Winslow Leach [Phantom of the Paradise (1974)] stimboard
X|X|X X|X|X X|X|X
Noah Kahan
occasionally subtle
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
KIROKAZE
tumblr dot com
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Today's Document

Janaina Medeiros
Cosimo Galluzzi
Game of Thrones Daily
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

titsay
Cosmic Funnies
RMH
𓃗
YOU ARE THE REASON
Monterey Bay Aquarium

oozey mess

No title available
almost home
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from France
seen from France

seen from Australia
seen from Ukraine
seen from Tunisia

seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@everybody-ska
Winslow Leach [Phantom of the Paradise (1974)] stimboard
X|X|X X|X|X X|X|X
80s: the decade of stupid good horror
Hi hi! I’ve decided to start a little series named “Sewing with Siren”. It’ll cover basic in garment construction and how to start basic patterning. (aka your first year of fashion school so hey if any of you are applying for school I got you covered). I hope this turns out??? Helpful??? To someone? LMFAO I know I ramble on a lot but I always thought that knowing about grainlines and stuff was important even for people who just sew for fun (cosplayers and people making their own lolita stuff) but there wasn’t really a resource for it. Next week we get to go over pattern drafting. OH BOY.
I think this series is going to be great, especially if you’re just starting out with sewing!
"your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
8% is basically microscopic and featureless LMAO i think 20% is the smallest i can go with it still looking good. goofy ass experiment
know your englishes
i was just talking to a friend about how we have to have this conversation every single quarter that we teach, so i pass it on to you. shakespeare is not old english! chaucer is not old english!!
old english
also called anglo-saxon
in use from around 400 to around 1066 (the norman conquest) in england and parts of scotland during the early middle ages.
most popular example: beowulf (see it written)
looks the least like modern english:
“Hwaet, we gardena in geardagum, þeodcyninga þrym gefrunon, hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon!”
if it looks like it could be the name of a field or military group in Rohan, it’s probably OE
middle english
in use from 1066 to the early 1500s (along with french & latin) during the late middle ages.
most popular example: chaucer’s canterbury tales (see it written)
A knyght ther was, and that a worthy man, That fro the tyme that he first bigan To riden out, he loved chivalrie, Trouthe and honour, fredom and curteisie…”
will have recognizable words. read it out loud if you’re struggling.
still no standardized spelling. or dictionaries. soz. we’re getting there.
just straight-up regular english
in use from the 1500s until now.
that means shakespeare and james joyce and jk rowling are all grouped under the same language umbrella
reread that. shakespeare is tough and uses english differently than we’re used to, but he is not old english! he is, for the purposes of labelling, modern english.
if you are feeling super picky you can label his work as “early modern english” (”early modern” being the period between 1500 and 1700ish) but tbh that’s a fairly arbitrary distinction.
Identifying texts from around 1500-1700 as early modern is fairly standard within academic circles. This is because, despite Shakespeare’s English more closely resembling our own, there was still a great deal of variety in the ways in which words were spelled. Shakespeare, of course, is so popular, that his works are widely available in modern English and with modern punctuation (though it’s worth noting that punctuating Shakespeare is still an ongoing critical debate.) For example, in the First Folio of Shakespeare’s plays, the famous couplet from Claudius—"My words fly up, my thoughts remain below. / Words without thoughts never to heaven go.“—appears as, “My wordes fly vp, my sinnes remaine below. / No King on earth is safe, if Gods his foe.” This example highlights the spelling and editorial revisions which have since gone into making Shakespeare sensible to “modern” audiences. Moreover, early modern texts are also contemporaneous with what is commonly referred to as the “great vowel shift"—the period in which the pronunciation of English vowels changed drastically. What this means is that, whereas you might recognise Shakespeare’s English more easily than, say, Chaucer’s, you wouldn’t understand Shakespeare’s English if you were to hear it out loud. The Globe Theatre periodically does OP (original pronunciation) productions and they’re worth checking out if you’re curious.
