ve just refused to make an alliance with the Uchiha and established his own village. Going behind the back of the other founding party and not abiding by the treaty’s precepts makes him a crooked character that’s untrustworthy in every definition of the word. That makes him racist by definition as, when you create an unevenness in this manner via your personal fears, especially when you hold a position of great power, you create circumstances for greater prejudices to take root and spiral out of control. This is the basics of politics and the bedrock of all fascist regimes, so save it with your faux-intellectualism (“I know all the nuances!”) that’s the perfect case-in-point of people that talk big but have no knowledge on basic political theory. 

Furthermore, Chapters 670, 671, & 681 have zero mentions of the term Curse of Hatred. Neither Hagoromo nor Zetsu even mention, imply, or reference it. I can’t believe this poster literally lied through her teeth to push forward this wankery. It’s hilarious. What Hagoromo stated is that the older brother lashed out because he chose the younger one as his heir. Later, he clearly states that descendants of both his sons quarrelled and the Bijuu, which he left for peace, are only being weaponized by the villages; so his thinking was naive. I don’t ever remember the Uchiha weaponizing the Bijuu as WMDs for village use; oh wait, that was all Tobirama, who, with his brother, kick-started an arms-race backed by technocratic fascists who created nothing but chaos in the long run. All the subsequent wars can be rightly placed at their feet for their abysmal policy-making and hyper-militarism by creating a centralised system of war machine. How good is your “nuance” till now? 

Also, an older son lashing out at the father for choosing the younger one is curse of hatred now? Are you lot new to how property is transferred in Confucian system, which later became the basis for law in the Edo Period? I get it that you lot are very culturally illiterate but this is…laughable as in Japan, to this day, all property, every single penny, goes to the oldest son; and nothing is given to any other children, sons or otherwise. If there’s no son and only one daughter, then the property is transferred to the son-in-law. Doing what Hagoromo did was a sign of extreme disrespect. This isn’t curse of hatred; it’s just a different culture reflected in the manga written by, here it comes, a Japanese man. What a shocker that he’d inject his own culture into the manga he wrote? What a reality-defying discovery! Who’s ever heard of anyone doing that—and from another culture? By God!

Last but not least, Zetsu all but confirmed that all the incarnations did was battle each other to attain the Rinnegan. It was never an “Uchiha specific” thing. So why on earth is Tobirama’s opinion given any preference over the word of someone who’s older than Hagoromo?  

3: The Uchiha were systematically shut out from all walks of life save the police and this is confirmed by Tobirama himself. This is confirmed by Orochimaru, as well. And they were systematically isolated as Tobirama was the one who created this system in the first place; he made all the choices, so all the fallout, naturally, is a consequence of his poor decision-making. You don’t understand how words work? And who the fuck cares about his “trauma” in this regard? How’s this relevant? Are you trying to blunt the damning evidence against this incompetent fool? 

The police leadership was given over to them to isolate them. Tobirama admitted that, too. Simply because he wrapped that up in the words you seem to buy doesn’t mean we have to; furthermore, you gotta love the fact how “arrest him without warrant” is highlighted to purposefully leave out “we can’t”, to show that the Uchiha are this “big bad” clan that was corrupt, when nothing here proves that. It’s perfectly reasonable for a military force to have its own set of laws; and frankly, this doesn’t go in Tobirama’s favour as this excludes so much of the military force from scrutiny, given that not only shinobi move in and out of Anbu but they also do the Hokage’s bidding; but, apparently, he wasn’t prejudiced to create a law that placed an entire sector of military, the very sector he used to maintain surveillance on the Uchiha, above the law. That’s literally prejudice! Are you people high? 

The democratic part that’s hidden in the tags is fucking hilarious when he himself was appointed by his brother and then he appointed Hiruzen without voting; who in turn appointed Minato; and then when he died, he appointed himself as the Hokage again; Tsunade was also chosen without any voting. All of this system was created by Tobirama. Funny, how when Hashirama wanted to choose Madara, he cried foul but, from that point onwards, democracy wasn’t ever utilised but instead completely removed from the political system. This is so laughable!

