rope 1948 but two dumbass gays can’t get away with a simple ass murder
Cosimo Galluzzi

tannertan36
ojovivo

Love Begins

oozey mess
Three Goblin Art

#extradirty
Game of Thrones Daily
i don't do bad sauce passes
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

No title available

Janaina Medeiros

Product Placement
DEAR READER
Mike Driver

pixel skylines
todays bird
No title available
Jules of Nature

No title available
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Australia

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Pakistan
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Vietnam

seen from United Kingdom
@farleygrangerblog
rope 1948 but two dumbass gays can’t get away with a simple ass murder
Rope 1948 Behind The Scenes - DVD Bonus Material
Part 1 | Part 2
Rope 1948 Behind The Scenes - DVD Bonus Material
Part 1 | Part 2
Gun Crazy | 1950
do you ever see someone’s lips and just
ugh
Farley getting slapped around in Rope (1948) and Hans Christian Andersen (1952)
Happy Birthday Farley Granger (July 1st 1925 - March 27th 2011)
a summary of phillip morgan in rope 1948 in four pictures
if i had to watch this you all do too
John Dall in Gun Crazy (1950)
One interesting detail in Rope that might escape notice on a first viewing: Brandon is wearing a ring on the ring finger of his right hand that bears strong resemblance to a wedding band.
My first thought is that this was one of those clever little details Hitchcock slipped in to contribute to the subtext of the movie while still getting it past the censors. I don’t know when exactly the tradition of same-sex couples wearing rings on their right hands, as opposed to their left, began, but I suppose it could easily have been around in the late 1940s. (Moreover, it appears from the film that John Dall was left-handed, which could explain why the ring was on his right hand, but not why it’s there to begin with.) But Philip isn’t wearing a ring on either of his hands, as you can see here:
In fact, the only other characters to wear rings are Mrs. Atwater, Mrs. Wilson, and Mr. Kentley, all of whom are (or have been) married.
So, okay, maybe it would have been too obvious to have both Brandon and Philip wearing wedding rings since we all know that this movie was Strictly Heterosexual, Absolutely No Gays To Be Found Here, Production Code. But the possibilities are intriguing. If the ring is intended to be a symbol of commitment, it adds another layer to the subtext of a film that said so much with so little. If it represents something else, it adds another layer of mystery to Brandon’s character.
drunk and “tight” Philip beginning to melt down is always quality entertainment
i miss john dall
Farley Granger in The North Star (1943) dir. Lewis Milestone
“You frighten me. You always have, from that very first day in prep school. Part of your...charm, I suppose.”
{b+p moodboard 1/?}
At the very end of Rope, when Brandon and Philip’s “perfect murder” has unravelled and ramifications are imminent, we get this final shot in which this toppled pile of books (which fell to the floor when Rupert Cadell opened the chest to discover David’s body) takes center frame.
This poignant image is symbolic of the toppling of the murderers’ sophistication and air of intellectual superiority, the dependence on scholarly theoreticals which Rupert had dismantled in his tirade against Brandon just moments before.
With the books having served for the duration of the film as an aid to the dramatic flourish of the murder plot—they are the ostensible reason Mr. Kentley was invited over, they are Brandon’s excuse for moving the food to the chest so that the party guests dine unwittingly off of David’s corpse concealed within, and they are the vessel by which Brandon gets his “neat little touch” in tying up the books for Mr. Kentley with the rope which was used to strangle his son to death—this shot represents the dismantling of that careful construction, the undermining of the sophistication of Brandon and Philip’s “immaculate murder.”
Following Rupert’s epiphany speech in which he finally rebukes the Nietzschean ideals which inspired David’s murder, this is Hitchcock’s subtler and perfectly artistic way of conveying with certainty that those so-called ideals are not only abhorrent and egregious, but ultimately futile.
Rope + tumblr posts