You are wrong about all your claims you say alot if stuff about consensual sex somehow harming. Children even if it's filmed there is no reason to believe that consensual sex is harmful innately and further absurd to claim that there is something special about sex some kind of woowoo metaphysical property or "implications" that is claimed "can not be understood" what implications? What can't be comprehended about the nature of sex itself that a 13 year old can't comprehend that isn't entirely dependent on the societies around themselves reactions and then we get to the conclusion that the "harm" done isn't by the pedophile or the person filming or the child but societies "secondary harm" and creation of trauma which even therapists create trauma with these things because trauma is expected and forced onto them even when they say or claim they liked it or there wasn't trauma it's being written off as them being "groomed" which is incredibly ageist and disregards the real ability of children to decern things especially about their own internal experiences which can be used to justify so much bad stuff like transphobia
Dear followers,
You may be wondering "what the ever-loving fuck did I just read?"
Good question.
Well, I'm sorry to inform you all that you have just had your first experience with what is known, amongst the internet pedophile community, as "contact discourse." This refers to some truly infuriating arguments about to what extent children can consent.
Yes, I know - this topic would seem like it's pretty goddamn open-and-shut, huh? But, perhaps unsurprisingly, many pedos disagree.
You know what, this is probably going to take me more than one post to fully explain everything. So let's start with:
PART ONE
Wherein I Desperately Try to Explain What I was Doing at the Devil's Sacrament
"And how exactly," I hear you asking, "would you know what the online pedo community is chatting about, you fucking creep?"
Okay, fair question.
Unfortunately, as anyone who has seen my iceberg chart has undoubtedly realized, many of the most highly-suppressed books are ones written by pedophiles (or, I suppose, "MAP"s, as they've taken to calling themselves in recent years). I have begun to refer to this literary genre collectively as "Pedοshit."
Now, in order to actually find, document, and report on these Pedοshit writings, I knew that I would have to make some contacts in the shadier parts of the internet. So I began to covertly infiltrate the hidden realm of these pedo communities. First I found several SFW communities and support groups that had good oversight, so I could be reasonably confident they wouldn't get into any sort of legally questionable territory.
Then, I had to blend in, using all of my cunning and stealth:
But somehow they kept seeing through my ingenious disguise.
So instead I decided to keep a low profile. I would just lurk, gather information, and once I identified someone who might be able to help me out, I would reach out to them privately instead.
This tactic worked unexpectedly well, and I've managed to acquire quite a collection of exceedingly rare Pedoshit writing that does not appear to be hosted publicly anywhere online. I realize now that I say that out loud that this a rather dubious distinction at best. 💀
In any case, this has given me a rare first-hand look inside these communities, and I have some potentially interesting info to report.
So stay tuned for my next post about this, where I will breakdown what the actual fuck this original Ask was trying to claim, and why I personally think it's stupid.
What exactly is this ongoing debate amongst the peds about, and why is it maybe better that the public learns about it rather than keeping it "out-of-sight, out-of-mind"? You'll find out in PART TWO: I Cannot Believe That I Have to Actually Explain in Detail Why Child Molestation is Wrong
Do you think that Thorfinn’s looked at and listened to Garm’s “fight me fight me fight me” mentality, and while he suffered he quietly realized that he finally knew how Askeladd had probably felt all those years.
