Sweet Seals For You, Always
we're not kids anymore.
macklin celebrini has autism
Not today Justin
EXPECTATIONS
Fai_Ryy
★
NASA
Show & Tell
PR's Tumblrdome
Discoholic 🪩
Product Placement
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
$LAYYYTER
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Stranger Things
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
ellievsbear
izzy's playlists!
official daine visual archive
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Sri Lanka
seen from Türkiye
seen from Singapore
seen from Thailand
seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Croatia
seen from South Africa
seen from Germany
seen from France
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from Malaysia
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
@eikont
Itt a nyár, meleg van, nincs eső
Szárítsuk a kertbe a ruhákat!
Az összeset leszarja egy turul
És AZONNAL beröffenti a szomszéd a faszenes BBQ-t, hogy illatosítsa őket.
Az a szomszéd én leszek!
Akinek ilyen közel vannak a szomszédai, az annyit is ér.
sajnos erre rá kellett jönnöm nekem is, hogy számomra a nyugalmat csak én tudom biztosítani. tök sokáig kerestem valakit, aki mellett végre lazíthatok, de mindenki csak idegesíteni tud, van, aki nagyon, van, aki kevésbé, de már az a kevés sem tesz jót az idegrendszeremnek, és bele vagyok fáradva, hogy mindig kiálljak a saját érdekeim mellett és valaki ellen, miközben lehetne ezt együtt is, teljes harmóniában csinálni. ha eddig, 42 év alatt nem találtam meg ezt az illetőt, akkor ezután se fogom reálisan, szóval maximum be tudok engedni valakit a mások idejét és személyes terét tiszteletben tartó világomba, de ő ott csak vendégként élvezheti a békét...
"Mi vagyunk azok, akikra mindig is vártunk."
én igazából tisztelem azokat az embereket, akik kreatív módon találják meg a piaci réseket
de a vegán cipő azért meglepett
Vettem vegre magnézium biszglicinatot, rajta van h vegan
Meg h
“Mustarmagot es halat feldolgozó üzemben készült”
Tobb kerdesem is van…
Sokkal vegánabb, mint egy bőrcipő... 🤷
Múltkor egy palack boron láttam a vegán feliratot.
Jó, de akkor ki lesz a következő köztársasági elnök?
Hadházy Ákos
Laczó Adrienn
Puzsér Róbert
Lovász László
Kapu Tibor
Rost Andrea
Kassai Lajos
Lupita Nyong'o
Karikó Katalin
Hide the pain Harold
valami jogászprofesszor, akinek eddig a nevét se hallottuk
más, megírom kommentben
Nem hiszem hogy valami ismeretlen lesz, olyat akarnak majd akit ismerunk, elfogadunk es moge tudunk allni.
Arató Bandi bácsira szavaznék.
Polgár Judit
Hmm & Ok Are simple words But, Kill a whole conversation.
A once-in-a-lifetime shot — the moon perfectly framed by a rainbow. Caught at just the right time. 🌈 🌕
Már a Hold is...
Seriously 😆
Peti 😆
tetszik, ahogy mp trollkodik :)
Elnézést, de nagyon vinnyogok
Ez Hírcsárda?
Ön is ütné az Árpád hídi gázolót még a mentőben is? Fasza kivan az éjszakánként főútvonalakon versenyző seggfejekkel? És a rollerrel sisak nélkül, autók közt cikázó, vagy járdán gyalogosok közt szlalomozva száguldozó kis férgekkel? Szavazzon!
A biztonságos közlekedés mindannyiunk közös ügye. A közúti balesetek mögött rengeteg emberi tragédia áll, ráadásul a sérülések és károk éven
that's a Nemzeti Konzultáció I approve 🙌🏻
Nem. Hiszem. El. 🤣🤣🤣
Slomóék megpuccsolták az amúgy elég vicces hazai ortodoxiát ezzel a Keszlerrel, akinek van pofája a Mazsihiszre mutogatni, hogy jelzálog került a zsinire.