That “bootlicker” part is also completely antithetical to what this moron herself has typed out. He demands absolute obedience and segregates the clan in the name of caution and hyper-militarises this whole thing via centralised military and WMD usage; and to top it off, dissidence is punishable by law in the system he created—to the point that death squads are there to hunt the "uppity crowd" down. Please, do tell, what else does it mean, then? This poor, misunderstood husbando!

Danzo was his student since his Genin days; so was Hiruzen. Then they both became a part of his squad; but, you see, they weren’t taught anything by him. Nothing at all; and can you, for the love of Allah, stop misusing the term prejudice and open a fucking dictionary? This is embarrassing; and there’s no proof in the manga that the Uchiha were manipulated into coup by Danzo—or Obito of all the people. 

Gods, you people are stupid and have very poor comprehension skills. I get it, you can’t stop being this paper-thin character’s throat-goat, but show some restraint. It’s not cute anymore. Also, whilst I’m at it, and to drive the point home, what’s this insistence on assimilation? Why should the Uchiha Clan, or any other clan, assimilate into a system that’s hostile to their culture? Complete assimilation that comes at the expense of culture is cultural genocide. Are you A-OK with that now as long as you can shine this pathetic fuck's balls?

And since you people get so offended by the moniker “boot-licker”, okay, let’s call it the “mutt syndrome”, then? Is that appropriate? The dude fixed a bulb and then expected the whole world to turn around it, and Tobirama wankers clock double-shifts and struggle real fucking hard to make this work. This isn’t how you create lasting and peaceful political infrastructures. Yes, it’s a structure, but not a good one. Yes, yes, I know, Itachi that right-wing reddit libertarian (on his best day) is the only good Uchiha, but let’s stop pretending that this guy fixed anything. He basically created "patreon for serial killers" and gave himself a heavy pat, and then his fanboys went down on their knees to worship his cock. (Not to mention this is the very same guy who allowed the Hyuga to become a part of the village on the condition that they can practise slavery as long as they’d stay a part of it; how else do you think that they can openly practise slavery? They had this guy's blessing; they, by law, can practise it.)

Not to mention his tendency for quantifying people—what does one do? Who does what? People can ask why and not agree with that quantification, so to quell that, you negotiate. Picking up spaces for people and preventing them from moving from these spaces is the very definition of discrimination. Wouldn’t you call a profession sexist if it barred a particular gender from entry? Then why's it so hard for you to get his? The need to put the Uchiha in "their place"...is discrimination. Why would you do that if you weren’t afraid of losing the power? Pulling aspects out selectively doesn’t do you any good. Questioning the way the power works and acting against it is everyone’s fundamental right. If you think that this is a dictatorship or whatever, then why does it bother you why people seek to deconstruct it? Take that greasy, pube riddled thong of righteousness out from between your lumpy arse. This isn’t an argument you can defend as it’s an argument based on might is right.

Where’s the negotiation between what Tobirama imposed and how the clan took it? It’s one-sided, so that, by definition, leaves room for future upheaval as the power imbalance allows it to come about. This isn’t complicated. You’re just not capable of basic contextualization. 

Taking away someone's entire sources of support and then expecting that person to abide is lunacy. Using the language of slavery and oppression in his sermons whilst his fangirls gurgle his entire ballsack-set? How can anyone side with this character…you’d have to be an athletic piece of shit to back any of his mantra. It’s just fascist. 

And challenge the law the right way? Once a system becomes a part of legislation, law, it becomes impossible to change it. Years. And many people that live under boot can’t afford that sort of time, so all they can do is introduce a shock into the system, and revolution is that system shock. 

This system was deliberately exported out to make the world a domain in which they’d have control, hence, the creation of WMD bartering. And this is supposed to be the “moral life” for a Shinobi. I get that the people who’d drunk this kool-aid, choked on it, and reached Shinobi Nirvana defend it as if their lives depend on it, because they do as they cut their pay-checks, but why do you? Are you fictional? A product of the Shinobi world? What’s so appealing about any of it? About this never-ending apparatus of warfare?