yes!! this is such a great addition, thank you! yall, reading in the original is so, so important - and it’s easier with early modern texts than with medieval ones. if you have database access most things are centrally available on EEBO, and both the folger and the bodelian have digitized versions of shakespeare’s first folio that are worth checking out. don’t settle for reading the results of late editorial decisions you didn’t make!
also on the distinction between old and middle english– there are, of course, gradations, as one would expect when trying to periodize a thousand years into two neat linguistic partitions. as time passes, our notion of middleness shifts inevitably to the right, for better or for worse. with old and middle english the distinction is almost neat, as the norman conquest created some very deep and abiding changes in the language (the change from “cyning” to “king,” as evinced in the later sections of the anglo-saxon chronicle, is a notable example), but there are still marked shifts over time– though old english is the form of english that least resembles our modern language, there are sections of the a-s chronicle that can be read much like modern English thanks to case collapse and syntax shift. old english comes with a different alphabet which includes ð, þ, and æ; different syntax; a case system; vastly different vocabulary– as well as so many words that are just a letter or two away from their modern derivatives–; dialects and variation; and pronunciations that feel simultaneously foreign and so familiar. and all this nuance is of course lost with the words “old english? what, like shakespeare?”
100%, all of the above. also i edited the original post (a few minutes after it took off, unfortunately) to add that middle english looks & sounds very different depending on where it’s written/spoken – gawain and the green knight, for example, looks very different from the canterbury tales, in large part because the gawain author is from the north and chaucer wrote from london.
ALSO a Very Important Medieval Fact is that “ye,” as in “Ye Olde Shoppe,” is NOT A THING. not a thing, folks!! the letter thorn (þ) was pronounced “th” and often looked very similar to the letter “y” - some scribes didn’t even distinguish between them. when the press happened, “the” was mostly written with a “th,” but sometimes rendered as “þ” with a superscript “e”; eventually thorn phased out and got replaced by “y” (probably because that was one less piece of type for printers to deal with). so “ye olde shoppe” is actually just “the olde shoppe.” now you know~~
Just adding to the early modern English thing: let me introduce you to a wonderful little thing called secretary hand. Basically it’s an early form of what we all know as ‘cursive’ or ‘joined up’ writing–it was used to write efficiently and legibly. But there was still a load of variation and some of the letter forms are absolutely unrecognizable today, so it can be really confusing to read. In our first secretary hand workshop this year we had to basically re-learn the alphabet and it took us literally two hours to decipher a marmalade recipe. Here’s why:
Here’s the trickiest part: minims. Minims are little teeny dashes used to indicate small letters like m, n, u, v, w, etc. Problem is, when you get a bunch in a row it can be really hard to work out how many letters are actually there and what they are. The word “minimum,” for example, would b a nightmare. Here’s another example of the secretary hand alphabet from the Folger Shakespeare library. If you look in the middle of the fourth row you’ll see the minims, in between the big fancy Ls and Ms:
So that’s an extra little tidbit about early modern English.
Here’s a citation from the Oxford English Dictionary:
1871 H. Sweet “King Alfred’s Version of Gregory’s Pastoral Care” pref. p.v I use ‘Old English’ throughout this work to denote the unmixed, inflectional stage of the English language, commonly known by the barbarous and unmeaning title of ‘Anglo-Saxon’.
He couldn’t have known how “Old English” would come to represent the peculiar version of Early Modern English that passes for Renfair-Speak (speke?), nor how “Old English” as a font name would become associated with spiky Blackletter Gothic or Fraktur letters that have nothing to do with the “Old English” he was defending. (More in this post.)
This is @dduane‘s copy of a book I used at Uni; though “Old English” was in common use (that’s what my course was called) the writers clearly preferred to go their own way.
The three Old English letters ð, æ and þ are called eth (not “oak”, which is a shame) ash and thorn; in Modern English, eth has transformed to d (Odin was originally Othin), ash has dropped out except in older print (hemophilia was once hæmophilia, etc. - one letter - though remains as two letters - haemophilia etc. - in UK/Irish usage) while thorn changed as described by @post–grad.
An extra “e” appeared at the end of many Middle English words and was voiced - “shoppe”, which appears in Chaucer’s “The Cook’s Tale”, would sound like “shop-puh” - but even when Middle English became Early Modern English and the final e fell silent, printers (Hi, Caxton!) would still add them as an accepted way to justify the right margin of a book. Spelling was still free-form enough that nobody minded.
