The Best Horror Movies Ever #1: The Shining
When it was first released, Stanley Kubrickâs film adaptation of the iconic Stephen King novel was met with mixed reviews. Now, despite the perfectly valid criticisms surrounding actors performances, pacing and cinematic techniques, this film will forever be a staple of horror, and indeed, all of movie history. Hereâs why Stanley Kubrickâs, The Shining is one of the best horror movies of all time.
1)Â Set Design. Not only are they large scale, but they reflect the mystery of The Overlook Hotel. Take the opening scene: as Jack walks through the lobby, in the background of shot we can clearly view a hallway opening with people coming and going. Yet Mr Ullmanâs office has a large, glass window with sunlight coming in through what should be solid wall. Also, each section of the hotel has its own distinctive look.
- Room 237: pale greens and purples providing a more dream-like quality to the dwelling of the ghastly lady in the tub.
- The common area: washed-out and aged colours with a more âwesternâ/cowboys and Indians theme, enabling the audience to interpret Kubrickâs possible real world metaphors, while also better focus on the actors more bold clothing fabrics.
- The kitchen: silver and sheer surfaces, giving scenes that take place there a cold and clinical feeling, with increased fear of armed violence.
By creating different looks for different areas of The Overlook, Kubrick intentionally alienates the audience. We can better empathise with Wendyâs disorientation, if we are also lost in a universe which is rarely, visually consistent.
2) Practical Effects. Within The Shining, thereâs a scarce amount of visual effects that werenât created by makeup or manually. Even the overhead shot of the maze was done using a partially practical set, and zooming out over the surrounding landscape which was later edited. Elevators releasing a tidal-wave of fake blood, smashing a door in with an axe- these things are made far more terrifying when they donât depend on CGI to manifest on screen. Heck, thereâs several big budget film companies whoâd probably have 8 year old Danny Torrance zooming around on a minimal green-screen set instead of just building what they needed, and could definitely afford.
3)Â Acting Performances. Before anyone says it, YES, thereâs a few people in this movie guilty of over-acting. And yes, I am biased. Jack Nicholson can do no wrong in my eyes. However, as a performer, I can understand why Kubrick hired these actors, and encouraged...exaggerated responses.
- Shelley Duvall. Itâs no secret that Shelley had a horrific time on set, and itâs clearly present in the behind the scenes footage on the DVD. But Iâm here to talk about her performance itself. I personally think she did a great job, despite the fact itâs so different to how Wendy Torrance appears in Kingsâ text. This film is made great by itâs absurd, artificial portrayal of family, and cabin fever. When Wendy goes hysterical, I can believe it. Partially because from the start, she wasnât exactly composed. Duvall, while exaggerated, fills the role of scream queen pretty effectively. Her hysteria contrasts everyone elseâs acceptance of, or relatively calm approach to what weâre seeing. Sheâs like adding wasabi to sushi. Surprising, but it stands out.
- Jack Nicholson. Aside from the fact heâs one of the greatest actors of all time, donât @ me, Nicholson taps into the meat of Jack Torranceâs psychological breakdown. Especially in a film, especially a Kubrick film, we canât always have the same gradual, subtle decline we can in a book. Stephen King wasnât a fan of this on-screen portrayal either, but again, it WORKS within this adaptation. Take the car scene where the trio is driving to The Overlook. Jackâs demeanour is intentionally uptight, silently agitated without real reason. âItâs okay, he saw it on the television.â is one example of how Jack is already prone to illogical annoyance. In a 146 minute film, itâs more believable that The Overlook would infiltrate the mind of a person who is already vulnerable to being a vessel of violence.
4) Cinematography. Kubrickâs style is very distinctive within the film industry, and if I asked you to think of an example of his works, youâd probably say The Shining first. Namely, the constant tone he creates. The suspenseful build is somehow very laid back; not depending on jump-scares or sudden audio strikes to make you tense. Kubrick keeps his audience on the edge of their seats by forcing you to pay attention. His work is like watching a security camera, or a found footage film. You have to watch the foreground, and are rewarded for observing the background. Every frame is crafted, rather than just done for the sake of it. Modern cinema, particularly within horror, just wants to throw everything in the audiences face. Like showing a baby a shiny set of keys. Kubrick doesnât do that. He trusts the audience will want to pay attention to his work, and the story, and rewards us for our diligence.
To conclude, The Shining is a very unique film within the horror genre, and can be picked apart for its subtext, itâs creative license etc. Itâs also a source of ethical controversy, with actors and crew having a whole spectrum of experiences working on the project (though thatâs a topic for another day). Whether you personally like the film or not, you canât deny, as a standalone piece, itâs incredibly beautiful for its manipulation of reality and framing of events. Itâs responsible for inspiring many modern film makers and creative minds. For all these reasons, Stanley Kubrickâs The Shining, is one of the best horror films ever made.