new trio of prints // buy here
thanks for buying and boosting yall!
IM BUYING THAT TOP ONE WHEN I GET PAID ON THURSDAY FUCK YES ALESIA
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON
AnasAbdin
Peter Solarz

Product Placement
trying on a metaphor
Show & Tell
hello vonnie

★

if i look back, i am lost

JBB: An Artblog!
Misplaced Lens Cap
Sade Olutola
art blog(derogatory)

#extradirty

shark vs the universe
One Nice Bug Per Day
tumblr dot com
Cosimo Galluzzi
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Poland
seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Netherlands

seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye
@formsandfunctions-blog
new trio of prints // buy here
thanks for buying and boosting yall!
IM BUYING THAT TOP ONE WHEN I GET PAID ON THURSDAY FUCK YES ALESIA
By Gosha Bondarev
It is impossible to be good with money when you don’t have any. Full stop. If I’m saving my spare five bucks a week, in the best-case scenario I will have saved $260 a year. For those of you that think in quarters: $65 per quarter in savings. If you deny yourself even small luxuries, that’s the fortune you’ll amass. Of course you will never manage to actually save it; you’ll get sick at least one day and miss work and dip into it for rent. Gas will spike and you’ll need it to get to work. You’ll get a tear in your work pants that you can’t patch. Something, I guarantee you, will happen in three months.
Linda Tirado on the realities of living in bootstrap America: daily annoyances for most people are catastrophic for poor people. (via brutereason)
kiiiind of amazing.
Mad Men in 2015. This one’s my favorite.
“It’s a cycle of renewal, and as Don listens to the meditation leader’s mantras on the topic of newness, he smiles because he’s coming to terms with that cycle. It’s Don’s lot to plunge deep into the fears that plague the American psyche, experiencing broad-based ennui on a personal level. Once he understands these essential anxieties, he infuses his advertising with hopes that counteract them. He markets these new dreams until they, too, reveal their inadequacies, and the cycle restarts. That’s why Don loves beginnings: Fantasies are believable in the beginning. Then they lose their sheen.
...
Don is the embodiment of a process by which our consumerist system creates, sustains, and ultimately discards visions of a better world. Does this cycle lead anywhere? Mad Men remains agnostic on that question. But Don smiles in that closing shot because, if nothing else, the routine of aspiration, disappointment, and rebirth gives him a sense of purpose. There is an essential reward in the circular struggle to create a better self, even if—like Don—we’re making up that better self as we go along.”
-Interesting insight on Mad Men
Creativity sometimes defies commodification. (And is a word I hate.)
The crown of a massive submarine, appearing to have just surfaced from an underwater journey, has materialized from beneath the sidewalk of milan’s piazza mercanti, surprising and baffling pedestrians. the installation has the tremendous deep-sea voyager popping out from the concrete path, causing a massive wreckage of rubble nearby. a smartfortwo car, seemingly at the wrong place at the wrong time, is apparently caught up in the chaos, haphazardly propped on the debris. the elaborate, staged intervention is actually a marketing scheme by advertising agency M&C saatchi milano for europ assistance IT, an insurance group based in italy, as part their ‘protect your life‘ campaign and launch of the lifepark protection store
the scale of this..wow
Ads for WWG. A side project of mine to eradicate closets in the workplace.
Each and every thing you think is an insight into human behavior. You are not special. You are part of everyone. And it’s better that way.
My #diversityintech Code/Interactive submission (an eye catching subway ad for C/I) . Extending coding skills to the underpriveleged youths of the nation, I’d say that’s a good enough cause to lay some big idea, pro bono thinking on.
DEAR GOD JUST PUSH THE TORCH OVER TO THE LEFT. PLEASE GOD!
I effing love this tagline: #ImNoAngel. It does so much.
Still, there’s something I don’t understand about pop stars today, esp female pop stars who look like goddesses and proclaim feminism in bright lights as they fall into the same tropes that trouble young girls and have for decades (millenia?). Those tropes being embodied in neon sweaty curves of women who want to be respected as women but failing the girls they once were who today still need to look like Victoria Secret models to function normally in their lives.
Which brings me to the same issues i have with this campaign. These women are still beautiful. Jesus, they’re hot. Is this just inescapable in advertising? Is the function indeterminably linked to the flash in this industry? The obvious yes, is still ringing in my ears, thanks for that. But no. I don’t think it is.
There’s idealism yet to accomplish. But what a fool’s errand it seems.