Same with “the”, “ye” and “yͤ”, where the way space was saved or filled by using one or the other is obvious. But it wasn’t pronounced as yee, any more than etc. is pronounced as etick.
Nowadays, something called Ye Olde Worlde Shoppe is just a twee faux-antique affectation, and as for calling it “yee oldee worldee shopee”…
“When you say that, smile…”
:->
oof im looking through my old artfight attacks and i totally forgot i usually go whole hog on at least one background every year... i dont think ive drawn a single background this year?? =A='''
hello L Lawliet enjoyers!! i have painstakingly edited screencaps of all of L's sprites (18 from normal gameplay, 45 from the L Communicator mode, 14 from cutscenes/Deduction mode) from my Spiraling Trap gameplay for any of your creative purposes. all of them are original DS screen resolution (256x192), so you might have to do some editing if you need them upscaled.
beware: drive and full spritesheet contains spoilers for the full game!!
full spritesheets under cut but be aware that they'll be compressed a bit (so it's better to DL from the drive):
Furby Tutorial Masterpost
If you want anything deleted, added, or fixed let me know and I’ll be more than willing to do so! If you use any of the tumblr tutorials, or find them helpful, please consider reblogging them from the source! Good luck with your furbs :))
Last Update: 06-Apr-25
Keep reading
Happy holidays! Here are some brush packs for CSP, Photoshop and Procreate for $5 each!
🖌️CSP: https://ko-fi.com/s/01b3fb91b8
🖌️PS: https://ko-fi.com/s/4dc75f6444
🖌️Procreate: https://ko-fi.com/s/ffae710957
Reblogs are immensely appreciated, thank you so much for your support!
Costume appreciation series: The Muppet Christmas Carol (1992) dir Brian Henson
Costume Design by Ann Hollowood and Polly Smith
Fashion historian Abby Cox did a delightful 30-minute breakdown of the costumes in The Muppet Christmas Carol:
And Nichole Rudolph recreated Gonzo as Charles Dickens’ outfit from the movie using historical research and techniques. Here’s a playlist of 9 videos documenting the process:
Every year it makes me so happy to see people discovering (or rediscovering) that the Muppets Christmas Carol is genuinely one of the best films ever made and I’m not kidding.
You could look at pretty much any aspect of filming - special effects! Music! Set design! - and literally every person on every team went absolute ham for this movie, because it was a labor of love. Brian Henson made the movie after the death of his father Jim Henson and co-father Richard Hunt. The whole team was devastated after losing the two men who had brought the heart and soul and creativity to The Muppets from the very beginning, and for a while there was debate over whether they should keep making movies at all.
(That scene where Kermit, voiced by Brian Henson, says the brief epitaph for Tiny Tim? The cracks and wavers in Brian’s voice are very real as he says “Life is full of meetings and partings children, that is the way of it. I’m sure we will never forget… this first… parting there was among us…” MY HEART.)
Eventually they decided that they would make this movie, and they would make it as a tribute to all the things Jim and Richard valued; kindness and empathy, in-jokes about life in showbiz, and an attention to detail that even the most autistic among us might not notice at first glance.
Please enjoy some screenshots of Abby Cox’s video, because she did her fucking homework hunting down the specific fashion plates Smith and Hollowood referenced:
(See they were printing plates with the latest fashions on them, that’s where the expression comes from!)
I do want to point out that the costume designers, Ann Hollowood and Polly Smith, were prepared to bring their absolute A game for this project even when it only had the budget of a made-for-tv Christmas special. But when the producers scored Michael Caine and locked in that good good Disney money, these two maniacs looked at each other and immediately said, probably in unison, “We are going to exhaustively research smocking techniques for men’s work shirts specifically from 1840 to 1842 - and keep in mind we’re doing this at a time before the internet is really a thing - then we are going to hand sew a tiny, perfectly accurate recreation, and then we are going to put it on a rat puppet for exactly one scene.”