Péklapáttal kell kibaszni ezt az amcsi szektát a faszba.
Cáfolja a MAOIH vezetése, hogy ingatlanfejlesztés céljából eladná az értékes városmajori tulajdonát. A szervezet háza táján továbbra is nyom
Slomó is megérne egy misét.
literally
“Mise” alatt bírósági tárgyalást értesz?
Erről se feledkezzünk meg:
A Fidesszel szoros kapcsolatokat ápoló EMIH részesült a legmagasabb összegű támogatásban a kultúr-tao pótlására létrejött pályázati keretből
Dzsudzsi tósztot mond Petiminiszterúr BYD-s onboarding partyján.gif
Truncated text of tweet from MrPitBull, Mar 11, 2026:
She kept finding women in laboratory photographs from the 1800s. Then she read the published papers—and every single woman had vanished. Someone had erased them from history.
Yale University, 1969.
Margaret Rossiter was a graduate student studying the history of science. She was one of very few women in her program.
Every Friday afternoon, students and faculty gathered for beers and informal conversation. One week, Margaret asked a simple question: "Were there ever any women scientists?"
The faculty answered firmly: No.
Someone mentioned Marie Curie. The group dismissed it—her husband Pierre really deserved the credit.
Margaret didn't argue. But she also didn't believe them.
So she started looking.
She found a reference book called "American Men of Science"—essentially a Who's Who of scientific achievement. Despite the title, she was shocked to discover it contained entries about women. Botanists trained at Wellesley. Geologists from Vermont.
There were names. There were credentials. There were careers.
The professors had been wrong.
But Margaret's discovery was just the beginning. Because as she dug deeper into archives across the country, she found something far more disturbing.
Photograph after photograph showed women standing at laboratory benches, working with equipment, listed on research teams.
But when she read the published papers, the award citations, the official histories—those same women had disappeared. Their names were missing. Their contributions erased.
It wasn't random. It was systematic.
Women who designed experiments watched male colleagues publish results without giving them credit. Women whose discoveries were assigned to supervisors. Women listed in acknowledgments instead of as authors. Women passed over for awards that went to male collaborators who contributed far less.
Margaret realized she was witnessing a pattern that stretched across centuries.
Women had always been present in science. The record had simply pushed them aside.
She needed a name for what she was documenting.
In the early 1990s, she found it in the work of Matilda Joslyn Gage—a 19th-century suffragist who had written about this exact phenomenon in 1870.
In 1993, Margaret published a paper formally naming it: The Matilda Effect.
The term captured something that had been hidden in plain sight for generations. Once you knew the term, you saw it everywhere.
Her dissertation became a lifelong mission.
For more than 30 years, Margaret researched and wrote her landmark three-volume series: Women Scientists in America. She examined letters, institutional policies, individual careers. She gathered undeniable evidence that women in science had been consistently under-credited and structurally excluded.
Her work faced resistance. Many dismissed women's history as political rather than academic. Others insisted she was exaggerating.
Margaret didn't argue emotionally. She presented data. Documented cases. Patterns repeated across decades and institutions.
Eventually, the evidence became undeniable.
Her research helped restore recognition to scientists who had been erased:
Rosalind Franklin, whose X-ray work revealed DNA's structure—credit went to Watson and Crick.
Lise Meitner, who explained nuclear fission—omitted from the Nobel Prize.
Nettie Stevens, who discovered sex chromosomes—received little credit.
Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin, who discovered stars are made of hydrogen—initially dismissed.
And countless others whose names had nearly vanished.
Margaret changed the narrative. Science was no longer just the story of solitary male geniuses. It became a story of collaboration that included women who had been written out.
The Matilda Effect became standard terminology. Scholars used it to examine how credit is assigned, how authors are listed, who receives awards, who gets left out.