Best spots within your campaign are the ones that critique the cultural world we live in. Can’t be escaped, that world. It craves to be exploited. The beauty is that every product has one. Just got to nuance the shit out of your big idea. Plus, being somewhat of an iconoclast helps.
Interesting about this spot is the interior struggle of the participants to defy what they thought was convention. Walking in the beautiful aisle or the average aisle, with the exact same ideal in mind.
Jake... youu. What are you doing that small?
Nora, 2003
Is the internet smart? Are apps the most we could currently hope for, at our current epoch, out of the internet? Are apps really harnessing the power the internet could provide? Is this really it? Or is it time we start thinking about how the internet can function in ways to the average person more than Google searches and vanity apps to make our lives “easier .” A large infrastructure change, not just an interface change is what will make the internet dynamic. The only enhancements I see are the differing sizes of screens. Why are we so hung up on different screen sizes? Pads, phones, laptops. Pads, phones, laptops. Oh yea, and Google Glass which is just another screen size affixed to the head. Companies have turned our desire for change into a unidimensional one in the way we use the internet. How sad? Why have we let businesses like Google determine what the internet is for everyone? Information. Is that all it is? Information that, for my average search, 90% of which is not significant to me. Are 296 million search results efficient when I only ever need one? And, maybe more importantly, have the rest of us given up in lieu of allowing these huge companies to determine the future?
The internet has done a lot of really great and interesting things. Economies of scale, accelerated technological advancement, communications connectivity, etc. But aren’t all these really simply an affect of the information age brought on by the thing and not the thing itself?
"...lesser than I expected."
Driverless cars, quantum computers, improvements in home and personal safety, medicine and health diagnostics. Is the internet only about what’s coming and not what’s here now? It feels like we’re always waiting in the potential of the internet without ever participating in the kinesis of it.
App designs are taking the brunt of this future possibility, but for me, it just seems... lesser than I expected.
With companies like Google and Apple stuck in the information age, my guess is we probably will not see much in the way of agile infrastructure changes for some time. The information age still of course has much room with which to grow and evolve. But, it seems like we’ll have to wait until it’s done playing out until we see smarter, more dynamic progress in the Internet world.
"The website of tomorrow will function like a transformer, shifting into a new shape for each viewer and catering content apt to one instead of many."
I once believed years ago the future of advertising was akin to an ad that brought together many brands and products and services to raise the bar of consumer interaction. In some ways, I saw it as...
Procter Gamble TV Commercial 2014 Olympics
...an umbrella company like Procter and Gamble. A sleuth of products and brands being used in unison to convey a lifestyle. The selling of a life not your own in a way that did not sell you one product but many. The camera would rove over your home as a user, a mom or dad, would use many brands with the same ideal in mind. In P&G’s case, an advanced state of family life attainable by quality products. Increased satisfaction and pleasure through an undeniable value on quality.
As internet advertising takes over (and TV ads begin to level out and drop until being consumed technologically by the internet), brand building techniques will go the way of the dinosaur. The idea of advertising that ‘we hope this will work’ is replaced by ‘we know this is working’. Companies may be considered citizens, but they act more like robots. If they know something is making money, it is valued over long term branding and longitudinal lifestyle shifts that yield no current, instant gratifying, shareholder inflating quantitatives in revenue, share of market, or ROI.
This of course will hurt the creative industry immensely. The place where long-lasting, brand building campaigns are made. Consumer metrics are increasing at an incredible clip. Because of the internet, and unregulated spying, we can see how a buyer interacts with its media to make a purchase, in addition to how they act in more general ways when he or she is just surfing around. This means a smaller gap between what we know and what we want to know. Media habits will become so understood in this environment as to negate a lot of the guesswork which accounts for a huge amount of wasted ad budgets. This, in turn, means more focused market information and an increased accountability on the advertiser to convert. A brief and a creative agency’s interpretation of it, will no longer be a loose targeted connection. A place where currently throwing that dart may be wildly off the bullseye if the idea is groundbreaking enough or smart enough or on-brand enough will become less acceptable and diminish. The creative creators will be less encouraged and less able to interpret their own visions for brands, companies, and campaigns (provided you buy into the fact that agencies have any power or influence here at all). And so the art will be leeched from the industry.
