being a fan of media that requires critical thinking skills and cant just be broken down into "this one bad this one good" is so hard like can you imagine the fucking takes im seeing
š

No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Cosimo Galluzzi
No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Kaledo Art

No title available

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£
Noah Kahan
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
art blog(derogatory)
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć

Product Placement
KIROKAZE
Claire Keane
hello vonnie
Sade Olutola
Not today Justin
One Nice Bug Per Day
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@faust-vs-mephistopheles
being a fan of media that requires critical thinking skills and cant just be broken down into "this one bad this one good" is so hard like can you imagine the fucking takes im seeing
I think half of the reason that Snape is so popular is that he's a canon redeemed villain...the other half is that he's allowed to be bitter and petty against the people who hurt him.
I agree.
I think (maybe itās just my personal experience, idk) Snape gave us what we couldnāt get in real life. Snaters are prime examples of people who tell victims of abuse to
⢠āget over itā
⢠Because āit wasnāt that badā
⢠āBut you did *this* so in my eyes they did a Justiceā
⢠And āwhat exactly did you do before that happened? Thatās why it happened to youā
⢠And letās not forget that ābeing angry and impacted long term by the actions of others (AND their lack of consequences) isnāt called trauma, itās called āholding grudgesā and thatās childishā
For us, it was a damn statement that he held on to that shit. It was relatable that it affected him well into his adulthood and that he didnāt tolerate anyone telling him to do and feel otherwise. The books, whether Snaters want to admit it or not, laid it out: he was valid for hating them.
Even Harry saw the bullshit after he witnessed swm
And, like we see with Snape, trauma is villainous apparently. Because how dare what we went through negatively shape our thoughts, feelings, and perspectives? How dare our trauma force us to put up a wall around ourselves and become cold and unlikable as protection? How dare we do stupid things in hopes weād be accepted SOMEWHERE because god knows the rest of society doesnāt give a shitā¦How dare us?
And how dare Snape show us that traumatized ppl donāt have to be lifeless husks but brave mfs who will die to save the rest of the ppl who were too busy judging others to do it themselves. Letās be honest, most ppl who hate on Snape wouldnāt have half the balls to what he didā¦
Snape was a voice. Thatās why I think heās popular. Some ppl donāt like the voices of victimsā¦thatās why heās so hated.
A series of Instagram ads run by Signal got the messaging app booted from the formerās ad platform, according to a blog post Signal published on Tuesday. The ads were meant to show users the bevy of data that Instagram and its parent company Facebook collects on users.
Thatās actually a brilliant idea, even from a strict effectiveness standpoint.
Pity they got shut down.
Some examples:
Just goes to show how much data facebook/insta collect about you that gets sent to advertisers. Also facebook responded by effectively saying āyes we collect the data but we dont allow advertisers to say that theyāre using this dataā after trying to accuse Signal of pulling a āPR stuntā. Facebook is so scummy.
Harry, Luna, Nevile: Being bullied but not joining a genocidal group.
Snape: You don't get it I had a reason I was bullied.
People react differently as well as having different experiences. It makes no sense to compare Snape to Harry, Neville or Luna. Yes they were bullied too, but they had loyal friends unlike Snape who didn't have positive friends. In more none of them have ever been SA, None of them was the victim of an attempted murder by a schoolmate
Harry had a terrible childhood like Snape it is true, but once he got to school he found friends who welcomed and defended him. Harry was famous, rich and respected by those who mattered to him. Snape was just a poor, unpopular halfblood boy who was bullied, humiliated, and nearly killed by the bullies who assaulted him throughout his school years. The situations are not comparable
That's right. Snape was a completely lonely boy, abandoned even by educational institutions. We are not surprised if he then took a wrong path.
His real strength was to redeem himself and understand his mistakes.