And it shows. Every frame of this movie, literally every frame of this movie, contains costumes that are not only immaculately period accurate (bearing in mind that the story is not set in Generic Victorian Timey Times, it’s set in 1843 specifically, a time in European fashion that was completely fucking bonkers on several levels), but are also a pitch perfect insight to each individual character, with telling details that contribute to the vibe of each scene even if we don’t consciously pick up on them. We can tell that Miss Piggy is a fashionable lady who doesn’t have much money but is dressed up in her very best, even if we don’t actually know the elaborate tatting technique used to make that lace bonnet that was fashionable maybe 12 years before the events of the story, or that she clearly added a simpler tatted border to that older heirloom shawl to make it match the bonnet better.
And those plates weren’t the only inspiration, I actually recognize a few famous historical pieces, like this 1840s day dress currently in storage at the Met:
Look at it. Look at that fucking feat of engineering. Look at the way the upper sleeves are cut on the bias and the lower sleeves are cut straight, look at the way the pleated collar is gathered at the drop shoulders, and look at how many different ways and in how many places the intricate plaid pattern matches up at the seams, carefully folded and pleated so that the blue underthread matches up in the front panels of the skirt.
This character is in the corner of the screen for less than a minute in total. Smith and Holloway did not have to do this.
Even at a glance you can tell that this plaid pattern was probably less expensive at the time, but it too was cut on the bias, and her bonnet also has very very teeny tiny tatting. This character is also on screen for less than one minute, and she’s also about 4 inches tall.
THEY DID NOT HAVE TO DO THIS.
There’s a reason that one of the most frequently done Muppet cosplays ever is Gonzo as Charles Dickens, because that fit still absolutely fucking slaughters to this day:
Just look at this motherfucker! Look at his fur top hat and matching foxtoe shoes! Look at his stockings! Those stockings look accurately hand-knit to me, and they were on screen for a matter of seconds.
Next, let’s all channel our inner Miss Piggy and stare at Kermit’s crotch!
I couldn’t get clear screenshots of it to save my life, so you’ll just have to trust me, but when these characters are moving, you can tell that Kermit’s pants have a fold front fly. Which was popular up until about the early 1830s - which indicates that his clothes are about 15 years old, presumably the last suit he could afford to buy before he started having a bunch of kids.
Nephew Fred, on the other hand, is wearing the newfangled hot look of the season, a button fly front:
Again, you’ll just have to trust me, but it’s there if you know what to look for. Also, a keen eye will notice that Fred’s coat doesn’t fit him quite perfectly, but he and Clara seem to be stable enough that he could afford to get it tailored - which indicates that either he hasn’t had time or hasn’t bothered, or maybe it’s a new coat that Clara has just given him or something.
Let’s look again at Fred’s daytime monstrosity, period accurate down to the embroidered floral waistcoat with the plaid pants, which at the time would have been the absolute height of fashion for any young man to irritate his penny-pinching uncle in:
These methods of making clothes aren’t just old skills that have no modern application anymore, they’re advanced old skills. This is like someone writing a poem in iambic pentameter in a dead language, and only on the sixth reread do you realize it’s also a palindrome. This is insane.
Y'all. It took me until my 937th viewing of this movie, but I took a closer look at Peter’s little jacket:
It’s also a little outdated, like Kermit’s - and this isn’t a great photo of it, but if you look really really really carefully, there’s a line of darker fabric along the shoulders. And only if you really know your shit about sewing, you can spot the clues that this garment has been let out at the seams. Given that he can’t quite close it and the arms are still a little too short, that indicates that the Cratchets bought him a fairly nice coat a couple years ago and have kept letting it out as he grew. And I can’t find any stills to prove it, but I’d be willing to bet there’s evidence that Tiny Tim’s clothes are hand-me-downs from Peter.
THEY DID 👏NOT👏 HAVE👏 TO👏 DO THIS!
And in any other movie I’d assume that they didn’t, that it must be a coincidence or something, but given the level of detail in this movie I absolutely believe that the costume designers took the time to add a tiny clue like this that maybe fifty people on the planet would notice at the time.
