The Emu's Right Wing

Dedicated to freedom of speech and intillectual diversity. Bringing right wing, conservative values to a traditionally left-minded site.

[lagonegirl]

Green, who lost her parents young, was raised by her aunt and uncle. While still at school, her aunt died from cancer, and three months later her uncle was diagnosed with cancer, too. Green went on to earn her degree in physics at Alabama A&M University, being crowned Homecoming Queen while she was at it, before going on full scholarship to University of Alabama in Birmingham to earn her Masters and Ph.D. There Green would become the first to work out how to deliver nanoparticles into cancer cells exclusively, so that a laser could be used to remove them, and then successfully carry out her treatment on living animals. 

source

her studies thus far are only on head and neck cancers, but her theory is this treatment platform would work on all types of cancers. But needs $$$$ to keep doing research.

It seems the issue is how to target the cancer cells and in her head and neck cancer tests, she had success in mice by utilizing fda approved immunotherepy antibodies to deliver nano particles to mark the tumor. Then she could proceed to blast the shit out of cancer with fuckin lasers.

she was ready or prepared when opportunity arose

I’m so proud of her. I wish more young black women would go into science.

#BLACKGIRLMAGIC 

[mamaduafe]

Yes!!!!! If she really does cure cancer, watch her name & face disappear behind some white man.

[yamino]

Don’t let it happen! She deserves all the credit.

[emusrightwing-blog]

Why must we play identity politics here? If it was a white man the headline wouldn’t read “White Man Develops New Technology” I mean, she’s clearly a brilliant scientist! Why can’t we focus on her achievements rather than her race and gender?!

[lolliblog]

The Five Stages of Trump

My therapist told me that she’s been overwhelmed by unhappy clients since Trump’s victory. I mentioned that the day after the election, my sister-in-law texted me to tell me she felt like she was sitting Shiva, and my therapist nodded, saying she seen a clear parallel between her clients’ states of mind and the five stages of grief.

To wit: first, they hadn’t believed it happened (denial) then, when they saw that it indeed had, they were livid (anger). Next, the internet was abuzz with news of a loophole that would allow the Electoral College to elect Hillary President and all they had to do was sign a petition (bargaining). When they found out this was not going to happen, they wanted to crawl back into bed for four years (depression).

As for the fifth and final stage, acceptance, my therapist counsels her clients against it. No one should ever accept Trump’s election as a normal inevitability, like death. Instead of acceptance, she recommends acknowledgement, followed by vigilance. I agree. Go through the stages. Ignore it, rail against it, try to find a way around it, and sink into despair, but then, look it in the face, see it for what it is, and watch it to make sure it doesn’t get worse.

[emusrightwing-blog]

Kindly remove your head from the depths of your echo chamber. Are you aware that you have become an ideologue? You are so committed to the dogma of social justice that you absolutely refuse any pretense of skepticism for the claims made about President-elect Trump. He is not racist, nor is he the sexist monstrosity you make him out to be. I assume you’ll inevitably posit the infamous “Crime, Drugs, Good People” quote as evidence of racism, so allow me to explain what that actually means. Trump is simply saying that we have a problem with illegal immigration - true - and during the Obama administration the government was lax in dealing with it. But because he doesn’t see fit to cloak his claims in politically correct demagoguery, his statements are misconstrued and made notorious by the media and the willfully uninformed masses they control. I apologize for waffling on a bit there, but you get my point. You lot are so angry at Trump because he refuses to conform to your ideological dogma. He’s a dissident to your cause, and thus you will find any excuse to paint him as a racist deplorable. Step back, examine the situation critically, without your ideologue blindfold on, and I’m sure you’ll reconsider your viewpoints.

[emusrightwing-blog]

Sunlight as Disinfectant: Why SJWs should never block their opposition

When discussing free speech with leftists, they inevitably try to create a false dichotomy between free speech and “hate speech.” This is absolutely fallacious, and in any case, who is going to be the one to decide what qualifies as “hate speech?” I can only assume it will be some overbearing moral busybody like yourselves. No, no. You see, when you sensor someone, it doesn’t change their thoughts, just further incenses them. What you should be doing is allowing these “haters” to say whatever they want, even encouraging them. Because if they really are as hateful and degenerate as you keep insisting, when you give them a platform, they will be exposed for the bigots they allegedly are. IF you kick them off your platform they’ll find another one and come back twice as fiery, but if you expose them to the condemnation of the public eye, they’ll be utterly crushed.

[left-reminders]

Profit – the unpaid surplus created by labor and appropriated by capital – is essentially a tax on labor with none of the pretense that it’s coming back to you in some way. In the best case scenario for tax, it’s put towards social programs and helpful common utilities. Profit, on the other hand, is essentially a tax on the worker’s labor for not owning means of production, a tax that is always there to line the pockets of the capitalist.

