you really believe in that "Han Dynasty" crap?
What?
As in like, the existence of the Han Dynasty from roughly 200bce-200ce?
Smh I can't believe you fell for the Han dynasty
NASA
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸

Discoholic đŞŠ
Acquired Stardust
tumblr dot com

pixel skylines
art blog(derogatory)
d e v o n

tannertan36

blake kathryn

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ

â
Sade Olutola
noise dept.
Xuebing Du
No title available

Andulka

JVL
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă

Kiana Khansmith

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Greece

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Sweden
@explosiverose
you really believe in that "Han Dynasty" crap?
What?
As in like, the existence of the Han Dynasty from roughly 200bce-200ce?
Smh I can't believe you fell for the Han dynasty
how to be okay when I see my deadname
real talk tho, i actually have a strategy for this. it was my wifeâs idea. the key is to change your default association with the name. that way, instead of automatically thinking of it as your deadname, you think of it as something elseâs name, ideally something you like.
what I did was start a new game on PokĂŠmon Omega Ruby and give my starter, mudkip, my deadname. after many hours of play time, whenever i hear or see my deadname, i think of my beloved mudkip, now grown into a handsome, strong swampert.
if pokĂŠmon isnât ur thing, i think the same strategy could be adapted to a pet or a stuffed animal. just a thought.
One of my friends gave my deadname to his vacuum cleaner.
If only it were a reason as clever as that. No, he just wanted to give his vacuum cleaner a human name for some reason and my birth name is kind of unusual so he figured if I wasnât using it anymore then he would just take it. I gave him my blessing. That name belongs to the vacuum cleaner now.
This is probably my favourite tweet ever hello we are your bank
theyre unlocking new types of guy over on reddit apparently
this guy really always had something to say about almost everything and nearly all of it is still completely relevant almost 200 years later. fascinating stuff.
the philly natives are showing up to shit and piss all over this anonymous facebook user and it has such beautiful philadelphia energy. i can hear the diphthongs. i love people from philadelphia. i didn't even know that's where this was taken, but i really couldn't be happier that it wound up being the subject of this post. few other outcomes would result in what i can only hope will be weeks of indignant philadelphians letting loose on yuppie assholes in the tags.
Think you could take a 10x10 inch cock? Asking for a friend đ
like is it a cube or am i misunderstanding
True freedom.
Very true but why does this jpeg look like the fever dream of a dying man
my parents trying to get ahold of me in 1998
You wanna tell me I'm pretty sooooo bad you wanna objectify me sooooo baaaaaad
Transfems read this thread
Biological anthropologist here: TERFs are dead wrong about estrogen/testosterone not changing the skeleton. They do so much to the skeleton we had to completely reassess one of the ways we estimate the biological sex of skeletons.
So, before the advent of cross-sex hormone therapy, one of the surefire ways to ID a biologically female skeleton of a person who had borne children (this is important) was by looking for pits of parturition. These form when the estrogen surge during late pregnancy tells your pelvic ligaments to loosen up in order to fit the babyâs massive head through the birth canal. Your pelvis starts to s Thereâs hypothetically only one normally occurring biological reason for a body to give that signal, and since you have to be nominally XX (or some variant of that where you can still carry a pregnancy to term), it was a pretty solid shorthand for sex!
Until we started looking for these things outside of female skeletons, and surprise! âMaleâ skeletons can have them too! Sometimes these are chromosomal variants, sometimes theyâre men with a high estrogen or estrogen-esque hormonal component, and in the modern era? Sometimes these are trans women whose skeletons have undergone hormonal changes due to taking estrogen.
And then thereâs testosterone. You know what that does, right. It makes it easier to build muscle. But what THAT does is put new and interesting stresses and pressures on the bones, making them more rugged and in line with the skeletal structure we see in people who have had high testosterone their entire lives. We donât just see this in trans men- we see this in older cis women too. Once your estrogen production tanks after menopause, we see what we call masculinization of the face, where the features get more rugged and robust as tissue production changes. These changes donât happen overnight, and we donât have good data (yet) but my guess is that when we start looking at the skeletal remains of trans men who took T throughout their adult lives, their skulls are gonna look pretty damn masculine.