Content creators are the funnels for aggregating this information whether we like it or not. They hold the key. What we know now about consumers through metrics and bots and beacons and cookies is due to consumers visiting their websites. And so, with all that information at their behest, content creators will become the advertisers. Why not? They have the information. What good are they doing giving it away to advertisers, and outsourcing the work? It ultimately becomes a cost cutting maneuver.
And so I propose the technique of product placement we know today will be a fixture in the changing fabric that content creation will become. Metrics and data will be used to cater to users directly.Websites will become increasingly more powerful as the technologies advance.The website of tomorrow will function like a transformer. Shifting into a new shape for each viewer and catering content apt to one instead of many. What does this mean? It means we will consume advertising without being aware of it. Minority Report, with its eye scanning and prescience for our clothing preferences, will serve as an antiquated example of our ignorance and inability to tell the future. A direct assault on our presence is the current interface and it has never been anyone’s preference.
The future of ads will be subtle. It will be in the form of persuasion not selling. Imperceptible and underlying. Our products will be ingrained in our content. Persuasion will be the goal and will work at a meta-textual level. Fragmentation and the delineation of the internet landscape has created an ideal in the consumer psychology and thinking of their content. It’s there for ME. It’s MINE because? Well, because of the internet. This of course will change. Citizen Kane prevails again! as publishers will break loose from the ideals of the current internet age and dole out articles and news that make you believe in your free choice. (Wow, that got dystopic real fast.)
Point of purchase and purchase funnel placement will go extinct as the manipulation will have been done on a greater level and over a greater amount of time. (I’d say a lifetime if that weren’t already the case with, for example, cereal ads targeted to children and brands that capitalize into adolescence and beyond.) It will become a technicality. Content = Attention. And attention has always been the holy grail of advertising. The one metric unattainable. Here it is ingrained into the fabric of the users’ content.
Companies have the wealth of large towns and will soon have the wealth of large city’s of people. This means a vast agency of control and power. It also means the transformation of media in ways we can’t yet know. Advertising with its spiked form of interaction with its users in fits and starts will be smoothed out like peanut butter. Why? Because with money comes affordability of time, and with time comes the ability to learn.
"An ad is no longer an ad when it’s expertly targeted. It’s information."
It only makes sense to me to buy the content and with new tech, manipulate it in a way that’s indistinguishable. An ad is no longer an ad when it’s expertly targeted. It’s information. That dividing line is already blurring rapidly, and doing so within a fragmented industry of technology, hackers, and companies all vying to ultimately do the same thing while taking a windy, segmented road to do it. Once that beast starts to focus and create partnerships with similar objectives, the technology will understand us in such a way as to know us.
Our media use and our need for information is only increasing. Once our current channel boom in media consumption evens (presuming it does), we will finally be able to look at media habits and gain real world perspectives and averages on what’s actually happening. Companies will be the only ones capable of bringing us knowledge in the billions of different ways we desire.
I was wrong. I was saw the unison of brands and products and companies coming together to sell an ideal all at once. And that may very well still happen over the current evolution of advertising.
Procter & Gamble Launches Corporate Advertising Campaign
Ideas like this are getting closer and closer to a more realized industry of persuasion. But why take the gamble to try to sell you something with a tiny ad in seconds, with impressions and glancing eyes, when I can sell you a philosophy over time? A philosophy that causes you to buy Procter and Gamble and not just sell it to you. How crude this model will look in the future. I think the real question, the one that will get us from there to here, that will ultimately decide how this works out, is will we prefer it that way? Or better yet, will I, singularly, me and me alone, prefer it that way?