And that’s not even going into rent, the tax on the tenant enforced by the landlord.

[halvingthetimeofmylife]

Ok the first part, good & yes.

But rent is where one pays for the service/commodity of necessary shelter. Rent is not a tax. Nor are clothing or other purchased, necessary goods like food.

Few if any people are able to live completely on their own resources, now or any time in history.

There’s a wide difference in a community using each other’s resources and being owned, and I’m tired of the gray swath in between being painted as a thin ethical line.

[w32petrichor-deactivated2018122]

Rent – a type of unearned income appropriated by rentiers from tenants – is essentially a fine for not owning real property. In the best case scenario for land rent, it’s put towards repairs and the cost of some utilities, but is essentially a fine on the worker’s labor for not owning a house of their own, a fine that is always there to line the pockets of the landlords. That fine comes at the expense of workers who have to earn an income to survive by selling their labor. Money that would be saved for their children’s tuition, money to invest in property of their own, instead goes to the landlord’s new set of golf clubs, or a new mercedes. This is not a reciprocal exchange between two members of a community in equal standing.

[halvingthetimeofmylife]

…That is one functioning aspect of capitalism, yes. I rented out a room from a disabled couple who weren’t able to generate income by more traditional (hourly, physical labor) work. I don’t see how your explanations fit here–it makes them seem rather ablest actually…

[emusrightwing-blog]

@halvingthetimeofmylife Do you not understand why this is an explanation of the necessity of profit? I’m sorry to hear that about the disabled couple, but that is not evidence in support of what I assume is the claim you’re defending. In fact it’s a virtue-signaling non sequitur designed to win arguments by inciting sympathy. Sorry, that doesn’t work on me

[hijadepavlov-deactivated2017012]

Until every single imperial power in Europe and the white post-colonial governments in America hasn’t paid reparations and given back land to Black and Indigenous people in the countries they’ve colonized, y’all can truly miss me with all those “but we’ve changed and grown” arguments.

[R.Darín/Bombita saying “Por mí se pueden ir todos a la mierda. ¡Todos a la mierda!”]

[emusrightwing-blog]

@hijadepavlov I can and have written about this extensively, and I would refer you to my post about the Dakota Access Pipeline. Sufficed to say, you have a tenuous grip on reality and a skewed perception of history.

[left-reminders]

Profit – the unpaid surplus created by labor and appropriated by capital – is essentially a tax on labor with none of the pretense that it’s coming back to you in some way. In the best case scenario for tax, it’s put towards social programs and helpful common utilities. Profit, on the other hand, is essentially a tax on the worker’s labor for not owning means of production, a tax that is always there to line the pockets of the capitalist.

And that’s not even going into rent, the tax on the tenant enforced by the landlord.

[emusrightwing-blog]

Communist “economics” never fail to amuse me. Tell me, remove the concept of “profit” entirely and what will provide the incentive for productivity? You see, corporations depend on profit to exist, and to provide a salary for their employees. And the salary, you see, is compensation for the goods and/or services that employee provides the company. And in a capitalist society, the more you better yourself, the more compensation you receive. This is called incentivization, it produces quality services due to competition for better compensation, and the hyper efficient, productive economy it produces was ultimately treason the Soviet Union crumbled while the USA flourished. Apologies for sounding condescending, but welcome to the realm of realistic economics. Yes, it can be a bit jarring when you’ve been living in a Utopia for as long as you have

[emusrightwing-blog]

The history of mankind is one of conflict and conquest. Those who have the wherewithal to expand and acquire territory do so, and those who lack the ability to defend themselves fall victim to this brutal system. The European imperialists grew their empires through bloodshed, and their subjugated peoples only reclaimed their nations through struggles. Why then Do we not consider White Americans to be “real Americans?” Their ancestors conquered and accrued this land, and therefore it is theirs as much as anyone’s. Personally I believe defining ones self by ones ancestry is ludicrous, but if we are playing that game, my ancestors were Americans because before they colonized this continent, there was no modern nation state known as “America.” My ancestors forged and modernized this nation, and by the time they arrived, the native peoples hadn’t even discovered the wheel. Therefore, any claim the “First Nations” had to that land was forfeited when a modern nation, the United States of America, acquired it, organized it, and built its infrastructure. The treatment of the Native population has been downright lenient, in historical perspective. The USA has every right to plumb, exploit, and utilize the land under their jurisdiction to its full extent. The Dakota Access Pipeline is completely legal, and in fact is not even a racial issue, but one of population density. The DAPL can and will be built, regardless of the protestations of sanctimonious liberal twats.