No one belongs to the past, and the Senju aren’t the future. It’s hilarious how it’s seen this way, straight up a projection of the western “from savagery to the dawn of the civilised man” in regard to the establishment of Leaf from the fandom. Who controls whom, apparently, is seen as a part of the civilised man. A masculine power-fantasy a lot of the Sakura Wankers adore, as well. This is so...textbook patriarchal that I doubt any one of you cunts have read a word of it as you wouldn’t gloss this over with slime of feminism. 

People can challenge these paradigms and their place in them, obliterate them to establish equity. What sort of argument exists against it that’s even remotely rational? It’s just a hysterical unleashing of as to who “deserved better” and a stinky pall of morality over it. This is a supremacist view at the most fundamental level, and it’s absurd that people would find it to be any other way. 

What does it mean to have an equal system? It means a system without hierarchies. The desire for status is the desire for stature, and that means…there’s nothing leftist about your meta. Save it. All I can say is that Tobirama defenders (and he got the most votes from EU, very unsurprisingly, enough to catapult him to the first spot there), like the Sakura wankers, have got a persecution fetish that’s born from a culture with a christian framework. No wonder they keep shitting their beds about “redemptions”. That’s all, and it’s laughable, especially when the character they seek to defend has less characterization than about 5-ish panels, and I’m being very charitable here. Then why don't you ask yourself: who do you defend this character so vehemently—why this specific character—especially when you regurgitate fascist talking-points out of your pocket?

[dushman-e-jaan]

Source

Bitch has written an entire manga in her head that doesn't even exist, just so she can rant and rave and rage against the "matrimonial injustices" Sakura experienced. You know, the real issues in the manga that concern genocides, ethnic cleansings, mass starvation campaigns, slavery, and child butchery. Do you not understand how she's the real victim?! Uh-oh, anyway...

She'd know what the manga is stating if she yanked her head out of her own arsehole, but let's not hold our breaths here. Funnily enough, if Sakura deserves better and if all of them are mass-murderers, then...she deserves a better mass-murderer? Huh?! Someone who mass-murders but treats her pussy right? Surely, treating a cunt, pun intended, right is better than butchering droves of people. Surely! What are you people, and what sort of garbage morals do you even have? You know what, don't tell me. (The reality of their so-called "ship" is that Sasuke's so fucking out of her league that it's the most magnanimous charity-case in the entire manga; and it isn't something I'm making up; it's just canon that Sasuke's the most sought after character for his absurdly extraordinary beauty and talents, all of his pursuers were prodigies and/or characters with immense leverage in the narrative, unlike Sakura; get over yourselves.)

Also, which character lost everything that made it that character? Certainly not Sakura. Sasuke's entire theme of revolution was dropped as soon as he was tethered to Konoha through her. This pairing destroyed everything he stood for. She's, on the other hand, lonely 'cause he's never home? Boo-fucking-hoo, man. Not even remotely the worst thing in the world (Naruto-verse, too). She can leave. Sasuke isn't holding her hostage.

And why does Naruto deserve better? What the fuck does this even mean when he's the one who kept chasing after Sasuke, thought Sasuke ought to have returned home after learning of the genocide from Obito, brushed his clan's genocide under the rug when he took the seat, and...look what he did for Ame! Oh wait, it's still a shithole; or rather, it returned to its shithole status after Nagato took his life. The guy's morally bankrupt; he, like Sakura, deserves squat. And Hinata, on whom that reddit-thread is created? Sasuke doesn't even know that that mundane bitch exists. Keep seething, coping, and weeping. It's entertaining!

God, all you shippers do is maim Sasuke's character, make him grovel before whichever self-insert you find convenient, and then throw a cloak of flimsy morality over it, which is steeped in the gutters of self-righteous centrism and a gloss of pink-washing. You want him to care about a version of you so fucking bad. Is this some brain-rotted version of a poor self-esteem? Getting mad over a cartoon not validating your manga-extension? Then compensating that dreadful "neglect story" via writing...whatever this sewage is? I'm surprised that this lot hasn't got tired of this routine as it's so easy to spot. Just an entire pile of stupid, from top to bottom.

Oh and, Happy Birthday, King!

[dushman-e-jaan]

I didn't even know who this person was till one of my followers brought her to my attention: she was calling me a bigot over my anti-sns posts; and, to the surprise of no one, she's one of those rainbow fascist types that benefit off brutal neocolonialism and militarism in MENA countries; but then they turn around and show their unabashed fascism; you know, show us who they really are.

