
titsay

No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Sade Olutola
The Stonewall Inn
Game of Thrones Daily
Noah Kahan
taylor price
h

No title available
No title available

Origami Around

pixel skylines
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Doug Jones
NASA
$LAYYYTER

bliss lane

PR's Tumblrdome
I'd rather be in outer space šø
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
@eddiecranes
right wing handwringing over birth rates has always unsubtly been a combination of wanting more white babies/wanting control over women, so it's bothersome that the popular response to that is just pointing out the cost of living. "we Would be having more kids if you guys made some positive changes to society" and such. pronatalist sentiment is becoming so much more explicit that I don't think many self-styled progressives are ready to reconcile with the fact that many women simply do not want to have children. we already see how women are demonized for refusing to undertake the thankless burdens of their mother and grandmother's generations lol, I can't imagine how full abdication from child rearing will come across to some people.
I can't even see "we Would be having kids" as a strategic approach to get conservatives to consider advocating for a higher quality of life considering that they truly could not care less if you, specifically, are poor. it's true that more couples would have kids if it was cheaper, but that will not be enough for these types until women's subservience is codified. even now, they consider the lack of child rearing in today's insane society to be a matter of selfishness. they view themselves as completely different animals than you. they have and will continue to advocate for more advantages for people of their specific backgrounds and income brackets to reinforce this lol.
This Doonesbury abortion cartoon was originally written by Gary Trudeau in 2012, in response to a Texas law requiring women to have an ultrasound before an abortion. It was banned from many major newspapers, and they ran syndicated cartoons in its place.
Now seems like an appropriate time to bring these cartoons back, with the passing of Texasā new law requiring the burial or cremation of miscarried or aborted fetal remains. I guess weāll have to wait and see if Trudeau decides to write the sequel.
(Source)
time for a lil bit of melon chompin'
more vaporeon x fish variations ! i finally got time to make some new ones traditionally (you can find the old digital vaporeons x fish here)
from top to bottom there is :
Coelacanth vaporeon : water x rock
Angelfish vaporeon : water x psychic
Koi vaporeon : water x fire
Dojo loach vaporeon : water x ground
If you want to get your own fishy vaporeon, you can commission me on Ko-Fi :)
These three places all have about the same population size
(by u/KelVelBurgerGoon)
doing the "we are the daughters of the witches you couldn't burn" thing in a catholic country making it somewhat unclear what I'm getting at
Trying to parse whether this reblog is making:
An extremely inaccurate assumption about how widespread witch trials were in the early modern period
An extremely specific point about the prevalence of different execution methods (most accused witches in Britain were hanged, not burnt)
A radical claim about the ontology of nations (technically the āUnited Kingdomā wasnāt created until the 1800 Acts of Union, therefore nothing prior to that date happened āin the UKā)
this is an excellent question but your phone may have a concussion
whether you call it an "AMV", an "edit", or a "fancam", all of us, across generations, want the same thing: videos of The Character set to music. and i think that is beautiful ā¤ļø
In certain corners of this website, much has been made (and lamented) of the "likes to reblogs ratio" changing over time. This feels like a good starter question on the quest to understanding
What is your primary reason for liking posts and not reblogging?
Type/The posts don't fit my blog(s) (e.g. fandom posts & nonfandom blog)
Curation/I don't want too much of the same thing on my blog
I want to show support/that I am listening to OP
I want to show support/that I am listening to prev/'s tags
I use my likes to save posts for later
Multiple of these (which ones? any additional reasons?)
A different reason/Nuance
I don't ever "like" and not "reblog'
pick one of my favorite fruits or veggies:
mango
strawberry
avocado
broccoli
green beans
blackberries
carrots (full size, not babies)
pink lady apples
pick one of my favorite fruits or veggies:
mango
strawberry
avocado
broccoli
green beans
blackberries
carrots (full size, not babies)
pink lady apples
results
in the future humans will have something called "sinus button " and pressing it will immediately drain your sinuses of all fluid so that it can be filled with other things like rocks, webs, paint, tar, freef (new fluid that will be so important in that time) and also dr papper
Do you find babies cute
Yes
No
Nuance/Only in specific circumstances
Results
Do you find babies cute?
Yes
No
Nuance/Only in specific circumstances
Results
me when iām fucked in the head (1968)
@henrysblake
A 100% accurate beginners guide to Sparks
do you have any friends that are 4x your age or more?
Do you have any friends that are 4x your age or more?
Yes
No