I know OPās trying to be snarky, but theyāre sooo close to the actual huge point thatās being made with these characters
Itās that there are two parts to people, the part that theyāre set up for by their circumstances and the part thatās a result of their choices. But their choices can only come after theyāve been through enough of the stuff theyāre set up for. There are so many parallels made constantly between Harry, Snape, and Voldemort, for instance: the abused, impoverished halfbloods for whom the magical world promised an escape and a home. But they all turned out differently. And the point that JKR makes over and over again is that itās the power of love that does it. Neville, Luna, and Harry had friends. Luna had a loving father who taught her to be confident in herself even if others thought she was weird. Nevilleās circumstances were different from Harryās (although Harry himself sees how this is really just a matter of chance). Harry had loving parents for a year, and Dumbledore goes to great lengths to get him to understand that itās his ability to love ā his parents, his friends, Sirius ā that makes him different from Voldemort. And while Snape initially makes bad choices, itās his ability to love Lily that leads him out of that. No, he isnāt completely healed; he never has any room or opportunity to do so. But itās harshly unfair and ridiculous, not to mention completely missing the point of not only Snape but the entire series, to judge this one character as a static entity based on choices they made as a kid in shitty circumstances who didnāt see an alternative. There is no great strength in avoiding a pitfall that was never a threat. There is nothing impressive about rich liberal James who grew up without those obstacles or ingrained prejudices or pressure about them not joining the Death Eaters, but it is very impressive for someone who did fall into that to manage to get out.
If you canāt understand this I donāt even know what books you were reading because it sure wasnāt these ones.
Harry, Luna, Neville, being bullied decades after said cult had shown it's true colors and stopped recruiting:
Snape:
To add few:
Snape grew up in slums, the rest didn't.
Harry did not have an option to join Voldemort. The choice was made for him.
Everyone including the Malfoys and Harry's parents had something to gain from Voldemort's defeat. Snape would gain nothing.
People act like being bullied was the only element that contributed to that miserable, idiotic decision. They really like to inflate their fave's importance, don't they?
James's bullying explains, doesn't justify, his reaction to Harry. Not his joining the Death Eaters. Not by itself, for sure.
...otherwise why did all the non-bullied Death Eaters sign up.
Their entire judgement system is based on oversimplification and assumptions, or else it falls apart on its own.Ā
I am legit curious to read academic research about the thinking process and almost non-existed reading comprehension society developed in the last 10 years.
Harry, Luna, Nevile: Being bullied but not joining a genocidal group.
Snape: You don't get it I had a reason I was bullied.
People react differently as well as having different experiences. It makes no sense to compare Snape to Harry, Neville or Luna. Yes they were bullied too, but they had loyal friends unlike Snape who didn't have positive friends. In more none of them have ever been SA, None of them was the victim of an attempted murder by a schoolmate
Harry had a terrible childhood like Snape it is true, but once he got to school he found friends who welcomed and defended him. Harry was famous, rich and respected by those who mattered to him. Snape was just a poor, unpopular halfblood boy who was bullied, humiliated, and nearly killed by the bullies who assaulted him throughout his school years. The situations are not comparable
That's right. Snape was a completely lonely boy, abandoned even by educational institutions. We are not surprised if he then took a wrong path.
His real strength was to redeem himself and understand his mistakes.
I know OPās trying to be snarky, but theyāre sooo close to the actual huge point thatās being made with these characters
Itās that there are two parts to people, the part that theyāre set up for by their circumstances and the part thatās a result of their choices. But their choices can only come after theyāve been through enough of the stuff theyāre set up for. There are so many parallels made constantly between Harry, Snape, and Voldemort, for instance: the abused, impoverished halfbloods for whom the magical world promised an escape and a home. But they all turned out differently. And the point that JKR makes over and over again is that itās the power of love that does it. Neville, Luna, and Harry had friends. Luna had a loving father who taught her to be confident in herself even if others thought she was weird. Nevilleās circumstances were different from Harryās (although Harry himself sees how this is really just a matter of chance). Harry had loving parents for a year, and Dumbledore goes to great lengths to get him to understand that itās his ability to love ā his parents, his friends, Sirius ā that makes him different from Voldemort. And while Snape initially makes bad choices, itās his ability to love Lily that leads him out of that. No, he isnāt completely healed; he never has any room or opportunity to do so. But itās harshly unfair and ridiculous, not to mention completely missing the point of not only Snape but the entire series, to judge this one character as a static entity based on choices they made as a kid in shitty circumstances who didnāt see an alternative. There is no great strength in avoiding a pitfall that was never a threat. There is nothing impressive about rich liberal James who grew up without those obstacles or ingrained prejudices or pressure about them not joining the Death Eaters, but it is very impressive for someone who did fall into that to manage to get out.