[heavenly-garden]

I despise racism, I despise that so many people of different minorities, especially black people have been mistreated, not shown fair opportunity for employment, told they don’t belong some where, they just minding their own damn business and some ignorant asshole/s have the audacity to tell another human being where they belong and don’t belong. Its bullshit that they can’t shop in certain places white people can without being judged or eyed up like they’re criminals. The fact that they can’t eat in certain places like white people do because they don’t fit a certain “type of customer”, like they don’t deserve equal treatment and respect. It pisses me off so much, I can’t stand the injustice. I really respect how strong you all are. You put up with so much shit and its ridiculous that you have to. I just want to say my blog IS a safe place for my followers, no matter your race, your gender or your sexual preference. I love you. I accept you for who you are. I’m so sorry you’ve been mistreated and have had to deal with such a cold and ignorant world, just know my heart is warm and open to you. Much love and good vibes to you all.

[emusrightwing-blog]

I don’t presume to tell you what you believe, but ask yourself this, do you condemn racist discrimination as it applies to white people as well? You provide no citations and rely solely on anecdotal evidence and virtue signaling. Now I could provide you tangible evidence for anti-white bigotry and discrimination, but seeing as you assert your claim with no evidence, I dismiss it with no evidence. See how that works? Anyway, I could be wrong, and you could actually be someone who acknowledges anti-white racism. I would very much like you to prove me wrong :)

[ithelpstodream]

[emusrightwing-blog]

Even if your assertion was congruous with reality (which it isn’t) you are lending credence to your opposition saying that people like you want to replace one form of bigotry with another. You are as racist as your prototypical white southern Baptist, yours is just socially acceptable racism.

[whatareyoureallyafraidof]

[emusrightwing-blog]

I laughed when I read this. I can only assume you have an infantile mind. You should probably read an essay entitled “The Indispensable Opposition” by Walter Lippman. Even supremacists (of which I am not one) have a right to voice their opinion. You should be in support of this because sunlight is the best disinfectant, and the best way to kill bad ideas is to subject them to the critique of the public.

[emusrightwing-blog]

A strange thing how the people bemoaning the status of 2016 as “The worst year ever” are all young, uninformed, or leftists (or all three). It’s been a marvelous year for us practical republicans

[emusrightwing-blog]

Power is domination, control, and therefore a very selective form of truth which is a lie.

Wole Soyinka

[emusrightwing-blog]

Bernie Sanders: A symptom of a flawed society

The greatest enemy of the political Left has always been reality. The newly minted generation of youth in the west, who have grown up in an age of prosperity and decadence, are laden with a sense of entitlement and are prone to sanctimonious grandstanding. No wonder, then, that a prospective leader who promises government concessions on all fronts, would become so lionized by the millennial generation. No longer do we aggrandize ideals of hard work and individual merit, supplanted instead by whining and pleading with daddy Democrat to please pay for our college.

[emusrightwing-blog]

Affirmative Action: Clearly Racist

Let me posit a hypothetical scenario: Two men, one White, and one Black, are applying to college. Both have grown up in poverty, and cannot afford college without assistance. When considering their options, the school counselor recommends the Black student apply for one of the many scholarships and financial aid programs dedicated to minorities. The Black student takes his counselor’s advice, and succeeds in receiving a scholarship. However the White student - equally poor - has no opportunities for scholarships based on his race. A search on scholarships.com shows 0 results for white/Caucasian scholarships, and the Wikipedia results turn out to be a parody created by a Hispanic college student. Was this White man not discriminated against? He was passed over for opportunities purely based on his race. Tell me, which one seems privileged to you? Can you imagine the uproar if the races were reversed in this situation? In fact this is irrelevant to my real argument, and just serves to prove a point about racism against Whites in modern society. Even if there was a scholarship for White people, I would be against that too, because it is anti meritocratic and collectivist. I want rewards to be doled out based on achievements and prowess, not the group one belongs to. But, hey, feel free to call me racist.

[emusrightwing-blog]

2016 has been the Red Wedding of the left wing. Britain and the USA are only the precursors to a projection of massive shifts back to right wing leadership throughout Europe. If I were a leftist, I would step back and take a moment for self examination. Maybe just shouting “Racist!” at differing opinions isn’t productive and fails to win you support?

[emusrightwing-blog]

Yes, there are significant populations of Muslims already living productive, integrated lives in the west. But as research by Pew shows, the majority of Muslims in their Near East / North African majority nations hold harsh, even regressive views about women, homosexuals, and nonbelievers. Demographics which have noticeable representation on this platform. Seeing that this is demonstrably the case, is it really practical to import millions of self segregating migrants who are unwilling to integrate and live in cohesion to the classically liberal societies of Europe?