And finally, here are the two women responsible for this visual feast I enjoy every year, and every year as my sewing skill grows I can appreciate more and more of their virtuosity and dedication to their craft:
Ann Hollowood!
Polly Smith!
Why so flat
This was made in Blender using grease pencil with geometry nodes :)
Normally, grease pencil objects don't cast or react to shadow, so I would have had to render and export the animation separately and place it into 3D space. But with geometry nodes, it allows me draw anything and convert them into 3D mesh in real time.
I cannot believe there's absolutely no way to watch free shows and movies anymore, there are too many paid streaming platforms and pirating websites have viruses and ads preventing you from watching it uninterrupted((.)) id rather follow the rules and purchase media moving forward because it is too inconvenient. Seriously, free and no ads or viruses with 1080p streaming is DEAD.
Exactly! It's freaking annoying when I want to watch movies but I would have to subscribe to like 24 different services . Just to watch the shows that I like.
Oh and wouldn’t it be nice for cartoons? Just anything animated. I just wanna stream things without getting conned. Must I be cartoonless forever?
i like using streaming apps but there are waaaay too many and they're all stealing my data .i wish there was a secure and organized way to have millions of shows and movies available one one app. but alas. we've truly gone full circle back to cable + now it spies on you. its a real shame. i dont want to fill my device storage with tons of boring and stupid cash grabs.
i know, it's so annoying for everything to be paid nowadays, especially movies and tv shows. it would be perfect if i could watch them without getting infected by some virus or some shit. i'm fine with ads, they gotta run themselves somehow, but i want to watch stuff and .live! if they have to use different domains i'm okay with that too, because free media is .top dog either way.
for mobile users, it especially sucks, because you can't just use websites and you have to not only pay, but you have to download a billion apps just to find what the thing you wanna watch is on. it doesn't help that the streaming services take up...so much space. so much.
🔥New brush packs are live for Photoshop, Procreate and CSP!🔥 For $10 you get all three sets!
Here's a bundle of brush packs for PS/CSP/Procreate! For $10 you get all 3 of these sets! The packs contain mostly color changing tone-like
Reblogs are immensely appreciated, thank you for looking!
Happy holidays! Here are some brush packs for CSP, Photoshop and Procreate for $5 each!
🖌️CSP: https://ko-fi.com/s/01b3fb91b8
🖌️PS: https://ko-fi.com/s/4dc75f6444
🖌️Procreate: https://ko-fi.com/s/ffae710957
Reblogs are immensely appreciated, thank you so much for your support!
i think the near-extinction of people making fun, deep and/or unique interactive text-based browser games, projects and stories is catastrophic to the internet. i'm talking pre-itch.io era, nothing against it.
there are a lot of fun ones listed here and here but for the most part, they were made years ago and are now a dying breed. i get why. there's no money in it. factoring in the cost of web hosting and servers, it probably costs money. it's just sad that it's a dying art form.
anyway, here's some of my favorite browser-based interactive projects and games, if you're into that kind of thing. 90% of them are on the lists that i linked above.
A Better World - create an alternate history timeline
Alter Ego - abandonware birth-to-death life simulator game
Seedship - text-based game about colonizing a new planet
Sandboxels or ThisIsSand - free-falling sand physics games
Little Alchemy 2 - combine various elements to make new ones
Infinite Craft - kind of the same as Little Alchemy
ZenGM - simulate sports
Tamajoji - browser-based tamagotchi
IFDB - interactive fiction database (text adventure games)
Written Realms - more text adventure games with a user interface
The Cafe & Diner - mystery game
The New Campaign Trail - US presidential campaign game
Money Simulator - simulate financial decisions
Genesis - text-based adventure/fantasy game
Level 13 - text-based science fiction adventure game
Miniconomy - player driven economy game
Checkbox Olympics - games involving clicking checkboxes
BrantSteele.net - game show and Hunger Games simulators
Murder Games - fight to the death simulator by Orteil
Cookie Clicker - different but felt weird not including it. by Orteil.
if you're ever thinking about making a niche project that only a select number of individuals will be nerdy enough to enjoy, keep in mind i've been playing some of these games off and on for 20~ years (Alter Ego, for example). quite literally a lifetime of replayability.