Now, hormone therapy isnât going to change every aspect of your skeleton. Estrogen in particular doesnât do too much to the cranial bones. Your skeletal height and limb length are unlikely to change. Things like the size and shape of the pelvic inlet, the sciatic notch, and other features that are used in sex estimation, are also unlikely to change. Professional anthropological sex estimation is a complex calculus where you look at many, many features of the skeleton to make the best possible estimation of what sex the person was. It has nothing to do with gender or gender presentation. It simply tells us the end result of your hormonal composition during life. So long as youâre taking hormones regularly for a while and giving your body a chance to change and grow, your skeleton WILL undergo changes based on your hormone levels.
Hey, one anth to another: I'd love to read some of this literature, do you have any reccs? Cause I always figured that hormones would change things like bone density and possibly some of the shape, but after fusing and ossification they cant change things like the sciatic notch and the bowl shape of the pelvis and whatnot. Because I know that in grad school we did learn about the pits of partirition but as like an outdated thing that isn't very useful for sex ID anymore (if anyone's wondering, these are the source of that "pregnancy leaves notches on your pelvis" post that was going around tumblr a few years back. It isn't true.). Tho I'd love to see a study on the hands thing the op mentioned. Like I know a lot about the skeleton at this point and I'd love to know how that happened. Was it remodeling? Did the hormones somehow "reactivate" the ephyphesys? Change the bone ossification? Or was it all soft tissue? Because we do know that males and females have different proportions to their fingers vs palms (that's how the handprint paintings in caves were IDd as done by women.), but is it bone or soft tissue? Idk man it's just really interesting.
Yeah! Fair warning, a lot of these papers use terms that the trans community no longer sees as appropriate. The language standards that the medical community uses are not the same as the trans community at large (Iâm sure any trans person can tell you that!) so youâll see terms like âtranssexualâ a lot.
The TL:DR from all of this: there is good evidence for skeletal changes during adult-initiated HRT. We know that these changes occur, but there isnât a whole lot of literature about exactly what occurs. Many of these changes are minute and you may not see them in a living trans human, but are more discernible in a skeleton. We need to study this more.
Introductory Stuff
A nice Sapiens article proposing how to improve trans visibility within bioarchaeology/forensics: https://www.sapiens.org/biology/transgender-intersex-forensic-anthropology/
Why itâs important to be able to talk about the bodily changes trans people go through as an anthropologist: https://journals.upress.ufl.edu/fa/article/view/1409
Studies of skeletal development in trans people taking hormones
Bone health as a part of trans healthcare: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8756328208007722?casa_token=Q0yyPHewOLIAAAAA:f6VKhwq1uVylVHkVZtAX6c-t3WADx8aaymmIWtiUeci1dqVuYAMH9OXn2ofmm4T1thKw5dkutuw
Hormones and bone density: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00396.x?casa_token=o2l0Y9Nt4qoAAAAA:tO3_aIeM4RqBE0xyNpC8Ns8d7vipYNFzsdMdaX5ZcodO9JShKdEkh-Vw-66FKJAW13bDG2pCCKKUYeyc
Interesting paper on pelvic morphology changes: https://asbmr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jbmr.4262
(this oneâs about people who started HRT before 18, but itâs still a really interesting read even if it isnât directly applicable to OPâs situation since they transitioned as an adult)
10 year bone health study in transgender individuals: https://asbmr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jbmr.3612
Not hormones, but stuff on how FFS affects skeletal remains: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32200173/
Ok, so weâve identified that there ARE bone changes. How does muscle affect bone structure?
Explains the bone/muscle relationship in typical cis men and typical cis women: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189615/ (Note: by typical, we mean that their hormones are generally within the range thatâs expected for their chromosomal composition.)
Comparing trans men on long-term HRT to cis women of the same age and looking at bone mass, body composition, etc: https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/97/7/2503/2834495
Facial masculinization of the female cranium with age: https://digital.library.txstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10877/5250/NAPARSTEK-THESIS-2014.pdf?sequence=1