Funny, how this "immigration results in increased crime" is literally a myth perpetuated by these white fascists that hide behind pink fascism and support mass-butchery in MENA countries, leaving millions starved, displaced, and without any prospects in life; and what's funnier is that their countries further brutalize these people when they flee their homes, which they've destroyed, by putting them through fascistic racism, unrelenting in the complete subjugation of these people:

Research by Stanford’s Ran Abramitzky and co-authors uncovers the most extensive evidence to date that immigrants are less likely to be impr

EU research disproves link between immigration and increased crime

An EU funded report, reviewing 17 research projects, has concluded that there is no evidence of immigration leading to an increase in...

Migrant crime wave a myth - police study

Acpo report concludes offending no worse than rest of the population

The Myth of Immigrant Criminality

Public perceptions of immigrants and crime This essay originally appeared as a special report for the Immigration Policy Center, a division

Funny, how their countries still benefit from neo-colonialism in African countries and Brazil, still fucking up their environment through waste-dumping to keep their own clean:

Both ENDS: Business as Usual: Dutch neo-colonialism in Brazil

The Netherlands is a major business partner to Brazil and has not been deterred by the record of human rights' abuses by Bolsonaro's governm

A Neocolonial Plastics Scandal: The Netherlands Plays a Leading Role in the International Trade in Plastic Waste

Funny, how they enjoy great economies through weapons manufacturing and deals with fascist regimes to endlessly bomb, kill, and maim millions of people in MENA countries:

The arms trade can fuel ongoing conflicts and lead to serious human rights violations by repressive regimes and armed groups. Peace organisa

Funny, how this racism is completely institutional:

Institutional racism in the Netherlands

Report uncovers widespread racism at Dutch foreign ministry

The top civil servant at the Dutch foreign ministry has apologized after an independent investigation found widespread racism at the governm

Racism In The Ranks: Dutch Police Film Spurs Conversation

Documentary discusses a culture of fear and bullying in the national police force

What's this, your pathetic fears about The Great Replacement, another fascist theory? Another myth!

I can keep going and going and going and there would be no end to the evidence that sheds light on just how racist this white-supremacist shit-hole truly is. Imagine, how people like that have the fucking gall to throw a drape of "nu-uh, you hate supposedly gay cartoon-people in my Shonen, so you're a bigot!" over their obsession to turn straight little boys into their rainbow avatars for smutty content (they don't even bother upping their ages most of the time; just content with drawing child-pornography and hiding behind "queer expression"); but then they turn around and post and offer support to the most fascist rhetoric that germinates unchecked in their countries.

Here's the reality check for you: your countries aren't turning far-right/fascist because of immigrants; they're turning far-right/fascist as capitalism, white supremacy's strong-arm, is in crisis due to the changing world-order; in fact, you're simply taking your masks off and showing us all as to what you've always been, white fascists. Does that make you upset that people fucking despise you when you horde their resources, export weapons to kill them, and then put them through barbaric racism when they show up to your countries, which stand on their blood and resources? You think you're one of the good ones because you draw cute gay drawings of two little boys and slap a label of "queer liberation" on them? This ought to sicken you.

Sincerely, and to paraphrase a great deprogram post, your countries and populaces have spent centuries ransacking, murdering, oppressing, enslaving, and enforcing corrupt regimes over your colonial subjects; but the poor white reactionaries, the real victims of neo-colonialism, have the audacity to be uppity when the disenfranchised prefer to live in your shitty, racist gutters because that's where all their resources went. You know, your grand economies!

'Third world' is a category that only exists in the wake of European colonial barbarity, and you white sociopaths still use it (directly and indirectly) to insult and degrade the people you forced into it. Absolute filth.

And, last but not least, it's no wonder the anime/video-game fandoms are teeming with white supremacists that hide behind flavours of anti-white/ All Lives Matter racism, white queerness, and white feminism to obfuscate their intentions. Case in point: you!

[dushman-e-jaan]

Marxist-Leninist Reading Hub

Without revolutionary theory there can be no revolutionary movement. V. I. Lenin

Great resource for learning for Marxist-Leninists.