If you canāt understand this I donāt even know what books you were reading because it sure wasnāt these ones.
Harry, Luna, Neville, being bullied decades after said cult had shown it's true colors and stopped recruiting:
Snape:
To add few:
Snape grew up in slums, the rest didn't.
Harry did not have an option to join Voldemort. The choice was made for him.
Everyone including the Malfoys and Harry's parents had something to gain from Voldemort's defeat. Snape would gain nothing.
self care is filtering out wolfstar tags and jegulus tags whenever I go on ao3
Friendly reminder that:
Tonks did nothing wrong. She just fell in love with a man. Stop bashing her because of your toxic puppyship that was never going to happen anyway.
The Weasleysābesides Mollyātreated Percy like absolute shit, especially Fred and George. āAbandoningā your family because said family never acts like they care about you and never shows you the appreciation you deserve even after you got the job of your dreams is NOT a bad thing. Most of you hate him because you know damn well youād do the exact same thing if you were in his shoes.
People who love Snape arenāt āSnape apologists,ā you guys just canāt handle the fact that about 99% of your so-called arguments can be debunked by canon facts and quotes.
Cho Chang is not a ācrybabyā or āweak.ā She had just lost her wonderful boyfriend and was having a hard time dealing with her grief. Yes, playing with Harryās feelings was wrong, but she was going through a lot of different emotions. She was just a hormonal 15/16 year old. You would all go crazy and call her heartless had she just immediately gotten over Cedricās death.
Ron was not āabusiveā to Hermione, he was a jerk to her sometimes and heās wrong for that, but he always regretted it. If anything, itās Hermione whoās abusive. She was the one who sent raging canaries (which were described as āgolden bulletsā btw) at him which left him bleeding, and punched him all over when he returned in DH. Had Ron been the one who did all this, you all would give him hell for that (and rightfully so).
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
Umbridge: im going to pass anti werewolf legislation to ruin werewolves lives so werewolves cant get jobs šø
16 year old Sirius Black about to tell Snape to press the knot on the willow and not caring about Remus at all: way ahead of you, Dolores
Sirius is an embodiment of chaotic energy.
Might save your life. Might kill his friend.
i wish there were more harry & sirius fics that didnāt feature w0lfst@r, or sirius/anyone really.
iām not a huge fan of any of the ships sirius is usually involved in, but in my opinionāsirius is simply tooā¦broken to even THINK about having a romantic relationship. heās on the run from the Ministry, heās just escaped after 12 years of literal hell on earthāonly to be trapped in the house of his traumatic childhood; not to mention he has to deal with the fact that the entire Order and one of his close friends wholeheartedly believed he was a mass murderer and that he would really betray james.
oh, alsoāit was his idea to switch secret keepers. something totally non consequential that would have nooooo effect on him in the presence of magical creatures designed to dredge up your worst memories and torment you with them xD
at this point, harry really is his only purpose in life. and he canāt even focus on THAT properly because of how absolutely miserable he is.
sirius black is such an interesting character, and part of the appeal to me is just how doomed by the narrative he is. for all intents and purposes, sirius also died on that terrible night in 1981. he has no prospects, his entire life was stolen from him, and he canāt even fulfill the one purpose he has anymore because he was so intensely fucked over twelve years ago. his entire life, his escape AND his deathā¦was justā¦pointless. and thatās so fucking tragic it makes me want to curl up and die. and also read a million fics about the short period of time he DID have with harry.
i just wish there were more fics that really dug into this incredible, incredible character, instead of just sticking him into a relationship
Sophocles, tr. by Robert Fagles, from The News of Orestesā Death; āElectra,ā
White Reindeer, Norway by Till Daling
Noble Knight helmet by Ynd & Kidddo
DIY: Pickled Cherry BlossomsĀ
@earthlady for the spring