Cranial remodeling with age: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joa.12247
(The aging stuff is important because hormonal composition changes drastically with age and itâs a useful analogue, if not direct analogy.)
Some interesting reads on the relationship between sex hormones and cartilage
Estrogen and osteoarthritis (aka cartilage loss): https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/5/2767/htm
More sex hormones and osteoarthritis: https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.1053.15
Generally speaking, HRT isnât going to do too much to the cartilage. If you think your nose looks different, itâs probably because youâre seeing it in a new context since the fat deposits on your face rearrange themselves. Theyâre very close to the surface, after all.Â
Pelvic Scarring and how itâs not strictly based in pregnancy
Oops we found it in men: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.2887
Itâs also found in women who have never given birth: https://digital.library.txstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10877/8481/GALEA-THESIS-2018.pdf?sequence=1
Identifying transgender people within archaeology
https://miami.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/the-fallacy-of-the-transgender-skeleton (good read on how human sexual dimorphism... isnât. The spectrum of traits overlaps too much.)
surgery piece: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073820300827?casa_token=jy_vbV7_fXkAAAAA:nz2d-xCUT-JoYACam3CDliKmto1UFkB8-ft837QzSpjLZJ0uiH5DHNSH7M_fG_b5XWsln3yZZKk
As for the mechanism, itâs a combination of remodeling and changes in bone density. The bones donât unfuse, so youâre basically stuck with the same structure, just with different sizes and densities. This is more notable in trans men- they can lose some height from bone density loss if theyâre not careful. Itâs usually not a lot and isnât as noticeable in living people as it is in skeletons, because thereâs a lot more tissue to you than just bone! Itâs the same mechanism that happens in cis women with osteoporosis. Fortunately, most endocrinologists take that into consideration these days.
Right now, most of the research on skeletal changes is focusing on FFS because itâs much more visible and dramatic. Thereâs a lot of reasons we donât really understand everything that HRT does to the skeleton- we know a lot of it, but not everything- and how any of it shows up in the archaeological record. One of them is that HRT is relatively new and we donât have the representation in skeletal collections. Another is that most of our standards are written based on studying white people, and while you canât truly identify race from a skeleton, you can associate a skeleton with certain genetic groups based on suites of traits. By only including white skeletons in a study, you miss out on a TON of variation.
I know this is a little disjointed, but I think itâll help as a starting place for people interested in doing more research on the relationship between HRT and the human skeleton and how we can see some of these changes in the archaeological or forensic context!
Amazing list of resources, and as a biologist in training imma take a dive into these.
But a friendly reminder: the key ingredient of HRT is PATIENCE. I've already read a lot of studies, and most seem inconclusive, but all agree on one thing: time on HRT (with appropriate levels) supercedes the majority of other factors involved with feminization/masculinization. Don't let someone tell you you're "done" at one year, two years, five years.... this is lifelong. Your body will adapt to the hormones it currently has at the age it is. Let it do that, and give it the time to do so.
Oh wow it was me seeing this thread all along
But uh yeah bump for visibility
I'm not british but "daft cunt" is such a funny insult but I couldn't say it without sounding like one myself
It's a shame they aren't making music anymore
I dreamed I met Spring inside my fridge
This song has single-handedly taken over my life and itâs only been like a week
the only thing more powerful than a weird little girl is a weird middle aged woman. the only thing more powerful than a weird middle aged woman is a weird old lady. and the only thing more powerful than a weird old lady is a weird little girl. thus the world is balanced.
Clovis Trouille (1889â1975) - RĂŞve Claustral (Claustral Dream), 1952
Dehumanizing bigots is bad, not because I want to be nice to them, but because they are human beings and they serve as a reminder that anyone is capable of evil ideation and action. Violent bigots are not fundamentally different beings from you. They are human beings, who have developed a reactionary and destructive belief system due to their circumstances combined with their biases. In a different timeline, that could've been you. Anyone can be radicalized. Nobody is immune to propaganda, not even the person reading this.